Skip to main content
Auggie CLI SignalsBack to the read

Every source behind the read

Every source GILD analyzed, newest first. Each says who the source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and which findings it counts toward. Open a count to see only its sources.

Whose sources count

Source

88 sources in All practitioners, with product documentation Showing all 88 sources

  1. Mixed

    Julian Mesa, integrating Auggie into GitKraken Kepler

    Comment on: ACP mode: host-supplied mcpServers in session/new replace (rather than merge with) settings.json/.mcp.json serversGitHub issue comment

    Integrating Auggie into GitKraken's Kepler, the Kepler team found ACP sessions dropped users' own MCP servers. The team warned that merging repository-controlled MCP settings would let a checkout launch arbitrary processes; Kepler ships a patch meanwhile.

    Published Sep 17, 2026self-described: GitKraken Kepler, which drives Auggie 0.36.0 over ACP

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Auggie partner: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Specific details; Observed on 0.36.0 bundle (SHA-256 6229e1685a5c4f9305ad333d76cd1a05c4315e6a9c8af3bbc75170b524005306)
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    partner (suspected); partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    1 artifact (pull request)
    Date and version
    2026-09-17, 0.36.0 bundle (SHA-256 6229e1685a5c4f9305ad333d76cd1a05c4315e6a9c8af3bbc75170b524005306)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Not counted

    Its author builds GitKraken Kepler, a commercial product that integrates Auggie. Kept in the record; it takes part in no figure.

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.36.0, ACP mode

  2. Mixed

    inercia, Auggie CLI user running it under an ACP host

    Multi-minute event-loop freeze in uv__fsevents_close (macOS) when indexing/file-watching is enabledGitHub issue

    Reports that with indexing on, Auggie's agent froze for about five to seven minutes on macOS before finishing, traces the hang to file watching, and saw it on several workspaces at once.

    Published Jun 4, 2026self-described: Large workspaces on macOS, Auggie 0.28.0 in ACP mode with indexing on

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Artifact checked (log); Observed on 0.28.0 (commit 63537d73)
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (log)
    Date and version
    2026-06-04, 0.28.0 (commit 63537d73)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.28.0, ACP mode

  3. Mixed

    harjothkhara, Auggie CLI user testing tool permissions

    [Bug]: Denying launch-process doesn't block file deletion - agent silently falls back to remove-filesGitHub issue

    With launch-process denied, Auggie still deleted a file by falling back to its remove-files tool; blocking deletion took a deny rule on both tools.

    Published Jun 3, 2026self-described: Auggie 0.28.0 in print mode with toolPermissions

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Artifact checked (transcript); Observed on auggie 0.28.0 (commit 63537d73)
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (transcript)
    Date and version
    2026-06-03, auggie 0.28.0 (commit 63537d73)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.28.0

  4. Mixed

    parasti, developer whose team moved off Augment

    Comment on: Show HN: Semble - Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grepHacker News comment

    Says the team used Augment Code and its Context Engine at work, then switched to Claude Code, which parasti finds reads code less efficiently.

    Published May 18, 2026self-described: Team at work, moved from Augment Code to Claude Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-18
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  5. Positive

    rsyring, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Task Paralysis and AIHacker News comment

    Has had GPT 5.4 write code and Opus review it in a fresh Augment session for eight months, with a spec file per change and one AGENTS.md for instructions.

    Published May 10, 2026self-described: Augment agents in VS Code and the CLI for about eight months

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on GPT 5.4
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-10, GPT 5.4
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension and Auggie CLI, GPT 5.4 and Claude Opus

  6. Positive

    RanHal, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: What do you still do manually in 2026 that should be automated?Hacker News comment

    Opened an Obsidian notes directory with Augment Code, which indexed it in seconds and made the notes retrievable.

    Published May 7, 2026self-described: Personal knowledge base

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-07
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  7. Mixed

    kwalitynut, member of a Clari developer-experience team

    [Feature]: Project-scoped hooks (.augment/settings.json checked into the repo)GitHub issue

    A team supporting both Augment and Claude Code asks for hooks a repository can ship, since Augment loads hooks only from user and system settings.

    Published May 1, 2026self-described: Team building an AI-provenance commit standard for Augment and Claude Code users

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-01
    Counts toward
    Operational control, admin control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI, VS Code and IntelliJ

  8. Positive

    mytechtoday, IT consultant

    Comment on: Show HN: MTTCleaner - Same as CCleaner but free, no adsHacker News comment

    Built and published a cross-platform browser-cleaning tool generated with VS Code, Augment Code, OpenSpec and beads.

    Published Apr 26, 2026self-described: Solo IT consultant building PowerShell tools for clients

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-26
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  9. Positive

    parasti, developer on a team of four rewriting a legacy CRM

    Comment on: Ask HN: How is AI-assisted coding going for you professionally?Hacker News comment

    On a team of four using Augment Code heavily to rewrite a legacy CRM with 30 years of business rules, the author works in the Auggie CLI because the VS Code integration became too slow and hung often. A favorite recent interaction paired two sessions through a shared API specification.

    Published Mar 15, 2026self-described: Team of 4, full rewrite of a 30-year-old CRM in Laravel

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Sonnet 4.6 for speed and execution, GPT 5.1 for comprehension and planning
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-15, Sonnet 4.6 for speed and execution, GPT 5.1 for comprehension and planning
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.1

  10. Negative

    hn_acc1, developer whose company standardizes on Augment

    Comment on: OpenAI raises US$110B on US$730B pre-money valuationHacker News comment

    Cannot get Augment with Opus 4.5 to edit a few C++ files in VS Code without it looping between the same investigation steps.

    Published Feb 27, 2026self-described: C++ work in VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Opus 4.5
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-27, Opus 4.5
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, Claude Opus 4.5

  11. Mixed

    fodurrr, GitHub user

    Predatory credit pricing: --print re-indexes workspace on every call, burning 2000+ credits per queryGitHub issue on augmentcode/auggie

    Scripting Auggie CLI in print mode, the author found every call re-indexed the workspace, and 17 queries in one day used 37,016 credits, 92.5% of the Indie plan's monthly allowance.

    "Burned **37,016 credits** (92.5% of 40,000 monthly Indie Plan allowance)…"
    Excerpt, fodurrr

    Published Feb 20, 2026self-described: Solo, scripting Auggie CLI in print mode on the Indie plan

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Indie Plan
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-20, Indie Plan
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI --print, Indie plan of 40,000 credits per month

  12. Positive

    Kyle Getty, software engineer at Tilt

    AI DevOps: Building Intelligent Incident Response SystemsCompany engineering blog post, Tilt

    Getty describes an incident-response system as a real-world example: an alert triggers an Azure DevOps pipeline whose agent, built on the Auggie CLI over Agent Client Protocol, pulls the runbook, queries logs, reviews commits and posts a summary to Slack, using the Augment Context Engine for code analysis.

