Skip to main content
JunieProduct page

Junie Signals

What engineering leaders and their teams report about Junie, with every finding tied to its evidence.

Read the findings

What the evidence says

Whose sources count

Practitioner sentiment, all practitioners

+28 Positive from 80 sources that take a side

How this figure is made

Positive overall signal, net 28 points

From 74 authors in 70 discussions. Use a task pilot to measure accepted work and review time.

Analyzed
111 total sources
Top praise
Code Quality (17 of 30 sources) See praise evidence
Top concern
Inconsistent Results (17 of 20 sources) See concern evidence

Feb 2025 to Oct 2026.

89 sources from practitioners, by month and sentiment.

Of the 80 public accounts that give an opinion, the read is positive. Codebase understanding earns the most consistent praise, 14 of 19. Uneven results on large or vague tasks are the most frequent concern.

Positive, mixed and negative sources

The score counts them as 36 positive, 23 mixed and 15 negative votes, one per author. See How the numbers work.

See the evidence

Below: 5 praise themes, 6 concerns, 4 close to agreement and 2 disagreements.

Findings

Counted for All practitioners, from 89 sources. Change group

What practitioners praise

Every capability practitioners describe positively, ranked by how many sources say so. Open one to read who said it.

  1. Code Quality17 of 30 sources on it praise itWhether Junie writes correct code that follows local patterns and stays within the requested change.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Positive, 17

    1. Mixed

      cmrdporcupine, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Calls Junie really good, but JetBrains restricts it to a curated list of model variants without support for arbitrary OpenAI-compatible endpoints. Its AI strategy has pivoted too often.

      Published Oct 6, 2026self-described: JetBrains user for 25+ years

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    2. Positive

      Alessandro Giacomella, Developer who sets AI-use rules for their team

      Coding in the Age of AI Agents: what I learned after letting them write (some of) my codePersonal blog post, Medium

      After gating AI code generation for their team, reopened it with guardrails and describes Junie as the careful agent they use for safe refactoring that follows project patterns.

      Published Nov 21, 2025self-described: Team codebase

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    3. Mixed

      VRT303, Developer who tracks their team's AI usage and helps junior developers

      Comment on: Can anyone share their experience with Junie VS VS code / cursor?Reddit comment

      Comparing Junie and Cursor on the same model and prompts across their team, Junie was slower but made fewer mistakes and got changes right in one go. The UI is clunky.

      Published Nov 8, 2025self-described: Team on huge mature projects; GoLand user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    4. Positive

      MarcoAx, Laravel developer (blog author)

      Laravel boost: JetBrains Junie vs Claude Code - Full code review and refactorPersonal blog post (part 4 of a comparison series), Magutti Blog (magutti.com)

      In a blind cross-review, Junie made a simple refactor that worked on the first prompt while Claude Code broke the app. The author found Junie reliable but Claude faster.

      Published Aug 30, 2025self-described: Laravel Boost test project (Google Maps app) built and cross-reviewed by Junie and Claude Code

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Mixed

      ceronman, Lobsters commenter

      Comment on: GPTs and feeling left behindLobsters comment

      Using GPT-5 in Junie to port a Python test suite to Rust, it honored the no-dependencies request that Gemini CLI ignored and wrote simple code. The result had bugs on complex cases.

      Published Aug 10, 2025self-described: Porting a Python test suite to Rust

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    6. Positive

      ta988, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Show HN: Use Third Party LLM API in JetBrains AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Has used Junie a lot and finds it much better than before. It solved problems Claude Code struggled with, though not all, and is still slowish.

      Published May 3, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Positive

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains IDEs Go AI: Coding Agent, Smarter Assistance, Free TierHacker News comment

      Says Junie replaced their paid Claude Code and Cursor use: the least aggressive agent they tried, achieving about 95% of requests, but it forgot context between messages.

      Published Apr 16, 2025self-described: Web application development; previously paid for Claude Code and Cursor

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    8. Positive

      Dave Leeds, Kotlin educator, typealias.com

      Junie - The New AI Coding Agent from JetBrains - Can it build a Compose Desktop app?Video, YouTube

      Lets Junie write a whole Compose Desktop app. First impressions are quite positive with pretty good code, but it feels slow and uses stale library versions.

      "…adding the guidelines - each step along the way is given its own commit, so that's great. So overall, my first impressions with Junie are quite positive. I haven't used AI for coding very much, but so far Junie seems very capable, and I'm looking…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 12:10Partial support

      Published Feb 26, 2025self-described: Compose Desktop YouTube channel browser built entirely by Junie (EAP)

      Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    9. Positive

      ccb_pnpm, Developer comparing three agent setups

      Same model, very different results: is the agent harness (Junie vs Claude Code vs Hermes) doing more work than the model itself?Reddit post

      Running the same tasks through Hermes, Junie and Claude Code, Junie consistently gave the most satisfying results: fast, finds the real problem, and avoids unrequested changes.

      Published Sep 3, 2026self-described: Same coding tasks run through Hermes, Junie in IntelliJ and Claude Code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    10. Positive

      dzhiurgis, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for US$60BHacker News comment

      Uses Gemini through Junie and finds it far cheaper than Claude, faster and better at following instructions, with the IDE symbol table making everything just work.

      Published Apr 22, 2026self-described: Uses Junie with Gemini in a JetBrains IDE

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    11. Positive

      Mirzamehdi Karimov, Kotlin Multiplatform developer (hackathon participant)

      How to Get the Most Out of Junie in a Kotlin Multiplatform ProjectPersonal blog post, Medium

      Built two KMP apps with Junie. Code rarely failed to compile but tasks were slow, so they ran two projects in parallel and improved results with Sonnet and evolving guidelines.

      Published Oct 19, 2025self-described: Two Compose/Kotlin Multiplatform apps built during a hackathon with free Junie access

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    12. Positive

      snuxoll, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: RubyMine is now free for non-commercial useHacker News comment

      Says Junie benefits from IDE integration: the PSI syntax tree flags invalid code, so after large refactors or feature work the developer can be confident the result is not garbage.

      Published Sep 2, 2025self-described: JetBrains All Products Pack subscriber (AI Pro included)

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits

    13. Mixed

      smrtinsert, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: JetBrains working on higher-abstraction programming languageHacker News comment

      Loves Junie's accuracy, but it works like Claude Code launching a subagent per file, takes as long, likely burns as many tokens, and cannot be switched off.

      Published Aug 14, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    14. Positive

      crappybird, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Apple just released a weirdly interesting coding language modelHacker News comment

      Calls Junie amazing and says only Claude Code and opencode come close, but it burns through credits quickly.

      Published Jul 8, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    15. Positive

      TrespassersWilliam, Kotlin developer

      Junie is a gamechangerReddit post

      Spent a couple of hours writing .junie/guidelines.md for Compose Multiplatform and Ktor. Junie followed the instructions well, and fixing a gap meant adding one line to the guidelines.

      Published May 25, 2025self-described: Compose Multiplatform frontend and Ktor backend projects

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    16. Positive

      GamerTomC, Backend developer on a team at work

      Comment on: Anyone used Jetbrains Junie the coding agent? How is it?Reddit comment

      Using Junie at work on two well-structured Kotlin and Java repos, estimates their velocity rose at least 25% because it follows existing codebase patterns. Expects less value on messy codebases.

      Published May 9, 2025self-described: Team maintaining well-structured Kotlin and Java backend code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    17. Positive

      Snakes3727, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BHacker News comment

      Their team compared Cursor with Junie and settled on Junie because it does a good job with Rust where Cursor did not.

      Published May 7, 2025self-described: Team working in Rust that compared Cursor and Junie

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Mixed or negative, 13

    1. Mixed

      bpavuk, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: MCP is a fadHacker News comment

      Delegated ready Figma designs to Junie on Gemini 3 Flash for Jetpack Compose. It did best of three agents tried and used Context7 for newer APIs, but fumbled details, performance, and abstraction.

      Published Jan 10, 2026self-described: Developer in Ukraine, personal projects in GTK-rs, Jetpack Compose and Svelte

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    2. Negative

      aerhardt, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Why agents are bad pair programmersHacker News comment

      Added an instruction to Junie's guidelines document, but Junie still keeps writing a comment every three lines regardless of language.

      Published Jun 10, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Negative

      Vortelf, Go developer

      Junie is disappointing and I'm glad I tried it before buying a blindly subscribing.Reddit post

      On a simple Go struct-tag edit, Junie needed terminal security disabled, edited one line at a time, stopped a third of the way through, and its bug hunt produced breaking suggestions.

      Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: Refactoring a Golang project

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    4. Mixed

      _kidlike, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Jules: An asynchronous coding agentHacker News comment

      On a 250k-line Java project, Junie was very good at identifying which parts of the codebase needed to change, but its actual code generation was as poor as any other LLM's.

      Published May 20, 2025self-described: Java project of about 250k lines of code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Negative

      port11, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Calls Junie mediocre at best and says the JetBrains AI plan quota runs out in three days.

      Published Oct 8, 2026self-described: WebStorm user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    6. Negative

      parpfish, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Claude is the drug, Cursor is the dealerHacker News comment

      Tried Junie because they love JetBrains IDEs and found it terrible. Cursor was much better at agentic code generation, the change-review workflow and autocomplete.

      Published Aug 11, 2025self-described: JetBrains IDE user; Cursor used on greenfield toy projects

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Negative

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Mercury: Ultra-fast language models based on diffusionHacker News comment

      Found that Junie researched irrelevant things, kept asking permission, and after 15 minutes returned a mountain of broken code, even with actions approved up front.

      Published Jul 7, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    8. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    9. Mixed

      Michelangelo van Dam, Web application developer and architect

      Personal experience with JetBrains Junie™: day 2Company blog post, in2it

      Pushing Junie to 85 percent PHPUnit coverage, found it ignored guideline test requirements, used deprecated annotations and loosened phpunit.xml strictness to make tests pass.

      Published Jun 11, 2025self-described: PHP training-course registration app (Slim, Twig, PHPUnit) in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    10. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    11. Mixed

      leonidasv, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BHacker News comment

      Found Junie an improvement over JetBrains' earlier assistant but less smart than Cursor or Windsurf: it stops exploring too early and does not fix its own linter or compiler errors.

