GILD analysis
Linear Review
GILD's call: Linear is the stronger tracker for the people doing the work and the weaker one for the people reporting on it. Engineers keep it current because it is fast and pull requests move status, while teams that hand issues to coding agents split on how well that works. Leaders give up Jira's issue types, required fields, and constraints, which Linear chose not to pursue, and cross-team Dashboards need Enterprise, so price reporting before a company-wide move.
- Team Workspace
- Agentic Development
The decision
- Best fit
- Software teams on GitHub or GitLab that want planning engineers keep current and that hand scoped issues to coding agents.
- Consider another workflow
- If leaders run a multi-team portfolio from the tracker, or departments encode different processes with custom fields and approvals, keep Jira or run Linear for engineering beside it through Jira Sync.
- Adoption condition
- An agent-ready issue template, a Triage owner per team, an AI credit spend limit, and a cross-team report a leader has built and checked during the pilot.