GILD verdict
Choose Greptile if you want prepaid credits with no plan fee, or your code is on Gitea or another host Qodo does not list.
Choose Qodo for a monthly credit pack with a capped overage, or for code on Azure DevOps or Gerrit. Pilot both on the same repository and compare addressed comments per pull request at the plan you would buy.
Let billing and Git hosts decide, because each wins a different benchmark. Greptile ranked second on Martian's online board of real pull requests on October 6, 2026, and Qodo Deep ranked first on its offline set of known bugs. Both read beyond the diff and run on your own infrastructure. Qodo's reviewer was called Qodo Merge until Qodo folded it into Qodo Review.
Choosing between Greptile and Qodo
Choose Greptile if
- You want to pay US$1 per credit for completed reviews, with no seat fee or monthly plan fee.
- Your code is on Gitea or Perforce, or you want the Cursor Origin integration.
- You want learning from team reactions and replies without an Enterprise contract.
Choose Qodo if
- You want a monthly credit pack with overage at the same rate up to a cap you set. Qodo sets no user limit on Pro Team.
- Your code is on Azure DevOps, or on Gerrit with a Qodo Enterprise plan.
- You want a single-tenant hosted deployment between multi-tenant SaaS and on-premises.
Side by side
| Dimension | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Independent accuracyMartian's online board scores reviews on fresh public pull requests; its offline board scores 50 pull requests against known bugs. | Martian online benchmark: second on Oct 6, 2026; 76.2% of suggestions acted on in Greptile's Jul 30, 2026 capture1314 | Martian offline benchmark: Qodo Deep first on Oct 6, 202613 |
| Billing unit | Prepaid credits at US$1 each, shared across the organization; reviews pause at zero unless automatic recharge is on | Credits pooled across the workspace at US$0.012 each; overage at the same rate up to a monthly cap |
| Self-serve team planList prices in US dollars. Included review volume is not directly comparable: Greptile counts reviews by tier, Qodo by credits consumed. | Pro: no seat or plan fee; credits at US$1 each | Pro Team: from US$30 per month for a 2,500-credit pack; no user limit, per Qodo's FAQ and billing docs |
| Git providers | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea, Cursor Origin (beta), and Perforce on-premises | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus Gerrit on Enterprise |
| Deployment | Greptile Cloud, or self-hosted on Docker Compose or Kubernetes, air-gapped included (Enterprise) | Multi-tenant, single-tenant, on-premises on Kubernetes, and air-gapped, depending on Git provider |
| Learning from feedback | Learns from reactions and replies; the pricing page does not reserve it for Enterprise | Self-learning system on Enterprise plans |
| SSO | SAML SSO and SCIM (beta) on Enterprise | SSO/SAML and audit logs on Enterprise |
What practitioners report, side by side
Each product's figures come from its own practitioners, for the group you pick.
Overall signal
Leaders and teams rate Greptile +40, 23 points above Qodo at +17. Most of the gap is in praise, with 11 of Greptile's 20 sources positive against 9 of Qodo's 23. Greptile has 3 negative and Qodo 5.
The score is how far positive sources lead negative ones, per 100 sources from leaders and teams that take a side. Each author behind these scores wrote one of them, so each source is one vote.
A lead of a fifth of the sources reads positive and a lead of half strong positive, with the same lines below zero. The dots run positive, mixed, negative. Run a pilot on live pull requests to measure which comments engineers act on and which they dismiss.
Footprint on the Agentic Software Development stack
They differ on one of 12 layers. On Testing, Greptile supports it and Qodo touches it. Coverage is each product's placement on this stack, as its product page shows it. Core is a job the product owns; Supports and Touches are jobs it helps with. Coverage says nothing about how well a product does them.
| Layer | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Validate | ||
| Testing | Supports | Touches |
The 11 layers where they match
| Layer | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | ||
| Work planning | Touches | Touches |
| Build | ||
| Codebase context | Supports | Supports |
| Coding | Touches | Touches |
| Agent runtime | Touches | Touches |
| Tool execution | Supports | Supports |
| Validate | ||
| Debugging | Touches | Touches |
| Code review | Core | Core |
| Application security | Supports | Supports |
| Ship | ||
| Source control | Supports | Supports |
| CI/CD | Touches | Touches |
| Operate | ||
| Observability | Touches | Touches |
What practitioners praise
Among leaders and teams, Real bug catches and Configurable review rules reach 5 sources from 3 authors only for Qodo, at 7 of 7 and 3 of 7. Greptile needs a pilot on the same pull requests before you choose on either. Bug Detection reaches 5 sources from 3 authors only for Greptile, at 8 of 8. Qodo needs a pilot on the same pull requests before you choose on it.
| Praised for | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Bug Detection | 8 of 8 | Not a theme in its sources |
| Real bug catches | Not a theme in its sources | 7 of 7 |
| Configurable review rules | Not a theme in its sources | 3 of 7 |
Each count is the sources that praise a theme, or raise it as a concern, out of those that discuss it. A row pairs the two products when both carry a theme under the same or an equivalent name.
A count ending in "so far" has under 5 sources from 3 authors among leaders and teams. "Not a theme in its sources" means GILD found no theme of that name in that product's sources.
What practitioners raise as concerns
Among leaders and teams, Comment noise and wrong findings and Credits, trials, and price reach 5 sources from 3 authors only for Qodo, at 8 of 10 and 1 of 5. Greptile needs a pilot on the same pull requests before you choose on either.
| Raised as a concern | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Comment noise and wrong findings | Not a theme in its sources | 8 of 10 |
| Credits, trials, and price | Not a theme in its sources | 1 of 5 |
14 sources
- Greptile pricing
- Greptile docs: Billing
- Greptile docs: Code providers
- Greptile docs: Deployment options
- Greptile docs: Memory and learning
- Greptile docs: SSO & identity
- Qodo pricing
- Qodo docs: Pricing & usage
- Qodo docs: Deployment models by Git provider
- Qodo docs: On-premises
- Qodo docs: Platform overview
- Qodo docs: Code review
- The New Stack: Copilot tops GitHub's own AI code review benchmark. An independent one tells a different story. (Oct 6, 2026)
- Greptile: Greptile Ranks #1 on Martian's AI Code Review Benchmark (Jul 30, 2026)