      Published May 7, 2025self-described: Paying JetBrains IDE user on a free Junie trial month

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    12. Negative

      thi2, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: The hidden cost of AI codingHacker News comment

      Ran a refined prompt through Junie three times on a Vue and Kotlin Spring Boot codebase. The result was still lacking, so they discarded it and wrote the code themselves.

      Published Apr 25, 2025self-described: Employer-provided JetBrains AI; Vue frontend with Kotlin Spring Boot backend

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    13. Negative

      surrTurr, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains Fleet drops support for Kotlin MultiplatformHacker News comment

      Tested Junie in the invite-only beta and found it very basic, roughly 30% as good as Cursor's agent mode, while noting it was still early.

      Published Feb 11, 2025self-described: Tested Junie in the invite-only beta

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Open them in the record
  2. Codebase Understanding14 of 19 sources on it praise itHow well Junie reads and reasons about an existing project before it changes it.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Positive, 14

    1. Mixed

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: AI helps ship faster but it produces 1.7× more bugsHacker News comment

      Describes a mixed experience: Junie shines at explaining codebases and helped them write more tests and better comments, but sometimes produces convoluted code and can slip bad changes past an inattentive user.

      Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: React and TypeScript front end plus backend work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    2. Positive

      Mike Lundahl, Developer writing on a personal site

      JetBrains Junie: AI Coding Without the ChaosPersonal blog post, mikelundahl.com

      Uses Junie daily mainly as a pair programmer for questions and debugging, letting it write more only on new projects after a written spec and guidelines. Finds it slow at times.

      Published Dec 11, 2025self-described: Mike Lundahl, mikelundahl.com

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    3. Positive

      Somasundaram Mahesh, Android developer

      How to use JetBrains Junie in your Terminal (First Look)Video, YouTube

      First look at Junie CLI on an Android codebase: it read the file structure, summarized the UI architecture and proposed a concrete quick-win refactor.

      "Empty or error states we can handle. Navigation and state, accessibility, performance and polish, design and consistency, interaction testing, quick thing. It has also made a quick win like. directly with the code how we can add the empty state and so on. So yeah,…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 1:56Partial support

      Published Nov 27, 2025self-described: Android MVVM template project, Junie CLI

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    4. Positive

      Miguel Teheran, Software developer and content creator

      Automating Code Reviews with Junie by JetBrainsDeveloper blog post (dev.to), DEV Community

      Used Junie in Rider to review a branch with planted issues. It found and fixed them plus older problems nearby, which they call an exceptional code review tool.

      Published Oct 21, 2025self-described: Practice C# minimal API project in Rider

      Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    6. Positive

      MarcoAx, Laravel developer (blog author)

      Laravel boost: JetBrains Junie vs Claude Code - Full code review and refactorPersonal blog post (part 4 of a comparison series), Magutti Blog (magutti.com)

      In a blind cross-review, Junie made a simple refactor that worked on the first prompt while Claude Code broke the app. The author found Junie reliable but Claude faster.

      Published Aug 30, 2025self-described: Laravel Boost test project (Google Maps app) built and cross-reviewed by Junie and Claude Code

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    7. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    8. Mixed

      _kidlike, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Jules: An asynchronous coding agentHacker News comment

      On a 250k-line Java project, Junie was very good at identifying which parts of the codebase needed to change, but its actual code generation was as poor as any other LLM's.

      Published May 20, 2025self-described: Java project of about 250k lines of code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    9. Positive

      Isabel Garrido Cardenas, Senior Software Engineer, Barcelona

      Legacy Code Collaboration with Junie AIPersonal blog post, Isa's code (Hashnode)

      A skeptic turned regular user. In three days Junie helped their team add the first acceptance test to a legacy system that had no tests, but it mishandled unit test doubles and small TDD steps.

      Published May 15, 2025self-described: Their team at work; business-critical legacy Scala/Akka service with no tests

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    10. Positive

      GamerTomC, Backend developer on a team at work

      Comment on: Anyone used Jetbrains Junie the coding agent? How is it?Reddit comment

      Using Junie at work on two well-structured Kotlin and Java repos, estimates their velocity rose at least 25% because it follows existing codebase patterns. Expects less value on messy codebases.

      Published May 9, 2025self-described: Team maintaining well-structured Kotlin and Java backend code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    11. Positive

      Dan Vega, Developer content creator (danvega.dev)

      Beyond Auto-Complete: Junie Is Your Autonomous Coding Partner in JetBrains IDEsVideo, YouTube

      Hands-on walkthrough using Junie to explain an existing codebase and build a REST API, customized with personal guidelines, stressing that the developer stays the pilot and reviews output.

      "-step tasks autonomously, from understanding your code base to implementing new features and running tests. What makes Junie special is the ability to explore your project, generate context -appropriate code, run tests when needed, and present results for your review, all while…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 0:34Partial support

      Published Apr 20, 2025self-described: Exploring an existing codebase and building a Spring Boot CRUD REST API in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    12. Positive

      ccb_pnpm, Developer comparing three agent setups

      Same model, very different results: is the agent harness (Junie vs Claude Code vs Hermes) doing more work than the model itself?Reddit post

      Running the same tasks through Hermes, Junie and Claude Code, Junie consistently gave the most satisfying results: fast, finds the real problem, and avoids unrequested changes.

      Published Sep 3, 2026self-described: Same coding tasks run through Hermes, Junie in IntelliJ and Claude Code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    13. Positive

      Victor Bash, Independent developer (hackathon entrant)

      I built a browser game for the Cloud9 x JetBrains Hackathon and it started from a really simple…Personal blog post, Medium

      Leaned on Junie throughout a hackathon game build for boilerplate, refactoring and bug reasoning, such as diagnosing arrow tunneling, and felt the IDE plus agent kept the work in flow.

      Published Jan 25, 2026self-described: Hackathon browser game in WebStorm (TypeScript, Babylon.js)

      Practitioner account, self-described; opinion; not counted, takes no position

    14. Positive

      Amazing_Hospital_515, Senior developer on a team of more than 10 developers

      Junie Ultimate 61 days inReddit post

      After two months on Junie Ultimate in a 10+ developer team, a full-stack feature with e2e tests takes about 2 hours, down from 2-3 days. Colleagues see similar results.

      Published Jun 29, 2025self-described: Monorepo with Spring Boot backend, React/Vite frontend, Playwright e2e tests, infrastructure and Storybook/Figma

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits

    Mixed or negative, 5

    1. Negative

      digitalend, PHP developer at the same company for 15 years

      Your experience with AI Agents and AI Programming Tools in 2025Reddit post

      On a large bespoke PHP codebase with an in-house framework, Junie in PhpStorm (like Claude Code and Aider) did not work at all, misreading routing, ORM and structure.

      Published Jun 17, 2025self-described: Company with an in-house PHP framework and millions of lines of code across separate repos

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Mixed

      leonidasv, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BHacker News comment

      Found Junie an improvement over JetBrains' earlier assistant but less smart than Cursor or Windsurf: it stops exploring too early and does not fix its own linter or compiler errors.

      Published May 7, 2025self-described: Paying JetBrains IDE user on a free Junie trial month

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Positive

      cmpalmer52, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Vibe Code Warning - A personal casestudyHacker News comment

      Built a pull-request dashboard for their team with Junie in WebStorm in about three hours of step-by-step tasks. The team uses it daily, but Junie misses things in their huge main codebase.

      Published Nov 10, 2025self-described: Team tooling: pull-request dashboard across Azure DevOps and YouTrack, built in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    4. Negative

      Vortelf, Go developer

      Junie is disappointing and I'm glad I tried it before buying a blindly subscribing.Reddit post

      On a simple Go struct-tag edit, Junie needed terminal security disabled, edited one line at a time, stopped a third of the way through, and its bug hunt produced breaking suggestions.

      Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: Refactoring a Golang project

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    5. Mixed

      bb88, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Finds Junie reasonably good and capable of fixing unit tests in Brave mode, but it struggles with large code blocks and applies changes before review, so small defined tasks work best.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: Go and Python development in JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Open them in the record
  3. IDE Integration11 of 15 sources on it praise itHow much Junie gains from the JetBrains IDE: its index, inspections, run configurations, and test runners.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Positive, 11

    1. Positive

      ccb_pnpm, Developer comparing three agent setups

      Same model, very different results: is the agent harness (Junie vs Claude Code vs Hermes) doing more work than the model itself?Reddit post

      Running the same tasks through Hermes, Junie and Claude Code, Junie consistently gave the most satisfying results: fast, finds the real problem, and avoids unrequested changes.

      Published Sep 3, 2026self-described: Same coding tasks run through Hermes, Junie in IntelliJ and Claude Code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Positive

      dzhiurgis, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for US$60BHacker News comment

      Uses Gemini through Junie and finds it far cheaper than Claude, faster and better at following instructions, with the IDE symbol table making everything just work.

      Published Apr 22, 2026self-described: Uses Junie with Gemini in a JetBrains IDE

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Positive

      Victor Bash, Independent developer (hackathon entrant)

      I built a browser game for the Cloud9 x JetBrains Hackathon and it started from a really simple…Personal blog post, Medium

      Leaned on Junie throughout a hackathon game build for boilerplate, refactoring and bug reasoning, such as diagnosing arrow tunneling, and felt the IDE plus agent kept the work in flow.

      Published Jan 25, 2026self-described: Hackathon browser game in WebStorm (TypeScript, Babylon.js)

      Practitioner account, self-described; opinion; not counted, takes no position

    4. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    5. Positive

      snuxoll, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: RubyMine is now free for non-commercial useHacker News comment

      Says Junie benefits from IDE integration: the PSI syntax tree flags invalid code, so after large refactors or feature work the developer can be confident the result is not garbage.

      Published Sep 2, 2025self-described: JetBrains All Products Pack subscriber (AI Pro included)

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits

    6. Positive

      manquer, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleHacker News comment

      Tried Junie and found it better than Claude Code for some tasks because it uses what the IDE knows, finishing simpler tasks with fewer prompts and tokens than Claude Code or Windsurf.

      Published Jul 13, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Mixed

      Steven Webber, Software Engineer at Equal Experts

      Prompts, pitfalls, and progress: What I learned building an app with AI agentsCompany engineering blog post, Equal Experts

      An Equal Experts engineer built a full app through agents without writing code. He started with Junie and found it well integrated with the IDE, but moved to Warp's terminal workflow, and agents often ignored his .junie/guidelines.md rules.

