Skip to main content
OpenCode SignalsBack to the read

Every source behind the read

Every source GILD analyzed, newest first. Each says who the source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and which findings it counts toward. Open a count to see only its sources.

Whose sources count

Source

111 sources in All practitioners, with product documentation Showing all 111 sources

  1. Positive

    cyanydeez, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: The State of Context EngineeringHacker News comment

    Runs OpenCode on local models with a context-compaction plugin they extended with eviction to keep context near 128,000 tokens.

    Published Oct 25, 2026self-described: Runs models locally with an OpenCode context compaction plugin

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-25
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Local models

  2. Mixed

    verdverm, developer using custom agents and subagents in OpenCode

    Comment on: OpenCode agents and markdown engineeringHacker News comment

    Uses custom agents and subagents in OpenCode as a repeatable one-line workflow, while noting that smaller models still make more hallucinations and bad assumptions.

    Published Oct 25, 2026self-described: OpenCode workflow with custom agents and subagents

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-25
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  3. Positive

    Alan Wells, founder of Rocketable (stated in profile)

    Post by @alanwells on XX post

    Rocketable's QA agent uses OpenCode with agent-browser as its runner for markdown test scenarios, run in full before each release and again on production.

    "For the QA agent, we use opencode + agent-browser (thanks @vercel!) as a runner."
    Excerpt, Alan Wells

    Published Oct 24, 2026self-described: Rocketable's QA agent, run before each release and on production

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-24
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  4. Positive

    Alex Spînu, Applied AI Tech Lead at Deloitte (stated in profile)

    Post by @alspinu on XPost on X

    Runs OpenCode with project-specific plugins that OpenCode wrote for him, such as running code on Lambda with one-time keys that are revoked when the agent finishes.

    Published Oct 24, 2026self-described: Applied AI tech lead at Deloitte

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-24
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  5. Positive

    Brad Trnavsky, operations leader (stated in profile)

    Post by @bmtrnavsky on XPost on X

    Has a US$20 Claude plan and uses Opus for planning and verification, and uses DeepSeek 4.1 Flash for most code work. Separately lists US$10 for OpenCode Go and US$10 for CommandCode GOAT, and has never run out despite hours-long sessions.

    Published Oct 24, 2026self-described: Operations leader

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of OpenCode; Used it directly; Observed on OpenCode Go; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-24, OpenCode Go
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    OpenCode Go: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  6. Negative

    u/Lordddddddy, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-described

    Free models are having ridiculous limitsReddit post, r/opencodeCLI

    Pays for OpenCode Go and sends cheap work to the free models to save quota, but the free models now stop after about 100,000 to 120,000 tokens.

    Published Oct 23, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-23
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode Go and free models

  7. Negative

    Erik Fiala, founder (stated in profile)

    Post by @fialaerik on XPost on X

    Ran Claude Code and OpenCode on the same refactor; Claude Code finished it cleanly while OpenCode reported tests passing when half never ran.

    Published Oct 23, 2026self-described: Works on Breakflare.com and Everch.at

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-23
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  8. Positive

    u/rizal72, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI

    Why I left OpenCode for Pi, then came back for v2Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI

    Left OpenCode 1 for Pi to build custom widgets, then returned for v2's plugin API, and reports a lighter first prompt (about 11,000 tokens) than their Pi setup.

    Published Oct 22, 2026self-described: Builds custom coding assistant plugins and widgets

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on OpenCode v2
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-22, OpenCode v2
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2

  9. No opinion stated

    u/trytoinfect74, Reddit commenter in r/LocalLLaMA

    Comment on: Does opencode send chats/other data to their server? It establishes a connection even though I am using local modelReddit comment, r/LocalLLaMA

    Their company's infosec team banned OpenCode after seeing it send telemetry and data with every sharing option turned off.

    Published Oct 21, 2026self-described: Company infosec team forbids OpenCode because of telemetry and data leaks

    not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Reports others' experience
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-21
    Not counted
    Operational control, data control: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  10. Positive

    sammajayi, developer

    Post by @sammajayi on XPost on X

    Likes switching providers inside one OpenCode session when credits run out, without re-explaining the codebase.

    Published Oct 21, 2026self-described: Web3 builder using OpenCode across providers

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-21
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  11. Positive

    its_eknock, builder in Nairobi (stated in profile)

    Post by @its_eknock on XPost on X

    Dropped Claude, Cursor and Codex subscriptions for OpenCode on free open models, with a Claude API key kept for Opus when needed.

    Published Oct 20, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with free Chinese models and Claude API access

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-20
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  12. Positive

    Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare

    Cutting our inference bill by 68% by being obsessive about optimizationCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Cloudflare cut its OpenCode-based reviewer from US$2.43 to US$0.77 per review. OpenCode 1 placed its only cache breakpoint after repository-specific text, which a plugin hook fixed. OpenCode 2 matched 1 on 98% of approval decisions and finished 13% faster.

    "The problem ended up being in how OpenCode v1 constructed the system prompt: It built one block containing our agent prompt, followed by an environment section with the working directory and the date, and placed the only cache breakpoint at the end of that block."
    Excerpt, Ryan Skidmore

    Published Oct 19, 2026Cloudflare's internal AI code reviewer after its move to OpenCode 2

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (benchmark output); Observed on OpenCode v2
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Systems Engineer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    10 artifacts (benchmark output, organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-10-19, OpenCode v2
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, regressions: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current

  13. No opinion stated

    jprokay13, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedHacker News comment

    Got OpenCode's breach notice the same morning Anthropic reported their US$20 of monthly API credits used up on the exposed key.

    Published Oct 17, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-17
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  14. Mixed

    john01dav, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedHacker News comment

    Gets great results from Qwen 3.7 Plus on OpenCode Go for US$10 per month and knows no other option of nearly that value, but is interested in switching because OpenCode "isn't so trustworthy, it seems", calling this the second issue seen.

    Published Oct 17, 2026self-described: Personal user paying $10 monthly for OpenCode Go and Qwen

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of OpenCode; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on OpenCode Go
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-17, OpenCode Go
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode Go: Qwen 3.7 Plus

  15. No opinion stated

    mmmmbbbhb, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment

    Runs OpenCode under bubblewrap and finds the sandbox fits poorly with its client and server split.

    Published Oct 17, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with bubblewrap

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-17
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2.0

  16. Mixed

    u/New-Stop1494, Reddit poster in r/ClaudeAI, self-described

    PSA: OpenCode breach - my stored Anthropic key was used to drain ~$158 overnight. Revoke yours.Reddit post, r/ClaudeAI

    An Anthropic key stored only in OpenCode Console was drained of about US$158 overnight in the October breach; Anthropic declined a refund and OpenCode offered US$200 in credit.

    Published Oct 17, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; Customer of OpenCode; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed); customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-17
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  17. Negative

    cute_boi, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment

    Reports that each OpenCode subagent uses about 300 MB of RAM.

    Published Oct 16, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-16
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  18. Positive

    spopejoy, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment

    Tried Pi twice and came back; OpenCode 2.0 cleared most of the 1.x bugs, though permission parsing still fails on long tool calls.

    Published Oct 16, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode and Pi with custom extensions

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 2.0
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-16, 2.0
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2.0

  19. Positive

    nfriedly, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment

    Uses a terminal agent at work, and OpenCode through OpenChamber's web and mobile clients for personal projects in short sessions away from the desk.

