Every source behind the read

57 sources in All practitioners, with product documentation Showing all 57 sources

1. No opinion stated

   Diego Ruiz Barbero, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

   Review of the Tabnine plugin (no star rating)Marketplace review

   In a review on the Tabnine for Enterprise plugin page, reports the plugin crashing on the current IntelliJ IDEA Professional build IU-262.9437.185 with a NoClassDefFoundError for a JCEF class when it creates the chat browser.

   Published Aug 13, 2026self-described: IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate, build 262.9437

   Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Self-described; Used it directly; Artifact checked (log)

   Role

   Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

   Relationship

   Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   1 artifact (log)

   Date and version

   2026-08-13

   Counts toward

   Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

   Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Tabnine for Enterprise plugin

2. Mixed

   Ollymid, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

   Can no longer add or update Tabnine custom commandsGitHub issue

   Their team shared custom Tabnine commands through a .tabnine_commands file in the repository. After a recent change, adding and sharing commands fails.

   Published Jun 11, 2026self-described: Team on Tabnine Enterprise, self-hosted updater extension for VS Code

   Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Version 3.360.7

   Role

   Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

   Relationship

   customer (self disclosed)

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-06-11, Version 3.360.7

   Counts toward

   Reliability, regressions: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

   Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Very small team

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Tabnine for Enterprise extension 3.360.7

3. Negative

   Derak Kilgo, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

   Review of the Tabnine plugin (no star rating)Marketplace review

   Says the plugin is effectively dead after June 28, 2026, because Tabnine is closing all Pro and Dev subscriptions.

   Published May 26, 2026self-described: JetBrains IDE

   Practitioner account, self-described; opinion; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Self-described; Opinion; Specific details

   Role

   Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

   Relationship

   Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

   How they know

   Opinion, no use stated

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-05-26

   Not counted

   Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

   Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Legacy plugin, Pro and Dev subscriptions

4. Mixed

   the-isz, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

   [BUG] Agent stuck loadingGitHub issue

   On Tabnine Enterprise in Neovim, completions work but the Tabnine Agent window never finishes loading and shows no error.

   Published Apr 22, 2026self-described: Neovim on Ubuntu, Tabnine Enterprise

   Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 4.334.0

   Role

   Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

   Relationship

   customer (self disclosed)

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-04-22, 4.334.0

   Counts toward

   Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

   Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Completion Quality: Positive
   • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
   • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Tabnine binaries 4.334.0

5. Mixed

   bredren, Hacker News commenter

   Comment on: Coding after coders: The end of computer programming as we know it?Hacker News comment

   An early TabNine user in PyCharm calls it the first AI code completion that truly worked in PyCharm, before GitHub Copilot arrived and they moved on to CLI agents.

   Published Mar 14, 2026self-described: PyCharm and Django developer

   Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly

   Role

   Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

   Relationship

   No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-03-14

   Not counted

   no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

   Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward, pending a recheck

   • Completion Quality: Positive
   • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Needs a recheck

6. Negative

   Patrick Beye, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

   Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

   Used to like its top models and chat. After the plugin froze, a clean reinstall said Tabnine no longer onboards new users, locking out a paying customer.

   Published Feb 9, 2026self-described: JetBrains IDE

   Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details

   Role

   Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

   Relationship

   Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-02-09

   Counts toward

   Adoption and upkeep, continuity: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

   Not counted

   Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

   Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Overall signal
   • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
   • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern
   • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

7. Mixed

   BRIAN LAI, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

   Review of the Tabnine plugin (3 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

   Finds Tabnine uses far more memory than Cursor, and notes the service no longer takes new users.

   Published Feb 3, 2026self-described: JetBrains IDE

   Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Self-described; Used it directly

   Role

   Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

   Relationship

   Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-02-03

   Not counted

   Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

   Not counted

   Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

   Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Overall signal
   • Price & Plan Changes: Discussed without concern
   • Resource Use: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

8. Negative

   lordrebel, Individual developer

   How can I get my refund back?GitHub issue

   An individual developer on a one-year Tabnine Dev subscription was told the plan would be stopped, had the subscription canceled, and received no refund.

