Skip to main content
Devin SignalsBack to the read

Every source behind the read

Every source GILD analyzed, newest first. Each says who the source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and which findings it counts toward. Open a count to see only its sources.

Whose sources count

Source

49 sources in Engineering leaders and teams, with product documentation Showing all 84 sources

  1. Positive

    Brian Xu, engineer on the Agents team at Rox

    Living Evals: an eval suite that grows from productionCompany engineering blog post, Rox

    Xu describes how each week Devin "samples" about 350 production conversations from Braintrust and labels them, replays cases in a "preview" environment holding a full copy of Rox, and opens a pull request with each eval. The first sweep's suite covered 72% of unseen conversations, against 43 to 57% for 142 hand-written evals.

    "It works in its own environment, so it can stand up a preview environment, use Rox there the way a salesperson would, and open a pull request with the finished eval."
    Excerpt, Brian Xu
    "One automated sweep covered twice as many behaviors as everything we had written by hand."
    Same speaker
    "When the skill gets something wrong, Devin proposes a fix to the skill itself, and we review it like any other change."
    Same speaker
    "Every week, Devin, the coding agent from Cognition, reads real conversations on Rox from our production traces in Braintrust, turns them into evals, and opens a pull request that we review."
    Same speaker

    Published Oct 14, 2026Rox engineering team, revenue agent product; post published in partnership with Cognition and Braintrust

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; not counted, tied to the vendor How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Agents)
    Relationship
    partner (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-14
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin running a weekly eval-writing skill against Braintrust traces and per-branch test environments

  2. Positive

    David Griffiths, Group Head of AI at Citi

    A Competitive Differentiator: David Griffiths on Building the World's Most AI-empowered Financial InstitutionCompany perspectives article, Citi

    Citi's profile of its Group Head of AI says the bank adopted Devin early to speed up complex, multi-step coding tasks. One task re-mapped more than 30 years of legacy code across the firm in two days.

    "Early on, Citi adopted Devin, a coding agent developed by the AI lab Cognition to expedite complex, multi-step coding tasks. One such task involved re-mapping more than 30 years of legacy code across the firm in two days."
    Excerpt, David Griffiths

    Published Sep 22, 2026Global bank; firmwide AI platform team serving employees in more than 87 countries and jurisdictions

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Competitor staff: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Group Head of AI)
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed); partner (self disclosed); partner (self disclosed); partner (self disclosed); partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-22
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin used by Citi developers on legacy code work

  3. Mixed

    hightrix, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    hightrix's company has used Devin enterprise seats for about nine months; it beats Copilot, but hightrix now finds Claude and Codex much better and the web and desktop harnesses inconsistent.

    Published Sep 10, 2026self-described: Company with a number of Devin seats on an enterprise plan, used for about 9 months

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on enterprise plan
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-10, enterprise plan
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Enterprise plan, about 9 months of use

  4. Positive

    deet, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    deet's team uses Devin heavily and calls it one of the best cloud-hosted, team-managed coding agents, citing its UX, sandboxed testing and QA, and API control.

    Published Sep 10, 2026self-described: Team using Devin heavily as a team-managed agent

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-10
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  5. Positive

    John Wang, Co-Founder and CTO at Assembled

    Code review bottlenecks: How we hill climbed our way to higher PR throughputCompany blog post, Assembled

    Assembled's CTO reports that non-engineers wrote 13% of all PRs after the rollout, and credits the company's auto-reviewer combined with cloud agents like Devin for letting non-engineers contribute without much engineering handholding.

    "The auto-reviewer, combined with cloud agents like Devin, allowed non-engineers to contribute significantly without requiring a large amount of engineering handholding."
    Excerpt, John Wang
    "Non-engineers accounted for 13% of all PRs."
    Same speaker

    Published Aug 7, 2026Assembled, a customer support software company; engineers and non-engineers ship through coding agents and an in-house auto-reviewer

    Practitioner account, self-described; opinion; not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Opinion
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Co-Founder and CTO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-08-07
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin cloud agents alongside an in-house reviewer that approves low-risk PRs

  6. Positive

    Zachary Proser, Applied AI at WorkOS

    Devin AI Has Come a Long WayPersonal blog post, zackproser.com

    WorkOS abandoned a 2024 Devin trial with zero completed sessions; by 2026 it became a daily, organically adopted Slack agent shipping reviewable PRs, bug fixes and data queries.

    Published May 24, 2026self-described: WorkOS engineering team using Devin in Slack; also personal blog repos

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Customer of Devin; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Applied AI engineer)
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-24
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  7. Negative

    cocoflunchy, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Launch HN: Twill.ai (YC S25) - Delegate to cloud agents, get back PRsHacker News comment

    While evaluating cloud agents for the company, cocoflunchy tried Devin and could not get it working after an hour of fiddling, pointing to onboarding and repo setup.

    Published Apr 11, 2026self-described: Company evaluating cloud agents to let anyone in the company fix things in the product

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-11
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  8. Mixed

    Hiroki Akamatsu (@hi120ki), AI Security engineer at Mercari

    Enabling AI usage at Mercari with Secure Devin ManagementEngineering blog post, Mercari Engineering blog

    Mercari's AI Security team built a Terraform provider and automation on Devin's Enterprise API to manage members, ACU caps, secret rotation and API key expiry that Devin lacks natively.

    Published Apr 3, 2026self-described: Mercari, Devin Enterprise with separate Organizations per team across multiple business domains

    Practitioner account; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Customer of Devin; Ran the rollout; Specific details; Observed on Devin's Enterprise plan
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-03, Devin's Enterprise plan
    Counts toward
    Operational control, admin control: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Organization-wide
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin Enterprise plan; Enterprise API v2 and v3

  9. Positive

    Prashant Naikar, Developer at a startup acquired by a UK company

    Using Devin AI Daily for 6 Months: What Actually ChangedPersonal blog post, Medium

    After six months of daily use, Prashant Naikar's work shifted to reviewing Devin's pull requests and teaching it the product. Devin navigated the codebase well but missed edge cases and coupling.

    Published Feb 6, 2026self-described: Company-wide AI push after acquisition; manager gave Devin access to two developers

    Practitioner account; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Used it directly
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-06
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  10. Negative

    Fit_Sprinkles_8649, Reddit user in r/programming

    Comment on: Someone uses Devin AIReddit comment

    Fit_Sprinkles_8649's team dropped Devin after two months: its pull requests ignored existing patterns, so senior developers spent more time reviewing and fixing than writing the code themselves.

    Published Feb 2, 2026self-described: Company team, two-month trial

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-02
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  11. Negative

    Global-Molasses2695, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding

    Comment on: Where did Devin go? What does it say about the future of AI dev tools?Reddit comment

    Evaluating Devin for a regulated environment, Global-Molasses2695 asked Cognition for a pilot proposal and was told there are no pilots, only US$500 seats.

