Skip to main content

Research

Otter in Practice: What 95 Public Accounts Report

Two in three public accounts since 2025 are negative, led by complaints about a notetaker nobody chose. The live transcript draws the most praise, and G2 reviewers rate Otter 4.4 of 5.

Reading time
6 min read
Sources
30 cited

Key findings

  1. Live transcription leads the praise, from 11 accounts against 3 critics. Six of the 11 are reporters on r/Journalism who transcribe interviews.
  2. 19 accounts describe IT work to block or remove Otter, and 15 call it a problem. Revoking app consent or removing the app in Entra often did not stop the bot.
  3. Price and minute caps come up in 17 accounts, and 9 raise them as a problem. Transcript accuracy draws 11 complaints, mostly about accents, crosstalk, and languages other than English, and an Emory study counted 2 to 3 times more errors than human transcribers.
  4. 14 accounts say an organization should set rules, contracts, or blocks before Otter spreads. Nine come from IT staff and five from university IT pages.
  5. Of the 36 team and IT accounts, 28 are negative and 3 positive. The 49 individual accounts lean negative as well, with 10 positive among them.
  6. Paying customers on G2 rate Otter far higher than the forums do, at 4.4 of 5 from 505 reviews on October 5, 2026, with 74% five-star.

Decide who controls Otter's notetaker before you buy it, because a notetaker that joins or emails without anyone choosing it is the complaint that dominates public accounts. Of the accounts, which run from January 2025 to October 2026, 56 are negative and 23 raise the uninvited notetaker. IT administrators describe the work of removing Otter from a Microsoft 365 tenant, and reporters who record interviews praise the live transcript.

What people praise

The transcript draws the praise. Reporters on r/Journalism record interviews in person, on Teams, and over speakerphone with Otter. One relies on the live transcript to catch words a source said too fast. Another expects interview work to take much longer now that the newsroom is canceling Otter. A biotechnology company's IT director rated it 10 of 10 after benchmarking other services.

The record is the second draw. Users search old meetings for what was agreed on pricing, export transcripts into Notion or project software, and feed recordings into a CRM.

Figure 1Praise themes: how many accounts praise each one
ThemeAccountsShare of accounts
Live transcription11 of 9512%
Voice notes & interviews5 of 955%
Summaries & action items5 of 955%
Searchable record5 of 955%

GILD's Otter records: 95 public accounts dated Jan 2025 to Oct 2026, read Oct 12, Oct 25, and Oct 26, 2026

What people raise

The uninvited notetaker comes up most. Bots join meetings their owner skipped, and notes go by email to every attendee. People report that clicking a meeting summary created an Otter account, which then joined their meetings. Others describe invitations sent to a whole contact list after one sign-up. One commenter reports parties or lawyers bringing Otter into closed, confidential court hearings on Teams.

Privacy comes next. Reporters keep sensitive interviews off Otter. Virginia Tech bars Otter because vendor terms let collected data be shared, sold, or used to train models. Mississippi State blocked it because recordings sit outside university control and cannot be deleted. Otter's privacy policy answers the training part. Its privacy policy says it trains Otter's own AI on de-identified audio and transcripts, and the Help improve Otter setting controls whether Otter and its providers may access conversations for training, including human review.

Price complaints are about minute caps on the free and Pro plans and about paying more for less. Accuracy complaints are about crosstalk in long meetings and Spanish-language interviews, and one commenter finds British, German, and French accents hard for Otter.

Figure 2Concern themes: accounts that discuss each one, and how many raise it as a problem
ThemeDiscussRaiseShare of accounts that discuss it
Uninvited notetaker232327%
Privacy & consent201924%
IT control191522%
Price & minute caps17920%
Transcript accuracy121114%

GILD's Otter records: 95 public accounts dated Jan 2025 to Oct 2026, read Oct 12, Oct 25, and Oct 26, 2026

What IT teams report

Revoking Otter's app permissions does not keep the bot out. Nineteen accounts discuss blocking or removing Otter, and 18 of them do it for an organization or its clients. On r/sysadmin, admins say the bot came back after they revoked permissions or blocked the app, and one says it joins as a guest from an Otter-controlled machine.

Admins report several fixes. They delete the enterprise app and require admin consent, add Conditional Access blocks, or turn on Teams verification for anonymous and untrusted joiners. Some made each user delete their Otter account.

Otter's documentation explains why guest policies work. The bot joins as a guest through the meeting link and cannot sign in to get past guest restrictions, so policies that block or verify guests keep it out.

Where the accounts come from and what paying customers report

Most accounts come from people Otter reached through someone else's sign-up. Community sites supply 78 of the 95 accounts, from Reddit, Hacker News, and Microsoft Q&A. Of those, 19 come from r/Journalism and 16 from r/sysadmin. The largest threads are about unwanted notetakers and the 2025 class action. The other 17 include 6 university IT pages, 2 peer-reviewed accuracy studies from Emory and Otago, 2 TrustRadius reviews, and 2 videos. Five more are a Poynter article, a student newspaper article, a newsletter post, an X post, and a GitHub issue. TrustRadius lists only those 2 recent reviews. Positive accounts number 13, mostly reporters who record interviews.

G2, where most reviewers are paying users, reads far better. On October 5, 2026, Otter held 4.4 of 5 from 505 G2 reviews, 74% of them five-star and 4% one-star. G2's review tags put ease of use (145 reviews) and accuracy (105) on top, and recording issues (66) and accuracy issues (55) at the head of the complaints. G2 marks some reviews as invited and incentivized.