    "…with Agent Client Protocol we can build a C# based model to interact with the Augment CLI Auggie This allows us to leverage the benefits of the Augment Context Engine when doing things like code analysis."
    Excerpt, Kyle Getty

    Published Feb 13, 2026Tilt on-call engineering on Azure, alert-triggered incident analysis

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Customer of Auggie; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Software Engineer)
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-13
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI over Agent Client Protocol from a C# client, run in an Azure DevOps pipeline

  13. No opinion stated

    Pengrui Lu and five co-authors, academic researchers

    ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project DevelopmentIndependent benchmark, research paper on arXiv

    On ProjDevBench, the authors report Codex with GPT-5 highest at 77.85, outperforming Augment with GPT-5 at 72.35, Cursor with GPT-5 at 71.85 and Claude Code with Sonnet-4.5 at 68.87. Augment with Sonnet-4.5 scored 70.10.

    "Codex paired with GPT-5 achieves the highest final weighted score of 77.85, outperforming Augment+GPT-5 at 72.35, Cursor+GPT-5 at 71.85, and Claude Code+Sonnet-4.5 at 68.87."
    Excerpt, Pengrui Lu
    "Both Cursor and Augment demonstrate stable performance across different base models, with all their tested configurations achieving final scores above 70…"
    Same speaker

    Published Feb 2, 2026self-described: Independent benchmark of six coding agents through their command-line interfaces on 20 project-building tasks

    Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Ran a structured test; Artifact checked (benchmark output); Observed on GPT-5 and Sonnet-4.5
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (benchmark output)
    Date and version
    2026-02-02, GPT-5 and Sonnet-4.5
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment with GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5

  14. Mixed

    yann0001, Auggie CLI user, self-described

    [Bug]: 0.15.0 Context exceedsGitHub issue

    Reports that Auggie 0.15.0 often fails with a prompt-length error, a problem present since its first releases.

    Published Jan 30, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Artifact checked (log); Observed on 0.15.0
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (log)
    Date and version
    2026-01-30, 0.15.0
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.15.0

  15. Mixed

    JonatanRoo, GitHub user

    Sub-agents bypass CLI permission enforcement (security gap) - v0.14.0GitHub issue on augmentcode/auggie

    A developer using Auggie for all work found that permission rules in settings.json blocked commands such as rm for the main agent, but sub-agents ran the same commands anyway.

    "CLI permission rules configured in settings.json work correctly for the main agent but are completely ignored by sub-agents."
    Excerpt, JonatanRoo

    Published Jan 30, 2026self-described: Solo, using Auggie for all development for several months

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Observed on 0.14.0 (commit 8aaa2dfb)
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-30, 0.14.0 (commit 8aaa2dfb)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.14.0

  16. Positive

    defatigable, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?Hacker News comment

    Gets a decent efficiency boost from Augment at work in Golang and Python, languages defatigable knows well.

    Published Jan 21, 2026self-described: Golang and Python at work

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-21
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  17. Positive

    fmdv, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?Hacker News comment

    Codes PowerShell and references a highly detailed rules file at the top of requests in Augment Code, plus essential MCP servers, to get the output wanted. Notes PowerShell isn't particularly complex, so this "might not work out" for a larger codebase; "YMMV".

    Published Jan 21, 2026self-described: PowerShell development

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-21
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  18. Mixed

    mythz, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: How Google got its groove back and edged ahead of OpenAIHacker News comment

    Retried Antigravity a few weeks after launch, after Augment Code's new pricing kicked in, and was pleasantly surprised how reliable it had become on the free quota. Upgraded to Pro and hasn't hit a quota since.

    Published Jan 8, 2026self-described: Full-time coding assistant user

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Opinion
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-08
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  19. Mixed

    atombender, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Claude Code gets native LSP supportHacker News comment

    Enjoys Augment's fast completions but uses Claude Code as the agent, and reports serious stability problems, including the IDE using all cores while re-indexing.

    Published Dec 23, 2025self-described: Uses Augment completions with Claude Code for agent work

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-12-23
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  20. Mixed

    vb-8448, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Claude Code gets native LSP supportHacker News comment

    Currently uses Augment and finds it good, but its completions trail Supermaven and Cursor and lack automatic cursor movement.

    Published Dec 22, 2025self-described: Uses PyCharm

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-12-22
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  21. Positive

    adam_patarino, founder of Cortex.build

    Comment on: Ask HN: How can I get better at using AI for programming?Hacker News comment

    Likes Augment Code's context engine because it finds where changes belong without the planning step Claude Code and Cursor need.

    Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: Builds a competing context product

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Competitor staff: not counted as independent; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    competitor employee (suspected); competitor employee (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-12-18
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Not counted

    Its author runs Cortex.build, a competing AI coding tool, and the post compares coding tools with it. Kept in the record; it takes part in no figure.

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  22. Positive

    kenforthewin, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Launch HN: Nia (YC S25) - Give better context to coding agentsHacker News comment

    Says Augment's main value add is its context engine, which "imo" they do really well, and that if all they had to do was launch an MCP for it, the comparison is still worth exploring.

    Published Dec 8, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Opinion
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-12-08
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  23. Negative

    danielodievich, engineer working with the company's support team

    Comment on: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI raceHacker News comment

    When a colleague ran Augment with the feature's full source code to answer a customer question, it confidently made up behavior that does not exist.

    Published Dec 2, 2025self-described: Company support and engineering, answering a customer question

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; second-hand; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Second-hand
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Reports others' experience
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-12-02
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  24. Mixed

    feintruled, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Developers are choosing older AI modelsHacker News comment

    Notes Augment's switch to token-based pricing has not gone down well, stopped using GPT-5 in it, and finds Sonnet 4.5 too verbose for token billing.

    Published Nov 5, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Sonnet 4.5
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-11-05, Sonnet 4.5
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Credit-based plan, GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5

  25. Negative

    nchmy, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: </> Htmx - The Fetch()eningHacker News comment

    Says the author has been rugpulled a few times recently by thoroughly unscrupulous companies, calling Augment Code "trash humans".

    Published Nov 3, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Opinion
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-11-03
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  26. Mixed

    rishitank, Auggie CLI user

    [Bug]: New version of Auggie (v0.6.0) having delayed responsesGitHub issue

    Reports that Auggie 0.6.0 sometimes takes a long time to answer a prompt with no sign that it is working.