    Published Jan 30, 2026self-described: Buyer evaluation for a regulated environment

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Opinion; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-30
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  12. Positive

    joshgachnang, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Devin Review: AI to Stop SlopHacker News comment

    joshgachnang is impressed with Devin, calling it the best tool for AI-generated features when you know what you want and have patterns to follow, likely helped by its project context.

    Published Jan 21, 2026self-described: Team codebase with its own review rules; using Devin for features and review

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-21
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  13. Positive

    cloudking, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Why we built our own background agentHacker News comment

    Says the team uses Devin and it works very well: it has its own virtual environment, IDE, terminal and browser, can be configured to run the application, and can modify the app, test changes in the browser and send a screen recording of the working feature with a PR.

    Published Jan 14, 2026self-described: Team using Devin as its background agent

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-14
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  14. Positive

    Sahil Lavingia, CEO of Gumroad, interviewed by Aakash Gupta

    How to PM Production Changes with Devin: Tutorial From Gumroad CEO, Sahil LavingiaPodcast episode show notes, The Growth Podcast (Product Growth)

    Gumroad's CEO sends small, clear features straight to Devin from Slack and reviews the pull request it opens only as closely as the change's importance calls for.

    "Small and clear feature → Straight to Devin…"
    Excerpt, Aakash Gupta
    "Devin opens a PR. You review it (or don’t, depending on importance)."
    Same speaker

    Published Oct 19, 2025Gumroad, a US$10M ARR company with one employee; Devin connected to Slack and the codebase

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (founder and CEO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-19, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  15. Positive

    Eight Sleep data team (Editorial byline)

    How Eight Sleep Uses Devin as a Data AnalystCompany blog post, Eight Sleep blog

    Eight Sleep runs Devin in Slack as a data analyst over its dbt repo and warehouse; with curated knowledge it ships 3x more data work and clears ad-hoc asks.

    "Faster shipping. We’re shipping 3x as many data features and data investigations each week compared to before…"
    Excerpt, Eight Sleep data team

    Published Sep 4, 2025self-described: Eight Sleep small data team; dbt, Snowflake, Looker, Amplitude; Devin used as a data analyst, not for app code

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; not counted, tied to the vendor How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role unknown
    Relationship
    partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-09-04, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  16. Positive

    nikisweeting, Engineer at browser-use

    Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseHacker News comment

    DeepWiki was instrumental in the browser-use team's refactor of a large codebase from Playwright to pure CDP; nikisweeting rates its follow-up research questions above OpenAI deep research for complex codebases.

    Published Aug 26, 2025self-described: browser-use, refactor of a large codebase from Playwright to CDP

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Opinion; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-26, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  17. Positive

    Marco Argenti, Chief Information Officer, Goldman Sachs

    American Banker: Goldman Sachs staff now write a million gen AI prompts a monthNews report quoting the CIO

    Goldman Sachs' CIO describes Devin as a virtual colleague developer teams can delegate work to, beside the Copilot every developer has.

    "All the developers have Github Copilot. They are getting the Devin technology. There's a shift from the developer assistant that helps you auto complete your code or generate code for a specific task, so I now have a virtual colleague that I can delegate work to."
    Excerpt, Marco Argenti

    Published Jul 25, 2025self-described: Goldman Sachs developer teams

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Organization-wide
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  18. Positive

    Zach Davis, Director of engineering at LaunchDarkly

    Successfully coding with AI in large enterprises: Centralized rules, workflows for tech debt, & morePodcast episode, How I AI (YouTube)

    Davis consolidated Cursor rules and a Claude MD file into one in-repo agents directory, started from Devin's per-repo wiki to write docs, got Devin running in front-end-only mode before a colleague set up the back end, and can Slack Devin to pick up the next tech-debt cleanup task.

    "…for anybody trying to deploy AI agents in a real engineering team with a real codebase, not just vibe coding. We have Zach Davis, director of engineering at Launch Darkley, who's going to show us how he sets up centralized rules and…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 1:12Partial support

    Published Jul 21, 2025self-described: LaunchDarkly, 100-plus-person engineering team working in a large, roughly 10-year-old monorepo

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Director of Engineering at LaunchDarkly)
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-21, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  19. Mixed

    David Griffiths, Chief Technology Officer, Citi

    American Banker: Citi is rolling out agentic AI to its 40,000 developersNews report quoting the CTO

    Citi's CTO gives developers Devin for simple, repeatable tasks such as upgrades, rewrites, patches, documentation and tests, and would not yet ask an agent to build a complicated feature end to end.

    ""It's not at the point where you would want to ask the agent to implement a very complicated feature from start to finish. We may get there with the technology in time, but today, I wouldn't recommend anyone to do that. We focus on the simple, repeatable tasks, which it can do at our scale."
    Excerpt, David Griffiths

    Published Jul 14, 2025self-described: Citi, 40,000 developers

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Organization-wide
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  20. Mixed

    Daniel Price, docs team at Neon

    AI Workflows for Docs: Putting Devin to WorkCompany blog post, Neon

    Neon's docs team uses a Devin playbook to set up the weekly changelog, sends it to work through older docs issues and small UI copy fixes, and has it explain code. A feature rename left awkward edits that took 20+ manual commits, and open-ended tasks often failed silently, so Cursor stays their interactive tool.

    "Devin does well when the problem is clearly scoped, but once things get open-ended, it still struggles."
    Excerpt, Daniel Price
    "But its edits leaned heavily on direct find/replace, which led to some awkward constructions like “instant instant restore.” It took another 20+ manual commits to polish the changes."
    Same speaker
    "But when the task is clear and the scope is right, it’s a genuinely helpful assistant."
    Same speaker

    Published Jun 23, 2025Neon docs team; docs repo, changelogs and small Neon Console UI fixes

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-23, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Devin with a weekly changelog playbook, issue-driven docs PRs and multi-file renames

  21. Mixed

    Kieran Klaassen, GM of Cora at Every

    Transcript: 'How Two Engineers Ship Like a Team of 15 With AI Agents'Podcast transcript, AI & I (Every)

    Ranking the coding agents his team uses, Klaassen grades Devin a B: less integrated and harder to set up than Cursor or Claude Code, with less well-rounded code quality.

    "It's not as integrated. It's a little bit hard to set up, and the code quality is not as well rounded as Cursor or Claude Code."
    Excerpt, Kieran Klaassen

    Published Jun 11, 2025Two-engineer team building Every's Cora email assistant with several coding agents

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, from a competitor's side How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Competitor staff: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Member of Frontier Team)
    Relationship
    program member (self disclosed); program member (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-11, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: excluded, criticism from a competitor's side, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: excluded, criticism from a competitor's side, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  22. Positive

    Rick Blalock, co-founder at Agentuity

    The Agent-Native CompanyConference talk page with transcript, AI Engineer World's Fair 2025

    Blalock reports that it is really common at Agentuity standups to have Devin take on a task, with a pull request to review before the meeting ends. A few months in, Devin has documented so much of the company's code and knows how the team handles certain things; Blalock calls it a superpower.