    Published Oct 15, 2026self-described: Software engineer using a TUI at work

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-15
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  20. Negative

    verdverm, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment

    Switched from OpenCode to Pi the week of the 2.0 launch, citing security and the minimal, user-built setup that others leaving cite too.

    Published Oct 15, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-15
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  21. Positive

    otekengineering, engineer trying OpenCode with API credits

    Comment on: OpenCode and free modelsHacker News comment

    Tried OpenCode to use API credits unavailable in another client, liked its accessibility for students and hobbyists, and found the free Nemotron model useful.

    Published Oct 15, 2026self-described: OpenCode with Claude Max API credits and Nemotron

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on ornith 1.5 35b q8; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-15, ornith 1.5 35b q8
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  22. Mixed

    ghrl, developer evaluating OpenCode integrations

    Comment on: OpenCode MCP integrationsHacker News comment

    Reports that OpenCode is often absent from commercial agent integrations, even when those products document other coding clients.

    Published Oct 15, 2026self-described: OpenCode and provider integrations

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-15
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  23. Mixed

    u/SM8085, Reddit poster in r/LocalLLaMA, self-described

    OpenCode 2.0.26 is out, if you need to constantly prompt "Continue" it's not just your bot AFAIKReddit post, r/LocalLLaMA

    After upgrading to 2.0.26, agents stopped after announcing a step and needed a prompt to continue, even on capable models.

    Published Oct 11, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on OpenCode 2.0.26
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-10-11, OpenCode 2.0.26
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2.0.26

  24. Mixed

    u/avinthakur080, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI

    How is opencode v2 going for you guys ? (my experience in description)Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI

    Uses OpenCode for all work and personal coding and finds it largely works. Daily v2 issues and the lack of a built-in sandbox across several machines have them weighing Pi or a fork.

    Published Oct 3, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode on office and personal machines

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on v2; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (repository)
    Date and version
    2026-10-03, v2
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2

  25. Positive

    Andreas Jansson, Principal Systems Engineer at Cloudflare

    Cut your AI spend with AI Gateway's Auto RouterCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Cloudflare routes requests from its internal OpenCode deployment to a capable enough model per task, saving up to 30% against frontier models alone. Without the router, users in OpenCode and other harnesses pick models by hand.

    "We use Auto Router internally at Cloudflare within our OpenCode deployment and within Cloudflare OS, our custom agent harness."
    Excerpt, Andreas Jansson

    Published Sep 30, 2026Cloudflare's internal OpenCode deployment routed through AI Gateway

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Principal Systems Engineer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    1 artifact (organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-09-30
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current

  26. Positive

    u/FickleSwordfish8689, Reddit poster in r/ChatGPTCoding

    Finally moved off claude code to OSS models on opencodeReddit post, r/ChatGPTCoding

    Moved fully from Claude Code to OpenCode on open models such as Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, while noting the recent workload has been light.

    Published Sep 23, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with open source models for complex engineering projects

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-23
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  27. Mixed

    u/CarryOnRTW, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI

    Forced transition from opencode v1 to v2Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI

    A routine Arch package update installed OpenCode 2 under a 1.x version number and broke their local llama.cpp setup until they found the new background service.

    Published Sep 16, 2026self-described: EndeavourOS user running local llama.cpp and Qwen models with OpenCode

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on opencode v2.0.3
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-09-16, opencode v2.0.3
    Counts toward
    Reliability, regressions: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 2.0.3, llama.cpp

  28. Negative

    u/Arkhaitekton, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-described

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash nerf on OpenCode so now CommandCode is betterReddit post, r/opencodeCLI

    Measured OpenCode Go's DeepSeek V4.1 Flash allowance at half the earlier usage and moved to CommandCode, which gave more usage for the same price.

    Published Sep 10, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Specific details; Observed on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (benchmark output)
    Date and version
    2026-09-10, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: mixed, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode Go: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  29. No opinion stated

    DHH, chief technology officer, 37signals

    Lex Fridman Podcast #501: DHH on the future of programming and agentic engineeringPodcast episode with publisher transcript

    DHH often runs Claude and Codex in two panes and sometimes adds an OpenCode setup beside them.

    "So oftentimes I’ll run Claude up top, and then I’ll run Codex down below, and then maybe I also have an OpenCode set up."
    Transcript excerpt, DHH, around 2:43:27 in the episode

    Published Aug 26, 2026self-described: 37signals and Omarchy, his own agent work

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  30. Positive

    Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at Ramp

    Why Ramp built its own in-house coding agent, InspectNewsletter deep dive, The Pragmatic Engineer

    Ramp's engineering leaders chose OpenCode as the harness inside Inspect because its HTTP API made setup straightforward and it works with any model. Inspect sessions now produce 75% of Ramp's merged pull requests.

    "…exposed an HTTP API which made it straightforward to set up, and was open-source, good enough, and importantly, offered model agnosticism."
    Excerpt, Rahul Sengottuvelu
    "Engineers at Ramp can use any tool they want, but 75% of merged PRs are now raised by Inspect…"
    Excerpt, The Pragmatic Engineer

    Published Aug 25, 2026Interview with Ramp's CTO and the engineers who built Inspect

    Practitioner account, self-described; second-hand; not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Second-hand; Specific details
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (Ramp's chief technology officer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Reports others' experience
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-08-25
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Current

  31. No opinion stated

    Mark Cavage, President and COO, Docker

    Software Engineering Daily SED1952: Docker and Sandboxing AI AgentsPodcast episode with publisher transcript

    Docker lets engineers choose their agent; some love OpenCode, beside the Claude Code most prefer, and most agents run inside Docker's own sandbox.

    "We're probably like everybody else where most of the engineers like Claude Code the best. Some people love OpenCode, some people love Codex. We let people do what they want on their things of choice."
    Transcript excerpt, Mark Cavage, around 38:49 in the episode

    Published Jul 30, 2026self-described: Docker engineering, engineers choose their own agent

    Published on
    Podcasts, Talks & Videos
    Who
    Organization-wide
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current

  32. Positive

    Ivan Fioravanti, co-founder and board member of CoreView (stated in profile)

    Post by @ivanfioravanti on XPost on X

    Uses OpenCode alongside other agents and likes it, but shows that editing AGENTS.md mid-session forces about 62,000 tokens to be processed again, which hurts most on local models.

    Published Jul 22, 2026Technology advisor, investor, and co-founder at CoreView

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-22
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Current
    Observed on
    Local models on Apple MLX

  33. Mixed

    martinkivi, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Uses OpenCode daily across three or four projects at once and values how easily custom agents are created, while missing the old session sidebar.

    Published Jul 21, 2026self-described: Rails and Vue apps

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-21
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  34. Negative

    Luke Wren, engineer, on his personal site

    Stop Using OpenCodePersonal blog post, wren.wtf

    Tried OpenCode with Qwen3.6-27B on an M4 Max and shows a "git *" deny rule blocking git status while allowing the same commands through env, a full path or a pipe to bash. Calls textual command filtering entirely useless and says everyone using OpenCode should stop using it.