    Published Oct 31, 2025self-described: macOS, zsh

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 0.6.0
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-31, 0.6.0
    Counts toward
    Reliability, regressions: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI 0.6.0

  27. Positive

    Codewello, developer and YouTube creator

    Roo Code vs. Copilot vs. Cline vs. Kilo Code vs. Augment Code: The Ultimate Coding Assistant.Video, YouTube

    Rates Augment the most polished VS Code assistant with one of the best context engines, but calls the US$60 plan too much and reports paying over US$150 in a month.

    "…augment code that will cover everything from $10 affordable plan to $60 or even going higher like I did last month and pay more than $150 per month for a coding assistant. So, choose your B and let me know down below what you think…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 18:20Partial support

    Published Oct 27, 2025self-described: Compares five VS Code assistants the channel uses

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-27, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, credit-based plans

  28. Positive

    Dan Van Tran, CTO of Collectors, with staff engineer Alex

    How Collectors learnt to assess AI coding toolsWebinar in a LeadDev series produced with Augment Code, LeadDev (YouTube)

    Collectors ran phased trials of AI tools on real work. Its staff engineer calls Augment one of the clear winners among assistant tools for its context awareness, and the company has begun shifting to it as a single tool.

    "…sort of our augmenters um as as a as a tool type, I guess, and our autonomous agents. Um I think and and so I think to start um augment has always been one of our one of our clear winners especially…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 36:49Partial support

    Published Oct 15, 2025self-described: Collectors (PSA, PCGS), about 220 engineers, structured trials of several AI tools

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; not counted, tied to the vendor How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Auggie partner: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    partner (suspected); partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-15, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Not counted

    It is part of a LeadDev webinar series produced with Augment Code. Kept in the record; it takes part in no figure.

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment IDE extensions, evaluated against Cursor and Devin

  29. Positive

    keithnz, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Vibe engineeringHacker News comment

    Vibe codes much of a front end with Augment Code and Claude Sonnet 4.5, reviewing and cleaning up the code at the end; most of it is fine.

    Published Oct 8, 2025self-described: Front-end work

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-08, Claude Sonnet 4.5, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Claude Sonnet 4.5

  30. Positive

    James Garrett, staff engineer at Tilt

    How Tilt's review bot transformed its code reviews, with Augment CodeWebinar in a LeadDev series produced with Augment Code, LeadDev (YouTube)

    Tilt runs Auggie CLI as a context-aware PR review bot with team-written rules; he reports about 30% higher PR velocity and roughly 40% faster merges across time zones.

    "…a 23 1.5% drop in the number of comments on the PR if we excluded the augment bot. So we were having a lot less corrections needed, almost a quarter. And then we also saw the merge time drop about 40% because…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 21:06Partial support

    Published Oct 8, 2025self-described: Tilt backend engineering, monolithic codebase, teams across US and Australian time zones

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Auggie partner: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    partner (suspected); vendor employee (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed); design partner (self disclosed); partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-08, Sonnet 3.5; Sonnet 4; 4.5; GPT5, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Not counted

    It is part of a LeadDev webinar series produced with Augment Code. Kept in the record; it takes part in no figure.

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment IDE extension and Auggie CLI in an Azure pipeline

  31. Positive

    Paul Schleger, Cyoda

    Getting the Most out of Augment CodeEngineering team write-up, Substack (Paul Schleger)

    Cyoda's team treats Augment as a skill: guidelines and memories, small checkpointed tasks, supervised diffs, and critical review of generated tests and docs.

    Published Sep 20, 2025self-described: Cyoda engineering team, six months of daily use, mostly IntelliJ IDEA with Java and Kotlin

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Customer of Auggie; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-09-20, Claude Sonnet 4; GPT-5, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment IntelliJ plugin and VS Code extension, GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4

  32. Positive

    James Garrett, backend developer at Tilt

    Beyond the Purchase Order: How We Actually Made AI Work for EngineeringCompany engineering blog post, Tilt

    Garrett reports that Tilt's AI adoption only worked once engineers invested in documentation, rules and workflows. Notion principle docs fed the first attempt at Augment Rules, which are verbose, explicit and grouped into three categories, and the team uses auto-generated Augment Memories as feedback loops that show where rules need refinement.

    "At Tilt, adoption only worked once engineers invested in documentation, rules, and workflows that embedded AI into daily practice."
    Excerpt, James Garrett
    "Augment rules translate our human concepts into AI-digestible guidance. They’re verbose, explicit, and frankly boring to read, which is exactly what makes them effective."
    Same speaker

    Published Sep 11, 2025Tilt fintech engineering, rules shared across the team

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page); Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (a seasoned backend developer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    2 artifacts (organization page)
    Date and version
    2025-09-11, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment Rules and Memories, with a Notion MCP server for deeper context

  33. Positive

    Robert Matsuoka, fractional CTO and former CTO of Tripadvisor

    Augment Code's Auggie: When Focused Single-Process Beats Multi-AgentNewsletter post, Hyperdev (Substack)

    After Claude Code failed across several sessions to fix a D3.js visualization in his framework, Robert Matsuoka got it working with Auggie in about 45 minutes, crediting the Context Engine's automatic indexing.

    "Claude Code couldn't crack it across multiple sessions. The complexity of coordinating D3.js rendering with file system analysis kept leading us in circles."
    Excerpt, Robert Matsuoka
    "Within 45 minutes on that train ride, Auggie and I had it working."
    Same speaker
    "The Context Engine's automatic codebase understanding is genuinely superior to anything else I've used."
    Same speaker

    Published Sep 4, 2025self-described: Solo, debugging his open-source Claude MPM framework, a long-time Claude Code user

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Customer of Auggie; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-09-04, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI at launch, US$50 Developer plan

  34. Positive

    atombender, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Claude Code: Now in Beta in ZedHacker News comment

    Rates Augment's completions and agent highly after more than a year in JetBrains IDEs, and says colleagues moved from Cursor to Augment.

    Published Sep 3, 2025self-described: Uses Augment in JetBrains IDEs; colleagues use Cursor

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-09-03, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  35. Positive

    Allan Leinwand, Chief Technology Officer at Webflow

    How Webflow Got 89% of Its Engineers To Use AI DailyInterview article, The New Stack

    In an interview, Webflow's CTO reports that Webflow has enabled agents in both Cursor and Augment Code, and engineers hand Augment Code a specific issue and get back suggested pull request changes that a human then reviews and tests. He describes engineers using MCP from Augment Code to reach Jira, GitHub and parts of the codebase.