    "We started using it a few months ago. It was good. We had to do some things. And now over time it's learned so much, it's documented so much of our code, it knows how we handle certain things."
    Excerpt, Rick Blalock
    "During a team meeting, it's really common to hear things like, "Well, just have Devin go do that."…"
    Same speaker

    Published Jun 3, 2025Agentuity, an early-stage agent cloud startup of six or seven people

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (co-founder)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-06-03, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Devin used for several months, with tasks sent from standups and Linear tickets

  23. Positive

    Sahil Lavingia, CEO and founder of Gumroad

    Gumroad CEO's playbook to 40x his team's productivity with v0, Cursor, and Devin | Sahil LavingiaPodcast episode, How I AI (YouTube)

    Lavingia's flow is v0, then Devin, then Cursor: prototype in v0, hand the work to Devin, and open Cursor when Devin fails to completely finish. Ran a US$33,000 competition for whoever merged more Devin PRs than the author in May; the host cites Devin writing 41% of Gumroad's PRs.

    "…sort of fails to completely finish then I open it up in cursor. though I did I think last week Devon launched this pairing mode where you can actually like jump in and so I haven't really experimented with that yet but that's presumably I…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 8:40Partial support
    "Yeah, so generally my flow is V0, Devin cursor, is probably how I would say it. Like generally V0 is my prototyping tool of choice. And once I have like a really good prototype that I'm happy with, then I go to Devin and if Devin sort of fails to completely finish then I open it up in cursor."
    Transcript excerpt, Sahil Lavingia (automatic captions), at 8:20

    Published Apr 22, 2025self-described: Gumroad engineering team; episode description says AI agents write 41% of code commits

    Practitioner account, self-described; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (founder and CEO)
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-22, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  24. Mixed

    Vikram Sreekanti and Joseph E. Gonzalez, RunLLM

    One month of using DevinNewsletter, The AI Frontier (Substack)

    Sreekanti and Gonzalez found Devin effective on hour-sized fixes that took 1-5 ACUs (US$2-10). A full-stack task they expected a junior engineer to finish within a day was beyond it, and 2 of the 3 bigger tasks, averaging about 20 ACUs, gave no usable results.

    "The 3 bigger tasks we tried averaged about 20 ACUs and 2 of the 3 didn’t yield usable results."
    Excerpt, Vikram Sreekanti and Joseph E. Gonzalez

    Published Jan 23, 2025self-described: RunLLM, a startup codebase (frontend and Python backend); tested over the holidays

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-23, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    US$500 for 250 ACUs

  25. Negative

    tlarkworthy, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Thoughts on a month with DevinHacker News comment

    Devin impressed when it grasped formatting and local tests, but it kept adding extraneous, breaking changes it could not undo, so tlarkworthy will recommend canceling it.

    Published Jan 17, 2025self-described: Trial of Devin including its Slack interface; author plans to recommend canceling

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-17, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  26. Mixed

    steve_avery, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: We tried hard to make Devin work for us, But it didn'tHacker News comment

    Devin impressed their team early on but has lately been a letdown; steve_avery is wading through a bloated Devin PR, though the team is not yet ready to cancel.

    Published Jan 17, 2025self-described: Team using Devin; author reviewing a Devin PR

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of Devin; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-17, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  27. Negative

    Jeremy Howard, founding CEO at Answer.AI

    We tried really really hard to make Devin (the coding agent) work for usX post

    Answer.AI's founding CEO reports that the company tried very hard to make Devin work for its team and it did not: nearly all of the many tasks it tried failed, and the company remains less than bullish on agents.

    "We tried really really hard to make Devin (the coding agent) work for us."
    Excerpt, Jeremy Howard
    "Check out Hamel's detailed writeup blog linked below, describing the many tasks of many types we explored, nearly all of which failed."
    Same speaker

    Published Jan 17, 2025Answer.AI, a small AI research and development lab that builds its own developer tools

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-17, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Not counted

    It reports the same Answer.AI trial as the team's write-up, which counts once. Kept in the record; it takes part in no figure.

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Answer.AI's month-long Devin trial on many types of tasks

  28. Negative

    Hamel Husain, Isaac Flath, and Johno Whitaker, Answer.AI

    Thoughts On A Month With DevinCompany blog post, Answer.AI blog

    Over one month the Answer.AI team gave Devin 20 real tasks: 14 failed, 3 succeeded, 3 were inconclusive, and they could not predict which tasks would work.

    "The results were sobering. Out of 20 tasks, we had 14 failures, 3 successes (including our 2 initial ones), and 3 inconclusive results."
    Excerpt, Hamel Husain

    Published Jan 8, 2025self-described: Answer.AI, a team that routinely experiments with AI developer tools; month-long test on real projects

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-08, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Very small team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  29. Mixed

    aimkiray, GitHub user

    [Windows] devin.exe acp child leaks committed memory until system commit is exhausted (65.7 GB observed)GitHub issue on CognitionAI/devin-cli

    A long-lived Devin CLI session on Windows kept growing its committed memory to 65.7 GB, and two CLI instances were enough to exhaust the commit limit of a 32 GB machine.

    "In the observed session it reached **65.7 GB** (working set only ~2 GB) after ~20 hours…"
    Excerpt, aimkiray
    "Two simultaneous Devin CLI instances are enough to hit the commit limit on a 32 GB machine."
    Same speaker

    Published Oct 21, 2026self-described: Long-lived local Devin CLI sessions on a 32 GB Windows 11 workstation

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Artifact checked (log); Observed on Devin CLI 3000.11.92 (commit `7f4e64980e22`)
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (log)
    Date and version
    2026-10-21, Devin CLI 3000.11.92 (commit `7f4e64980e22`)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin CLI 3000.11.92 on Windows 11

  30. Mixed

    Sogl, GitHub user

    TUI re-emits entire transcript (~700KB) + ED3 on every SIGWINCH, unusable over mobile SSH/tmuxGitHub issue on CognitionAI/devin-cli

    Over mobile SSH into tmux, every terminal resize makes the Devin 3000.11.3 TUI re-emit the entire transcript. Each soft-keyboard resize costs about 80 to 285 KB, an animated burst about 0.7 to 1 MB and 17 s of churn, and remote work is unusable.

    "…each one costs ~80 to 285 KB re-rendered through the SSH pipe. An animated IME resize burst costs ~0.7 to 1 MB and ~17 s of visible churn, the session looks like it "reloads from scratch" and remote work is unusable."
    Excerpt, Sogl

    Published Sep 27, 2026self-described: Runs Devin CLI remotely from an Android phone over SSH and tmux; session of about 1,500 messages

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Artifact checked (benchmark output); Observed on devin 3000.11.3
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (benchmark output)
    Date and version
    2026-09-27, devin 3000.11.3
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin CLI 3000.11.3 on macOS

  31. Positive

    Catalin Pit, Developer (tested on Documenso work)

    Devin AI & SWE-2 First ImpressionsPersonal blog post, catalins.tech

    After a week across the Devin suite, Catalin Pit liked the CLI with SWE-2 or Fusion for cost versus capability, but found the desktop app crowded and usage reporting thin.