    Published Jul 20, 2026self-described: Undated post, first shared on Hacker News on Jul 20, 2026; source read at commit baef5cd4

    Practitioner account; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Used it directly; Observed on baef5cd4; Specific details
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-20, baef5cd4
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Qwen3.6-27B on an M4 Max

  35. Negative

    regexorcist, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Dropped OpenCode for the lighter maki harness because it sent data to the cloud for session titles while they used only a local model.

    Published Jul 20, 2026self-described: Uses local models exclusively with OpenCode

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-20
    Not counted
    Operational control, data control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Local model

  36. Negative

    calgoo, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Tried OpenCode while leaving Claude, disliked how it worked, and prefers Pi.

    Published Jul 20, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-20
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  37. Mixed

    dizhn, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Used free models for a long time and finds today's free choices very limited, running out way too quickly. In the same thread suggests OpenCode's Go plan, US$5 the first month and US$10 at renewal, which on DeepSeek Flash alone "would take you a long way".

    Published Jul 20, 2026self-described: Uses free models with OpenCode

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-20
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode free models

  38. Positive

    bel8, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kHacker News comment

    Has unlimited Anthropic and OpenAI plans at work, and covers personal projects with the US$10 OpenCode Go plan on open models.

    Published Jul 14, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on $10/mo OpenCode Go
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-14, $10/mo OpenCode Go
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode Go: DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiMo 2.5, GLM 5.2

  39. Positive

    Systima, AI consultancy whose team usually works in OpenCode

    Claude Code Is Way More Token-Hungry Than OpenCode. We Measured Exactly How MuchCompany blog post, Systima blog

    Measured both agents on the same model and tasks: about 33,000 tokens of scaffolding for Claude Code before a one-line prompt against about 7,000 for OpenCode. The prompt cache was steadier. Claude Code, however, spent less on one multi-step task.

    Published Jul 12, 2026self-described: Systima team, same model and machine for both agents

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Ran a structured test; Artifact checked (benchmark output); Observed on OpenCode 1.17.18
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    1 artifact (benchmark output)
    Date and version
    2026-07-12, OpenCode 1.17.18
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  40. Positive

    neya, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kHacker News comment

    On the same GLM 5.2 model through OpenRouter, Claude Code cost about US$10 per task and OpenCode about US$10 a day for four or five tasks.

    Published Jul 12, 2026self-described: Database migrations, code audits and documentation

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on GLM 5.2
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-07-12, GLM 5.2
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    GLM 5.2 through OpenRouter

  41. Positive

    porridgeraisin, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: AUR packages compromised with Infostealer and RootkitHacker News comment

    Has OpenCode, with the opencode-pty plugin, drive the Arch package helper and review each package build before they upgrade.

    Published Jun 12, 2026self-described: Systems engineer using OpenCode to review AUR packages on Linux

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-06-12
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  42. Mixed

    Ishaan Jaffer, CTO at LiteLLM

    How we built a background agent to cover 30% of our backlogCompany engineering blog post, LiteLLM blog

    LiteLLM picked OpenCode as the harness for its ticket agent after the Claude Agents SDK ran out of memory at about one request per minute. OpenCode holds sessions in memory too, but its memory grew more slowly. The team keeps a layer that can swap it for Claude Code or Codex.

    "OpenCode hits the same fundamental bottleneck (long-running sessions held in memory), but its memory usage grew more slowly, making it the better fit for now."
    Excerpt, Ishaan Jaffer

    Published May 27, 2026LiteLLM's background agent that takes tickets from Linear and files pull requests

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (CTO, LiteLLM)
    Relationship
    vendor employee (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    2 artifacts (organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-05-27
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  43. Positive

    estebarb, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: DeepSeek reasonix, DeepSeek native coding agent with high caching and low costHacker News comment

    In a day of regular coding on DeepSeek, OpenCode hit the prompt cache for 120 million input tokens and missed it for 2.59 million.

    Published May 24, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with DeepSeek for regular coding

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on DeepSeek
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-24, DeepSeek
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    DeepSeek

  44. Positive

    pzo, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanentHacker News comment

    Spent about US$2 for 100 million tokens in a day of OpenCode on DeepSeek V4 Pro, mostly cached tokens.

    Published May 23, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with DeepSeek for coding

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on Deepseek v4 pro
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-23, Deepseek v4 pro
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    DeepSeek V4 Pro

  45. Positive

    Carmelo Daniele, developer and OpenCode user

    Claude Code, OpenCode, and π (pi): anatomy of a trivial requestPersonal blog post, cd4n1's blog

    Captured the first request of Claude Code, OpenCode and Pi on the same Bedrock model. OpenCode stays his choice, with a system prompt about a third the size of Claude Code's and safety guidance Pi lacks.

    Published May 18, 2026self-described: Same model on Amazon Bedrock through LiteLLM for all three agents

    Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Ran a structured test; Observed on eu.anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0
    Role
    Name self-described; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-05-18, eu.anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance, C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  46. Positive

    Rajesh Bhatia, leader of the Productivity Platform function at Cloudflare

    The AI engineering stack we built internally - on the platform we shipCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Thakur, Roe-Meschke and Bhatia describe Cloudflare's internal AI stack, where one opencode auth login command configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands and permissions. From Feb 5 to April 15, 2026, 3,683 users (93% of R&D) were active, with 27.08M OpenCode messages against 434.9K for Windsurf.

    "That command triggers a chain that configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands, and permissions, without the user touching a config file."
    Excerpt, Rajesh Bhatia
    "3,683 internal users actively using AI coding tools (60% company-wide, 93% across R&D), out of approximately 6,100 total employees…"
    Same speaker

    Published Apr 20, 2026Company-wide OpenCode setup at Cloudflare, configured from one internal discovery endpoint

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Customer of OpenCode; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (leads the Productivity Platform function at Cloudflare)
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    7 artifacts (organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-04-20
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, admin control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Organization-wide
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  47. Positive

    Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare

    Orchestrating AI Code Review at scaleCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Skidmore reports that Cloudflare built its CI merge-request reviewer around OpenCode because the team already used it, it is open source, its SDK makes plugins easy and, most importantly, it is server first, letting them create sessions programmatically. In the first 30 days it ran 131,246 review runs across 48,095 merge requests.

    "It has a great open source SDK, allowing us to easily build plugins that work flawlessly…"
    Excerpt, Ryan Skidmore

    Published Apr 20, 2026CI-native code reviewer that runs OpenCode in GitLab CI across Cloudflare's repositories

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Systems Engineer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    8 artifacts (organization page, benchmark output)
    Date and version
    2026-04-20
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, measured outcomes: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  48. Positive

    Tyson Trautmann, Senior Director, Engineering at Cloudflare

    Agents that remember: introducing Agent MemoryCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Trautmann and Sutter say Cloudflare uses an internal OpenCode plugin that wires Agent Memory into the development loop. With a shared team profile, the agent knows what others have already learned, so it "can stop asking questions" already answered and stop repeating corrected mistakes.

    "We use an internal OpenCode plugin that wires Agent Memory into the development loop."
    Excerpt, Tyson Trautmann

    Published Apr 17, 2026Internal OpenCode plugin that gives Cloudflare teams shared agent memory

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Used it directly
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Senior Director, Engineering)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-17
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  49. Positive

    Derek Meegan, software engineer at Browserbase

    How we build internal agents at BrowserbaseCompany engineering blog post, Browserbase blog

    Jeong and Meegan describe Browserbase's internal agent bb, one OpenCode agent loop shared across tasks and pre-started on a local port in each sandbox. Domain workflows live as skills in .opencode/skills, with typed service packages as a second layer.