    "…but we definitely have the ability to take a piece of code, put it up into Augment Code, and say: Go work on this particular issue…"
    Excerpt, Allan Leinwand
    "If I’m in Cursor and I’m in Augment Code, I use MCP to talk to Jira, I use MCP to talk to GitHub…"
    Same speaker

    Published Aug 29, 2025Webflow engineering, about 300 engineers with Cursor and Augment Code in a company AI toolkit

    not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Webflow's new CTO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Reports others' experience
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-29, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment Code remote agents and MCP connections to Jira and GitHub

  36. Positive

    Nathan Sebhastian, developer and YouTube creator

    Auggie CLI + Sonnet 4: The BEST Agentic Terminal I've Tried Yet (Augment Code CLI)Video, YouTube

    Builds and pushes a CRM dashboard with Auggie CLI and its native GitHub integration, calling it a strong addition for Augment users at one of the highest prices.

    "What's interesting is that this native integration also works in Auggie, which means we can instruct Auggie to commit, push, create pull requestes, basically anything GitHub allows the agent to do. Let's see a quick demo. Uh here I will try to push the CRM…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 7:09Partial support

    Published Aug 29, 2025self-described: Builds a CRM dashboard in Auggie CLI

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-29, set 4, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI at general availability, Claude Sonnet 4

  37. Positive

    David Eastman, London-based software developer and consultant, writing for The New Stack

    Developer Walk-Through of Auggie CLI, an Agentic Terminal AppIndependent review article, The New Stack

    Testing the Auggie CLI beta on a Rails project, David Eastman found it worked harder than other agentic CLIs to understand the project. But it showed no usage or cost and did not say which model it used.

    "What I did like was the sense that Augment is working a little harder to figure out your project, and how it works."
    Excerpt, David Eastman
    "There has been no attempt to tell me what costs have been used, either from Augment or via the model providers. In fact, I still don’t know what model was ever in use…"
    Same speaker

    Published Aug 23, 2025self-described: Solo, trying the private beta on his own Ruby on Rails tool for a game

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Auggie partner: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    program member (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-23, private beta version, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Auggie CLI private beta

  38. Mixed

    Povilas Korop, Laravel developer and creator of AI Coding Daily

    Augment Code: Worth US$50/Month? Three Tests vs Claude CodeVideo, YouTube

    On a relationship refactor, Augment took 16 minutes because it wrote and ran tests unprompted while Claude Code took 4 without tests, and Korop found no context-speed edge.

    "…and then fixed again, all of that in total took 12 extra minutes. So for the whole task, cloud code took 4 minutes, but without tests, augment took 16 minutes, but we have automated tests executed and verified as a result. It's your preference whether…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 13:57Partial support

    Published Aug 18, 2025self-described: Laravel project, three tasks run side by side in Augment and Claude Code

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-18, sonet 4, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, trial of the US$50 Developer plan, Claude Sonnet 4

  39. Positive

    lemiffe, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Vibe coding is the fast fashion industry of software engineeringHacker News comment

    Augment has produced production-level code in dbt, PHP and TypeScript codebases, creating and running tests, with several levels of review before merge.

    Published Aug 1, 2025self-described: dbt, PHP and TypeScript codebases

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-01, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  40. Mixed

    Ricky Guo, daily Augment user

    Augment Code releases CLI Claude Code competitor Auggie (reply)Product Hunt forum reply

    Uses Augment daily after quitting Cursor and Windsurf and rates its context engineering top-tier, but recent versions crashed until a rollback to the previous week's release.

    Published Jul 31, 2025self-described: Moved from Cursor and Windsurf in spring 2025; uses VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-31, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, regressions: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension

  41. Positive

    Allan Leinwand, Chief Technology Officer at Webflow

    Building with AI: How Webflow engineers move faster, think deeper, and ship smarterCompany engineering blog post, Webflow Blog

    Leinwand describes how Webflow uses Augment Code in VS Code, WebStorm or Cursor to answer long-context questions and find logic flaws, keeps Augment guidelines versioned in the codebase, and pairs remote agents with Cursor and Augment so engineers can work on many PRs at once.

    "We also leverage Augment Code to bring the best of LLM assisted engineering into VSCode, WebStorm or Cursor. It answers long-context questions, finds bad assumptions developers are making, helps find logic flaws, scaffolds unit tests, highlights regressions, and more."
    Excerpt, Allan Leinwand
    "These tools are only as good as the context you provide them which is why we've invested deeply in maintaining Cursor rules and Augment guidelines versioned within the codebase."
    Same speaker

    Published Jul 16, 2025Webflow engineering, where every engineer gets Augment Code beside Cursor

    Practitioner account, self-described; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Opinion; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Allan Leinwand, Webflow's new CTO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-16, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment Code inside the engineers' existing IDEs, with Augment guidelines in the repository

  42. Mixed

    physix, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: What are your favorite coding tools?Hacker News comment

    Names the Augment Code plugin for IDEA and PyCharm a current favorite tool, joking that its waits leave time to read Hacker News.

    Published Jul 15, 2025self-described: Uses the plugin in IDEA and PyCharm

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-15, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  43. Positive

    gavinray, engineer at a company that rolled out Copilot and Augment

    Comment on: Ask HN: Where are the AI-driven profits or promotions?Hacker News comment

    Their company offers Copilot org-wide and Augment, and Augment has had the biggest impact there, with small features and many refactors done entirely through it.

    Published Jul 13, 2025self-described: Company provides Copilot and Augment

    not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Reports others' experience
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-13, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  44. Mixed

    e1g, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleHacker News comment

    Spends hours each week with Augment and other agents but keeps defaulting to Claude Code for heavy daily work.

    Published Jul 12, 2025self-described: 6 to 10 hours a day across mid-size codebases

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-12, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  45. Positive

    lp4x, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleHacker News comment

    Uses AugmentCode in JetBrains IDEs and rates it the best after trying Junie and Windsurf.

    Published Jul 12, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-12, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  46. Mixed

    M4v3R, developer using Augment at a day job and on a side project

    Comment on: Show HN: I AI-coded a tower defense game and documented the whole processHacker News comment

    Augment's context engine worked on a medium-sized day-job codebase where other agents failed, but it costs more than Cursor and often times out.

    Published Jul 4, 2025self-described: Medium-sized codebase at a day job

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-04, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Reliability, service availability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Developer plan, US$50 per month

  47. Positive

    chime, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: What useful AI tools do you use every day?Hacker News comment

    After trying most AI editors and CLI agents, reports the best results with the Augment extension in VS Code, including its remote agent.

    Published Jun 25, 2025self-described: Has tried most AI editors and CLI agents

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-25, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, remote agent

  48. Mixed

    chuckadams, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Agentic Coding RecommendationsHacker News comment

    Liked Augment apart from its heavy UI, then went back to JetBrains Junie once Augment revealed its price.