      "…while Junie was great and nicely integrated with the IDE. I ended up preferring the workflow from the terminal as offered by Warp and Amazon Q."
      Excerpt, Steven Webber
      "Despite setting up a .junie/guidelines.md with explicit instructions (like always updating prompts.txt), agents often ignored them or followed them inconsistently."
      Same speaker

      Published Oct 6, 2025Equal Experts AI experiment: a Java Quarkus and React app with CI/CD to AWS, built only through agents and BDD over just over a week

      Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Adoption and upkeep

    8. Mixed

      Rimantas Benetis, Partner, Head of Technology at Gritmind

      We compared 5 AI code assistants - Here's how they stack upCompany blog post, Gritmind Insights

      Gritmind's engineers tested five assistants and found Junie fits teams already on JetBrains IDEs, but its responsiveness was uneven, its autocomplete slow, and it has no checkpoints, so developers must commit first. Cursor and Copilot came out ahead.

      "Initial responsiveness was uneven but has improved with recent updates - still worth monitoring before full adoption…"
      Excerpt, Rimantas Benetis
      "Lacks checkpoint features - developers must commit before use, increasing the risk of unwanted code changes."
      Same speaker

      Published Aug 31, 2025Gritmind, a development partner working inside client stacks; post co-written with Head of Product Laura Graves

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep

    9. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    10. Mixed

      mike_hearn, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for US$3BHacker News comment

      Still prefers Claude Code for its access to more tools, since "Junie seems unable to fetch URLs", calling it a tiny gap. Finds the Junie UI quite pretty and says that with IDE index tools JetBrains "in theory" should be able to compete very strongly.

      Published May 7, 2025self-described: Uses Claude Code alongside

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    11. Positive

      Spring Framework Guru, Spring Boot course instructor

      First Look at Junie the AI Coding Agent from JetBrainsVideo, YouTube

      After a little over a week with Junie on Claude 3.7, generated and committed about 35,000 lines to a corporate repository. Finds Junie's code quality much better than GitHub Copilot Workspace's, crediting IDE hooks such as inspections and compile steps that catch missing imports.

      "…using Claude 3.7 as the LLM that it's working with. And in the last week, I'm not exaggerating, I generated and committed to uh my corporate repository for my day job about 35,000 lines of code. I've developed prompts where I can point it to…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 1:46Partial support

      Published Mar 29, 2025self-described: Spring Boot application used in the author's Udemy courses

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability

    Mixed or negative, 4

    1. Positive

      David Haley, Software and cloud architect, Google Cloud Expert

      Auto-loading .nvmrc in JetBrains Junie terminalDeveloper blog post (dev.to), DEV Community

      Reports an overall great experience with Junie since April 2025, and shares a shell fix after Junie's terminal ignored .nvmrc, which broke test runs in a React project.

      Published Dec 23, 2025self-described: React/TypeScript project

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep

    2. Negative

      rolisz, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Agentic Coding RecommendationsHacker News comment

      Junie in PyCharm had big problems running tests or even using the project's PyCharm virtual environment, which they expected JetBrains to handle better.

      Published Jun 12, 2025self-described: Python project in PyCharm

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Mixed

      GordonS, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains Air: A System of Products for Agentic Software DevelopmentHacker News comment

      Used Junie for small refactorings, where it did a good job quickly, but it handled more complex requests poorly and its UI was tricky. Now uses Codex instead.

      Published Sep 22, 2026self-described: Uses JetBrains Rider and DataGrip regularly

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    4. Mixed

      VRT303, Developer who tracks their team's AI usage and helps junior developers

      Comment on: Can anyone share their experience with Junie VS VS code / cursor?Reddit comment

      Comparing Junie and Cursor on the same model and prompts across their team, Junie was slower but made fewer mistakes and got changes right in one go. The UI is clunky.

      Published Nov 8, 2025self-described: Team on huge mature projects; GoLand user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Open them in the record
  4. Test Writing10 of 14 sources on it praise itWhether Junie generates useful tests and runs them to verify its changes.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Positive, 10

    1. Positive

      Arghya Banerjee, Developer with under two years in IT

      How AI Blurred My Thinking, and How I'm Winning It BackPersonal blog post, Medium

      Compared a manual refactor with a Junie-assisted one under TDD guidelines. Junie was much faster and generated tests, while the developer kept ownership of architecture and reviewed tests.

      Published Oct 18, 2025self-described: Refactoring a monolithic Python script from a live project

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    3. Positive

      harrall, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: Anyone struggling to get value out of coding LLMs?Hacker News comment

      Finds Junie great compared to other offerings: it writes JUnit tests with test doubles, runs them and fixes tests or broken code, though it helps with only about 10% of their work.

      Published May 26, 2025self-described: Java codebase with JUnit tests

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    4. Positive

      panstromek, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggestsHacker News comment

      After a few days with Junie, had it write long-postponed tests that were mostly correct from a one-sentence prompt. Reverts wrong attempts cheaply and finds a sweet spot of suitable tasks.

      Published May 4, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    5. Mixed

      dools, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Junie in IntelliJ was what convinced them AI coding was the future. They later ran Junie CLI in parallel with other agents but dropped it because instruction compliance broke down on their workflows.

      Published Oct 6, 2026self-described: Kotlin Multiplatform projects; a team sharing JetBrains AI credits

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    6. Mixed

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: AI helps ship faster but it produces 1.7× more bugsHacker News comment

      Describes a mixed experience: Junie shines at explaining codebases and helped them write more tests and better comments, but sometimes produces convoluted code and can slip bad changes past an inattentive user.

      Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: React and TypeScript front end plus backend work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Positive

      Amazing_Hospital_515, Senior developer on a team of more than 10 developers

      Junie Ultimate 61 days inReddit post

      After two months on Junie Ultimate in a 10+ developer team, a full-stack feature with e2e tests takes about 2 hours, down from 2-3 days. Colleagues see similar results.

      Published Jun 29, 2025self-described: Monorepo with Spring Boot backend, React/Vite frontend, Playwright e2e tests, infrastructure and Storybook/Figma

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits

    8. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    9. Mixed

      bb88, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Finds Junie reasonably good and capable of fixing unit tests in Brave mode, but it struggles with large code blocks and applies changes before review, so small defined tasks work best.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: Go and Python development in JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    10. Positive

      A N M Bazlur Rahman, Java developer and conference speaker

      JetBrains Junie: My Firsthand ExperiencePersonal blog post, bazlur.ca

      Used the Junie EAP to build a website and front-end UIs outside a backend comfort zone, finishing a week of work in a day while noting it still needs oversight.

      Published Mar 3, 2025self-described: Ramadan awareness website (React) and DevNexus talk projects (Jakarta Faces, LangChain4j)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Mixed or negative, 4

    1. Mixed

      Povilas Korop (Laravel Daily), Laravel educator, Laravel Daily

      PhpStorm Junie AI Re-Review: Compared to Cursor / Claude CodeVideo, YouTube

      Re-review after three months: Junie got faster and more stable and is on par with Claude Code and Cursor when it works, but how it tests generated code is a red flag.

      "…cursor if it works. I mean, if specific prompt is executed successfully, but in my testing, it's pretty much okay. What is not okay is some smaller UX issues, some lacking features here and there, but the most danger and kind of red flag is…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 16:30Partial support

      Published Aug 11, 2025self-described: Laravel practice projects in PhpStorm over a few weeks

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    2. Mixed

      Michelangelo van Dam, Web application developer and architect

      Personal experience with JetBrains Junie™: day 2Company blog post, in2it

      Pushing Junie to 85 percent PHPUnit coverage, found it ignored guideline test requirements, used deprecated annotations and loosened phpunit.xml strictness to make tests pass.

      Published Jun 11, 2025self-described: PHP training-course registration app (Slim, Twig, PHPUnit) in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    3. Positive

      Isabel Garrido Cardenas, Senior Software Engineer, Barcelona

      Legacy Code Collaboration with Junie AIPersonal blog post, Isa's code (Hashnode)

      A skeptic turned regular user. In three days Junie helped their team add the first acceptance test to a legacy system that had no tests, but it mishandled unit test doubles and small TDD steps.

      Published May 15, 2025self-described: Their team at work; business-critical legacy Scala/Akka service with no tests

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    4. Negative

      rolisz, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Agentic Coding RecommendationsHacker News comment

      Junie in PyCharm had big problems running tests or even using the project's PyCharm virtual environment, which they expected JetBrains to handle better.

      Published Jun 12, 2025self-described: Python project in PyCharm

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Open them in the record
  5. Planning & Control8 of 16 sources on it praise itJunie's planning clarity and the engineer's ability to approve or redirect work, including rollback.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Positive, 8

    1. Mixed

      Ken Kousen, Independent trainer who taught an AI Agents with Junie course on O'Reilly

      Tales from the jar side: Junie Joy, Nano Banana, LM Studio, and the usual social media postsNewsletter, Tales from the jar side (Kousen IT newsletter, Substack)

      Teaching a Junie course went better than expected: Junie excels at planning and built small apps quickly, though it is still not their primary tool versus Claude Code and others.

      Published Sep 15, 2025self-described: Live training course exercises in IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm and WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Mixed

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Deep AgentsHacker News comment

      Junie was the first agent they saw with a high-quality to-do list and became their favorite: slow and thoughtful while Cursor rewrote working files. Stopped using it when it became paid.

      Published Aug 1, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    3. Positive

      Mike Lundahl, Developer writing on a personal site

      JetBrains Junie: AI Coding Without the ChaosPersonal blog post, mikelundahl.com

      Uses Junie daily mainly as a pair programmer for questions and debugging, letting it write more only on new projects after a written spec and guidelines. Finds it slow at times.

      Published Dec 11, 2025self-described: Mike Lundahl, mikelundahl.com

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    4. Positive

      Alessandro Giacomella, Developer who sets AI-use rules for their team

      Coding in the Age of AI Agents: what I learned after letting them write (some of) my codePersonal blog post, Medium

      After gating AI code generation for their team, reopened it with guardrails and describes Junie as the careful agent they use for safe refactoring that follows project patterns.

      Published Nov 21, 2025self-described: Team codebase

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    6. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    7. Positive

      TrespassersWilliam, Kotlin developer

      Junie is a gamechangerReddit post

      Spent a couple of hours writing .junie/guidelines.md for Compose Multiplatform and Ktor. Junie followed the instructions well, and fixing a gap meant adding one line to the guidelines.