    Published Sep 22, 2026self-described: About one week of use on Documenso tasks; Max plan received free through a giveaway

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on SWE-2
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    program member (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-22, SWE-2
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Max plan (complimentary); Devin Desktop, Devin CLI, SWE-2 model, Fusion mode

  32. Positive

    InsideOutSanta, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    Bought the US$20 subscription and has used SWE-2 for a few days. Finds it good, not Fable-class, with SWE-2 Max substantially better than K3 and on par with Opus 5 Max; calls it a great achievement.

    Published Sep 16, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on SWE-2 Max
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-16, SWE-2 Max
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    US$20 plan, Devin CLI, SWE-2 Max

  33. Mixed

    future3OOO, GitHub user

    SWE-2 verbatim repetition loops on long agentic trajectories (native Devin CLI)GitHub issue on CognitionAI/devin-cli

    On a multi-hour Devin CLI task, SWE-2 repeated a 600-word paragraph verbatim and, after context compaction, re-attempted edits it had already applied.

    "A single thinking stream repeated a ~600-word paragraph byte-for-byte, twice in one generation…"
    Excerpt, future3OOO
    "The model re-emits and re-executes work the compacted context presents as uncommitted, e.g. re-attempting identical edits that then fail with "string not found" because they already applied."
    Same speaker

    Published Sep 12, 2026self-described: Multi-hour Devin CLI task on the sqlite-utils Python repository, about 220 tool calls

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Artifact checked (transcript); Observed on swe-2-max
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (transcript)
    Date and version
    2026-09-12, swe-2-max
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin CLI with swe-2-max

  34. Positive

    fishtoaster, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    Comparing cloud agents from Cursor, Amp and Hoplite, fishtoaster came away enjoying Devin, but calls the gap between Devin cloud and Devin desktop embarrassing.

    Published Sep 11, 2026self-described: Evaluating cloud coding agents

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-11
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  35. Mixed

    randomblock1, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    Trying SWE-2 in Devin, randomblock1 found it charged their on-demand usage at 75% off, so it was not free.

    Published Sep 10, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on SWE-2
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-10, SWE-2
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    SWE-2

  36. Positive

    chris_st, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    chris_st uses Devin and is mostly happy with it, running GPT-5.6 Sol and Opus work there and using the free models, GLM 5.2 for months and now SWE-2.

    Published Sep 10, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-10
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus, GLM 5.2, SWE-2

  37. Negative

    klardotsh, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraHacker News comment

    klardotsh calls Devin CLI the worst coding agent klardotsh has used, full of bugs, including dropped answers to its question tool.

    Published Sep 10, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-10
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin CLI

  38. Positive

    ebilly, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-described

    Comment on: Where did Devin go? What does it say about the future of AI dev tools?Reddit comment

    On the US$20 plan, ebilly handed Devin their GitHub dependency alerts and found it worked well and mostly on its own.

    Published Aug 24, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of Devin; Used it directly; Observed on $20 a month subscription
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-08-24, $20 a month subscription
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    US$20 plan

  39. Positive

    Ryan Carson, Solo founder of Untangle, a B2B SaaS platform for family law firms

    How I manage 15 AI agents 24/7 as a solo founder | Ryan CarsonPodcast episode, How I AI (YouTube)

    Solo founder Ryan Carson works almost entirely in Devin's cloud agents. The account describes triaging parallel threads by priority folder and using playbooks to monitor accounts and land PRs.

    "…and in Devon what what you're seeing is uh is folders and you'll notice P 0 is the big stuff. the these are the the main things I need to move forward as the business. New features, P1, P2. So at priority…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 0:44Partial support

    Published Aug 24, 2026self-described: Solo founder running many concurrent Devin threads for features, bugs, investor updates and customer triage

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed); sponsor (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-08-24
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: excluded, praise from someone tied to the vendor, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Spent US$5,000 and then US$20,000 in one month; now receives US$20,000/month in credits from Cognition (2026)

  40. Negative

    Rochus, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Show HN: An Occam to Go transpiler (LLM-generated)Hacker News comment

    After two days of back and forth on an Oberon to C99 transpiler, Devin produced increasingly redundant code and lost track, so Rochus abandoned it and wrote the transpiler by hand.

    Published Feb 26, 2026self-described: Compiler work; existing Oberon parser and AST implemented in C++

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-26
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  41. Negative

    mneil, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Theres no mainstream AI coding tool?Hacker News comment

    Of the AI coding tools mneil has used heavily, Devin is the only one not worth the cost, being ahead of its time for enterprise and overpriced.

    Published Feb 19, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-02-19
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  42. Positive

    samyok, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Devin Review: AI to Stop SlopHacker News comment

    After using Devin Review for a while, samyok calls it the first code review bot that does not feel like slop. They also like that it orders a pull request's files by logical flow.

    Published Jan 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on Devin Review
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-21, Devin Review
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Devin Review

  43. Positive

    James Camilleri, Developer at Scott Logic with more than 15 years of experience

    Rapid web app development with Devin - A Developer's PerspectiveEngineering blog post, Scott Logic blog

    Camilleri used Devin to turn a carbon-emissions spreadsheet into a tested web app in seven days for about 155 ACUs and US$350, work estimated at eight to ten weeks for three engineers. Left alone, the code bloated and the design drifted until the author had it refactor.

    "I estimate this would have taken around eight to ten weeks with a team of three engineers."
    Excerpt, James Camilleri

    Published Oct 20, 2025Scott Logic, a carbon-emissions calculator web app built in seven days

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (I'm a Lead Developer at Scott logic)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-10-20, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    About 155 ACUs, pay-as-you-go

  44. Negative

    nextworddev, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Don't Build Multi-AgentsHacker News comment

    nextworddev rates Devin among the worst coding agents they tried, bad enough that they skipped requesting a refund for unused credits, noting this was two months earlier.

    Published Sep 1, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-09-01, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Paid credits, mid 2025

  45. Mixed

    fergie, Open source library maintainer

    Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseHacker News comment

    fergie finds DeepWiki's system diagrams impressive and time-saving, but for their own libraries, with a few million downloads a year, it generates documentation that is incorrect.

    Published Aug 26, 2025self-described: DeepWiki pages for their own libraries

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Opinion; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-26, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  46. Negative

    jcranmer, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseHacker News comment

    Reviewing DeepWiki's generated wiki for LLVM, a codebase jcranmer knows well, jcranmer found a wrong compilation pipeline diagram and missing coverage of LLVM IR, the pass manager, and TableGen.

    Published Aug 25, 2025self-described: Checked DeepWiki's pages for the LLVM project

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Opinion; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-25, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  47. Positive

    Sambhav Gaur, Developer

    Copilot, Cursor, or Devin? My Hands-On Weekend with AI That Codes and DeploysPersonal blog post, Medium

    On the Core plan, Devin built and deployed a full-stack app from an empty repo in about 90 minutes; Sambhav Gaur flags opaque ACU billing and weaker fit for legacy codebases.