    Published Jun 12, 2025self-described: Works in JetBrains IDEs

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-12, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  49. Positive

    gondo, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cursor 1.0Hacker News comment

    Reports that AugmentCode has done most of the coding for two weeks, with gondo prompting, reviewing and re-prompting across two or three parallel tasks in JetBrains IDEs.

    Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: Works in GoLand, Android Studio and other JetBrains IDEs

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-05, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  50. Positive

    mythz, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Claude Code is now available to Pro plansHacker News comment

    Moved to Augment Code for its monthly cap and context engine, which lets agents match existing implementations without context in every message.

    Published Jun 4, 2025self-described: Uses VS Code and Rider

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-04, Claude Sonnet 4, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Claude Sonnet 4

  51. Mixed

    hn_acc1, developer whose company allows only Augment

    Comment on: Human coders are still better than LLMsHacker News comment

    At a company that allows only Augment, finds its completions follow team debugging idioms, but it keeps suggesting a temporary hack from months earlier.

    Published May 30, 2025self-described: Company standard: the only AI tool allowed

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-30, o4, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension

  52. Positive

    nchmy, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseHacker News comment

    Calls Augment Code the best coding agent around and credits its code indexer.

    Published May 28, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-28, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  53. Positive

    chime, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseHacker News comment

    Says Augment's indexing makes a large difference in a large monorepo, enough that chime would not use an editor without full indexing.

    Published May 27, 2025self-described: Large monorepo

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-27, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  54. Positive

    jjani, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseHacker News comment

    Agreed with the case against codebase indexing until trying Augment, whose indexing and retrieval changed that opinion.

    Published May 27, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-27, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  55. Positive

    cheema33, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: The unreasonable effectiveness of an LLM agent loop with tool useHacker News comment

    Has Augment Code write a PRD from its index of local code, then feeds it one task at a time from a plan, with another model reviewing each task in git.

    Published May 20, 2025self-described: Works in a git repo with several LLMs reviewing each other

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-20, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  56. Mixed

    Kent Beck, software developer and author

    My Augmented Coding Tools As Of 16 May 2025Newsletter, Software Design: Tidy First? (Substack)

    Augment builds its own context from large projects and has a professional UI, but its habit of deleting tests is infuriating and trust-destroying.

    Published May 16, 2025self-described: Personal projects in VS Code and IntelliJ

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Auggie partner: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    sponsor (self disclosed); sponsor (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-16, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment in IntelliJ and VS Code, US$30 per month

  57. Positive

    physix, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Perverse incentives of vibe codingHacker News comment

    Uses Augment Code as a plugin in IntelliJ and PyCharm and finds it good, but only gives it narrow, targeted objectives, in agent mode or not.

    Published May 15, 2025self-described: Uses the plugin in IntelliJ and PyCharm

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-15, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

  58. Positive

    bv_dev, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: My 600 Hours with AI Coding Assistants: A Practical ComparisonHacker News comment

    After 600 hours across assistants, names Augment Code the go-to tool for multi-file refactors and features despite its higher price, noting occasional hallucinations outside the codebase.

    Published May 14, 2025self-described: Over 600 hours across AI coding assistants in three months

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-14, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    US$30 per month plan (May 2025)

  59. Mixed

    replwoacause, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cline is quietly eating Cursor's lunch and changing how we codeHacker News comment

    Pays for Augment Code alongside Copilot, finds it decent for simple work, and prefers Cline for large undertakings.

    Published May 8, 2025self-described: Pays for several assistants at once

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-08, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  60. Mixed

    sagarpatil, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BHacker News comment

    Ranks Augment Code above Windsurf but prefers Claude Code over Windsurf, Cursor and Aider.

    Published May 7, 2025self-described: Windsurf customer since launch

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-07, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  61. Positive

    evelant, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cursor hits US$9B valuationHacker News comment

    Says Augment has no model picker and runs on Claude 3.7, and that its context engine is far ahead of other tools and usually gets it right where others fail.

    Published May 5, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Opinion; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-05, Claude 3.7, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Claude 3.7

  62. Positive

    Matt Lewellyn, VP of Engineering at Level 12

    Building UI with AICompany blog post, Level 12

    Level 12's VP of Engineering built a client's user deletion dialog with Augment Code in VS Code by splitting the work into small prompts. He estimates it cut development time by 50 to 60%, though one revision went the wrong way and testing still took real time.

    "In my latest experiment, I used Augment Code in VSCode to construct a modal dialog flow."
    Excerpt, Matt Lewellyn
    "Overall, using these prompts likely cut the development time by 50-60%. Testing, revision, and refinement remain a time-consuming and integral part of the development process."
    Same speaker

    Published Apr 30, 2025Level 12, a Louisville software consultancy, on a client project with a Bootstrap template

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Matt Lewellyn VP of Engineering)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-30, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment Code in VS Code, prompted step by step

  63. Positive

    bluedevil2k, engineer building internal tooling for the company's frontend developers

    Comment on: The Future of MCPsHacker News comment

    Is writing an internal MCP server that links the company's API layer to Augment in VS Code so frontend developers can find endpoints and fields.

    Published Apr 23, 2025self-described: Company with an API layer of over 1,000 endpoints

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-23, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, MCP

  64. Mixed

    Jessica Kerr (Jessitron), software developer

    Augmented Coding: an Experience ReportPersonal blog post, jessitron.com

    Got further than alone with Augment's agent, but it loops, forgets what is not in its memories, and needs smaller steps and end-to-end checks after every change.

    Published Apr 20, 2025self-described: Weekend project: an app implemented in three to four languages

    Practitioner account; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-20, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment agent ("Auggie") in VS Code, Next Edit and completions

  65. Mixed

    Matt Lewellyn, VP of Engineering at Level 12

    AI Agent-Driven Development with Augment CodeCompany engineering blog post, Level 12

    Lewellyn had Augment Agent build a weighted-calculation feature: one prompt produced a grid view, a form, views with permissions and Jinja templates, a 70% solution that didn't work right away. It skipped the project's common mixins, duplicated template markup, and added no tests, which the prompt hadn't asked for.

    "I found that Augment Agent had significant productivity benefits by generating functional code structures quickly, but was limited in pattern recognition, code organization, and testing…"
    Excerpt, Matt Lewellyn
    "For all of the criticisms, bear in mind that the agent essentially developed a 70% solution, which is a huge productivity boost."
    Same speaker

    Published Apr 11, 2025Level 12, a Louisville software consultancy building Python SaaS apps for clients

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (VP of Engineering)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-11, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment Agent in VS Code

  66. Positive

    Josh Pocock, founder of Executive Stride and YouTube creator

    FREE Augment Code Beats Cursor & Windsurf For Large Codebase Indexing!Video, YouTube

    Indexed his Next.js codebase quickly and built a case-study feature with Augment, recommending it for existing projects that outgrow Cursor or Windsurf, with less benefit for new ones.