    "The core loop is OpenCode. It handles the LLM conversation, tool orchestration, context management, streaming, and context compaction. We don't touch any of that."
    Excerpt, Derek Meegan

    Published Apr 16, 2026bb, Browserbase's shared internal agent for support investigations and code changes

    Practitioner account, name and role on an outside page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on an outside page; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (software engineer)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-16
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  50. Positive

    Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at Cloudflare

    Building the foundation for running extra-large language modelsCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Cloudflare added session affinity headers to OpenCode and had its heaviest internal users adopt them. Input token cache hits on Workers AI rose from 60% to 80% at peak, and interactive OpenCode sessions got faster.

    "We added session affinity headers to popular agent harnesses like OpenCode, where we noticed a significant increase in total throughput."
    Excerpt, Kevin Flansburg

    Published Apr 16, 2026Workers AI serving Kimi K2.5 to Cloudflare's internal OpenCode users

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Senior Manager, Engineering)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-04-16
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Measured
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  51. Positive

    Robin Guldener, co-founder and CEO of Nango

    What we learned building 200+ API integrations with OpenCodeCompany engineering blog post, Nango blog

    Guldener describes how Nango's orchestrator spawns one OpenCode agent per API interaction; OpenCode runs headless in the pipeline, its SDK manages sessions, and the team attaches the UI to a session to inspect failures. The agent generates ~200 integrations across five APIs in 15 minutes for less than US$20 in tokens.

    Published Apr 1, 2026self-described: Nango background agent that builds API integrations

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Co-Founder & CEO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    5 artifacts (organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-03-12
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  52. Negative

    Darkmoon_UK, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Leaving OpenCode after weeks of SSE timeouts and a broken desktop UI, and is looking at Junie CLI for a Kotlin stack.

    Published Mar 29, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-29
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  53. Negative

    port11, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Gave up after minor and patch releases repeatedly broke a tuned plugin and prompt setup, and went back to other agents.

    Published Mar 22, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-22
    Not counted
    Reliability, regressions: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  54. Positive

    ctmnt, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Likes OpenCode and its interface but wants it to stop clearing the terminal on exit.

    Published Mar 22, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-22
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  55. Positive

    scuff3d, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Picked OpenCode to avoid being locked into one vendor's models; runs it on GPT today and found Claude Code buggy and unpolished.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with GPT and multiple provider options

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on GPT
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21, GPT
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    GPT models

  56. Mixed

    jFriedensreich, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Values the client and server split that lets one session move between the TUI, VS Code, a web app and the desktop app. But the web UI and API routes nobody has identified reach OpenCode's servers, and the defaults are unsafe outside a container.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Operational control, data control: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  57. Positive

    pprotas, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Runs OpenCode's web UI on a Raspberry Pi as a homelab assistant and reaches it from a phone over Tailscale.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Personal homelab on a Raspberry Pi 4B

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    2 artifacts (repository)
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  58. No opinion stated

    movq, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Warns that OpenCode sent prompts to its own Zen proxy without the user choosing it, so a developer limited to an approved provider could leak proprietary code.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Operational control, data control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  59. Negative

    lukewarm707, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Traced pinned version 1.2.20 with mitmproxy on a local model and found it silently called OpenCode Zen's gpt-5-nano for side tasks, a model with 30-day retention.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: OpenCode user running local chat completions

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran a structured test; Observed on 1.2.20; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21, 1.2.20
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Operational control, data control: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    OpenCode 1.2.20, local model

  60. Positive

    solarkraft, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Spends most of their AI time in OpenCode at work and at home. Calls it the most complete agent they have found for its server, SDK, web UI and plugin model, and names its security approach as the main criticism.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode at work and home for AI chat

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  61. Negative

    sorentwo, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Stopped using OpenCode after it moved from a Dockerfile fix to deploying to production without asking.

    "The moment that OpenCode, after helping fix a Dockerfile issue, decided it was time to deploy to prod _without asking for consent_, I was out."
    Excerpt, sorentwo

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Creator and maintainer of Oban, an Elixir background job processor

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  62. Negative

    NicuCalcea, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Abandoned OpenCode because a memory leak filled the machine's memory within minutes.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Investigative data journalist using OpenCode

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (issue)
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  63. Positive

    boomskats, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Likes OpenCode's interface and results after months of use; when Anthropic access turned flaky, tried Claude Code again and moved to an OpenAI plan to keep using OpenCode.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Reliability, service availability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  64. Mixed

    frankdejonge, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Moved back to Claude Code because Claude, the model their company uses, became less and less productive inside OpenCode.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Company using Claude; employee moved back to Claude Code

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Claude models

  65. Positive

    rurban, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Ranks OpenCode above Codex, Claude Code, Copilot and Qwen Code for its output, subagents and free models; Opus through a GitHub Copilot plan runs out of quota within a day.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Developer working with Lisp, Perl, C, C++, ASM, compilers, AI, and embedded systems

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on GitHub opus 4.6
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21, GitHub opus 4.6
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, limits in practice: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  66. Positive

    zkmon, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Settled on OpenCode with its free Big Pickle model after paying for Claude and Codex, and splits work into small tasks the free model can finish.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on BigPickle
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21, BigPickle
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Big Pickle, OpenCode's free model

  67. No opinion stated

    l72, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Wraps OpenCode in bubblewrap so it sees only the working directory and its own config, with no SSH keys or cloud credentials.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode sandboxed with bubblewrap in the current working directory

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  68. Mixed

    arthurjean, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Stayed with Claude Code for daily Opus work, and rates OpenCode above Codex, Gemini CLI and Mistral Vibe.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: Solo indie maker building developer tools and AI products full-time

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    Claude Opus

  69. Negative

    Imustaskforhelp, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    OpenCode ran out of memory on a 512 MB server and needed 1 GB or more, so they moved to Charm's Crush, which runs on small machines.

    Published Mar 21, 2026self-described: 512 MB virtual private server

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Reliability, run stability: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  70. Mixed

    monkey26, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Likes OpenCode after months of use but finds too much GUI packed into the terminal UI, and now reaches for Codex and Pi more often.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  71. Mixed

    hereme888, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Patched OpenCode to keep using a Claude subscription after Anthropic blocked it, knowing this breaks Anthropic's terms.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  72. Mixed

    plastic3169, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Finds OpenCode breaks terminal habits: no low-color theme, copy and paste taken over, and the keypad Enter ignored, though the agent itself is good.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  73. Negative

    EnPissant, Hacker News commenter, self-described

    Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment

    Dislikes OpenCode for taking over the terminal's alternate screen, which Codex no longer does.

    Published Mar 21, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Opinion
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-21
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  74. Positive

    Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at Cloudflare

    Powering the agents: Workers AI now runs large models, starting with Kimi K2.5Company engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog

    Cloudflare engineers use the open model Kimi K2.5 as a daily driver for agentic coding inside OpenCode. OpenCode sends the session affinity header that raises prompt cache hits on Workers AI without extra setup.

