Skip to main content

LangSmith vs Langfuse: Managed Platform or Open-Source Core?

The named teams that left LangSmith for Langfuse in 2026 did it to keep traces inside their own boundary, and the teams that stay run their release evals in LangSmith. GILD's calculation for 200,000 traces a month kept 30 days: US$1,840 on LangSmith Plus, US$369 on Langfuse Pro.

Reading time
9 min read
Sources
26 cited
In this piece

GILD verdict

Choose Langfuse when traces stay on your servers or many people need a flat fee, and LangSmith for LangGraph agents and its release gates.

The workflow
an AI team choosing where its agent traces, evals and prompts will live once agents serve users
The decisive evidence
  • Reported4 of 5 named teams adopted one; What teams report below sets out each account.
  • DocumentedLangfuse's MIT core self-hosts free with every core feature, while self-hosted LangSmith is an add-on to the Enterprise plan.1624
  • GILD analysisGILD's calculation from published rates puts 200,000 traces a month for 10 users, kept at least 30 days, at US$1,840 on LangSmith Plus and US$369 on Langfuse Pro. How many of your traces could live on the 14-day base tier is unresolved, and it decides up to US$500 of that gap.
The tradeoff
Self-hosting moves the operations work to your team. GAIA's self-hosted Langfuse collector caused 2,359 of the 3,890 Sentry events it logged over 30 days, which a pull request opened on Oct 25, 2026 sets out to fix.9
What would change the call
The call moves when LangChain offers self-hosting below Enterprise, or when your traces hold far more than 10 observations each, which raises Langfuse's unit count and leaves LangSmith's per-trace price unchanged.1622

Where trace data may live decides most choices on record. Cue Labs and one developer's personal platform retired LangSmith for Langfuse in October 2026 to keep data in their own boundary, and Cresta and SuperDial self-host Langfuse for the same reason. monday.com and SonderMind stay on LangSmith for evals tied to release. Langfuse's MIT core self-hosts free; LangSmith self-hosts only on Enterprise.

What teams report

Left or turned down 1

  1. NonBioS

    NonBioS had rewritten its systems without LangChain, so it declined LangSmith as too tied to LangChain and chose Langfuse after a shortlist of Langfuse and Helicone (Mar 5, 2025). Session tracking that groups a run's calls, self-hosting and open source decided it.

    “Langsmith appeared popular, but we had encountered challenges with Langchain from the same company, finding it overly complex for previous NonBioS tooling. We rewrote our systems to remove dependencies on Langchain and chose not to proceed with Langsmith as it seemed strongly coupled with Langchain.”
    Amit, Author of the NonBioS engineering post, NonBioSNonBioS, , write-up

Adopted 4

  1. monday.comOn LangSmith

    monday.com wraps each Feed agent run in LangSmith's traceable() and runs an LLM judge in CI to check for regressions before production deployment (Sep 9, 2026).

    “We use an LLM as a judge with specific metrics for each part, and run it on the CI to make sure we have no regressions before deploying to production.”
    Kamie Shami-Schnitzer, Feed agent builder, monday.commonday.com Engineering, , write-up
  2. SonderMindOn LangSmith

    SonderMind's clinical experts review production conversations of its mental health coach in LangSmith, and a script turns each missed disclosure they mark into an eval case (AI Engineer World's Fair 2026, June 29 to July 2; talk posted Jul 25, 2026).

    “A clinical SME reviews a production conversation in LangSmith, marks the missed disclosure with an expected observation, and the script writes it to the eval set.”
    Akele Reed and Dave Revere, Principal and Staff AI Engineers, SonderMindAI Engineer, , recording
  3. CrestaOn Langfuse

    Cresta self-hosts Langfuse to trace its multi-service agent pipelines, one instance per Kubernetes cluster and one Langfuse organization per customer, with personal data redacted before recording (Mar 26, 2026).

    “We self-host Langfuse rather than using a managed SaaS offering.”
    Cresta Engineering, Engineering team, CrestaCresta, , write-up
  4. SuperDialOn Langfuse

    SuperDial self-hosts Langfuse for all logging and observability of its voice agents because the calls carry healthcare data (AI Engineer Summit, February 2025; talk posted Apr 18, 2025).