   Published Jan 26, 2026self-described: Individual developer and AI compiler student

   Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Observed on tabnine dev

   Role

   Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

   Relationship

   customer (self disclosed)

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-01-26, tabnine dev

   Counts toward

   Adoption and upkeep, continuity: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

   Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Overall signal
   • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Tabnine Dev, annual

9. Negative

   Mind Print, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

   Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

   Rebuilding their setup on a new Mac, found the legacy Tabnine plan no longer available days after being charged for it.

   Published Jan 9, 2026self-described: IntelliJ on an M4 Pro Mac

   Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it

   Origin

   Published practitioner account

   Checked

   Self-described; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on Legacy Tabnine

   Role

   Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

   Relationship

   customer (self disclosed)

   How they know

   Used it directly

   Support

   No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

   Date and version

   2026-01-09, Legacy Tabnine

   Counts toward

   Adoption and upkeep, continuity: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

   Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

   Counts toward

   • Overall signal
   • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern

   Published on

   Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

   Who

   Individual practitioner

   Evidence

   Reported

   Applies to

   Current

   Observed on

   Legacy Tabnine plan

10. Mixed

    y.chaikivskyi, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (no star rating)Marketplace review

    Regrets the discontinuation: in their view Tabnine was the best AI option for PhpStorm, with no good alternative yet.

    Published Jan 5, 2026self-described: PhpStorm

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2026-01-05

    Not counted

    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • IDE Coverage: Positive
    • Price & Plan Changes: Discussed without concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Current

11. Mixed

    123abceng app, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (5 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    A Pro user defends the tool but asks how to keep using it once Pro users are opted out of their subscriptions, and whether to plan a migration.

    Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Observed on legacy Tabnine

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-12-18, legacy Tabnine

    Not counted

    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

    Observed on

    Tabnine Pro, legacy plugin

12. Mixed

    mitfik, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    [FEATURE] Allow to cherry-pick suggestion from the modelGitHub issue

    Reports that Tabnine's model sometimes modifies lines unrelated to the request, and that accepting a suggestion means taking the whole diff or nothing; asks to pick lines as in any diff tool.

    Published Oct 26, 2025self-described: Neovim

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-10-26, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Counts toward

    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Needs Close Steering: Raised as a concern
    • Noisy or Wrong Suggestions: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

13. Negative

    mulehang, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Autocomplete freezes the IDE for close to a second, unlike even free plugins.

    Published Oct 22, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-10-22, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Resource Use: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

14. Negative

    Michail Fragkiskos, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Paid for a year but stopped using it: inaccurate answers and a token limit reached by the second question.

    Published Oct 20, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-10-20, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Counts toward

    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

15. Negative

    programmetajs.martins, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (no star rating)Marketplace review

    Tabnine cannot handle big projects: switching projects by accident leaves the IDE unresponsive for 30 minutes.

    Published Oct 9, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-10-09, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Codebase Context: Mixed or negative
    • Resource Use: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

16. Mixed

    czietsman, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Terminal output not recognisedGitHub issue

    On Tabnine for Enterprise 1.261.0, chat in WebStorm reads only Tabnine's own terminal, while in VS Code it reads the standard terminal.

    Published Sep 15, 2025self-described: WebStorm and VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-09-15, Tabnine for Enterprise vs 1.261.0, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • IDE Coverage: Mixed or negative

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Current

    Observed on

    Tabnine for Enterprise 1.261.0

17. Mixed

    Primorsky, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository, self-described

    Tabnine has been out of service for several daysGitHub issue

    A paid annual user says Claude and GPT stopped working for days behind a rate-limit message while support stayed silent.

    Published Sep 14, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-09-14, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, service availability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

18. Mixed

    Vitasfor4af, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository, self-described

    Tabnine limitsGitHub issue

    On the Tabnine Dev plan, started hitting a usage limit after one to two hours with Claude 4 and could not find the documented limit.