    "Within our OpenCode environment, Cloudflare engineers use Kimi as a daily driver for agentic coding tasks."
    Excerpt, Kevin Flansburg

    Published Mar 19, 2026Cloudflare engineers using Kimi K2.5 on Workers AI inside OpenCode

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Ran the rollout; Specific details; Observed on Kimi K2.5
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Senior Manager, Engineering)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-03-19, Kimi K2.5
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  75. Mixed

    roymecat, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode

    [Critical] Memory leak causes kernel soft lockups (356s, 7/8 CPUs), OOM kills (111GB virt/21GB RSS), and total system death on LinuxGitHub issue

    One OpenCode process grew to 21 GB resident on a 20 GB Linux VM, causing out-of-memory kills and lockups that needed a hard power-off.

    Published Feb 12, 2026self-described: OpenCode on a Debian Linux VM with 20 GB RAM

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Artifact checked (log); Observed on v1.1.56
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (log)
    Date and version
    2026-02-12, v1.1.56
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G3 (3 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Debian 13 VM, 20 GB RAM

  76. Positive

    Tobias Jonas, Co-CEO at innFactory AI

    AI-Assisted Software Development with OpenCode: How We're Shaping the Future of Coding at innFactoryCompany blog post, innFactory AI

    Jonas reports that all innFactory developers are progressively adopting OpenCode for its skill system and free model choice, with code quality comparable to Claude Code when both use the same model. Legacy enterprise systems still need human experts, and team API costs led innFactory to build its own usage-control software.

    "All developers on the team are progressively adopting the tool, with particular emphasis on internal training and the development of best practices."
    Excerpt, Tobias Jonas

    Published Jan 30, 2026innFactory development team adopting OpenCode alongside GitHub Copilot

    Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Name and role on their organization's own page; Competitor staff: not counted as independent; Ran the rollout; Artifact checked (organization page)
    Role
    Name on a page the person does not control; employer on a page the person does not control; role on a page the person does not control (Mitgründer & Co-CEO)
    Relationship
    partner (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    9 artifacts (organization page)
    Date and version
    2026-01-30
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, context handling: mixed, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost transparency: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Counts toward
    Adoption and upkeep, ongoing upkeep: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds), capped: C-relationship
    Not counted
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: excluded, criticism from a competitor's side, kept as an attributed position
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, setup: excluded, criticism from a competitor's side, kept as an attributed position

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  77. Mixed

    MatthewCroughan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode

    OpenCode is not private by default?GitHub issue

    Found through firewall rules that session titles were generated outside their network while they ran only local models.

    Published Jan 24, 2026self-described: Founder of Nix.How and organizer of Nix.Camp

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-24
    Counts toward
    Operational control, data control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Self-hosted models

  78. Mixed

    vstenvik, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described

    opencode not respecting permissionsGitHub issue

    Denied git in the bash permission config, and OpenCode kept running git commands.

    Published Jan 16, 2026

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-16
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck

  79. No opinion stated

    JeremyNT, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Runs OpenCode in Incus virtual machines with only chosen folders mounted, so it can use every tool without approval.

    Published Jan 15, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode in Incus guests with mounted files

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-15
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)
    Not counted
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  80. Mixed

    jmspring, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Still reached Claude Max from OpenCode during Anthropic's block, but sessions hung and needed restarts every few context windows.

    Published Jan 15, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with a Claude Max subscription

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    customer (self disclosed)
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-15
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    Claude Max subscription

  81. Mixed

    bowmanjd, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode

    Copilot auth now sets far too many requests as "user" consuming premium requests rapidlyGitHub issue

    A request or two to Opus 4.5 through GitHub Copilot in OpenCode used half a monthly premium quota after an auth plugin update marked agent requests as user requests.

    Published Jan 12, 2026self-described: GitHub Copilot user using OpenCode for agent requests

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Cost predictability and limits How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 1.1.14
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-12, 1.1.14
    Counts toward
    Cost predictability and limits, cost predictability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance
    Counts toward
    Reliability, regressions: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    GitHub Copilot, Claude Opus 4.5

  82. Negative

    lvl155, Hacker News commenter

    Comment on: Unauthenticated remote code execution in OpenCodeHacker News comment

    Stopped using OpenCode as features outran upkeep of the core, found switching context across models impractical, and went back to Claude Code and Codex.

    Published Jan 12, 2026self-described: Uses OpenCode with Claude Code and Codex side by side

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-12
    Not counted
    Adoption and upkeep, continuity: repeats a stronger account in its group
    Not counted
    Operational control, models and deployment: repeats a stronger account in its group

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  83. Positive

    Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at Ramp

    Post by @rahulgs on XX post

    Ramp's CTO announces Inspect, Ramp's own background coding agent built on OpenCode and Modal, which works with all the frontier models and gives every Ramp builder a cloud environment with Ramp's tooling.

    "…its powered by @opencode and @modal, and works with all the frontier models…"
    Excerpt, Rahul Sengottuvelu

    Published Jan 12, 2026Ramp's background coding agent, Inspect

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-12
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  84. Positive

    Zach Bruggeman, Engineer at Ramp

    Post by @zachbruggeman on XX post

    Says Ramp's Inspect, a cloud background agent built on OpenCode and Modal, wrote 30% of Ramp's merged frontend and backend pull requests in one week and starts in seconds with no setup.

    "We call it Inspect. It wrote 30% of merged frontend + backend PRs in the past week."
    Excerpt, Zach Bruggeman

    Published Jan 12, 2026Ramp's background coding agent, Inspect

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Ran the rollout; Specific details
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile, author profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Ran the rollout
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-12
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: favorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Professional team
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  85. No opinion stated

    CyberShadow, security researcher who reported the flaw

    Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in OpenCodeSecurity disclosure, cy.md

    Disclosed CVE-2026-22812: before 1.1.10 OpenCode silently started an unauthenticated server that ran shell commands for any caller, and the opt-in server still had no authentication at disclosure.

    Published Jan 11, 2026self-described: Security research, reported Nov 17, 2025, disclosed Jan 11, 2026

    Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Ran a structured test; Specific details; Observed on Before v1.1.10
    Role
    Name unknown; employer unknown; role unknown
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Ran a structured test
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-11, Before v1.1.10
    Counts toward
    Operational control, execution control: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    OpenCode before 1.1.10

  86. Mixed

    piotryordanov, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode

    Broken Claude MaxGitHub issue

    On OpenCode 1.1.8 on a Mac, Claude Max usage stopped with an error a few moments before the report, and reconnecting gave the same error.

    Published Jan 9, 2026self-described: Uses Claude Max with OpenCode

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 1.1.8
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (screenshot)
    Date and version
    2026-01-09, 1.1.8
    Counts toward
    Reliability, service availability: unfavorable, G2 (2 units before bounds)

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable
    Observed on
    OpenCode 1.1.8, Claude Max

  87. Positive

    David Heinemeier Hansson, co-owner and CTO of 37signals

    Promoting AI agentsPersonal blog post, DHH on HEY World

    DHH has put Opus, Codex, Gemini, and open-weight models to work in OpenCode and values switching between them in one terminal interface. He states that Omarchy will ship OpenCode as a default in its next version.

