Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on Teams and technical leaders.
Teams and technical leaders
26 sources. Company teams and technical leaders describe where Mastra runs in their products and where they left it.
Individual builders
46 sources. Individual builders describe agents they shipped on Mastra, the defects they filed, and the projects they moved to other code.
All practitioners
72 sources. These accounts combine company engineering posts and a CTO interview with solo developers and GitHub issues, from side projects to agents serving customers.
72 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.
- Individual builderDevelopers building on the platform on their own46 sources
Emphasizes TypeScript ergonomics, memory defects, and step limits
- Small product team2 to 10 engineers, or an unnamed startup team3 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Opinionated patterns and moves to other frameworks
- Product or platform team11 to 50 engineers, or a named company's team22 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Durable runs, builds, and dependencies in company use
- Technical leadershipLeaders setting model and platform choices across teams1 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Mastra as the agent layer of a company's applications
- Organization-wideEnterprise or company-wide AI platformNo sources from this setting yet
What changes with scale. Individual builders file most of the defects and praise the TypeScript experience. Named companies appear as Brex's agent layer, Sanity's Content Agent, Brainforge's traced agents, Postiz's MCP server, and Vasco's move off Mastra after six weeks. Company-wide rollouts, at Factorial for 17,000 customers and at Replit's Agent 3, appear only in Mastra's own customer stories.