      Published May 25, 2025self-described: Compose Multiplatform frontend and Ktor backend projects

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    8. Mixed

      _kidlike, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Jules: An asynchronous coding agentHacker News comment

      On a 250k-line Java project, Junie was very good at identifying which parts of the codebase needed to change, but its actual code generation was as poor as any other LLM's.

      Published May 20, 2025self-described: Java project of about 250k lines of code

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Mixed or negative, 8

    1. No opinion stated

      dustin-auby, GitHub user

      Junie ignores ask mode and applies chnagesGitHub issue on JetBrains/junie

      Reports that Junie increasingly edits code while in ask mode and does not show the changes it applied, so he cannot roll them back from Junie.

      "…when using ask mode Junie will take your prompt and apply changes to the code base, further to that it will not show you the applied changes so you cannot rollback…"
      Excerpt, dustin-auby

      Published May 7, 2026self-described: Uses Junie's ask mode on an existing codebase

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    2. Negative

      Ken Kousen, Independent trainer, Kousen IT

      Tales from the jar side: Puppies and Mockito, Anthropic settlement, 1 MILLION tokens, Junie Air and CLI, FB and Moltbook: a Match made in Hades, and social media stuffNewsletter, Tales from the jar side (Kousen IT newsletter, Substack)

      Finds IDE Junie great at planning but too slow. The CLI is faster but ran ahead of planning mode, and sees no reason to pick it over Codex, Gemini or Claude Code.

      Published Mar 15, 2026self-described: One of the author's existing projects

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control

    3. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    4. Mixed

      bb88, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Finds Junie reasonably good and capable of fixing unit tests in Brave mode, but it struggles with large code blocks and applies changes before review, so small defined tasks work best.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: Go and Python development in JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    5. Positive

      Duncan (Pairing with Duncan), Developer and author of Java to Kotlin, A Refactoring Guidebook

      First Look at JetBrains Junie Autonomous AI AgentVideo, YouTube

      Pairs with Junie under strict TDD. It is overly eager and needed chat and IDE restarts in the EAP, but they call it a really promising start and likes the guidelines file.

      "…so over all a really promising start and I must say that I do particularly like this guidelines file as a way of communicating in language between the AI and human and vice versa whether you use cursor or Genie if you don't already then…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 28:51Partial support

      Published Feb 17, 2025self-described: Kotlin kata project with strict TDD in IntelliJ IDEA (Junie EAP)

      Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep

    6. Negative

      gquittet, Long-time JetBrains user

      JetBrains AI (Chat & Junie): My feedback after 2 monthsReddit post

      After two months on AI Pro, credits drained fast and Junie became unreliable, implementing a trivial benchmark after an agreed plan, so they downgraded and moved to OpenCode.

      Published Jun 11, 2026self-described: Two months on JetBrains AI Pro

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits

    7. Mixed

      Rimantas Benetis, Partner, Head of Technology at Gritmind

      We compared 5 AI code assistants - Here's how they stack upCompany blog post, Gritmind Insights

      Gritmind's engineers tested five assistants and found Junie fits teams already on JetBrains IDEs, but its responsiveness was uneven, its autocomplete slow, and it has no checkpoints, so developers must commit first. Cursor and Copilot came out ahead.

      "Initial responsiveness was uneven but has improved with recent updates - still worth monitoring before full adoption…"
      Excerpt, Rimantas Benetis
      "Lacks checkpoint features - developers must commit before use, increasing the risk of unwanted code changes."
      Same speaker

      Published Aug 31, 2025Gritmind, a development partner working inside client stacks; post co-written with Head of Product Laura Graves

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep

    8. Positive

      Isabel Garrido Cardenas, Senior Software Engineer, Barcelona

      Legacy Code Collaboration with Junie AIPersonal blog post, Isa's code (Hashnode)

      A skeptic turned regular user. In three days Junie helped their team add the first acceptance test to a legacy system that had no tests, but it mishandled unit test doubles and small TDD steps.

      Published May 15, 2025self-described: Their team at work; business-critical legacy Scala/Akka service with no tests

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Open them in the record

What concerns them

Every concern practitioners raise, most raised first.

  1. Inconsistent Results17 of 20 sources on it raise it as a concernVariation in quality on large or ambiguous tasks, or between runs of the same prompt.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Raised as a concern, 17

    1. Negative

      gquittet, Long-time JetBrains user

      JetBrains AI (Chat & Junie): My feedback after 2 monthsReddit post

      After two months on AI Pro, credits drained fast and Junie became unreliable, implementing a trivial benchmark after an agreed plan, so they downgraded and moved to OpenCode.

      Published Jun 11, 2026self-described: Two months on JetBrains AI Pro

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits

    2. Positive

      Ash Allen, Freelance Laravel web developer

      Using AI to Build a Laravel Feature with Junie in PhpStormPersonal blog post, Ash Allen Design (ashallendesign.co.uk)

      Uses Junie in PhpStorm to debug and write features. A pretty positive experience overall, though it sometimes misunderstands requests and struggled late in the recorded session.

      Published Jan 16, 2026self-described: Laravel application with the Vue.js starter kit in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Mixed

      Ash Allen, Freelance Laravel developer and author

      Building a Laravel Feature with Junie in PhpStormVideo, YouTube

      Recorded feature build where Junie does much of the heavy lifting but cannot finish the page after several rounds. The author calls it hit and miss and still needing handholding.

      "…it a prompt and it'll build a feature for you. Maybe it will be able to in the future, but um right now it does need a bit more handholding, but still extremely powerful and I'm looking forward to seeing how it's going in the…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 12:42Partial support

      Published Jan 14, 2026self-described: Adding a settings page to a fresh Laravel application in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability

    4. Mixed

      Umayanga Gunawardhana, Developer (Medium author)

      Taming the AI Beast: How Hierarchical Planning with Backtracking Unlocks Junie's Full Potential for Epic Coding TasksPersonal blog post, Medium

      Finds Junie strong on small tweaks but prone to drift on large multi-module tasks, and shares a guidelines.md prompt to keep its plans on track at extra token cost.

      Published Nov 9, 2025self-described: Golang projects

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Mixed

      ceronman, Lobsters commenter

      Comment on: GPTs and feeling left behindLobsters comment

      Using GPT-5 in Junie to port a Python test suite to Rust, it honored the no-dependencies request that Gemini CLI ignored and wrote simple code. The result had bugs on complex cases.

      Published Aug 10, 2025self-described: Porting a Python test suite to Rust

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    6. Negative

      sensanaty, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Andrej Karpathy: Software in the era of AI [video]Hacker News comment

      Lists Junie among the agents they and their team tried diligently. For anything beyond toy projects the tools fell apart repeatedly.

      Published Jun 19, 2025self-described: Team trying AI coding tools on non-trivial projects

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Negative

      thi2, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: The hidden cost of AI codingHacker News comment

      Ran a refined prompt through Junie three times on a Vue and Kotlin Spring Boot codebase. The result was still lacking, so they discarded it and wrote the code themselves.

      Published Apr 25, 2025self-described: Employer-provided JetBrains AI; Vue frontend with Kotlin Spring Boot backend

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    8. Mixed

      dools, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Junie in IntelliJ was what convinced them AI coding was the future. They later ran Junie CLI in parallel with other agents but dropped it because instruction compliance broke down on their workflows.

      Published Oct 6, 2026self-described: Kotlin Multiplatform projects; a team sharing JetBrains AI credits

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    9. Mixed

      GordonS, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains Air: A System of Products for Agentic Software DevelopmentHacker News comment

      Used Junie for small refactorings, where it did a good job quickly, but it handled more complex requests poorly and its UI was tricky. Now uses Codex instead.

      Published Sep 22, 2026self-described: Uses JetBrains Rider and DataGrip regularly

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    10. Negative

      RevEng, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60BHacker News comment

      Used Junie when it first came out and found it okay but unreliable. Now uses Cursor, though they miss PyCharm.

      Published Apr 25, 2026

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    11. Mixed

      delbronski, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Our eighth generation TPUs: two chips for the agentic eraHacker News comment

      Junie works best when the engineer stays involved and names the files and the change. It is faster and to the point there, but breaks when asked to code a whole thing.

      Published Apr 22, 2026

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    12. Mixed

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: AI helps ship faster but it produces 1.7× more bugsHacker News comment

      Describes a mixed experience: Junie shines at explaining codebases and helped them write more tests and better comments, but sometimes produces convoluted code and can slip bad changes past an inattentive user.

      Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: React and TypeScript front end plus backend work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    13. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    14. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    15. Negative

      digitalend, PHP developer at the same company for 15 years

      Your experience with AI Agents and AI Programming Tools in 2025Reddit post

      On a large bespoke PHP codebase with an in-house framework, Junie in PhpStorm (like Claude Code and Aider) did not work at all, misreading routing, ORM and structure.

      Published Jun 17, 2025self-described: Company with an in-house PHP framework and millions of lines of code across separate repos

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    16. Positive

      Isabel Garrido Cardenas, Senior Software Engineer, Barcelona

      Legacy Code Collaboration with Junie AIPersonal blog post, Isa's code (Hashnode)

      A skeptic turned regular user. In three days Junie helped their team add the first acceptance test to a legacy system that had no tests, but it mishandled unit test doubles and small TDD steps.

      Published May 15, 2025self-described: Their team at work; business-critical legacy Scala/Akka service with no tests

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    17. Positive

      A N M Bazlur Rahman, Java developer and conference speaker

      JetBrains Junie: My Firsthand ExperiencePersonal blog post, bazlur.ca

      Used the Junie EAP to build a website and front-end UIs outside a backend comfort zone, finishing a week of work in a day while noting it still needs oversight.

      Published Mar 3, 2025self-described: Ramadan awareness website (React) and DevNexus talk projects (Jakarta Faces, LangChain4j)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Discussed without concern, 3

    1. Mixed

      atraac, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?Hacker News comment

      Uses Junie only for easy, neatly defined tasks such as readmes, scripts and one-off tools. Would not trust it with day-to-day features and must verify its output thoroughly.

      Published Jan 21, 2026self-described: Backend work; one-off tools and small utilities

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    2. Positive

      panstromek, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggestsHacker News comment

      After a few days with Junie, had it write long-postponed tests that were mostly correct from a one-sentence prompt. Reverts wrong attempts cheaply and finds a sweet spot of suitable tasks.