    Published Aug 13, 2025self-described: Solo weekend project from an empty GitHub repo

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-13, Core plan, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Core plan, ACU billing

  48. Negative

    greenhat76, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Cognition (Devin AI) to Acquire WindsurfHacker News comment

    Having tested Devin since early access, greenhat76 is not impressed and says a decent developer using their preferred LLM does a far better job.

    Published Jul 15, 2025self-described: Early access tester

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    program member (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-15, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Early access through mid 2025

  49. Positive

    rock_hard, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Cognition (Devin AI) to Acquire WindsurfHacker News comment

    rock_hard says Devin is in a different category from Cursor; rock_hard has almost stopped writing code by hand and reports 10x output measured in landed PRs.

    Published Jul 14, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-14, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  50. Positive

    Parker Rex, Independent developer and technology video creator ("I build software and share what I'm learning")

    I Spent US$10K+ to Test Every AI Coding Agent (Augment, Claude, Cursor, Devin, OpenAI)Video, YouTube

    Given Devin access (Cognition did not sponsor the video), was really impressed with it for overnight work on issues already ready to go, calling its half-hour environment setup worthwhile. Says it has shipped "maybe 30" PRs through Devin as a starting point; one messed up from pushing it too hard.

    "…access to the tool. Shout out to them. And I was really impressed. If I'm going to bed and I have things lined up that are already issues that are already ready to go, it's a great way to get work done because their way…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 12:46Partial support

    Published Jul 6, 2025self-described: Solo build of a community platform in about 11 days, comparing several coding agents

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Access provided by Cognition; Parker Rex states that Cognition did not sponsor the video

  51. Positive

    Yandry Perez Clemente, Senior software engineer at Faros

    How Devin AI Manages Unplanned Customer RequestsCompany blog post, Faros AI blog

    From Slack, Devin researched SonarQube API support in the background, asked clarifying questions, and produced a working pull request. Yandry Perez Clemente shipped it the same day after small cleanups.

    Published Jul 3, 2025self-described: Faros; unplanned customer request routed from customer success (SonarQube API integration)

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-07-03, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  52. Positive

    int19h, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Type-constrained code generation with language modelsHacker News comment

    After months of use, int19h has never seen Devin commit uncompilable code; it builds before committing and pushes fixes when CI fails, though tasks take about 15 minutes.

    Published May 14, 2025self-described: Using Devin for TypeScript and Python

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-05-14, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  53. Positive

    PeterCorless, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: DeepWiki - Which repo would you like to understand?Hacker News comment

    PeterCorless asked Devin on DeepWiki whether Apache Pinot allows star-tree indexes with upserts and got a correct, clear answer that pointed to the code enforcing the rule.

    Published Apr 25, 2025self-described: Questions about the Apache Pinot codebase on DeepWiki

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (transcript)
    Date and version
    2025-04-25, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  54. Negative

    paradite, Developer who builds their own AI coding and eval tools

    Comment on: Vibe Coding is not an excuse for low-quality workHacker News comment

    In their testing Devin was pretty bad at some trivial frontend tasks, where Cursor did far better.

    Published Apr 20, 2025self-described: Web development and JavaScript on several large codebases

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-20, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  55. Mixed

    alpsencer, Researcher on LLM software-engineering agents and early Devin beta tester

    Comment on: Devin Roasts Manus AI. I Ran Some Tests to See If It's TrueHacker News comment

    An early Devin beta tester, alpsencer, ran Devin and Manus on four tasks and found Devin more structured and solid on technical, detailed work but weaker on general tasks. The tester calls both a little overhyped.

    Published Apr 2, 2025self-described: Weekend comparison of Devin and Manus on four tasks

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Devin partner: not counted as independent; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    program member (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-04-02, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  56. Negative

    paradite, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-described

    Comment on: What happened to Devin?Reddit comment

    After months of on-and-off use at US$500 a month, paradite saw little quality improvement and planned to cancel; their tracker counted 2,100 merged Devin pull requests on public GitHub in February 2025.

    Published Mar 16, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of Devin; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (repository)
    Date and version
    2025-03-16, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    US$500 Team plan

  57. Mixed

    frivolousfidget, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-described

    Comment on: What happened to Devin?Reddit comment

    Testing Devin recently, frivolousfidget found it works well but is expensive, and thinks a big company would do better building its own agent or using Cursor.

    Published Mar 15, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-03-15, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  58. Mixed

    Lesly Acuña, Software Engineer at Qubika

    Devin AI review | The first autonomous AI coding agent?Company engineering blog post, Qubika blog

    Testing Devin on a client's CRM feature, Acuña found it ignored some review comments and marked others addressed without making the change. She used all 150 included ACUs in under a week.

    "It was not consistent in addressing CR comments. Some of the comments it ignored but didn’t give a reason on why. Some others were treated as addressed but the changes were actually not done."
    Excerpt, Lesly Acuña
    "In my testing, I used all 150ACUs in less than a week…"
    Same speaker

    Published Mar 13, 2025Qubika, a software services firm; a deals feature for a client's NestJS and TypeORM CRM

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Customer of Devin; Ran a structured test; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Software Engineer)
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-03-13, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Team plan with 150 ACUs; web chat interface, Slack not tested

  59. Negative

    Casey Muratori, game developer reviewing the code, with ThePrimeagen running the Devin experiment

    Real Game Dev Reviews Game By Devin.aiVideo, YouTube (The PrimeTime)

    Reviewing a game Twitch chat built by steering Devin through about 126 merged pull requests, Muratori calls the code absolutely terrible and completely worthless, but finds its English parsing really amazing: code quality like a zero, English parsing like a 10.

    "…it's very good much better than I've ever seen before in anything else before this current you know AI sort of Boom so I think they've done a fantastic job on the conversation side and the code quality unfortunately is just abysmal…"
    Transcript excerpt, at 1:48:28Partial support

    Published Feb 24, 2025self-described: Browser game built by Devin from Twitch chat prompts, about 126 merged PRs over roughly eight hours

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-02-24, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  60. Positive

    Ancapistani, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: The Generative AI ConHacker News comment

    Ancapistani uses Devin for tasks up to complex Django migration squashing, likens it to a fresh junior hire, and says its knowledge base makes it far more valuable within a week.

    Published Feb 19, 2025self-described: Works mainly on a five-year-old Django app of about twenty apps; about a dozen of the company's projects share a Docker-based repository

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-02-19, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  61. Positive

    Pratik Patel, Developer

    A Real-World Coding Story: Devin AI as My Co-PilotPersonal blog post, DEV Community (originally published at pratik.pa.tel)

    A 15-minute endpoint took about an hour via Devin after 2 to 3 PR review rounds. It needed only minutes of Pratik Patel's attention, which left time for other work in parallel.

    Published Feb 14, 2025self-described: Backend microservice in their team's repo; one API endpoint task

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-02-14, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  62. Mixed

    rfoo, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Thoughts on a month with DevinHacker News comment

    rfoo treats Devin like a junior engineer, terminating sessions once it goes down a hopeless path and checking in every 10 to 15 minutes, and still gets real work done.