Otter said on April 28, 2026 that more than 35 million people use it and that 86% of Fortune 500 companies use Otter, without naming any of them. On October 20, 2026, TechCrunch reported that Otter raised US$320 million from General Catalyst's Customer Value Fund. It also reported that 40 million people have used it, and that it crossed US$100 million in annual recurring revenue last year. Otter gave TechCrunch no monthly active user or churn figures.

  • Ask Otter for named, dated references from teams your size, and how they set auto-join and auto-share. Its customer pages carry no dates, and its Fortune 500 figure names no company.
  • Ask Otter for renewal rates on business workspaces before you sign a multi-year term.
  • Pilot with Enterprise-style defaults set by hand: selected meetings only, no auto-share, training access refused.
  • Read the r/sysadmin accounts as evidence about governance. Most come from admins whose users never meant to buy Otter, so they say little about transcription quality.

Methodology

GILD opened 73 sources on October 12, 2026, 5 more on October 25, 2026, 7 more on October 26, 2026, and 10 from its research ledger on October 28, 2026. The set has 51 Reddit posts and comments, 14 Hacker News comments, 6 university IT pages, 3 Microsoft Q&A questions, and 2 TrustRadius reviews. It also includes 2 peer-reviewed studies, 2 YouTube videos, 1 Poynter article, 1 student newspaper article, 1 newsletter post, 10 X posts, and 2 GitHub issues. Dates run from January 13, 2025 to October 26, 2026. Arctic Shift's rate limits meant GILD read Reddit on reddit.com, and GILD found Hacker News comments through the Algolia API. The videos had no captions, so GILD used only their creators' descriptions. Each record stores its author, date, the kind of team behind it, its sentiment, and its positions. Counts allow at most 2 sources per author and 6 per thread. GILD checked product facts against Otter's site, help center, and Trust Center on October 12, 2026. On October 25, 2026, GILD added the G2 figures from the Wayback Machine copy of Otter's G2 page dated October 5, 2026, because G2 blocks automated access. It also added Otter's own user figures and TechCrunch's funding report. None of these are in the counts of 85.

Products in this piece

Sources

Official documentation
9
Public source
21
  1. Otter.ai pricingOfficial documentationotter.ai
  2. Otter Help Center: Otter Notetaker OverviewOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  3. Otter Help Center: Automatically add Otter Notetaker to your meetingsOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  4. Otter Help Center: Manage auto-share settingsOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  5. Otter.ai Privacy Policy (effective June 16, 2026)Official documentationotter.ai
  6. Otter Help Center: Provide feedback to OtterOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  7. Otter Help Center: Supported languagesOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  8. Otter Help Center: Enterprise Admin Controls OverviewOfficial documentationhelp.otter.ai
  9. VCU Technology Services: Otter.ai is blocked and can't be reached (last updated Jun 12, 2026)Public sourceknowledgebase.vcu.edu
  10. Virginia Tech Division of Information Technology: Use of unauthorized AI meeting assistants (Mar 11, 2026)Public sourcenews.vt.edu
  11. Mississippi State University ITS: Blocks Third Party AI Services for Enhanced Security (Mar 11, 2025)Public sourceservicedesk.its.msstate.edu
  12. American Journal of Qualitative Research: Accuracy and Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Transcription in Qualitative Research (Oct 22, 2026)Public sourceajqr.org
  13. Reddit r/Journalism: Newsroom is canceling Otter (Oct 7, 2026)Public sourcereddit.com
  14. Reddit r/Journalism: recording Teams and phone interviews with Otter (Oct 22, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  15. Reddit r/Journalism: I'm spending more time fixing transcripts than actually reading them (Aug 22, 2026)Public sourcereddit.com
  16. TrustRadius review of Otter.ai by an IT director at a biotechnology company (Jan 12, 2026)Public sourcetrustradius.com
  17. Reddit r/sysadmin: Otter.ai rant (Jan 17, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  18. Reddit r/sysadmin: Otter joining as a guest after Teams and Entra blocks (Jul 16, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  19. Reddit r/sysadmin: Otter recording closed state court hearings on Teams (Jun 5, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  20. Hacker News comment on a GDPR deletion request to Otter (Aug 18, 2025)Public sourcenews.ycombinator.com
  21. Hacker News comment on leaving a confidential meeting Otter joined (Aug 18, 2025)Public sourcenews.ycombinator.com
  22. Hacker News comment on piping Otter recordings into a CRM (Mar 5, 2026)Public sourcenews.ycombinator.com
  23. Reddit r/sysadmin: How to fully remove Otter.ai from M365? (Oct 16, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  24. Reddit r/sysadmin: steps to block Otter in a Microsoft 365 tenant (Jan 9, 2026)Public sourcereddit.com
  25. Reddit r/sysadmin: why revoking Otter's consent does not stop it joining (Oct 17, 2025)Public sourcereddit.com
  26. Reddit r/Zoom: Otter AI notetaker in a research group's call (Jul 31, 2026)Public sourcereddit.com
  27. Microsoft Q&A: I want to block Otter.ai from any of my tenant user accounts (Jul 1, 2025)Public sourcelearn.microsoft.com
  28. G2: Otter.ai Reviews (Wayback Machine copy, Oct 5, 2026)Public sourceweb.archive.org
  29. Otter.ai blog: Otter.ai Evolves from AI Notetaker to Create US$100B Enterprise Conversational Knowledge Engine Market (Apr 28, 2026)Official documentationotter.ai
  30. TechCrunch: Otter AI raises US$320M from General Catalyst's growth fund for its meeting tool (Ivan Mehta, Oct 20, 2026)Public sourcetechcrunch.com