Skip to main content

Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) vs GitHub Copilot: New Editor or Platform Add-On?

Choose Copilot to keep current editors and the GitHub workflow, and Devin Desktop for one editor that runs local and cloud agents.

Reading time
3 min read
Sources
13 cited

GILD verdict

Choose GitHub Copilot when your work already runs through GitHub and engineers should keep their editors.

Choose Devin Desktop when you want a dedicated editor that runs and tracks several agents, and you accept Enterprise pricing for SSO. Pilot either on accepted, reviewed changes and compare spend at the plan you would buy.

Copilot is the lower-cost default, because it adds chat, agent mode, and a cloud agent to the editors and GitHub workflow a team already uses. Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf, asks engineers to adopt Cognition's editor. It repays the switch when engineers will run local agents and Devin cloud sessions from that one place.

What teams report

Left or turned down 2

  1. IndeedOn GitHub Copilot

    In the talk DX published in June 2026, Indeed said it had retired GitHub Copilot and Sourcegraph Cody once their weekly use had fallen to about 3%; its engineers moved to agents, Windsurf among them.

    “And then we actually have phased out Cody and Copilot. So sort of that first generation of tools we’ve actually already fully retired. Our usage when we actually did retire them was down to about 3% of people. So our users actually abandoned them before we did.”
    Michael Redding, Principal Product Manager, IndeedDX Engineering Enablement podcast, , episode
  2. DisneyOn GitHub Copilot

    Business Insider reported on Jul 29, 2026 that Disney plans to drop GitHub Copilot for US staff; separately, eight Disney tech employees told the publication they rarely or never used it.

    “Eight Disney tech employees told Business Insider that they rarely or never used GitHub Copilot.”
    James Faris, Reporter, Business Insiderbusinessinsider.com, , reportSecond-hand, as businessinsider.com reported it

Switched 1

  1. ServiceNow

    The New Stack reported on Oct 17, 2025 that ServiceNow, a GitHub Copilot shop with decent results, evaluated newer tools and switched about 7,000 engineers to Windsurf (Devin Desktop since June 2026), measuring about a 10% gain in stories per engineer across the release boundary.

    “ServiceNow saw about a 10% increase in productivity as measured by stories per unit time per engineer between the last release before the team started using Windsurf and the first one after the tool was introduced.”
    Pat Casey, CTO and co-founderThe New Stack, , reportSecond-hand, as The New Stack reported it

Run both 1

  1. Monzo

    Monzo started with GitHub Copilot through VS Code and has been trying Windsurf, Cursor and Claude Code beside it while continuing to invest in Copilot, The Pragmatic Engineer reported on Sep 16, 2025.

    “Since then, we’ve been trying Cursor, Windsurf, and Claude Code, and we continue to invest in Copilot”.”
    Suhail Patel, Leads the platform teamsThe Pragmatic Engineer, , reportSecond-hand, as The Pragmatic Engineer reported it

Choosing between Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) and GitHub Copilot

Choose Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) if

  • Engineers are willing to switch editors to get local agents and a board for tracking them.
  • You want third-party agents such as Codex CLI or Claude Agent running inside the same editor.
  • You are on Enterprise and want repositories indexed remotely, which the docs offer only in the Devin Desktop plugins on Enterprise plans.

Choose GitHub Copilot if

  • Engineers want to stay in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, or Xcode.
  • Your code lives on GitHub and you want an agent that starts from an issue and returns a pull request.
  • You want organization license and policy management on Copilot Business at US$19 per granted seat per month.

Side by side

DimensionDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)GitHub Copilot
Where it runsIts own desktop editor for macOS, Windows, and LinuxAgent mode in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, plus Copilot CLI and GitHub.com
Individual priceList prices in US dollars. Included usage differs by plan and is not directly comparable.Pro: US$20 per monthPro: US$10 per month
Team priceTeams: US$40 per month per full seat, with a US$80 monthly minimumBusiness: US$19 per granted seat per month; Enterprise: US$39
Beyond the planExtra usage at API list prices once the daily or weekly quota runs outUsage beyond the pooled AI credits at US$0.01 per credit, when admins allow paid usage
Cloud delegationDevin cloud sessions on their own VMs, tracked in the Agent Command CenterCopilot cloud agent works in an ephemeral cloud environment and can open a pull request
Team controlsTeam settings for models, MCP, and agent permissions on Teams and Enterprise; SSO, SCIM, and role-based access on EnterpriseOrganization and enterprise policies for features and models on Business and Enterprise
Cloud pull requests merged (MSR 2026 study)Public GitHub repositories with at least 100 stars. In the 11 weeks both agents shared, reviewers merged 68.0% of each.Devin cloud sessions: 61.6% of 2,252 over 32 weeks from December 2024; Devin Local is outside the study13Copilot cloud agent: 68.0% of 2,194 over 11 weeks from May 202513

What practitioners report, side by side

Each product's figures come from its own practitioners, for the group you pick.