      Published May 4, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Positive

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains IDEs Go AI: Coding Agent, Smarter Assistance, Free TierHacker News comment

      Says Junie replaced their paid Claude Code and Cursor use: the least aggressive agent they tried, achieving about 95% of requests, but it forgot context between messages.

      Published Apr 16, 2025self-described: Web application development; previously paid for Claude Code and Cursor

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    Open them in the record
  2. Speed13 of 19 sources on it raise it as a concernElapsed time from Junie's plan through implementation and verification.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Raised as a concern, 13

    1. Negative

      Ken Kousen, Independent trainer, Kousen IT

      Tales from the jar side: Puppies and Mockito, Anthropic settlement, 1 MILLION tokens, Junie Air and CLI, FB and Moltbook: a Match made in Hades, and social media stuffNewsletter, Tales from the jar side (Kousen IT newsletter, Substack)

      Finds IDE Junie great at planning but too slow. The CLI is faster but ran ahead of planning mode, and sees no reason to pick it over Codex, Gemini or Claude Code.

      Published Mar 15, 2026self-described: One of the author's existing projects

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control

    2. Positive

      Mike Lundahl, Developer writing on a personal site

      JetBrains Junie: AI Coding Without the ChaosPersonal blog post, mikelundahl.com

      Uses Junie daily mainly as a pair programmer for questions and debugging, letting it write more only on new projects after a written spec and guidelines. Finds it slow at times.

      Published Dec 11, 2025self-described: Mike Lundahl, mikelundahl.com

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    3. Positive

      Mirzamehdi Karimov, Kotlin Multiplatform developer (hackathon participant)

      How to Get the Most Out of Junie in a Kotlin Multiplatform ProjectPersonal blog post, Medium

      Built two KMP apps with Junie. Code rarely failed to compile but tasks were slow, so they ran two projects in parallel and improved results with Sonnet and evolving guidelines.

      Published Oct 19, 2025self-described: Two Compose/Kotlin Multiplatform apps built during a hackathon with free Junie access

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    4. Mixed

      Rimantas Benetis, Partner, Head of Technology at Gritmind

      We compared 5 AI code assistants - Here's how they stack upCompany blog post, Gritmind Insights

      Gritmind's engineers tested five assistants and found Junie fits teams already on JetBrains IDEs, but its responsiveness was uneven, its autocomplete slow, and it has no checkpoints, so developers must commit first. Cursor and Copilot came out ahead.

      "Initial responsiveness was uneven but has improved with recent updates - still worth monitoring before full adoption…"
      Excerpt, Rimantas Benetis
      "Lacks checkpoint features - developers must commit before use, increasing the risk of unwanted code changes."
      Same speaker

      Published Aug 31, 2025Gritmind, a development partner working inside client stacks; post co-written with Head of Product Laura Graves

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep

    5. Mixed

      smrtinsert, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: JetBrains working on higher-abstraction programming languageHacker News comment

      Loves Junie's accuracy, but it works like Claude Code launching a subagent per file, takes as long, likely burns as many tokens, and cannot be switched off.

      Published Aug 14, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    6. Negative

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Mercury: Ultra-fast language models based on diffusionHacker News comment

      Found that Junie researched irrelevant things, kept asking permission, and after 15 minutes returned a mountain of broken code, even with actions approved up front.

      Published Jul 7, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    7. Negative

      Vortelf, Go developer

      Junie is disappointing and I'm glad I tried it before buying a blindly subscribing.Reddit post

      On a simple Go struct-tag edit, Junie needed terminal security disabled, edited one line at a time, stopped a third of the way through, and its bug hunt produced breaking suggestions.

      Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: Refactoring a Golang project

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    8. Mixed

      Calvin Hendryx-Parker, CTO at Six Feet Up

      AI Assistants and uv: Which Dev Tools Deliver?Company news post, Six Feet Up

      Six Feet Up's CTO gave five assistants the same Django refactor. Junie showed promise but felt slower and more rigid than the others, and Claude Code made the most complete refactor.

      "Juni, JetBrains’ AI assistant, showed promise but felt slower and more rigid compared to its peers."
      Excerpt, Calvin Hendryx-Parker
      "Claude Code performed the most complete refactor, modifying dozens of files with minimal prompting and high accuracy."
      Same speaker

      Published May 28, 2025Six Feet Up, a Python and AI consultancy; live IndyPy comparison of five assistants converting a Django project's GraphQL API to REST

      Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; second-hand; not counted until substantiated

    9. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    10. Positive

      Dave Leeds, Kotlin educator, typealias.com

      Junie - The New AI Coding Agent from JetBrains - Can it build a Compose Desktop app?Video, YouTube

      Lets Junie write a whole Compose Desktop app. First impressions are quite positive with pretty good code, but it feels slow and uses stale library versions.

      "…adding the guidelines - each step along the way is given its own commit, so that's great. So overall, my first impressions with Junie are quite positive. I haven't used AI for coding very much, but so far Junie seems very capable, and I'm looking…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 12:10Partial support

      Published Feb 26, 2025self-described: Compose Desktop YouTube channel browser built entirely by Junie (EAP)

      Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    11. Mixed

      VRT303, Developer who tracks their team's AI usage and helps junior developers

      Comment on: Can anyone share their experience with Junie VS VS code / cursor?Reddit comment

      Comparing Junie and Cursor on the same model and prompts across their team, Junie was slower but made fewer mistakes and got changes right in one go. The UI is clunky.

      Published Nov 8, 2025self-described: Team on huge mature projects; GoLand user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    12. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    13. Positive

      ta988, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Show HN: Use Third Party LLM API in JetBrains AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Has used Junie a lot and finds it much better than before. It solved problems Claude Code struggled with, though not all, and is still slowish.

      Published May 3, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Discussed without concern, 6

    1. Mixed

      Ken Kousen, Independent trainer who taught an AI Agents with Junie course on O'Reilly

      Tales from the jar side: Junie Joy, Nano Banana, LM Studio, and the usual social media postsNewsletter, Tales from the jar side (Kousen IT newsletter, Substack)

      Teaching a Junie course went better than expected: Junie excels at planning and built small apps quickly, though it is still not their primary tool versus Claude Code and others.

      Published Sep 15, 2025self-described: Live training course exercises in IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm and WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Positive

      MarcoAx, Laravel developer (blog author)

      Laravel boost: JetBrains Junie vs Claude Code - Full code review and refactorPersonal blog post (part 4 of a comparison series), Magutti Blog (magutti.com)

      In a blind cross-review, Junie made a simple refactor that worked on the first prompt while Claude Code broke the app. The author found Junie reliable but Claude faster.

      Published Aug 30, 2025self-described: Laravel Boost test project (Google Maps app) built and cross-reviewed by Junie and Claude Code

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    3. Mixed

      Povilas Korop (Laravel Daily), Laravel educator, Laravel Daily

      PhpStorm Junie AI Re-Review: Compared to Cursor / Claude CodeVideo, YouTube

      Re-review after three months: Junie got faster and more stable and is on par with Claude Code and Cursor when it works, but how it tests generated code is a red flag.

      "…cursor if it works. I mean, if specific prompt is executed successfully, but in my testing, it's pretty much okay. What is not okay is some smaller UX issues, some lacking features here and there, but the most danger and kind of red flag is…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 16:30Partial support

      Published Aug 11, 2025self-described: Laravel practice projects in PhpStorm over a few weeks

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    4. Mixed

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Deep AgentsHacker News comment

      Junie was the first agent they saw with a high-quality to-do list and became their favorite: slow and thoughtful while Cursor rewrote working files. Stopped using it when it became paid.

      Published Aug 1, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    5. Positive

      Amazing_Hospital_515, Senior developer on a team of more than 10 developers

      Junie Ultimate 61 days inReddit post

      After two months on Junie Ultimate in a 10+ developer team, a full-stack feature with e2e tests takes about 2 hours, down from 2-3 days. Colleagues see similar results.

      Published Jun 29, 2025self-described: Monorepo with Spring Boot backend, React/Vite frontend, Playwright e2e tests, infrastructure and Storybook/Figma

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits

    6. Mixed

      Michelangelo van Dam, Web application developer and architect

      Personal experience with JetBrains Junie™: day 2Company blog post, in2it

      Pushing Junie to 85 percent PHPUnit coverage, found it ignored guideline test requirements, used deprecated annotations and loosened phpunit.xml strictness to make tests pass.

      Published Jun 11, 2025self-described: PHP training-course registration app (Slim, Twig, PHPUnit) in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.JetBrains recommends keeping the default model and reasoning effort. Higher effort costs more and makes the model take noticeably longer, without reliably better results. Model selection

    Open them in the record
  3. StabilityAll 10 sources on it raise it as a concernWork interrupted by Junie crashes or stalls, including integration failures.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    1. Negative

      backwardsponcho, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains Air: A System of Products for Agentic Software DevelopmentHacker News comment

      Uses Junie at work and is not impressed. It will not run inside an Alpine Linux VM where every other agent they tried worked.

      Published Sep 22, 2026self-described: Junie at work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep

    2. No opinion stated

      wcampospro, GitHub user

      Junie CLI: "The task was stopped due to an error" for all OpenRouter BYOK modelsGitHub issue on JetBrains/junie

      Every OpenRouter model tried through Junie CLI's own-key option failed at once with a generic error, while JetBrains AI models worked in the same install.

      "Native JetBrains AI-provided models work fine; the issue is isolated to the OpenRouter BYOK path."
      Excerpt, wcampospro

      Published Aug 4, 2026self-described: Junie CLI on Linux, run from JetBrains Rider's terminal

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Reliability, Operational control

    3. No opinion stated

      molbal, GitHub user

      Bug Report: events.jsonl gets too big and fills up disk spaceGitHub issue on JetBrains/junie

      Junie wrote every line a long-running script printed into its session log with no size limit, and in one run the log kept growing until the computer ran out of disk space.

      "The app keeps writing every line of text to the file until the computer completely runs out of disk space."
      Excerpt, molbal

      Published Jul 4, 2026self-described: Long-running scripts executed by Junie

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    4. Mixed

      soco, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Anthropic Claude Max US$200/mo: They claim 99% uptime, I calculated 84% Loss: US$780Hacker News comment

      Gets value from Junie but reports frequent agent crashes that waste tokens, occasional short outages, and spending of US$10 or more on a normal coding day even with Gemini 3 Flash.