    "I've thoroughly enjoyed putting them all to work in OpenCode, which is a terminal interface for coding agents that allows you to seamlessly switch between all of the models…"
    Excerpt, David Heinemeier Hansson

    Published Jan 7, 2026Making OpenCode a default in the next version of Omarchy, the Linux setup he created

    Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Self-described; Used it directly; Observed on Claude Opus 4.5; Codex 5; Gemini 3
    Role
    Name self-described; employer self-described; role self-described (co-owner and CTO)
    Relationship
    Checked only from the record itself; an outside check is open
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2026-01-07, Claude Opus 4.5; Codex 5; Gemini 3
    Counts toward
    Operational control, models and deployment: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, task completion: mixed, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control
    Counts toward
    Delivered outcomes, correctness: favorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relationship, C-unknown-control

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Engineering Blogs & Reviews
    Who
    Technical leadership
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

  88. Mixed

    albertilagan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode

    opencode eating 70gb of memory?GitHub issue

    An idle OpenCode session left open in tmux grew to about 70 GB of memory.

    Published Dec 11, 2025self-described: Keeps an OpenCode session running in tmux

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Specific details; Observed on 1.0.141
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    1 artifact (screenshot)
    Date and version
    2025-12-11, 1.0.141
    Counts toward
    Reliability, run stability: unfavorable, G1 (1 unit before bounds), capped: C-relevance

    Checked Oct 30, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    OpenCode 1.0.141, macOS

  89. Mixed

    maheshmuttintidev, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described

    Copy To Clipboard is not workingGitHub issue

    Selecting response text in the TUI says it was copied, but the clipboard still holds the previous text.

    Published Nov 13, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Used it directly; Observed on 1.0.62
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Used it directly
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-11-13, 1.0.62
    Not counted
    no aspect: excluded, takes no position on any assessed aspect

    Checked Oct 29, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward, pending a recheck

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Needs a recheck
    Observed on
    OpenCode 1.0.62, Ubuntu 24.04

  90. Mixed

    edmBernard, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described

    Is there a way to sandbox the agent ?GitHub issue

    Asks how to keep agent commands inside the project directory, noting that Gemini CLI and Codex CLI sandbox with Seatbelt on macOS.

    Published Aug 25, 2025

    Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted until substantiated How GILD checked it
    Origin
    Published practitioner account
    Checked
    Pseudonymous; No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check; Opinion; Needs recheck after 12 months
    Role
    Pseudonymous account; identity not pursued
    Relationship
    No tie to OpenCode found in GILD's check (byline, content disclosure, platform api profile); that is not proof none exists
    How they know
    Opinion, no use stated
    Support
    No artifact or independent corroboration recorded
    Date and version
    2025-08-25, needs a recheck
    Not counted
    Operational control, execution control: a lead (G0), counts toward nothing until substantiated

    Checked Oct 31, 2026 under gild-policy/1.0.0. The scorecard

    Counts toward

    Published on
    Developer Communities
    Who
    Individual practitioner
    Evidence
    Reported
    Applies to
    Still applicable

Product documentation 21

Pages from Anomaly, used to check facts for every group.

  1. OpenCode

    States OpenCode is open source under the MIT license and runs as a terminal interface, desktop app, and IDE extension. It connects 75+ providers through Models.dev including local models, and accepts GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT Plus or Pro sign-in.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  2. Download

    Lists the terminal installers, desktop builds for macOS, Windows, and Linux, extensions for VS Code, Cursor, Zed, Windsurf, and VSCodium, and GitHub and GitLab integrations.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  3. Intro (OpenCode 1)

    Documents installing OpenCode 1 and notes that OpenCode 1 and OpenCode 2 share the opencode command and cannot be installed side by side under it.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  4. OpenCode 2 docs: Intro

    Documents the OpenCode 2 CLI, desktop builds, the web interface opened with opencode pair, and versioned Docker images.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  5. Anomaly: OpenCode 2.0 (Oct 12, 2026)

    Announces OpenCode 2.0: the server now runs as one background process that the TUI, web interface, and desktop app all talk to, with a rebuilt API and the @opencode/client package.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  6. Changelog

    Lists releases through v2.1.4 on October 23, 2026, with v2.0 point releases shipping several times a week in October.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  7. Providers

    Documents provider setup through /connect, OpenCode Go and Zen, and GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT sign-in. States that Anthropic prohibits using Claude Pro or Max through OpenCode, whose bundled plugins for it were removed in 1.3.0.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  8. Config

    Documents the small_model option for title generation, which uses a cheaper model from your provider when one exists and otherwise the main model.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  9. Permissions (OpenCode 1)

    Documents allow, ask, and deny rules per tool, an --auto mode, and permissive defaults: most actions are allowed, while .env reads, external directories, and repeated-loop detection ask.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  10. OpenCode 2 docs: Permissions

    Documents the OpenCode 2 base policy, which allows every action except .env reads; the plan agent denies edits, and paths outside the project proceed without a prompt unless a rule is added.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  11. Server

    Documents opencode serve, its OpenAPI 3.1 endpoint, and HTTP basic auth set with OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORD; the TUI is a client of the same server.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  12. Web

    Documents opencode web, which binds to 127.0.0.1 by default and warns the server is unsecured unless OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORD is set.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  13. GitHub

    Documents mentioning /opencode or /oc in an issue or pull request comment to run OpenCode in the repository's GitHub Actions runner, which opens a branch and pull request.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  14. ACP support

    Documents running OpenCode inside any editor that supports the Agent Client Protocol through the opencode acp command.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  15. Enterprise (docs)

    Documents per-seat Enterprise pricing, a central config tied to SSO that can restrict all traffic to an internal AI gateway, and a recommendation to disable share pages.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  16. OpenCode Enterprise

    States there is no token charge when an organization brings its own LLM gateway, and points to a SOC 2 Type 2 report in the OpenCode Trust Center.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  17. OpenCode Go

    Prices Go at US$10 per month and Go Plus at US$40 per month. Limits run on rolling windows of 20% of the monthly allowance per 5 hours and 50% per week, and the page has a per-model data retention table.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  18. OpenCode Zen

    Describes pay-as-you-go access to tested coding models at provider prices, a US$1.23 processing fee per US$20 top-up, monthly spend limits, and US and EU hosting.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

  20. Security advisory GHSA-632h-h47v-g4x4

    Rates high a cross-site request to opencode serve that could install an attacker's package on npm-managed installs, patched in 1.18.22 and published September 24, 2026.

    Checked Oct 25, 2026

Source index

Provenance at a glance

Every source GILD read, with the original address and the context used to count it. Open a finding to filter the full cards above. On smaller screens the index lists each source once by name, cohort and date; its full record above carries the address, context and findings.