    “And then all of our logging and observability, we self-host Langfuse, and we self-host these things also because these are like healthcare calls.”
    Nik Caryotakis, Staff Software Engineer, SuperDialAI Engineer, , recording

Choosing between LangSmith and Langfuse

Choose LangSmith if

  • Release gates should run on your tracing vendor's experiments: monday.com runs an LLM judge in CI before each production deploy of its Feed agent (Sep 9, 2026), and SonderMind's clinicians turn annotated production conversations into eval cases.
  • Your agents run on LangGraph, and you want Studio and LangSmith Deployment on the same platform as your traces.
  • You want to choose retention per tracing project, with short-lived base traces priced below the ones you keep.
  • You want LangChain to host your agents on Serverless or Dedicated deployments, or to run Agent Servers in your own VPC under a managed control plane.

Choose Langfuse if

  • Traces must stay inside your own network without an Enterprise contract: Cresta self-hosts one Langfuse per Kubernetes cluster (Mar 26, 2026), and SuperDial self-hosts it because its calls carry healthcare data.
  • You must self-host and want the full core platform free under the MIT license, on Docker Compose or Kubernetes, with your team running the collector, as GAIA learned when its own collector produced most of its error alerts.
  • Many people need access and you want a flat platform fee with unlimited users from the US$29 Core plan up.
  • Your code has left LangChain and you want a tracer with no tie to it, the reason NonBioS gave for ruling LangSmith out (Mar 5, 2025).
  • You want cloud data access for up to 3 years on the Pro plan, or a data region in Japan.

Side by side

DimensionLangSmithLangfuse
What teams reportNamed teams' own pages and talks. GILD found no team that compared both on the same traffic and published the numbers.monday.com traces its Feed agent with traceable() and runs an LLM judge in CI before each deploy (Sep 9, 2026), and keeps one parent trace per Infra agent run (Oct 26, 2026). SonderMind's clinicians mark missed disclosures in LangSmith and each becomes an eval case (Jun 2026). GAIA ran LangSmith beside Langfuse after its development workspace hit the monthly trace limit (May 28, 2026).1238Cue Labs (Oct 9, 2026) and one developer's personal platform (Oct 11, 2026) retired LangSmith for Langfuse to keep data in their own boundary. Cresta self-hosts one instance per Kubernetes cluster (Mar 26, 2026); SuperDial self-hosts it for healthcare calls (Feb 2025). NonBioS chose it over LangSmith, which it found tied to LangChain (Mar 5, 2025).456710
200,000 traces a month, 10 users, kept 30 daysGILD's calculation from published rates, Oct 28, 2026. Inputs: 200,000 traces a month, 10 observations and 1 code score per trace, 10 users, at least 30 days retrievable, no judge calls, 1 LSU at US$1.US$1,840 a month on Plus: US$390 for 10 seats, US$950 for 190,000 base traces past the 10,000 included at 0.005 LSU, and US$500 to move all 200,000 to the 180-day tier at 0.0025 LSU, since base traces last 14 days. At base retention alone, US$1,340.1113US$369 a month on Pro: US$199, plus US$72 for 900,000 units at US$8 per 100,000 and US$98 for the next 1.4 million at US$7, for 2.4 million units. Self-hosting the MIT core has no license fee; servers and operations are yours.2022
PlansList prices in US dollars. LangSmith charges per seat; Langfuse plans include unlimited users from Core up.Developer US$0 for 1 seat with 5,000 base traces a month; Plus US$39 per seat per month with 10,000 base traces a month; Enterprise custom11Hobby free with 50,000 units a month and 2 users; Core US$29 a month; Pro US$199 a month; Enterprise US$2,499 a month20
Billing unitAn agent run with 10 observations and 1 score is 1 LangSmith trace and 12 Langfuse units, so compare on your own trace shape.A trace: one execution of the application, including every run inside it, up to 25,000 runs13Units: each trace, each observation inside it, and each score count as one unit22
Usage price0.005 LSU per base trace past the included volume, or US$5 per 1,000, plus 0.0025 LSU, or US$2.50 per 1,000, to upgrade a trace to extended retention; 1 LSU is US$111100,000 units included on Core and above, then US$8 per 100,000, falling to US$6 per 100,000 above 50 million20
RetentionBase traces 14 days, extended traces 180 days, chosen per tracing project; online evaluators and automation rules upgrade the traces they touch unless you opt out13Data access for 30 days on Hobby, 90 days on Core, and 3 years on Pro; project retention policies from Pro up, minimum 3 days2023
Self-hostingEnterprise add-on, on Kubernetes with ClickHouse, PostgreSQL, Redis, and blob storage16Free under the MIT license with all core features; Enterprise adds project RBAC, retention policies, and audit logs. GAIA's self-hosted collector caused 2,359 of the 3,890 Sentry events it logged over 30 days (Oct 25, 2026).92124
Cloud regionsGCP us-central1, europe-west4, and australia-southeast1, and AWS us-east-21415US, EU, Japan, and a HIPAA region; US and HIPAA in AWS us-west-2, EU in eu-west-125
Agent hostingLangSmith Deployment: Serverless or Dedicated Agent Servers in LangChain's cloud, hybrid, self-hosted, or standalone, metered in LSUs18Not part of Langfuse's plans; it traces agents that run elsewhere20
SSO and access controlGoogle and GitHub sign-in on Developer and Plus; custom SSO, custom roles, and ABAC on Enterprise1117Enterprise SSO and project RBAC through the US$300 a month Teams add-on on Pro, included on Enterprise20
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, and GDPR; DPA on request15SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 reports, a HIPAA-ready region, and a GDPR DPA25
OwnershipLangChain, which also maintains LangChain, LangGraph, and Deep Agents12ClickHouse, which acquired Langfuse in January 2026 and states no planned licensing changes26