      Published Feb 4, 2026

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    5. No opinion stated

      Sebastian Müller, Managing Director at yWorks

      X post: "what's wrong with Junie via IDE Services"X post

      Says Junie via IDE Services, which the company switched to a few days earlier, stopped working for everyone in the company that day, and asks JetBrains whether it is a known issue or a temporary glitch.

      "…today, Junie stopped working for everyone in our company…"
      Excerpt, Sebastian Müller

      Published Dec 18, 2025yWorks, a Tübingen diagramming software company that moved its developers to Junie through JetBrains IDE Services

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    6. Negative

      nicolaslem, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Could never get anything out of Junie in PyCharm because every query left an internal process looping at 100% CPU, so went back to Windsurf.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: PyCharm user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    7. Positive

      Duncan (Pairing with Duncan), Developer and author of Java to Kotlin, A Refactoring Guidebook

      First Look at JetBrains Junie Autonomous AI AgentVideo, YouTube

      Pairs with Junie under strict TDD. It is overly eager and needed chat and IDE restarts in the EAP, but they call it a really promising start and likes the guidelines file.

      "…so over all a really promising start and I must say that I do particularly like this guidelines file as a way of communicating in language between the AI and human and vice versa whether you use cursor or Genie if you don't already then…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 28:51Partial support

      Published Feb 17, 2025self-described: Kotlin kata project with strict TDD in IntelliJ IDEA (Junie EAP)

      Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep

    8. No opinion stated

      dustin-auby, GitHub user

      Junie ignores ask mode and applies chnagesGitHub issue on JetBrains/junie

      Reports that Junie increasingly edits code while in ask mode and does not show the changes it applied, so he cannot roll them back from Junie.

      "…when using ask mode Junie will take your prompt and apply changes to the code base, further to that it will not show you the applied changes so you cannot rollback…"
      Excerpt, dustin-auby

      Published May 7, 2026self-described: Uses Junie's ask mode on an existing codebase

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    9. Negative

      Vortelf, Go developer

      Junie is disappointing and I'm glad I tried it before buying a blindly subscribing.Reddit post

      On a simple Go struct-tag edit, Junie needed terminal security disabled, edited one line at a time, stopped a third of the way through, and its bug hunt produced breaking suggestions.

      Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: Refactoring a Golang project

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    10. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    Open them in the record
  4. Credits & Cost7 of 22 sources on it raise it as a concernHow fast AI Credits run out and what Junie costs as use grows.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Raised as a concern, 7

    1. Negative

      port11, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Calls Junie mediocre at best and says the JetBrains AI plan quota runs out in three days.

      Published Oct 8, 2026self-described: WebStorm user

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    2. Negative

      gquittet, Long-time JetBrains user

      JetBrains AI (Chat & Junie): My feedback after 2 monthsReddit post

      After two months on AI Pro, credits drained fast and Junie became unreliable, implementing a trivial benchmark after an agreed plan, so they downgraded and moved to OpenCode.

      Published Jun 11, 2026self-described: Two months on JetBrains AI Pro

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Cost predictability and limits

    3. Mixed

      KronisLV, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: How is AI-assisted coding going for you professionally?Hacker News comment

      Found JetBrains AI and Junie, bundled with the IDEs they pay for, nice but limited by quotas, and has since moved to Claude Code on a Max plan.

      Published Mar 16, 2026self-described: Software engineer in Latvia, pays for own JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    4. Mixed

      soco, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Anthropic Claude Max US$200/mo: They claim 99% uptime, I calculated 84% Loss: US$780Hacker News comment

      Gets value from Junie but reports frequent agent crashes that waste tokens, occasional short outages, and spending of US$10 or more on a normal coding day even with Gemini 3 Flash.

      Published Feb 4, 2026

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    5. Mixed

      AdComplex1867, Independent developer on JetBrains AI Ultimate

      Junie is now costing me ~US$5 a day (that's about US$1,200/year)Reddit post

      After the credit change exhausted their Ultimate allocation early, they tracked spending daily and measured about US$5 per workday, roughly US$1,200 a year, while still finding value.

      Published Sep 30, 2025self-described: Daily Junie use; tracked credit balance at start and end of each day

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits

    6. Positive

      crappybird, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Apple just released a weirdly interesting coding language modelHacker News comment

      Calls Junie amazing and says only Claude Code and opencode come close, but it burns through credits quickly.

      Published Jul 8, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    7. Mixed

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: Deep AgentsHacker News comment

      Junie was the first agent they saw with a high-quality to-do list and became their favorite: slow and thoughtful while Cursor rewrote working files. Stopped using it when it became paid.

      Published Aug 1, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    Discussed without concern, 15

    1. Positive

      lowercased, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Best LLM for every budget, updated dailyHacker News comment

      Pays US$30 a month for US$35 in credits and, using Junie as a daily driver, tops up about US$20 more on average. The CLI made it more usable.

      Published Sep 24, 2026self-described: Pays own API costs, Junie $30/month plan for local dev work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits

    2. Positive

      FpUser, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Google Books (or similar) all book scans: $200k bounty (2025)Hacker News comment

      Uses Junie professionally with Gemini Flash, which handles what they ask. More advanced models from other vendors used up credits with no extra benefit.

      Published Jul 4, 2026self-described: Runs their own business

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    3. Positive

      FpUser, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for US$60BHacker News comment

      Uses Junie with the bundled credits plus top-ups costing about US$100 a month, billed to clients. Says the experience is excellent and far better than Cursor.

      Published Apr 22, 2026self-described: Client work in CLion, WebStorm and PyCharm

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    4. Mixed

      cmrdporcupine, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Calls Junie really good, but JetBrains restricts it to a curated list of model variants without support for arbitrary OpenAI-compatible endpoints. Its AI strategy has pivoted too often.

      Published Oct 6, 2026self-described: JetBrains user for 25+ years

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    5. Positive

      dzhiurgis, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for US$60BHacker News comment

      Uses Gemini through Junie and finds it far cheaper than Claude, faster and better at following instructions, with the IDE symbol table making everything just work.

      Published Apr 22, 2026self-described: Uses Junie with Gemini in a JetBrains IDE

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    6. Positive

      Artur Skowronski, Head of Java / Kotlin Engineering at VirtusLab

      JetBrains launches Air and Junie CLI - JVM Weekly vol. 166Newsletter, JVM Weekly (Substack)

      After Claude Code's TUI garbled over Mosh on a phone, switched to Junie CLI, whose simpler interface worked for fire-and-forget agent sessions checked remotely.

      Published Mar 12, 2026self-described: Personal setup: Junie CLI over Tailscale, Mosh and tmux from an iPhone

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control

    7. Mixed

      Umayanga Gunawardhana, Developer (Medium author)

      Taming the AI Beast: How Hierarchical Planning with Backtracking Unlocks Junie's Full Potential for Epic Coding TasksPersonal blog post, Medium

      Finds Junie strong on small tweaks but prone to drift on large multi-module tasks, and shares a guidelines.md prompt to keep its plans on track at extra token cost.

      Published Nov 9, 2025self-described: Golang projects

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    8. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    9. Positive

      snuxoll, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: RubyMine is now free for non-commercial useHacker News comment

      Says Junie benefits from IDE integration: the PSI syntax tree flags invalid code, so after large refactors or feature work the developer can be confident the result is not garbage.

      Published Sep 2, 2025self-described: JetBrains All Products Pack subscriber (AI Pro included)

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits

    10. Mixed

      Povilas Korop (Laravel Daily), Laravel educator, Laravel Daily

      PhpStorm Junie AI Re-Review: Compared to Cursor / Claude CodeVideo, YouTube

      Re-review after three months: Junie got faster and more stable and is on par with Claude Code and Cursor when it works, but how it tests generated code is a red flag.

      "…cursor if it works. I mean, if specific prompt is executed successfully, but in my testing, it's pretty much okay. What is not okay is some smaller UX issues, some lacking features here and there, but the most danger and kind of red flag is…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 16:30Partial support

      Published Aug 11, 2025self-described: Laravel practice projects in PhpStorm over a few weeks

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    11. Positive

      manquer, Hacker News commenter, self-described

      Comment on: OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf's CEO is going to GoogleHacker News comment

      Tried Junie and found it better than Claude Code for some tasks because it uses what the IDE knows, finishing simpler tasks with fewer prompts and tokens than Claude Code or Windsurf.

      Published Jul 13, 2025

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    12. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    13. Positive

      Amazing_Hospital_515, Senior developer on a team of more than 10 developers

      Junie Ultimate 61 days inReddit post

      After two months on Junie Ultimate in a 10+ developer team, a full-stack feature with e2e tests takes about 2 hours, down from 2-3 days. Colleagues see similar results.

      Published Jun 29, 2025self-described: Monorepo with Spring Boot backend, React/Vite frontend, Playwright e2e tests, infrastructure and Storybook/Figma

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits

    14. Positive

      okinok, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Cursor 1.0Hacker News comment

      Finds Junie comparable to Cursor, and because it comes with the JetBrains license there has been no need to pay for Cursor.

      Published Jun 5, 2025self-described: JetBrains license holder, Junie included in license

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position

    15. Positive

      shmatt, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains IDEs Go AI: Coding Agent, Smarter Assistance, Free TierHacker News comment

      Says Junie replaced their paid Claude Code and Cursor use: the least aggressive agent they tried, achieving about 95% of requests, but it forgot context between messages.

      Published Apr 16, 2025self-described: Web application development; previously paid for Claude Code and Cursor

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Individual AI Pro includes 10 AI Credits and AI Ultimate 35 every 30 days. One credit buys US$1 of model usage at the provider's API price. How long credits last depends on the plan, the model, and the task. Requests on your own provider keys bypass credits. JetBrains AI plans and usage

    Open them in the record
  5. Needs Close SteeringAll 6 sources on it raise it as a concernSupervision Junie needs to stay on task: running ahead of a plan, changing more than was asked, or ignoring instructions and guidelines.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    1. Mixed

      Steven Webber, Software Engineer at Equal Experts

      Prompts, pitfalls, and progress: What I learned building an app with AI agentsCompany engineering blog post, Equal Experts

      An Equal Experts engineer built a full app through agents without writing code. He started with Junie and found it well integrated with the IDE, but moved to Warp's terminal workflow, and agents often ignored his .junie/guidelines.md rules.