Provenance for every analyzed Signals source
SourceOriginal URLAuthor and contextWhoPublishedReview dateAppliesFindings
Comment on: The State of Context EngineeringID hn-39 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50236945cyanydeez, Hacker News commenterself-described: Runs models locally with an OpenCode context compaction pluginIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 25, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode agents and markdown engineeringID lead3-hn-50228445 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50228445verdverm, developer using custom agents and subagents in OpenCodeself-described: OpenCode workflow with custom agents and subagentsIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 25, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Post by @alanwells on XID l3b-12 | Developer Communitiesx.com/alanwells/status/2113870111463629015Alan Wells, founder of Rocketable (stated in profile)self-described: Rocketable's QA agent, run before each release and on productionTechnical leadershipPublished Oct 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Post by @alspinu on XID x-01 | Developer Communitiesx.com/alspinu/status/2114000171981799719Alex Spînu, Applied AI Tech Lead at Deloitte (stated in profile)self-described: Applied AI tech lead at DeloitteTechnical leadershipPublished Oct 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Post by @bmtrnavsky on XID x-04 | Developer Communitiesx.com/bmtrnavsky/status/2114055541953585205Brad Trnavsky, operations leader (stated in profile)self-described: Operations leaderIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Free models are having ridiculous limitsID rd-09 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1xdsl8j/free_models_are_having_ridiculous_limits/u/Lordddddddy, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 23, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Post by @fialaerik on XID x-03 | Developer Communitiesx.com/fialaerik/status/2113524322031870388Erik Fiala, founder (stated in profile)self-described: Works on Breakflare.com and Everch.atIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 23, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Why I left OpenCode for Pi, then came back for v2ID rd-01 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1xcgnpr/why_i_left_opencode_for_pi_then_came_back_for_v2/u/rizal72, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLIself-described: Builds custom coding assistant plugins and widgetsIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Does opencode send chats/other data to their server? It establishes a connection even though I am using local modelID rd-08 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xbqj0k/comment/19rg9rvslpmo5/u/trytoinfect74, Reddit commenter in r/LocalLLaMAself-described: Company infosec team forbids OpenCode because of telemetry and data leaksIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Post by @sammajayi on XID x-02 | Developer Communitiesx.com/sammajayi/status/2112879229440266722sammajayi, developerself-described: Web3 builder using OpenCode across providersIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Post by @its_eknock on XID x-06 | Developer Communitiesx.com/its_eknock/status/2112473180388597967its_eknock, builder in Nairobi (stated in profile)self-described: Uses OpenCode with free Chinese models and Claude API accessIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Cutting our inference bill by 68% by being obsessive about optimizationID l3b-03 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/obsessive-inference-optimization/Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at CloudflareCloudflare's internal AI code reviewer after its move to OpenCode 2Professional teamPublished Oct 19, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedID hn-21 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50134785jprokay13, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedID hn-22 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50136201john01dav, Hacker News commenterself-described: Personal user paying $10 monthly for OpenCode Go and QwenIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0ID hn-30 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50130836mmmmbbbhb, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with bubblewrapIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
PSA: OpenCode breach - my stored Anthropic key was used to drain ~$158 overnight. Revoke yours.ID rd-02 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1x8o35r/psa_opencode_breach_my_stored_anthropic_key_was/u/New-Stop1494, Reddit poster in r/ClaudeAI, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0ID hn-14 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50113810cute_boi, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0ID hn-24 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50112430spopejoy, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode and Pi with custom extensionsIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0ID hn-15 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50104026nfriedly, Hacker News commenterself-described: Software engineer using a TUI at workIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0ID hn-32 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50101235verdverm, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode and free modelsID lead3-hn-50097748 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50097748otekengineering, engineer trying OpenCode with API creditsself-described: OpenCode with Claude Max API credits and NemotronIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: OpenCode MCP integrationsID lead3-hn-50099290 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=50099290ghrl, developer evaluating OpenCode integrationsself-described: OpenCode and provider integrationsIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026CurrentListed, no finding position
OpenCode 2.0.26 is out, if you need to constantly prompt "Continue" it's not just your bot AFAIKID rd-05 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1x3n8ex/opencode_2026_is_out_if_you_need_to_constantly/u/SM8085, Reddit poster in r/LocalLLaMA, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 11, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
How is opencode v2 going for you guys ? (my experience in description)ID rd-07 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1wwfqud/how_is_opencode_v2_going_for_you_guys_my/u/avinthakur080, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLIself-described: Uses OpenCode on office and personal machinesIndividual practitionerPublished Oct 3, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Cut your AI spend with AI Gateway's Auto RouterID l3b-10 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/auto-router/Andreas Jansson, Principal Systems Engineer at CloudflareCloudflare's internal OpenCode deployment routed through AI GatewayProfessional teamPublished Sep 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Finally moved off claude code to OSS models on opencodeID rd-06 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1wo2k8x/finally_moved_off_claude_code_to_oss_models_on/u/FickleSwordfish8689, Reddit poster in r/ChatGPTCodingself-described: Uses OpenCode with open source models for complex engineering projectsIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 23, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Forced transition from opencode v1 to v2ID rd-03 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1whrllr/forced_transition_from_opencode_v1_to_v2/u/CarryOnRTW, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLIself-described: EndeavourOS user running local llama.cpp and Qwen models with OpenCodeIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash nerf on OpenCode so now CommandCode is betterID rd-04 | Developer Communitieswww.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1wcv7p0/deepseek_v41_flash_nerf_on_opencode_so_now/u/Arkhaitekton, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Sep 10, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Lex Fridman Podcast #501: DHH on the future of programming and agentic engineeringID sf-2 | Podcasts, Talks & Videoslexfridman.com/dhh-2-transcriptDHH, chief technology officer, 37signalsself-described: 37signals and Omarchy, his own agent workIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 26, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026CurrentListed, no finding position
Why Ramp built its own in-house coding agent, InspectID l3b-13 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsnewsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/why-ramp-built-inspectRahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at RampInterview with Ramp's CTO and the engineers who built InspectTechnical leadershipPublished Aug 25, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Software Engineering Daily SED1952: Docker and Sandboxing AI AgentsID sf-1 | Podcasts, Talks & Videossoftwareengineeringdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SED1952-Docker-2026.txtMark Cavage, President and COO, Dockerself-described: Docker engineering, engineers choose their own agentOrganization-widePublished Jul 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026CurrentListed, no finding position
Post by @ivanfioravanti on XID x-05 | Developer Communitiesx.com/ivanfioravanti/status/2080035604624973852Ivan Fioravanti, co-founder and board member of CoreView (stated in profile)Technology advisor, investor, and co-founder at CoreViewTechnical leadershipPublished Jul 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Current
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeID hn-17 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48995317martinkivi, Hacker News commenterself-described: Rails and Vue appsIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Stop Using OpenCodeID bl-05 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewswren.wtf/shower-thoughts/stop-using-opencode/Luke Wren, engineer, on his personal siteself-described: Undated post, first shared on Hacker News on Jul 20, 2026; source read at commit baef5cd4Individual practitionerPublished Jul 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeID hn-16 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983023regexorcist, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses local models exclusively with OpenCodeIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeID hn-31 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981542calgoo, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeID hn-40 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981700dizhn, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses free models with OpenCodeIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kID hn-19 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909464bel8, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 14, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Claude Code Is Way More Token-Hungry Than OpenCode. We Measured Exactly How MuchID bl-01 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewssystima.ai/blog/claude-code-vs-opencode-token-overheadSystima, AI consultancy whose team usually works in OpenCodeself-described: Systima team, same model and machine for both agentsProfessional teamPublished Jul 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kID hn-20 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885797neya, Hacker News commenterself-described: Database migrations, code audits and documentationIndividual practitionerPublished Jul 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: AUR packages compromised with Infostealer and RootkitID hn-38 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48504155porridgeraisin, Hacker News commenterself-described: Systems engineer using OpenCode to review AUR packages on LinuxIndividual practitionerPublished Jun 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How we built a background agent to cover 30% of our backlogID l3b-06 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsdocs.litellm.ai/blog/lap-internal-agent-30-percentIshaan Jaffer, CTO at LiteLLMLiteLLM's background agent that takes tickets from Linear and files pull requestsTechnical leadershipPublished May 27, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepSeek reasonix, DeepSeek native coding agent with high caching and low costID hn-36 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262038estebarb, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with DeepSeek for regular codingIndividual practitionerPublished May 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanentID hn-37 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243756pzo, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with DeepSeek for codingIndividual practitionerPublished May 23, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Claude Code, OpenCode, and π (pi): anatomy of a trivial requestID bl-03 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsc-daniele.github.io/en/posts/2026-05-18-coding-harness-comparison/Carmelo Daniele, developer and OpenCode userself-described: Same model on Amazon Bedrock through LiteLLM for all three agentsIndividual practitionerPublished May 18, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