    Published Sep 8, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    1 artifact (screenshot)

    Date and version

    2025-09-08, Tabnine Dev, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Price & Plan Changes: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

    Observed on

    Tabnine Dev plan, Claude 4

19. Negative

    business, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    After more than six months, says each version got less accurate, even generating non-compiling code, so they canceled the subscription.

    Published Aug 28, 2025self-described: JetBrains Rider

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-08-28, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Not counted

    Reliability, regressions: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Not counted

    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Completion Quality: Mixed or negative
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

20. Mixed

    Reathin, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Failed to insert diffGitHub issue

    Applying Tabnine chat edits often fails with "Failed to insert diff" across IntelliJ IDEA, Android Studio and VS Code on Windows and Mac.

    Published Aug 12, 2025self-described: IntelliJ IDEA, Android Studio and VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-08-12, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

21. Negative

    Ruslan Sukhikh, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Results were good on a small pet project in trial, but on their large Java project completions are poor. Having bought it, they expect to look elsewhere.

    Published Jul 25, 2025self-described: Team purchase, large Java project

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-07-25, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Completion Quality: Mixed or negative
    • Codebase Context: Mixed or negative
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Very small team

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

22. Mixed

    voilentKiller0, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Uses Too much RAM.GitHub issue

    When Tabnine starts, RAM use climbs to 40 of 42 GB and the machine freezes.

    Published Jul 10, 2025self-described: VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-07-10, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Resource Use: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

23. Negative

    Timon K, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Unusable under WSL: Tabnine creates files in a nested subfolder, and it is sluggish on a fast machine.

    Published Jun 15, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE on Windows with WSL

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-06-15, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Resource Use: Raised as a concern
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

24. Mixed

    julien-langlois, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Unable to log in with Tabnine Enterprise extensionGitHub issue

    On a fresh Ubuntu machine, the Tabnine Enterprise extension pointed at the company's server fails to sign in with a URI error.

    Published Jun 2, 2025self-described: Company Tabnine Enterprise account, VS Code on Ubuntu 22.04

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Artifact checked (log); Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    1 artifact (log)

    Date and version

    2025-06-02, TabNine Enterprise, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Very small team

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

    Observed on

    Tabnine Enterprise extension

25. Negative

    Tulio Ruiz, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (2 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Tabnine worked well until it began disconnecting. A full reinstall fixes it for a couple of hours before it breaks again.

    Published May 20, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-05-20, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, service availability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

26. Positive

    Aleksandr Yakovenko, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (5 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Says Tabnine works very well, better than every other coding LLM they have used.

    Published Apr 18, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-04-18, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

27. Negative

    xander1421, r/programming member, self-described

    Tabnine keeps charging me even though I'm on the free planReddit post, r/programming

    Says Tabnine charged monthly for three months for a paid plan while the dashboard showed the free Basic plan, and billing and support never answered the emails.

    Published Apr 16, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, earlier release How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Specific details; Out of date (Tabnine Basic (the free plan))

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-04-16, Tabnine Basic (the free plan), out of date

    Not counted

    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: excluded, describes an earlier release or was retracted

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward nothing current

    Replaced by newer evidence. Kept in the source history with its scope stated; it takes part in no current figure.

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Out of date

    Observed on

    Tabnine Basic (free) plan

28. Mixed

    Eric Guo, developer and author of blog.cloud-mes.com

    Make Tabnine Continue Work After Official Stop Support the Sublime TextPersonal blog post, blog.cloud-mes.com

    Eric Guo's Tabnine stopped working in Sublime Text after Tabnine ended Sublime support. He spent two hours finding the cause, then pinned the local binary to version 4.4.25 and blocked Tabnine's update server to keep it running.

    "Today I found my TabNine stop working and after 2 hours, I found it officially stop support Sublime Text But if you having the API key here is how to make it continue work in local mode."