    Published Jan 17, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to Devin found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to Devin found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-17, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  63. Positive

    Zhu Liang, Developer of 16x Prompt (uses Devin on their own product repos)

    Devin - First ImpressionsNewsletter, The Ground Truth (Substack)

    Calls Devin hands-down the best user experience of any AI coding tool and its US$500-a-month pricing fair. Four completed tasks averaged about US$23 each; Devin was really slow on some tasks, missed files it should have updated, and its performance degrades in long sessions.

    Published Jan 16, 2025self-described: Solo, own repos including the 16x Prompt website

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Customer of Devin; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-01-16, v1.1.0, as of 15 January 2025, needs a recheck
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering blogs & reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    US$500/month for 250 ACUs, US$2 per extra ACU; Devin v1.1.0

Product documentation 21

Pages from Cognition, used to check facts for every group.

  1. Introducing Devin

    Describes Devin as an autonomous AI software engineer that writes, runs, and tests code, with tasks an engineer could do in about three hours as the rule of thumb.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  2. When to use Devin

    Recommends clear success criteria, scoping with Ask Devin, parallel sessions, and splitting tasks longer than about three hours.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  4. Best practices

    Recommends slicing migrations, refactors, and technical debt into isolated, verifiable tasks under about 90 minutes of manual work, each reviewed before merge.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  5. Environment setup

    Describes the blueprint and snapshot every session boots from, and ranks environment configuration first among the steps that improve results.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  6. Skills

    Documents SKILL.md files committed to repositories that teach Devin repeatable procedures such as testing before a pull request.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  7. Knowledge

    Documents Knowledge, now deprecated and migrating automatically to Skills in plugins.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  8. AGENTS.md files

    Explains that Devin reads AGENTS.md and injects up to 16 KiB from the start of each file automatically.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  9. Advanced capabilities

    Describes a coordinator session that launches managed Devins in parallel, each in its own isolated machine.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  10. Session Insights

    Documents per-session usage, session sizes from XS to XL, and the flag on L and XL sessions as unhealthy.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  11. Self-serve plans

    Lists Free, Pro at US$20 a month, Max at US$200 a month, and Teams at US$40 per full seat with a US$80 monthly minimum, plus on-demand credits.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  12. Usage

    Explains that usage accrues with the actions Devin takes and machine time, and stops while a session sleeps after 30 idle minutes.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  13. Enterprise billing

    Documents ACU billing at the order-form rate, consumption pages, and organization ACU limits.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  14. Usage policies

    Documents per-user monthly ACU limits through usage tiers, in beta and enabled by the account team.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  15. Security at Cognition

    States the training default and opt-out for self-serve plans, SOC 2 Type II since September 2024, and the advice to review code and protect branches.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  16. Security profiles

    Documents reusable restrictions on a session's network, MCP servers, git access, and GitHub CLI token, with mandatory enforcement.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  17. GitHub integration

    Documents repository selection, pull requests opened under a linked user, /devin comments, and the branch protection recommendation.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  18. Slack

    Documents tagging @Devin in a Slack channel, thread sync, Slack code channels, and per-user profile linking.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  19. Linear

    Documents assigning tickets to Devin, playbook labels, and automation triggers on team, label, and status.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  20. Devin Review

    Documents pull request review with bug detection, auto-review trigger modes, and per-repository review spend.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

  21. Enterprise deployment

    Describes Enterprise Cloud with an isolated machine per session and a Customer Dedicated Deployment in a single-tenant VPC.

    Checked Oct 12, 2026

Source index

Provenance at a glance

Every source GILD read, with the original address and the context used to count it. Open a finding to filter the full cards above. On smaller screens the index lists each source once by name, cohort and date; its full record above carries the address, context and findings.