What practitioners report, side by side

Each product's figures come from its own practitioners, for the group you pick.

LangfuseClickHouse+46 PositiveHow this figure is made
Whose sources to count
Compare LangSmith with
  • Langfuse

Overall signal

All practitioners rate Langfuse +28, 11 points above LangSmith at +17. Most of the gap is in complaints, with 20 of LangSmith's 96 sources negative against 10 of Langfuse's 69.

The score counts the authors from all practitioners that take a side, one vote each with their latest view, and is how far positive votes lead negative ones, per 100 votes, so LangSmith's +17 rests on votes split 35 positive, 38 mixed and 19 negative. Each of Langfuse's authors wrote one source here, so each source is one vote.

A lead of a fifth of the votes reads positive and a lead of half strong positive, with the same lines below zero. The dots show each source, positive, mixed, negative. Run a pilot on one production app to measure which failures it surfaces and how long tracing them takes.

Footprint on the AI Application Platform stack

They differ on four of 9 layers. Coverage is each product's placement on this stack, as its product page shows it. Core is a job the product owns; Supports and Touches are jobs it helps with. Coverage says nothing about how well a product does them.

Layers where LangSmith and Langfuse differ
LayerLangSmithLangfuse
Model
Model gatewaySupportsTouches
Build
OrchestrationSupportsTouches
Tool useSupportsTouches
Operate
Cloud deploymentSupportsTouches
The 5 layers where they match
Layers where LangSmith and Langfuse match
LayerLangSmithLangfuse
Model
Model APIsTouchesTouches
Data
RetrievalTouchesTouches
Evaluate
EvaluationCoreCore
Operate
ObservabilityCoreCore
GuardrailsTouchesTouches

What practitioners praise

Among all practitioners, Langfuse alone has three praise themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Integrations & Setup and Open Source & Self-Hosting lead, at 11 of 11 and 8 of 8. Of the two themes both carry, Datasets & Evaluations differs most. It is praised in 13 of the 22 LangSmith sources that discuss it, against 2 of 7 for Langfuse. Quick Setup and Production Monitoring reach 5 sources from 3 authors only for LangSmith, at 11 of 11 and 4 of 14. Langfuse needs a pilot on the same production traffic before you choose on either.