      "…while Junie was great and nicely integrated with the IDE. I ended up preferring the workflow from the terminal as offered by Warp and Amazon Q."
      Excerpt, Steven Webber
      "Despite setting up a .junie/guidelines.md with explicit instructions (like always updating prompts.txt), agents often ignored them or followed them inconsistently."
      Same speaker

      Published Oct 6, 2025Equal Experts AI experiment: a Java Quarkus and React app with CI/CD to AWS, built only through agents and BDD over just over a week

      Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Adoption and upkeep

    2. Mixed

      dools, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains reports revenue growth, net financial loss for 2025Hacker News comment

      Junie in IntelliJ was what convinced them AI coding was the future. They later ran Junie CLI in parallel with other agents but dropped it because instruction compliance broke down on their workflows.

      Published Oct 6, 2026self-described: Kotlin Multiplatform projects; a team sharing JetBrains AI credits

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    3. Negative

      Ken Kousen, Independent trainer, Kousen IT

      Tales from the jar side: Puppies and Mockito, Anthropic settlement, 1 MILLION tokens, Junie Air and CLI, FB and Moltbook: a Match made in Hades, and social media stuffNewsletter, Tales from the jar side (Kousen IT newsletter, Substack)

      Finds IDE Junie great at planning but too slow. The CLI is faster but ran ahead of planning mode, and sees no reason to pick it over Codex, Gemini or Claude Code.

      Published Mar 15, 2026self-described: One of the author's existing projects

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control

    4. Mixed

      Michelangelo van Dam, Web application developer and architect

      Personal experience with JetBrains Junie™: day 2Company blog post, in2it

      Pushing Junie to 85 percent PHPUnit coverage, found it ignored guideline test requirements, used deprecated annotations and loosened phpunit.xml strictness to make tests pass.

      Published Jun 11, 2025self-described: PHP training-course registration app (Slim, Twig, PHPUnit) in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    5. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    6. Mixed

      bb88, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Finds Junie reasonably good and capable of fixing unit tests in Brave mode, but it struggles with large code blocks and applies changes before review, so small defined tasks work best.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: Go and Python development in JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Open them in the record
  6. Requires Strong Review5 of 12 sources on it raise it as a concernThe review needed to catch errors in Junie-generated changes.

    Counted for All practitioners.

    Raised as a concern, 5

    1. Mixed

      atraac, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: Do you have any evidence that agentic coding works?Hacker News comment

      Uses Junie only for easy, neatly defined tasks such as readmes, scripts and one-off tools. Would not trust it with day-to-day features and must verify its output thoroughly.

      Published Jan 21, 2026self-described: Backend work; one-off tools and small utilities

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    2. Mixed

      Ash Allen, Freelance Laravel developer and author

      Building a Laravel Feature with Junie in PhpStormVideo, YouTube

      Recorded feature build where Junie does much of the heavy lifting but cannot finish the page after several rounds. The author calls it hit and miss and still needing handholding.

      "…it a prompt and it'll build a feature for you. Maybe it will be able to in the future, but um right now it does need a bit more handholding, but still extremely powerful and I'm looking forward to seeing how it's going in the…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 12:42Partial support

      Published Jan 14, 2026self-described: Adding a settings page to a fresh Laravel application in PhpStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability

    3. Mixed

      PaulHoule, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: AI helps ship faster but it produces 1.7× more bugsHacker News comment

      Describes a mixed experience: Junie shines at explaining codebases and helped them write more tests and better comments, but sometimes produces convoluted code and can slip bad changes past an inattentive user.

      Published Dec 18, 2025self-described: React and TypeScript front end plus backend work

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    4. Mixed

      Julien Lengrand-Lambert, Google Developer Expert in Kotlin who leads Developer Relations at ING

      My experience using Junie for the past few monthsPersonal blog post, lengrand.fr (Julien's DevRel corner)

      Calls Junie one of the best coding agents tried so far, very well integrated with IntelliJ, great for Kotlin and good thanks to its test-first focus. But it is very eager to do more than asked, extremely slow (between 3 and 4 minutes on simple-ish requests), and cannot accept part of a solution.

      Published May 11, 2025self-described: Personal Kotlin side project (kbsky) in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits

    5. Mixed

      bb88, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI AssistantHacker News comment

      Finds Junie reasonably good and capable of fixing unit tests in Brave mode, but it struggles with large code blocks and applies changes before review, so small defined tasks work best.

      Published Apr 30, 2025self-described: Go and Python development in JetBrains IDEs

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account

    Discussed without concern, 7

    1. Positive

      Alessandro Giacomella, Developer who sets AI-use rules for their team

      Coding in the Age of AI Agents: what I learned after letting them write (some of) my codePersonal blog post, Medium

      After gating AI code generation for their team, reopened it with guardrails and describes Junie as the careful agent they use for safe refactoring that follows project patterns.

      Published Nov 21, 2025self-described: Team codebase

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    2. Positive

      Arghya Banerjee, Developer with under two years in IT

      How AI Blurred My Thinking, and How I'm Winning It BackPersonal blog post, Medium

      Compared a manual refactor with a Junie-assisted one under TDD guidelines. Junie was much faster and generated tests, while the developer kept ownership of architecture and reviewed tests.

      Published Oct 18, 2025self-described: Refactoring a monolithic Python script from a live project

      Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    3. Positive

      Stanislav Radchenko, Android developer at Effective

      How we used Junie by JetBrains to speed up development of an internal projectEngineering blog post, Effective (Medium publication)

      Radchenko reports that Effective used Junie to speed up an internal meeting-room booking app with a Spring Boot backend and Kotlin Multiplatform client, estimating, "in my opinion", about a 30% speed-up and up to 50%. Junie wrote roughly 70/30 of backend code, the reverse on the KMP client, and sometimes looped in complex scenarios.

      Published Sep 19, 2025self-described: Effective, internal Effective Office meeting-room booking app (Kotlin, Spring Boot, Kotlin Multiplatform)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control

    4. Positive

      Lou Sacco, CTO of DaisyHealth

      Junie AI Code Assistant for WebStorm: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyCTO newsletter post, DaisyHealth's CTO Substack

      After a month of near-daily use in WebStorm, Sacco, DaisyHealth's CTO, calls Junie a legit force multiplier for codebase awareness, unit tests and onboarding, but notes it doesn't always respect framework conventions and that abstract problems lead to painful loops.

      Published Jul 1, 2025self-described: DaisyHealth, JavaScript/TypeScript and NestJS microservices in WebStorm

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep

    5. Positive

      kachapopopow, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Generative AI coding tools and agents do not work for meHacker News comment

      Had Junie in GoLand build a Kubernetes device plugin for SR-IOV vGPUs while making tea. After reviewing it, the plugin worked nearly first try, saving an hour or more.

      Published Jun 17, 2025self-described: Kubernetes device plugin in Go (GoLand)

      Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    6. Positive

      Dan Vega, Developer content creator (danvega.dev)

      Beyond Auto-Complete: Junie Is Your Autonomous Coding Partner in JetBrains IDEsVideo, YouTube

      Hands-on walkthrough using Junie to explain an existing codebase and build a REST API, customized with personal guidelines, stressing that the developer stays the pilot and reviews output.

      "-step tasks autonomously, from understanding your code base to implementing new features and running tests. What makes Junie special is the ability to explore your project, generate context -appropriate code, run tests when needed, and present results for your review, all while…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 0:34Partial support

      Published Apr 20, 2025self-described: Exploring an existing codebase and building a Spring Boot CRUD REST API in IntelliJ IDEA

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Operational control

    7. Positive

      A N M Bazlur Rahman, Java developer and conference speaker

      JetBrains Junie: My Firsthand ExperiencePersonal blog post, bazlur.ca

      Used the Junie EAP to build a website and front-end UIs outside a backend comfort zone, finishing a week of work in a day while noting it still needs oversight.

      Published Mar 3, 2025self-described: Ramadan awareness website (React) and DevNexus talk projects (Jakarta Faces, LangChain4j)

      Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes

    Open them in the record

Where the evidence agrees

Statements this group's sources agree on, then the ones close to agreement.

Close to agreement: each needs 18 supporting sources

  1. Below threshold

    On work the engineer directs, Junie shortens the path from an idea to a working, tested change.

    15 supporting sources
  2. Below threshold

    A maintained guidelines file, now AGENTS.md and formerly .junie/guidelines.md, makes Junie follow the project's conventions more consistently.

    12 supporting sources
  3. Below threshold

    The most reliable reported workflows give Junie a well-scoped task with checks it can run, such as tests that define done.

    10 supporting sources
  4. Below threshold

    Junie is evaluated as an agent that plans a task and carries it through edits and test runs.

    8 supporting sources

Where it disagrees

Questions the sources split on, with the count on each side.

  • Evidence remains mixed

    Among practitioners who use Junie and another agent, which works better as the main tool?

    • Junie as the main tool, 13 sources

      Some prefer Junie for its fit with JetBrains IDEs, fewer mistakes per change, and code that follows the project's existing patterns.

    • Another agent as the main tool, 21 sources

      Others keep Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or Windsurf as their main tool, citing speed, capability on harder tasks, or a smoother review workflow.

  • Evidence remains mixed

    How much should Junie complete before a human checkpoint?

    • Broader delegation, 4 sources

      Some let Junie run whole features or long tasks unattended, often in Brave mode, and check back later.

    • Tighter steering, 9 sources

      More work in small, reviewed steps, one layer or task at a time, so wrong assumptions do not spread.

The evidence

Whose experience this is

The three groups, then every practitioner by the context they work in, and how emphasis changes with scale.

Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on All practitioners. Leaders and teams have 15 accounts; GILD prints their sentiment from 20.

  • Engineering leaders and teams

    18 sources. These accounts focus on how Junie works on a shared codebase, the tests it produces, review load, and what changes when Junie moves from one engineer to a team.

  • Individual builders

    71 sources. These accounts focus on raw capability, speed, credits, and how Junie compares with the agent each builder already uses.

  • All practitioners

    89 sources. This gives the broadest read. It mixes work settings that can reach different conclusions.

89 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.

  1. Individual practitionerSolo developers and independent builders71 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Speed, credits, and how Junie compares with other agents

  2. Very small team2 to 10 engineers9 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Shared guidelines and what reaches review

  3. Professional team11 to 50 engineers, or a named company's team3 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Which task types pay off in a pilot

  4. Technical leadershipLeaders setting adoption across teams6 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes IDE fit and onboarding across a team

  5. Organization-wideEnterprise or company-wide rolloutNo sources from this setting yet

What changes with scale. Individual builders focus on speed, credits, and whether Junie beats the agent they already use. Team and leadership accounts shift toward how well Junie reads a shared codebase, the tests it writes, and how uneven its results become as tasks grow.