Provenance for every analyzed Signals source
SourceOriginal URLAuthor and contextWhoPublishedReview dateAppliesFindings
[Windows] devin.exe acp child leaks committed memory until system commit is exhausted (65.7 GB observed)ID sx-06 | Developer communitiesgithub.com/CognitionAI/devin-cli/issues/31aimkiray, GitHub userself-described: Long-lived local Devin CLI sessions on a 32 GB Windows 11 workstationIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Living Evals: an eval suite that grows from productionID ld-01 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.rox.com/articles/living-evals-an-eval-suite-that-grows-from-productionBrian Xu, engineer on the Agents team at RoxRox engineering team, revenue agent product; post published in partnership with Cognition and BraintrustProfessional teamPublished Oct 14, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
TUI re-emits entire transcript (~700KB) + ED3 on every SIGWINCH, unusable over mobile SSH/tmuxID sx-05 | Developer communitiesgithub.com/CognitionAI/devin-cli/issues/13Sogl, GitHub userself-described: Runs Devin CLI remotely from an Android phone over SSH and tmux; session of about 1,500 messagesIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 27, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Devin AI & SWE-2 First ImpressionsID ir-12 | Engineering blogs & reviewscatalins.tech/devin-ai-swe-2-review/Catalin Pit, Developer (tested on Documenso work)self-described: About one week of use on Documenso tasks; Max plan received free through a giveawayIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
A Competitive Differentiator: David Griffiths on Building the World's Most AI-empowered Financial InstitutionID ld-03 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.citigroup.com/global/news/perspectives/2026/competitive-differentiator-david-griffiths-building-worlds-most-ai-empowered-financial-institutionDavid Griffiths, Group Head of AI at CitiGlobal bank; firmwide AI platform team serving employees in more than 87 countries and jurisdictionsTechnical leadershipPublished Sep 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-32 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49723949InsideOutSanta, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
SWE-2 verbatim repetition loops on long agentic trajectories (native Devin CLI)ID sx-04 | Developer communitiesgithub.com/CognitionAI/devin-cli/issues/7future3OOO, GitHub userself-described: Multi-hour Devin CLI task on the sqlite-utils Python repository, about 220 tool callsIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-31 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653534fishtoaster, Hacker News commenterself-described: Evaluating cloud coding agentsIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 11, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-26 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49647379randomblock1, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-27 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49648420chris_st, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-28 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49649457hightrix, Hacker News commenterself-described: Company with a number of Devin seats on an enterprise plan, used for about 9 monthsProfessional teamPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-29 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49650669klardotsh, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Cognition launches new SWE-2 model, Rivaling Fable 5.1 and GPT-AstraID dc-30 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=49651549deet, Hacker News commenterself-described: Team using Devin heavily as a team-managed agentVery small teamPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Where did Devin go? What does it say about the future of AI dev tools?ID dc-25 | Developer communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1qp82lr/where_did_devin_go_what_does_it_say_about_the/p5lpiyz/ebilly, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
How I manage 15 AI agents 24/7 as a solo founder | Ryan CarsonID tc-05 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=zPfxlcVpFgsRyan Carson, Solo founder of Untangle, a B2B SaaS platform for family law firmsself-described: Solo founder running many concurrent Devin threads for features, bugs, investor updates and customer triageIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Code review bottlenecks: How we hill climbed our way to higher PR throughputID ld-05 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.assembled.com/blog/code-review-bottlenecks-how-we-hill-climbed-our-way-to-higher-pr-throughputJohn Wang, Co-Founder and CTO at AssembledAssembled, a customer support software company; engineers and non-engineers ship through coding agents and an in-house auto-reviewerTechnical leadershipPublished Aug 7, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Devin AI Has Come a Long WayID ir-11 | Engineering blogs & reviewszackproser.com/blog/devin-has-come-a-long-wayZachary Proser, Applied AI at WorkOSself-described: WorkOS engineering team using Devin in Slack; also personal blog reposProfessional teamPublished May 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Launch HN: Twill.ai (YC S25) - Delegate to cloud agents, get back PRsID dc-24 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726513cocoflunchy, Hacker News commenterself-described: Company evaluating cloud agents to let anyone in the company fix things in the productVery small teamPublished Apr 11, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Enabling AI usage at Mercari with Secure Devin ManagementID ir-10 | Engineering blogs & reviewsengineering.mercari.com/en/blog/entry/20260403-secure-devin-management/Hiroki Akamatsu (@hi120ki), AI Security engineer at Mercariself-described: Mercari, Devin Enterprise with separate Organizations per team across multiple business domainsOrganization-widePublished Apr 3, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Show HN: An Occam to Go transpiler (LLM-generated)ID dc-23 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47160528Rochus, Hacker News commenterself-described: Compiler work; existing Oberon parser and AST implemented in C++Individual practitionerPublished Feb 26, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Theres no mainstream AI coding tool?ID dc-22 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47069443mneil, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 19, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Using Devin AI Daily for 6 Months: What Actually ChangedID ir-09 | Engineering blogs & reviewsmedium.com/@prashantnaiker9/using-devin-ai-daily-for-6-months-what-actually-changed-06535d9c67abPrashant Naikar, Developer at a startup acquired by a UK companyself-described: Company-wide AI push after acquisition; manager gave Devin access to two developersVery small teamPublished Feb 6, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Someone uses Devin AIID dc-21 | Developer communitieswww.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1qtrgjm/someone_uses_devin_ai/o35uhdj/Fit_Sprinkles_8649, Reddit user in r/programmingself-described: Company team, two-month trialProfessional teamPublished Feb 2, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Where did Devin go? What does it say about the future of AI dev tools?ID dc-20 | Developer communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1qp82lr/where_did_devin_go_what_does_it_say_about_the/o2jnvch/Global-Molasses2695, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCodingself-described: Buyer evaluation for a regulated environmentTechnical leadershipPublished Jan 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Devin Review: AI to Stop SlopID dc-18 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46712069joshgachnang, Hacker News commenterself-described: Team codebase with its own review rules; using Devin for features and reviewVery small teamPublished Jan 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Devin Review: AI to Stop SlopID dc-19 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46713031samyok, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Why we built our own background agentID dc-17 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46612715cloudking, Hacker News commenterself-described: Team using Devin as its background agentVery small teamPublished Jan 14, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Rapid web app development with Devin - A Developer's PerspectiveID ir-08 | Engineering blogs & reviewsblog.scottlogic.com/2025/10/20/rapid-development-with-devin.htmlJames Camilleri, Developer at Scott Logic with more than 15 years of experienceScott Logic, a carbon-emissions calculator web app built in seven daysIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 20, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How to PM Production Changes with Devin: Tutorial From Gumroad CEO, Sahil LavingiaID sx-03 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.news.aakashg.com/p/sahil-lavingia-podcastSahil Lavingia, CEO of Gumroad, interviewed by Aakash GuptaGumroad, a US$10M ARR company with one employee; Devin connected to Slack and the codebaseTechnical leadershipPublished Oct 19, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How Eight Sleep Uses Devin as a Data AnalystID ir-07 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.eightsleep.com/blog/how-eight-sleep-uses-devin-as-a-data-analyst/Eight Sleep data team (Editorial byline)self-described: Eight Sleep small data team; dbt, Snowflake, Looker, Amplitude; Devin used as a data analyst, not for app codeProfessional teamPublished Sep 4, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Don't Build Multi-AgentsID dc-16 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45097456nextworddev, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 1, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseID dc-14 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45021450nikisweeting, Engineer at browser-useself-described: browser-use, refactor of a large codebase from Playwright to CDPProfessional teamPublished Aug 26, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseID dc-15 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45024024fergie, Open source library maintainerself-described: DeepWiki pages for their own librariesIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 26, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepWiki: Understand Any CodebaseID dc-13 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=45020628jcranmer, Hacker News commenterself-described: Checked DeepWiki's pages for the LLVM projectIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 25, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Copilot, Cursor, or Devin? My Hands-On Weekend with AI That Codes and DeploysID ir-06 | Engineering blogs & reviewsmedium.com/@sambhavgaur_70582/copilot-cursor-or-devin-my-hands-on-weekend-with-ai-that-codes-and-deploys-acc708e802b3Sambhav Gaur, Developerself-described: Solo weekend project from an empty GitHub repoIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 13, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
American Banker: Goldman Sachs staff now write a million gen AI prompts a monthID sf-2 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.americanbanker.com/news/goldman-sachs-staff-now-write-a-million-gen-ai-prompts-a-monthMarco Argenti, Chief Information Officer, Goldman Sachsself-described: Goldman Sachs developer teamsOrganization-widePublished Jul 25, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Successfully coding with AI in large enterprises: Centralized rules, workflows for tech debt, & moreID tc-04 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzkfjEH-GUZach Davis, Director of engineering at LaunchDarklyself-described: LaunchDarkly, 100-plus-person engineering team working in a large, roughly 10-year-old monorepoTechnical leadershipPublished Jul 21, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Cognition (Devin AI) to Acquire WindsurfID dc-12 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44567221greenhat76, Hacker News commenterself-described: Early access testerIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 15, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Cognition (Devin AI) to Acquire WindsurfID dc-11 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=44565962rock_hard, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 14, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