    "…the blog Pages or case studies first let's create the necessary interfaces and functions okay so we'll just see that it's doing that here now let's create the case studies list page create a new file so it can create new files…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 9:55Partial support

    Published Feb 22, 2025self-described: His company's Next.js site

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-02-22, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Augment VS Code extension, free tier (February 2025)

  67. Positive

    ilrwbwrkhv, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: GitHub Copilot: The Agent AwakensHacker News comment

    Recommends trying Augment, saying its IntelliJ integration works really well and wondering why it isn't more widely known.

    Published Feb 6, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Auggie found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-02-06, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Augment JetBrains plugin

Product documentation 21

Pages from Augment Code, used to check facts for every group.

  1. Pricing

    Lists Standard at US$20 and Business at US$100 per month, each a flat price for up to 50 seats with the same amount of pooled usage, and Enterprise at custom pricing.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  2. Token-Based Pricing

    Bills LLM tokens at the provider's public API list price plus a 40% service fee, and Cosmos compute at US$0.19 per hour in 5-minute increments.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  3. Available Models

    Lists the Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, GLM, and Kimi models Augment offers, and Prism, its model router.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  4. Introducing Auggie CLI

    Describes Auggie as Augment's agent and Context Engine in the terminal, installed from npm, with an interactive mode and a print mode for automation.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  5. Install Auggie CLI

    Requires Node 20 or later on macOS, Linux, or Windows WSL, and updates itself automatically in interactive mode.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  6. Index your workspace (CLI)

    States that Augment stores code to run the Context Engine, and that .gitignore and .augmentignore control what gets indexed.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  7. Index your workspace (VS Code)

    States that opening a workspace with Augment enabled uploads the codebase to Augment's cloud for indexing.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  8. Tool Permissions

    Documents allow, deny, webhook, and script rules for tool calls, honored by Auggie CLI and Cosmos cloud agents but not by the IDE extension.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  9. Rules & Guidelines

    Lists the rules files Auggie loads, including CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and .augment/rules in the workspace.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  10. Using Auggie with Automation

    Documents print mode for CI and scripts, and notes that non-interactive mode may be disabled under an Enterprise agreement that does not include it.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  11. Service Accounts

    Documents non-human identities with API tokens for automation, on team and Enterprise plans, managed by a tenant administrator.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  12. ACP Clients

    Documents running Auggie as an Agent Client Protocol agent in Zed, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, and Emacs.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  14. Install Augment for JetBrains IDEs

    Documents installing the Augment plugin in JetBrains IDEs. The page lists version 2024.3 or later, and Augment's changelog for plugin v0.488.0 (August 17, 2026) raises the minimum to 2025.2.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  15. Completions

    States that Completions were deprecated on March 31, 2026 for non-Enterprise plans and remain supported on Enterprise plans.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  16. Context Engine MCP

    Documents serving the Context Engine to other agents over MCP, locally through Auggie or remotely through the GitHub App, at roughly US$0.03 to US$0.06 per query.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  17. Usage Dashboards & Budgets

    States that organization usage dashboards and monthly budgets are available only to Enterprise customers.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  19. Getting Started with Cosmos

    Introduces Cosmos, which runs Augment's agents in the cloud from Experts, Environments, Triggers, and Sessions.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  20. Security & Privacy

    States that Augment never trains on customer code and describes its proof-of-possession API, customer-managed keys, and ISO/IEC 42001 certification.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  21. Augment Code's next chapter

    Announces on October 8, 2026 that Cosmos, Auggie CLI, the Code Context Engine, and related technology are joining Harness.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

Source index

Provenance at a glance

Every source GILD read, with the original address and the context used to count it. Open a finding to filter the full cards above. On smaller screens the index lists each source once by name, cohort and date; its full record above carries the address, context and findings.