Whose sources to count
Compare Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) with
  • GitHub Copilot

Overall signal

Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) reads +17 and GitHub Copilot +18, each from its own practitioners. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf): 28 positive, 15 negative of 67. GitHub Copilot: 19 positive, 10 negative of 49.

The score counts the authors from all practitioners that take a side, one vote each with their latest view, and is how far positive votes lead negative ones, per 100 votes, so Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)'s +17 rests on votes split 26 positive, 22 mixed and 15 negative.

Each of GitHub Copilot's authors wrote one source here, so each source is one vote. A lead of a fifth of the votes reads positive and a lead of half strong positive, with the same lines below zero. The dots show each source, positive, mixed, negative. Use a task pilot to measure accepted work and review time.

Footprint on the Agentic Software Development stack

They differ on four of 12 layers. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) owns one that GitHub Copilot does not, and GitHub Copilot owns one that Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) does not. Coverage is each product's placement on this stack, as its product page shows it. Core is a job the product owns; Supports and Touches are jobs it helps with. Coverage says nothing about how well a product does them.

Layers where Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) and GitHub Copilot differ
LayerDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)GitHub Copilot
Build
Codebase contextCoreSupports
Validate
Code reviewSupportsCore
Application securityTouchesSupports
Ship
Source controlTouchesSupports
The 8 layers where they match
Layers where Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) and GitHub Copilot match
LayerDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)GitHub Copilot
Plan
Work planningSupportsSupports
Build
CodingCoreCore
Agent runtimeCoreCore
Tool executionSupportsSupports
Validate
DebuggingSupportsSupports
TestingSupportsSupports
Ship
CI/CDTouchesTouches
Operate
ObservabilityTouchesTouches

What practitioners praise

Among all practitioners, GitHub Copilot alone has five praise themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Inline Completions and GitHub Integration lead, at 9 of 10 and 9 of 11. Of the two themes both carry, Agent Execution differs most. It is praised in 12 of the 13 Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) sources that discuss it, against 7 of 15 for GitHub Copilot. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) alone has three praise themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Codebase Context and Editor Experience lead, at 15 of 17 and 10 of 14.

What practitioners praise, All practitioners
Praised forDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)GitHub Copilot
Agent Execution12 of 137 of 15
Value for Money5 of 85 of 9
Codebase Context15 of 17Not a theme in its sources
Editor Experience10 of 14Not a theme in its sources
Tab Completion5 of 11Not a theme in its sources
Inline CompletionsNot a theme in its sources9 of 10
GitHub IntegrationNot a theme in its sources9 of 11
Editor IntegrationNot a theme in its sources6 of 6
Code QualityNot a theme in its sources5 of 10
Enterprise AdministrationNot a theme in its sources2 of 6

Each count is the sources that praise a theme, or raise it as a concern, out of those that discuss it. A row pairs the two products when both carry a theme under the same or an equivalent name.

A count ending in "so far" has under 5 sources from 3 authors among all practitioners. "Not a theme in its sources" means GILD found no theme of that name in that product's sources.

What practitioners raise as concerns

Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)'s sources raise Requires Strong Review more often than GitHub Copilot's. It is raised in 18 of the 19 Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) sources that discuss it, against 5 of 10 for GitHub Copilot. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) alone has three concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Agent & Editor Reliability and Vendor Direction lead, at 10 of 10 and 9 of 12. GitHub Copilot alone has three concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Quality Against Alternatives and Measuring Impact lead, at 9 of 12 and 4 of 12.

What practitioners raise as concerns, All practitioners
Raised as a concernDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)GitHub Copilot
Requires Strong Review18 of 195 of 10
Usage / Cost9 of 137 of 17
Needs Close Steering3 of 83 of 7
Agent & Editor Reliability10 of 10Not a theme in its sources
Vendor Direction9 of 12Not a theme in its sources
Context Management6 of 9Not a theme in its sources
Quality Against AlternativesNot a theme in its sources9 of 12
Measuring ImpactNot a theme in its sources4 of 12
Data, IP & SecurityNot a theme in its sources2 of 5

13 sources

  1. Devin docs: Self-serve plansOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  2. Devin Desktop docs: Quota-based usageOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  3. Devin Desktop docs: InstallOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  4. Devin Desktop docs: Agent Client ProtocolOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  5. Devin Desktop docs: Devin in Devin DesktopOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  6. Devin Desktop docs: Context awarenessOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  7. Devin Desktop docs: Remote indexingOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  8. Devin Desktop docs: Admin controls referenceOfficial documentationdocs.devin.ai
  9. GitHub Copilot plans and pricingOfficial documentationgithub.com
  10. GitHub docs: Plans for GitHub CopilotOfficial documentationdocs.github.com
  11. GitHub docs: GitHub Copilot on GitHub.comOfficial documentationdocs.github.com
  12. GitHub docs: Managing Copilot policies in your organizationOfficial documentationdocs.github.com
  13. Pinna, Gong, Williams, and Sarro, MSR 2026: Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance (Feb 9, 2026)Public sourcearxiv.org