    Published Apr 9, 2025self-described: Solo developer on macOS, Sublime Text 4 build 4196, Tabnine API key in local mode

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-04-09, 4.4.25; 4.256.0, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Not counted

    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • IDE Coverage: Mixed or negative
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Engineering Blogs & Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

    Observed on

    Tabnine local binary 4.4.25 in Sublime Text 4

29. Positive

    Csaba Salat, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (5 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Finds Tabnine more informative than Copilot, values choosing the model, and says the documentation feature saves hours.

    Published Apr 2, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-04-02, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Not counted

    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant
    • Does Tabnine save time once its suggestions are checked?: Saves time

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

30. Mixed

    rmplbv, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Respect indention style of current file and/or .editorconfig for chat and inline suggestions.GitHub issue

    Chat responses ignore the file's indentation style and .editorconfig, which makes the diffs very hard to read.

    Published Apr 2, 2025self-described: VS Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    1 artifact (recording)

    Date and version

    2025-04-02, Tabnine: 3.250.0, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Noisy or Wrong Suggestions: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

    Observed on

    Tabnine 3.250.0

31. Negative

    20304158, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Finds GitHub Copilot more intuitive and Cursor better than Tabnine, and paid support for IntelliJ IDEA errors disappointing.

    Published Mar 31, 2025self-described: IntelliJ IDEA and VS Code

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-31, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • IDE Coverage: Mixed or negative
    • Behind Copilot & Cursor: Raised as a concern
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

32. Mixed

    Christian González, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (4 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Helps a lot with boilerplate, but its Tab key collides with PyCharm's own completion and leaves a mess to clean up.

    Published Mar 30, 2025self-described: PyCharm

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-30, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Counts toward

    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Noisy or Wrong Suggestions: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

33. Mixed

    Anh Chu Nam, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (3 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Everything worked until an upgrade broke sign-in. Completion is a bit slow, and the apply feature sometimes writes into a new, unrelated file.

    Published Mar 29, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-29, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Not counted

    Reliability, regressions: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Completion Quality: Mixed or negative
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

34. Positive

    Utkarsh Gupta, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (5 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Tested and compared other assistants and chose Tabnine as the best.

    Published Mar 24, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-24, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

35. Negative

    David St, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (1 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Nonsensical import suggestions unrelated to the project kept interrupting work. After removing Tabnine from all JetBrains IDEs they became more productive.

    Published Mar 23, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-23, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Codebase Context: Mixed or negative
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside
    • Does Tabnine save time once its suggestions are checked?: Costs time

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

36. Negative

    Alex Burdușel, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (2 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    On a Gradle and Bazel project, the @ClassName context crashes the plugin and breaks indexing, and the chat webview is often unresponsive.

    Published Mar 22, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-22, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Codebase Context: Mixed or negative
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

37. Positive

    Interesting videos In Youtube, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (no star rating)Marketplace review

    Calls Tabnine fantastic and a daily help that has improved over seven months, but wants it to read project files that are not open.

    Published Mar 16, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-16, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
    • Codebase Context: Mixed or negative
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

38. Mixed

    mattpease-ciq, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    CORs Error On Log In PageGitHub issue

    Every few days Tabnine in PyCharm and GoLand asks for a new sign-in and the login page fails for hours. The reviewer would pay for Tabnine if not for this.

    Published Mar 12, 2025self-described: PyCharm and GoLand

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-12, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Reliability, service availability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Price & Plan Changes: Discussed without concern
    • Reliability & Bugs: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

39. Positive

    stefano.dobrilla, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (5 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    After four months in PyCharm, praises efficiency gains, responsive support and fast model updates, with Claude 3.7 available almost on announcement.

    Published Mar 9, 2025self-described: PyCharm, Python

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months; Specific details

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-03-09, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Counts toward

    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Not counted

    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
    • Price & Plan Changes: Discussed without concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant
    • Does Tabnine save time once its suggestions are checked?: Saves time

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

40. Negative

    Matthias Fischer DS, JetBrains Marketplace reviewer

    Review of the Tabnine plugin (2 of 5 stars)Marketplace review

    Finds Tabnine adds little: completion should be on demand because it often suggests things that do not exist or work, which slows the work down.