American Banker: Citi is rolling out agentic AI to its 40,000 developersID sf-1 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.americanbanker.com/news/citi-is-rolling-out-agentic-ai-to-its-40-000-developersDavid Griffiths, Chief Technology Officer, Citiself-described: Citi, 40,000 developersOrganization-widePublished Jul 14, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
I Spent US$10K+ to Test Every AI Coding Agent (Augment, Claude, Cursor, Devin, OpenAI)ID tc-03 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=tgxogZHvEngParker Rex, Independent developer and technology video creator ("I build software and share what I'm learning")self-described: Solo build of a community platform in about 11 days, comparing several coding agentsIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 6, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How Devin AI Manages Unplanned Customer RequestsID ir-05 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.faros.ai/blog/how-to-use-devin-ai-for-rapid-feature-requestsYandry Perez Clemente, Senior software engineer at Farosself-described: Faros; unplanned customer request routed from customer success (SonarQube API integration)Individual practitionerPublished Jul 3, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
AI Workflows for Docs: Putting Devin to WorkID ld-02 | Engineering blogs & reviewsneon.com/blog/ai-workflows-for-docs-devinDaniel Price, docs team at NeonNeon docs team; docs repo, changelogs and small Neon Console UI fixesProfessional teamPublished Jun 23, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Transcript: 'How Two Engineers Ship Like a Team of 15 With AI Agents'ID sx-02 | Podcasts, Talks & Videosevery.to/podcast/transcript-how-two-engineers-ship-like-a-team-of-15-with-ai-agentsKieran Klaassen, GM of Cora at EveryTwo-engineer team building Every's Cora email assistant with several coding agentsVery small teamPublished Jun 11, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
The Agent-Native CompanyID ld-06 | Podcasts, Talks & Videosai.engineer/talks/0ZPAvzhpGjw-agent-native-companyRick Blalock, co-founder at AgentuityAgentuity, an early-stage agent cloud startup of six or seven peopleTechnical leadershipPublished Jun 3, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Type-constrained code generation with language modelsID dc-10 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43981022int19h, Hacker News commenterself-described: Using Devin for TypeScript and PythonIndividual practitionerPublished May 14, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepWiki - Which repo would you like to understand?ID dc-09 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43798750PeterCorless, Hacker News commenterself-described: Questions about the Apache Pinot codebase on DeepWikiIndividual practitionerPublished Apr 25, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Gumroad CEO's playbook to 40x his team's productivity with v0, Cursor, and Devin | Sahil LavingiaID tc-02 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=KVZ3vMx_aJ4Sahil Lavingia, CEO and founder of Gumroadself-described: Gumroad engineering team; episode description says AI agents write 41% of code commitsTechnical leadershipPublished Apr 22, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Vibe Coding is not an excuse for low-quality workID dc-08 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43741638paradite, Developer who builds their own AI coding and eval toolsself-described: Web development and JavaScript on several large codebasesIndividual practitionerPublished Apr 20, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Devin Roasts Manus AI. I Ran Some Tests to See If It's TrueID dc-07 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43562104alpsencer, Researcher on LLM software-engineering agents and early Devin beta testerself-described: Weekend comparison of Devin and Manus on four tasksIndividual practitionerPublished Apr 2, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: What happened to Devin?ID dc-06 | Developer communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1jbsefc/what_happened_to_devin/mi1isnm/paradite, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 16, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: What happened to Devin?ID dc-05 | Developer communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1jbsefc/what_happened_to_devin/mhwrq5k/frivolousfidget, Reddit user in r/ChatGPTCoding, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 15, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Devin AI review | The first autonomous AI coding agent?ID sx-01 | Engineering blogs & reviewsqubika.com/blog/devin-ai-coding-agent/Lesly Acuña, Software Engineer at QubikaQubika, a software services firm; a deals feature for a client's NestJS and TypeORM CRMIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 13, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Real Game Dev Reviews Game By Devin.aiID tc-01 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoswww.youtube.com/watch?v=NW6PhVdq9R8Casey Muratori, game developer reviewing the code, with ThePrimeagen running the Devin experimentself-described: Browser game built by Devin from Twitch chat prompts, about 126 merged PRs over roughly eight hoursIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 24, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: The Generative AI ConID dc-04 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=43099344Ancapistani, Hacker News commenterself-described: Works mainly on a five-year-old Django app of about twenty apps; about a dozen of the company's projects share a Docker-based repositoryIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 19, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
A Real-World Coding Story: Devin AI as My Co-PilotID ir-04 | Engineering blogs & reviewsdev.to/prpatel05/a-real-world-coding-story-devin-ai-as-my-co-pilot-548Pratik Patel, Developerself-described: Backend microservice in their team's repo; one API endpoint taskIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 14, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
One month of using DevinID ir-03 | Engineering blogs & reviewsfrontierai.substack.com/p/one-month-of-using-devinVikram Sreekanti and Joseph E. Gonzalez, RunLLMself-described: RunLLM, a startup codebase (frontend and Python backend); tested over the holidaysVery small teamPublished Jan 23, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Thoughts on a month with DevinID dc-01 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=42734916tlarkworthy, Hacker News commenterself-described: Trial of Devin including its Slack interface; author plans to recommend cancelingVery small teamPublished Jan 17, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Thoughts on a month with DevinID dc-02 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=42737039rfoo, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 17, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: We tried hard to make Devin work for us, But it didn'tID dc-03 | Developer communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=42744319steve_avery, Hacker News commenterself-described: Team using Devin; author reviewing a Devin PRVery small teamPublished Jan 17, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
We tried really really hard to make Devin (the coding agent) work for usID ld-04 | Developer communitiesx.com/jeremyphoward/status/1880157373119201612Jeremy Howard, founding CEO at Answer.AIAnswer.AI, a small AI research and development lab that builds its own developer toolsTechnical leadershipPublished Jan 17, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheckNot counted. It reports the same Answer.AI trial as the team's write-up, which counts once.
Devin - First ImpressionsID ir-02 | Engineering blogs & reviewsthegroundtruth.media/p/devin-first-impressionsZhu Liang, Developer of 16x Prompt (uses Devin on their own product repos)self-described: Solo, own repos including the 16x Prompt websiteIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 16, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Thoughts On A Month With DevinID ir-01 | Engineering blogs & reviewswww.answer.ai/posts/2025-01-08-devin.htmlHamel Husain, Isaac Flath, and Johno Whitaker, Answer.AIself-described: Answer.AI, a team that routinely experiments with AI developer tools; month-long test on real projectsVery small teamPublished Jan 8, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Introducing DevinID pd-01 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/get-started/devin-introCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
When to use DevinID pd-02 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/essential-guidelines/when-to-use-devinCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Instructing Devin effectivelyID pd-03 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/essential-guidelines/instructing-devin-effectivelyCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Best practicesID pd-04 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/use-cases/best-practicesCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Environment setupID pd-05 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/onboard-devin/environmentCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
SkillsID pd-06 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/product-guides/skillsCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
KnowledgeID pd-07 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/product-guides/knowledgeCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
AGENTS.md filesID pd-08 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/onboard-devin/agents-mdCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Advanced capabilitiesID pd-09 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/advanced-capabilitiesCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Session InsightsID pd-10 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/product-guides/session-insightsCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Self-serve plansID pd-11 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/admin/billing/self-serveCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
UsageID pd-12 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/admin/billing/usageCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Enterprise billingID pd-13 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/admin/billing/enterpriseCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Usage policiesID pd-14 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/enterprise/features/usage-policiesCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Security at CognitionID pd-15 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/admin/securityCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Security profilesID pd-16 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/product-guides/security-profilesCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
GitHub integrationID pd-17 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/integrations/ghCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
SlackID pd-18 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/integrations/slackCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
LinearID pd-19 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/integrations/linearCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Devin ReviewID pd-20 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/devin-reviewCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only
Enterprise deploymentID pd-21 | Product documentationdocs.devin.ai/enterprise/deployment/overviewCognitionOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 12, 2026CurrentVerification only