Where the sources come from

Where this group's sources were published.

Counted for All practitioners, from 89 sources. Change group

111 sources for this group, 22 of them documentation

  • Developer Communities58, 52% of 111 sources
  • Engineering Blogs & Reviews24, 22% of 111 sources
  • Product Documentation22, 20% of 111 sources
  • Videos & Talks7, 6% of 111 sources

Older evidence is retained when it still applies. Sources that depend on a changed quota, model lineup, or early-release behavior stay in the history, marked Needs a recheck.

See sources by origin

The record

Who each source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and what it counts toward.

About this read

What changed, and how we count

What changed

  • Nov 1, 2026: by the owner's decision, a record whose own words state no overall view of Junie now casts no vote; it still counts toward its topics and is listed, and 3 records that counted leave the vote this way. Leaders and teams stay unscored, individual builders move from +23 to +24 and all practitioners from +27 to +28.
  • Oct 31, 2026: rewrote 7 summaries that two blind coders found overstated their sources, so each says what its source says. A company outage report and a team's brief trial before moving its work to Cursor state no view of Junie overall and now carry no sentiment. All practitioners move from +25 to +27.
  • Builds the Junie evidence base from public sources only: every source links to the page it comes from and names its author and publication date.
  • Shows a finding for a group only when at least 5 sources from 3 different authors discuss it, and a disagreement only with at least 2 sources on each side.
  • Leaves out a review-capacity statement, which one source discusses, and a model-choice theme, which most sources mention without raising it as a concern. The disagreement about time saved overall is also omitted: no remaining source answers it with time saved.
  • Checks every documentation link against JetBrains' current Junie, JetBrains AI, and JetBrains Central documentation.
  • Oct 25, 2026: added Needs Close Steering and Value for Money from accounts already on the page. 5 say Junie needs close steering, and 4 say it is worth what it costs.
  • Oct 25, 2026: added 3 GitHub issues from JetBrains/junie: ask mode applying edits, a session log that filled a disk, and own-key OpenRouter models failing in Junie CLI.

Method

A running review of what engineering teams report about Junie, from individual builders to engineering leaders. Each finding links to its sources, and each conflict shows both sides.

Counts cover only the sources GILD reviewed.

Who counts

Engineering leaders and teams
Very small team, Professional team, Technical leadership, Organization-wide
Individual builders
Individual practitioner
All practitioners
Everyone in the leaders and teams and individual builders groups

Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. GILD files each source in a group from how the account describes its author. A role or employer marked self-described is what the source states about themselves. Documentation checks facts for every group and never counts toward sentiment.

How the numbers work

  • Overall signal. Positive votes minus negative ones, per 100 votes from the sources that take a side. Each author counts once, with their latest view, whoever they are and wherever they posted. The older weighted reading, where accounts GILD matched to a named person count three times when GILD lists the author among engineering leaders and twice otherwise, is shown beside it as a second view. Where an author wrote more than one source, the line beside the split gives the votes, one per author, so the score follows from it. When one author's sources from the same day disagree, that author counts as mixed, and a half point rounds away from zero. On the AI coding agent hubs, each account's overall stance comes from GILD's blind coding: two models from different families read the source's own words without seeing each other's codes, and a third settled where they differed. An account that states no overall view there, such as a bug report, casts no vote and still counts toward its topics. Other hubs count the stance stored on each record. Sources with no opinion are listed and not counted. Strong positive is +50 or higher, positive +20 to +49, mixed −19 to +19, negative −20 to −49, strong negative −50 or lower.
  • Weighted reading, second view. Counted the older way, where an account GILD matched to a named person counts two or three times, all practitioners read +27 positive (method sentiment/S1). GILD printed that number as "GILD score" until October 29, 2026; most of those matches rest on a name or a self-described role.
  • Method change, Oct 30, 2026. GILD changed how practitioner sentiment counts, to one vote per author. Weighted, it read +25 Positive; with one vote per author it read +27 Positive. No evidence changed.
  • Correction, Nov 1, 2026. GILD now takes each account's overall stance from its blind two-model coding, and accounts that state no overall view cast no vote. It read +27 Positive and now reads +28 Positive.
  • Unscored. A group gets a score only with 20 sources from 15 authors. Below that, one source moves the score about 5 points, so the read says "Unscored until 20 sources from 15 authors" and shows its counts.
  • Independence. A source whose author works for the vendor, for one of its partners or programs, or for a competitor, and a page the vendor published or ran, is listed with that tie and counts toward nothing. One author counts on at most two records per product. The line under the score says how many authors and how many separate discussions the counted sources come from: comments in one thread are one discussion.
  • Praise and concerns. How many of the sources that discuss a theme praise it or raise it.
  • Consensus. A statement joins when 20% of the group's sources support it and fewer contradict it. Contradicting sources are counted separately. Below that line a statement shows as building. At 40% or more it reads Strong agreement; below, Recurring point.
  • Disagreements. The count on each side. GILD names no winner and gives no share of all users.
  • Minimum evidence. A finding needs 5 sources from 3 authors; a disagreement also needs 2 on each side. Smaller counts stay in the table below, marked under the minimum.

Labels on a source

A source's date and whether it still applies are separate: a recent post can describe an old version, and an old one can still hold.

Documented
Stated in official documentation.
Reported
A practitioner's account of their own use.
Measured
Backed by the source's own measurements, such as a comparative test or tracked team metrics.
GILD analysis
GILD's check of a claim against official documentation.
Current
Describes the product as it is now.
Still applicable
Older, and the behavior or lesson still holds.
Needs a recheck
May depend on a plan, version or setting that changed since it was written. It keeps counting until GILD rechecks it, since the rest of the account usually holds, and its card says so.
Out of date
No longer accurate. Kept in the record; counts toward nothing current.

Flagged for a recheck, of the sources that take a side: leaders and teams 3 of 15, individual builders 10 of 65, all practitioners 13 of 80.

Limits

  • GILD reviewed 89 public sources. 18 describe teams or leadership, including six technical leadership accounts, and the leaders and teams read shows only the themes those 18 reach at 5 sources from 3 authors. One author collaborated with JetBrains on the described project and is marked. GILD used browsers or RSS feeds where Reddit, Medium, and Lobsters blocked automated fetching. Since general availability on June 17, 2026, the record holds 11 accounts: 8 Hacker News comments, 1 Reddit post, and 2 GitHub issues. A team should test current behavior in a pilot. GILD excluded sponsored videos and republished announcements. The counts describe this reviewed set.
  • Sources record the IDE, plan, and model inconsistently. Each source shows what it states. Junie has changed substantially since its early access in 2025: it gained model choice and own-key support, Junie CLI entered Beta in March 2026, and Junie left Beta on June 17, 2026. Sources whose findings depend on an earlier quota, a single model provider, or early-release behavior are marked Needs a recheck.

Every count, and the sources behind it

20 findings for 3 groups

Each row opens its sources for the group you are reading.

FindingEngineering leaders and teamsIndividual buildersAll practitionersSources
Current readCurrent sentiment9 positive, 4 mixed, 2 negative29 positive, 22 mixed, 14 negative38 positive, 26 mixed, 16 negativeSources
PraiseCodebase Understanding5 of 7 positive9 of 12 positive14 of 19 positiveSources
PraiseCode Quality4 of 5 positive13 of 25 positive17 of 30 positiveSources
PraisePlanning & Control3 of 5 positive5 of 11 positive8 of 16 positiveSources
PraiseTest Writing3 of 4 positive (under the minimum)7 of 10 positive10 of 14 positiveSources
PraiseIDE Integration3 of 4 positive (under the minimum)8 of 11 positive11 of 15 positiveSources
PraiseValue for Money0 of 0 positive (under the minimum)4 of 4 positive (under the minimum)4 of 4 positive (under the minimum)Sources
ConcernCredits & Cost0 of 3 raise it (under the minimum)7 of 19 raise it7 of 22 raise itSources
ConcernSpeed4 of 5 raise it9 of 14 raise it13 of 19 raise itSources
ConcernInconsistent Results6 of 6 raise it11 of 14 raise it17 of 20 raise itSources
ConcernRequires Strong Review0 of 3 raise it (under the minimum)5 of 9 raise it5 of 12 raise itSources
ConcernStability1 of 1 raise it (under the minimum)9 of 9 raise it10 of 10 raise itSources
ConcernNeeds Close Steering2 of 2 raise it (under the minimum)4 of 4 raise it (under the minimum)6 of 6 raise itSources
ConsensusWritten guidelines make results better2 supporting (under the minimum)10 supporting (below threshold)12 supporting (below threshold)Sources
ConsensusFaster on self-directed work7 supporting8 supporting (below threshold)15 supporting (below threshold)Sources
ConsensusEvaluated as an engineering agent1 supporting (under the minimum)7 supporting (below threshold)8 supporting (below threshold)Sources
ConsensusStrongest on scoped work3 supporting (under the minimum)7 supporting (below threshold)10 supporting (below threshold)Sources
DisagreementAmong practitioners who use Junie and another agent, which works better as the main tool?Junie as the main tool 4, Another agent as the main tool 5Junie as the main tool 9, Another agent as the main tool 16Junie as the main tool 13, Another agent as the main tool 21Sources
DisagreementHow much should Junie complete before a human checkpoint?Broader delegation 0, Tighter steering 2 (under the minimum)Broader delegation 4, Tighter steering 7Broader delegation 4, Tighter steering 9Sources
Current readEvidence mix40 sources93 sources111 sourcesSources

Fact checks

GILD's checks of claims against official documentation, kept apart from the source counts.

  • Credits & Cost. Individual AI Pro includes 10 AI Credits and AI Ultimate 35 every 30 days. One credit buys US$1 of model usage at the provider's API price. How long credits last depends on the plan, the model, and the task. Requests on your own provider keys bypass credits. JetBrains AI plans and usage, checked Oct 12, 2026
  • Speed. JetBrains recommends keeping the default model and reasoning effort. Higher effort costs more and makes the model take noticeably longer, without reliably better results. Model selection, checked Oct 12, 2026