Provenance for every analyzed Signals source
SourceOriginal URLAuthor and contextWhoPublishedReview dateAppliesFindings
Comment on: ACP mode: host-supplied mcpServers in session/new replace (rather than merge with) settings.json/.mcp.json serversID dc-47 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/171#issuecomment-5713982706Julian Mesa, integrating Auggie into GitKraken Keplerself-described: GitKraken Kepler, which drives Auggie 0.36.0 over ACPProfessional teamPublished Sep 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026CurrentNot counted. Its author builds GitKraken Kepler, a commercial product that integrates Auggie.
Multi-minute event-loop freeze in uv__fsevents_close (macOS) when indexing/file-watching is enabledID dc-46 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/147inercia, Auggie CLI user running it under an ACP hostself-described: Large workspaces on macOS, Auggie 0.28.0 in ACP mode with indexing onIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 4, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
[Bug]: Denying launch-process doesn't block file deletion - agent silently falls back to remove-filesID dc-45 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/145harjothkhara, Auggie CLI user testing tool permissionsself-described: Auggie 0.28.0 in print mode with toolPermissionsIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 3, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Show HN: Semble - Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grepID dc-44 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48176193parasti, developer whose team moved off Augmentself-described: Team at work, moved from Augment Code to Claude CodeVery small teamPublished May 18, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Task Paralysis and AIID dc-43 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084834rsyring, Hacker News commenterself-described: Augment agents in VS Code and the CLI for about eight monthsIndividual practitionerPublished May 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Ask HN: What do you still do manually in 2026 that should be automated?ID dc-42 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051779RanHal, Hacker News commenterself-described: Personal knowledge baseIndividual practitionerPublished May 7, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
[Feature]: Project-scoped hooks (.augment/settings.json checked into the repo)ID dc-41 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/130kwalitynut, member of a Clari developer-experience teamself-described: Team building an AI-provenance commit standard for Augment and Claude Code usersProfessional teamPublished May 1, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Show HN: MTTCleaner - Same as CCleaner but free, no adsID dc-40 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47905987mytechtoday, IT consultantself-described: Solo IT consultant building PowerShell tools for clientsIndividual practitionerPublished Apr 26, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Ask HN: How is AI-assisted coding going for you professionally?ID dc-39 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47392363parasti, developer on a team of four rewriting a legacy CRMself-described: Team of 4, full rewrite of a 30-year-old CRM in LaravelVery small teamPublished Mar 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: OpenAI raises US$110B on US$730B pre-money valuationID dc-38 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185554hn_acc1, developer whose company standardizes on Augmentself-described: C++ work in VS CodeProfessional teamPublished Feb 27, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Predatory credit pricing: --print re-indexes workspace on every call, burning 2000+ credits per queryID sx-05 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/80fodurrr, GitHub userself-described: Solo, scripting Auggie CLI in print mode on the Indie planIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
AI DevOps: Building Intelligent Incident Response SystemsID ld-04 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewstilt.com/blog/ai-devops-intelligent-incident-response-systemsKyle Getty, software engineer at TiltTilt on-call engineering on Azure, alert-triggered incident analysisProfessional teamPublished Feb 13, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project DevelopmentID sx-06 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsarxiv.org/html/2602.01655Pengrui Lu and five co-authors, academic researchersself-described: Independent benchmark of six coding agents through their command-line interfaces on 20 project-building tasksVery small teamPublished Feb 2, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
[Bug]: 0.15.0 Context exceedsID dc-37 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/73yann0001, Auggie CLI user, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Sub-agents bypass CLI permission enforcement (security gap) - v0.14.0ID sx-04 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/74JonatanRoo, GitHub userself-described: Solo, using Auggie for all development for several monthsIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?ID dc-35 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46701909defatigable, Hacker News commenterself-described: Golang and Python at workIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026CurrentListed, no finding position
Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?ID dc-36 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46704081fmdv, Hacker News commenterself-described: PowerShell developmentIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: How Google got its groove back and edged ahead of OpenAIID dc-34 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46538093mythz, Hacker News commenterself-described: Full-time coding assistant userIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 8, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Claude Code gets native LSP supportID dc-33 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46364128atombender, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses Augment completions with Claude Code for agent workIndividual practitionerPublished Dec 23, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Claude Code gets native LSP supportID dc-32 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46358503vb-8448, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses PyCharmIndividual practitionerPublished Dec 22, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Ask HN: How can I get better at using AI for programming?ID dc-31 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46314080adam_patarino, founder of Cortex.buildself-described: Builds a competing context productIndividual practitionerPublished Dec 18, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicableNot counted. Its author runs Cortex.build, a competing AI coding tool, and the post compares coding tools with it.
Comment on: Launch HN: Nia (YC S25) - Give better context to coding agentsID dc-30 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46197675kenforthewin, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Dec 8, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI raceID dc-29 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46128495danielodievich, engineer working with the company's support teamself-described: Company support and engineering, answering a customer questionProfessional teamPublished Dec 2, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Developers are choosing older AI modelsID dc-28 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45822465feintruled, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Nov 5, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: </> Htmx - The Fetch()eningID dc-27 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45804510nchmy, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Nov 3, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
[Bug]: New version of Auggie (v0.6.0) having delayed responsesID dc-26 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/augmentcode/auggie/issues/28rishitank, Auggie CLI userself-described: macOS, zshIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 31, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Roo Code vs. Copilot vs. Cline vs. Kilo Code vs. Augment Code: The Ultimate Coding Assistant.ID tc-06 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=6ri8IteZC2oCodewello, developer and YouTube creatorself-described: Compares five VS Code assistants the channel usesIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 27, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
How Collectors learnt to assess AI coding toolsID tc-05 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=N9iyfEXsfMEDan Van Tran, CTO of Collectors, with staff engineer Alexself-described: Collectors (PSA, PCGS), about 220 engineers, structured trials of several AI toolsTechnical leadershipPublished Oct 15, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicableNot counted. It is part of a LeadDev webinar series produced with Augment Code.
Comment on: Vibe engineeringID dc-25 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45511521keithnz, Hacker News commenterself-described: Front-end workIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 8, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicableListed, no finding position
How Tilt's review bot transformed its code reviews, with Augment CodeID tc-04 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=KKfM5EiugucJames Garrett, staff engineer at Tiltself-described: Tilt backend engineering, monolithic codebase, teams across US and Australian time zonesProfessional teamPublished Oct 8, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicableNot counted. It is part of a LeadDev webinar series produced with Augment Code.
Getting the Most out of Augment CodeID ir-03 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewscuriousquantumobserver.substack.com/p/getting-the-most-out-of-augment-codePaul Schleger, Cyodaself-described: Cyoda engineering team, six months of daily use, mostly IntelliJ IDEA with Java and KotlinProfessional teamPublished Sep 20, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Beyond the Purchase Order: How We Actually Made AI Work for EngineeringID ld-03 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewstilt.com/blog/beyond-the-purchase-orderJames Garrett, backend developer at TiltTilt fintech engineering, rules shared across the teamProfessional teamPublished Sep 11, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Augment Code's Auggie: When Focused Single-Process Beats Multi-AgentID sx-03 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewshyperdev.matsuoka.com/p/augment-codes-auggie-when-focusedRobert Matsuoka, fractional CTO and former CTO of Tripadvisorself-described: Solo, debugging his open-source Claude MPM framework, a long-time Claude Code userIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 4, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Claude Code: Now in Beta in ZedID dc-24 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45121210atombender, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses Augment in JetBrains IDEs; colleagues use CursorIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 3, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How Webflow Got 89% of Its Engineers To Use AI DailyID ld-05 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsthenewstack.io/how-webflow-got-89-of-its-engineers-to-use-ai-daily/Allan Leinwand, Chief Technology Officer at WebflowWebflow engineering, about 300 engineers with Cursor and Augment Code in a company AI toolkitTechnical leadershipPublished Aug 29, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Auggie CLI + Sonnet 4: The BEST Agentic Terminal I've Tried Yet (Augment Code CLI)ID tc-03 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=X-jPYuvY8hcNathan Sebhastian, developer and YouTube creatorself-described: Builds a CRM dashboard in Auggie CLIIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 29, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Developer Walk-Through of Auggie CLI, an Agentic Terminal AppID sx-02 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsthenewstack.io/developer-walk-through-of-auggie-cli-an-agentic-terminal-app/David Eastman, London-based software developer and consultant, writing for The New Stackself-described: Solo, trying the private beta on his own Ruby on Rails tool for a gameIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 23, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Augment Code: Worth US$50/Month? Three Tests vs Claude CodeID tc-02 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=xBQdbHC9UgAPovilas Korop, Laravel developer and creator of AI Coding Dailyself-described: Laravel project, three tasks run side by side in Augment and Claude CodeIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 18, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Vibe coding is the fast fashion industry of software engineeringID dc-23 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44754806lemiffe, Hacker News commenterself-described: dbt, PHP and TypeScript codebasesIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 1, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Augment Code releases CLI Claude Code competitor Auggie (reply)ID dc-22 | Developer Communitieswww.producthunt.com/p/augment-code/augment-code-releases-cli-claude-code-competitor-auggieRicky Guo, daily Augment userself-described: Moved from Cursor and Windsurf in spring 2025; uses VS CodeIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 31, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Building with AI: How Webflow engineers move faster, think deeper, and ship smarterID ld-01 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewswebflow.com/blog/building-with-aiAllan Leinwand, Chief Technology Officer at WebflowWebflow engineering, where every engineer gets Augment Code beside CursorTechnical leadershipPublished Jul 16, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Ask HN: What are your favorite coding tools?ID dc-21 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44566649physix, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses the plugin in IDEA and PyCharmIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 15, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Ask HN: Where are the AI-driven profits or promotions?ID dc-20 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44549007gavinray, engineer at a company that rolled out Copilot and Augmentself-described: Company provides Copilot and AugmentProfessional teamPublished Jul 13, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleID dc-18 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44538463e1g, Hacker News commenterself-described: 6 to 10 hours a day across mid-size codebasesIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 12, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleID dc-19 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44546051lp4x, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 12, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Show HN: I AI-coded a tower defense game and documented the whole processID dc-17 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44465360M4v3R, developer using Augment at a day job and on a side projectself-described: Medium-sized codebase at a day jobIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 4, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Ask HN: What useful AI tools do you use every day?ID dc-16 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44374539chime, Hacker News commenterself-described: Has tried most AI editors and CLI agentsIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 25, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Agentic Coding RecommendationsID dc-15 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44258053chuckadams, Hacker News commenterself-described: Works in JetBrains IDEsIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 12, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Cursor 1.0ID dc-14 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44190848gondo, Hacker News commenterself-described: Works in GoLand, Android Studio and other JetBrains IDEsIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 5, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Claude Code is now available to Pro plansID dc-13 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44180125mythz, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses VS Code and RiderIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 4, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Human coders are still better than LLMsID dc-12 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44131957hn_acc1, developer whose company allows only Augmentself-described: Company standard: the only AI tool allowedProfessional teamPublished May 30, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseID dc-11 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44112352nchmy, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished May 28, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseID dc-09 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44107579chime, Hacker News commenterself-described: Large monorepoIndividual practitionerPublished May 27, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Why Cline doesn't index your codebaseID dc-10 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44109268jjani, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished May 27, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: The unreasonable effectiveness of an LLM agent loop with tool useID dc-08 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44037259cheema33, Hacker News commenterself-described: Works in a git repo with several LLMs reviewing each otherIndividual practitionerPublished May 20, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
My Augmented Coding Tools As Of 16 May 2025ID ir-02 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsnewsletter.kentbeck.com/p/my-augmented-coding-tools-as-of-16Kent Beck, software developer and authorself-described: Personal projects in VS Code and IntelliJIndividual practitionerPublished May 16, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Perverse incentives of vibe codingID dc-07 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991057physix, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses the plugin in IntelliJ and PyCharmIndividual practitionerPublished May 15, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: My 600 Hours with AI Coding Assistants: A Practical ComparisonID dc-06 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43986580bv_dev, Hacker News commenterself-described: Over 600 hours across AI coding assistants in three monthsIndividual practitionerPublished May 14, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Cline is quietly eating Cursor's lunch and changing how we codeID dc-05 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43925974replwoacause, Hacker News commenterself-described: Pays for several assistants at onceIndividual practitionerPublished May 8, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BID dc-04 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43912096sagarpatil, Hacker News commenterself-described: Windsurf customer since launchIndividual practitionerPublished May 7, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Cursor hits US$9B valuationID dc-03 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43897451evelant, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished May 5, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Building UI with AIID ld-02 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewswww.level12.io/blog/building-ui-aiMatt Lewellyn, VP of Engineering at Level 12Level 12, a Louisville software consultancy, on a client project with a Bootstrap templateTechnical leadershipPublished Apr 30, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: The Future of MCPsID dc-02 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43776588bluedevil2k, engineer building internal tooling for the company's frontend developersself-described: Company with an API layer of over 1,000 endpointsProfessional teamPublished Apr 23, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Augmented Coding: an Experience ReportID ir-01 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsjessitron.com/2025/04/20/augmented-coding-an-experience-report/Jessica Kerr (Jessitron), software developerself-described: Weekend project: an app implemented in three to four languagesIndividual practitionerPublished Apr 20, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
AI Agent-Driven Development with Augment CodeID sx-01 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewswww.level12.io/blog/ai-agent-driven-development-augment-codeMatt Lewellyn, VP of Engineering at Level 12Level 12, a Louisville software consultancy building Python SaaS apps for clientsVery small teamPublished Apr 11, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
FREE Augment Code Beats Cursor & Windsurf For Large Codebase Indexing!ID tc-01 | Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=7cz3cymHTSQJosh Pocock, founder of Executive Stride and YouTube creatorself-described: His company's Next.js siteIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 22, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: GitHub Copilot: The Agent AwakensID dc-01 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=42966503ilrwbwrkhv, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 6, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
PricingID pd-01 | Product Documentationwww.augmentcode.com/pricingAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Token-Based PricingID pd-02 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/models/token-based-pricingAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Available ModelsID pd-03 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/models/available-modelsAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Introducing Auggie CLIID pd-04 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/overviewAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Install Auggie CLIID pd-05 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/setup-auggie/install-auggie-cliAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Index your workspace (CLI)ID pd-06 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/setup-auggie/workspace-indexingAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Index your workspace (VS Code)ID pd-07 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/setup-augment/workspace-indexingAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Tool PermissionsID pd-08 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/permissionsAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Rules & GuidelinesID pd-09 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/rulesAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Using Auggie with AutomationID pd-10 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/automation/overviewAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Service AccountsID pd-11 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/automation/service-accountsAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
ACP ClientsID pd-12 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cli/acp/clientsAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Install Augment for Visual Studio CodeID pd-13 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/setup-augment/install-visual-studio-codeAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Install Augment for JetBrains IDEsID pd-14 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/jetbrains/setup-augment/install-jetbrains-idesAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
CompletionsID pd-15 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/using-augment/completionsAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Context Engine MCPID pd-16 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/context-services/mcp/overviewAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Usage Dashboards & BudgetsID pd-17 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/analytics/credit-dashboard-and-quotasAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Setup Guide for Business Plan (Code Review)ID pd-18 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/codereview/setup-guide-otherplansAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Getting Started with CosmosID pd-19 | Product Documentationdocs.augmentcode.com/cosmos/getting-startedAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Security & PrivacyID pd-20 | Product Documentationwww.augmentcode.com/securityAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Augment Code's next chapterID pd-21 | Product Documentationwww.augmentcode.com/blog/augment-code-next-chapterAugment CodeOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only