    Published Feb 12, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Self-described; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown

    Relationship

    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-02-12, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Completion Quality: Mixed or negative
    • Noisy or Wrong Suggestions: Raised as a concern
    • Does Tabnine save time once its suggestions are checked?: Costs time

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

41. Mixed

    mgrundkoetter, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Disable inline completionGitHub issue

    Runs both in PhpStorm: prefers Tabnine chat but Copilot's inline completions, and cannot switch off Tabnine's inline suggestions.

    Published Feb 10, 2025self-described: PhpStorm

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-02-10, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Positive
    • Behind Copilot & Cursor: Raised as a concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

42. Mixed

    linuswillner, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Having this extension installed runs a Docker container without my knowledgeGitHub issue

    Found the Tabnine extension starting a Docker container with a qdrant-based vdb image on every VS Code reload, which stopped when the extension was disabled, and asked whether this was normal behaviour or a compromise.

    Published Feb 5, 2025self-described: VS Code on macOS with Docker

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-02-05, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Resource Use: Discussed without concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

43. Negative

    atmanactive, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Ask HN: Open-Source editor with local code completion?Hacker News comment

    Moved local code completion to Continue on Ollama, which they find much better than their old TabNine.

    Published Jan 26, 2025self-described: VSCodium, local models

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-01-26, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Behind Copilot & Cursor: Raised as a concern
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

44. Positive

    ttyprintk, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Trying out Zed after more than a decade of Vim/NeovimHacker News comment

    Switched to TabNine and was impressed that, with several buffers open, it synthesizes the right three-way merges.

    Published Jan 25, 2025self-described: Uses Tabnine in a Neovim workflow

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-01-25, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Codebase Context: Positive
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Main assistant

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

45. Negative

    righthand, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Llama.vim - Local LLM-assisted text completionHacker News comment

    Disabled the TabNine plugin and finds a language server good enough for 99% of their work.

    Published Jan 23, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-01-23, needs a recheck

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Overall signal
    • Is Tabnine a developer's main assistant, or one they moved away from?: Moved away or kept alongside
    • Does Tabnine save time once its suggestions are checked?: Costs time

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

46. Mixed

    ergo, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository

    Tabnine tries to update files in wrong directory on IntelliJ IDEA 2024.3.1GitHub issue

    Applying a Tabnine chat change wrote to a doubled home path and copied the project structure into the wrong directory.

    Published Jan 15, 2025self-described: IntelliJ IDEA 2024.3.1

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Needs recheck after 12 months

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    No tie to Tabnine found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-01-15, needs a recheck

    Counts toward

    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    • Chat, Agents & Model Choice: Mixed or negative
    • Noisy or Wrong Suggestions: Raised as a concern

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Still applicable

47. Negative

    jedwardnorm, GitHub user filing an issue against a Tabnine repository, self-described

    I cancelled my Tabnine Dev subscription before the end of the free trial period to avoid any charges.GitHub issue

    Canceled a Tabnine Dev subscription during the free trial, could not change billing details, and got no reply after emailing support several times.

    Published Jan 3, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, earlier release How GILD checked it

    Origin

    Published practitioner account

    Checked

    Pseudonymous; Customer of Tabnine; Used it directly; Out of date (Tabnine Dev)

    Role

    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued

    Relationship

    customer (self disclosed)

    How they know

    Used it directly

    Support

    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded

    Date and version

    2025-01-03, Tabnine Dev, out of date

    Not counted

    no aspect: excluded, describes an earlier release or was retracted; takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward nothing current

    Replaced by newer evidence. Kept in the source history with its scope stated; it takes part in no current figure.

    Published on

    Developer Communities, Issue Trackers & Marketplace Reviews

    Who

    Individual practitioner

    Evidence

    Reported

    Applies to

    Out of date

    Observed on

    Tabnine Dev trial