What practitioners praise, All practitioners
Praised forLangSmithLangfuse
Trace-Level Debugging28 of 3513 of 14
Datasets & Evaluations13 of 222 of 7
Quick Setup11 of 11Not a theme in its sources
Production Monitoring4 of 14Not a theme in its sources
Integrations & SetupNot a theme in its sources11 of 11
Open Source & Self-HostingNot a theme in its sources8 of 8
Prompt ManagementNot a theme in its sources4 of 7

Each count is the sources that praise a theme, or raise it as a concern, out of those that discuss it. A row pairs the two products when both carry a theme under the same or an equivalent name.

A count ending in "so far" has under 5 sources from 3 authors among all practitioners. "Not a theme in its sources" means GILD found no theme of that name in that product's sources.

What practitioners raise as concerns

Among all practitioners, LangSmith alone has five concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. UI & SDK Reliability and Seat & Trace Pricing lead, at 23 of 25 and 12 of 14. Langfuse alone has four concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Self-Hosting Operations and SDK & UI Reliability lead, at 14 of 15 and 12 of 12.

What practitioners raise as concerns, All practitioners
Raised as a concernLangSmithLangfuse
UI & SDK Reliability23 of 25Not a theme in its sources
Seat & Trace Pricing12 of 14Not a theme in its sources
LangChain Coupling8 of 9Not a theme in its sources
Self-Hosting & Data Control8 of 12Not a theme in its sources
Closed Source & Vendor Dependence4 of 6Not a theme in its sources
Self-Hosting OperationsNot a theme in its sources14 of 15
SDK & UI ReliabilityNot a theme in its sources12 of 12
Upgrades & MigrationsNot a theme in its sources12 of 13
Feature GapsNot a theme in its sources6 of 6

26 sources

  1. monday.com Engineering: Building a Robust Harness for agent in production, Feed agent case study (Sep 9, 2026)Public sourceengineering.monday.com
  2. monday.com Engineering: How We Gave AI Agents the Keys to Production and Still Sleep at Night (Oct 26, 2026)Public sourceengineering.monday.com
  3. Akele Reed and Dave Revere (SonderMind): Evals Driven-Development, AI Engineer World's Fair 2026 (Jun 2026)Public sourceai.engineer
  4. Cresta: Observability for AI Agents, Tracing Multi-Service LLM Pipelines with Langfuse (Mar 26, 2026)Public sourcecresta.com
  5. Nik Caryotakis (SuperDial): Voice AI, Your Bot Isn't Special, AI Engineer Summit 2025 (Feb 2025)Public sourceai.engineer
  6. Cue Labs, cue-app pull request #513: consolidate LLM observability on Langfuse, retire LangSmith (Oct 9, 2026)Public sourcegithub.com
  7. retrieva-backend pull request #94: drop LangSmith, Langfuse as the single LLMOps backbone (Oct 11, 2026)Public sourcegithub.com
  8. GAIA pull request #720: self-hosted Langfuse alongside LangSmith (May 28, 2026)Public sourcegithub.com
  9. GAIA pull request #1510: keep trace-export failures visible (opened Oct 25, 2026)Public sourcegithub.com
  10. NonBioS: The NonBioS LLM Observability Pick (Mar 5, 2025)Public sourcenonbios.ai
  11. LangSmith plans and pricingOfficial documentationlangchain.com
  12. LangSmith platformOfficial documentationlangchain.com
  13. LangSmith docs: Usage and billing (retention tiers and rate limits)Official documentationdocs.langchain.com
  14. LangSmith docs: Cloud (SaaS) architecture and regionsOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  15. LangSmith docs: Regions FAQOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  16. LangSmith docs: Self-hosted LangSmithOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  17. LangSmith docs: LangSmith for EnterpriseOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  18. LangSmith docs: LangSmith DeploymentOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  19. LangSmith docs: StudioOfficial documentationdocs.langchain.com
  20. Langfuse pricingOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  21. Langfuse self-hosted pricingOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  22. Langfuse docs: Billable unitsOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  23. Langfuse docs: Data retentionOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  24. Langfuse docs: Self-host LangfuseOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  25. Langfuse security and complianceOfficial documentationlangfuse.com
  26. Langfuse blog: Langfuse joins ClickHouse (Jan 16, 2026)Official documentationlangfuse.com