The AI engineering stack we built internally - on the platform we shipID l3b-01 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/internal-ai-engineering-stack/Rajesh Bhatia, leader of the Productivity Platform function at CloudflareCompany-wide OpenCode setup at Cloudflare, configured from one internal discovery endpointOrganization-widePublished Apr 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Orchestrating AI Code Review at scaleID l3b-02 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/ai-code-review/Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at CloudflareCI-native code reviewer that runs OpenCode in GitLab CI across Cloudflare's repositoriesProfessional teamPublished Apr 20, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Agents that remember: introducing Agent MemoryID l3b-09 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/introducing-agent-memory/Tyson Trautmann, Senior Director, Engineering at CloudflareInternal OpenCode plugin that gives Cloudflare teams shared agent memoryProfessional teamPublished Apr 17, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
How we build internal agents at BrowserbaseID l3b-07 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsbrowserbase.com/blog/internal-agents/Derek Meegan, software engineer at Browserbasebb, Browserbase's shared internal agent for support investigations and code changesProfessional teamPublished Apr 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Building the foundation for running extra-large language modelsID l3b-16 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/high-performance-llms/Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at CloudflareWorkers AI serving Kimi K2.5 to Cloudflare's internal OpenCode usersProfessional teamPublished Apr 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
What we learned building 200+ API integrations with OpenCodeID bl-02 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsnango.dev/blog/learned-building-200-api-integrations-with-opencode/Robin Guldener, co-founder and CEO of Nangoself-described: Nango background agent that builds API integrationsTechnical leadershipPublished Apr 1, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-13 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560514Darkmoon_UK, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 29, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-08 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476095port11, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-42 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47472901ctmnt, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 22, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-01 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47464321scuff3d, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with GPT and multiple provider optionsIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-02 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47467255jFriedensreich, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-03 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47470866pprotas, Hacker News commenterself-described: Personal homelab on a Raspberry Pi 4BIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-04 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47465091movq, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-05 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466629lukewarm707, Hacker News commenterself-described: OpenCode user running local chat completionsIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-06 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466438solarkraft, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode at work and home for AI chatIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-07 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47464989sorentwo, Hacker News commenterself-described: Creator and maintainer of Oban, an Elixir background job processorIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-09 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466063NicuCalcea, Hacker News commenterself-described: Investigative data journalist using OpenCodeIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-10 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47465692boomskats, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-11 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47465717frankdejonge, Hacker News commenterself-described: Company using Claude; employee moved back to Claude CodeIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-12 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47467434rurban, Hacker News commenterself-described: Developer working with Lisp, Perl, C, C++, ASM, compilers, AI, and embedded systemsIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-25 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47465756zkmon, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-27 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466528l72, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode sandboxed with bubblewrap in the current working directoryIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-28 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469135arthurjean, Hacker News commenterself-described: Solo indie maker building developer tools and AI products full-timeIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-29 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47465323Imustaskforhelp, Hacker News commenterself-described: 512 MB virtual private serverIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-33 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47470145monkey26, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-34 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47468134hereme888, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-41 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47464797plastic3169, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentID hn-43 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=47471186EnPissant, Hacker News commenter, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Mar 21, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Powering the agents: Workers AI now runs large models, starting with Kimi K2.5ID l3b-08 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsblog.cloudflare.com/workers-ai-large-models/Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at CloudflareCloudflare engineers using Kimi K2.5 on Workers AI inside OpenCodeProfessional teamPublished Mar 19, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
[Critical] Memory leak causes kernel soft lockups (356s, 7/8 CPUs), OOM kills (111GB virt/21GB RSS), and total system death on LinuxID gh-06 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/13230roymecat, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencodeself-described: OpenCode on a Debian Linux VM with 20 GB RAMIndividual practitionerPublished Feb 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
AI-Assisted Software Development with OpenCode: How We're Shaping the Future of Coding at innFactoryID l3b-14 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsinnfactory.ai/en/blog/ai-assisted-software-development-with-opencode/Tobias Jonas, Co-CEO at innFactory AIinnFactory development team adopting OpenCode alongside GitHub CopilotTechnical leadershipPublished Jan 30, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
OpenCode is not private by default?ID gh-01 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416MatthewCroughan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencodeself-described: Founder of Nix.How and organizer of Nix.CampIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 24, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
opencode not respecting permissionsID gh-03 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/8832vstenvik, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 16, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCodeID hn-26 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46634416JeremyNT, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode in Incus guests with mounted filesIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Comment on: Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCodeID hn-35 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46626385jmspring, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with a Claude Max subscriptionIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 15, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Copilot auth now sets far too many requests as "user" consuming premium requests rapidlyID gh-07 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/8030bowmanjd, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencodeself-described: GitHub Copilot user using OpenCode for agent requestsIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Comment on: Unauthenticated remote code execution in OpenCodeID hn-23 | Developer Communitiesnews.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593861lvl155, Hacker News commenterself-described: Uses OpenCode with Claude Code and Codex side by sideIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Post by @rahulgs on XID l3b-04 | Developer Communitiesx.com/rahulgs/status/2010734250203455862Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at RampRamp's background coding agent, InspectTechnical leadershipPublished Jan 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Post by @zachbruggeman on XID l3b-05 | Developer Communitiesx.com/zachbruggeman/status/2010728444771074493Zach Bruggeman, Engineer at RampRamp's background coding agent, InspectProfessional teamPublished Jan 12, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in OpenCodeID bl-06 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewscy.md/opencode-rce/CyberShadow, security researcher who reported the flawself-described: Security research, reported Nov 17, 2025, disclosed Jan 11, 2026Individual practitionerPublished Jan 11, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Broken Claude MaxID gh-05 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/7410piotryordanov, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencodeself-described: Uses Claude Max with OpenCodeIndividual practitionerPublished Jan 9, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
Promoting AI agentsID l3b-15 | Engineering Blogs & Reviewsworld.hey.com/dhh/promoting-ai-agents-3ee04945David Heinemeier Hansson, co-owner and CTO of 37signalsMaking OpenCode a default in the next version of Omarchy, the Linux setup he createdTechnical leadershipPublished Jan 7, 2026Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
opencode eating 70gb of memory?ID gh-04 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/5363albertilagan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencodeself-described: Keeps an OpenCode session running in tmuxIndividual practitionerPublished Dec 11, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Copy To Clipboard is not workingID gh-08 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/4283maheshmuttintidev, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Nov 13, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Needs a recheck
Is there a way to sandbox the agent ?ID gh-02 | Developer Communitiesgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/2242edmBernard, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-describedIndividual practitionerPublished Aug 25, 2025Assessment reviewed Nov 1, 2026Still applicable
OpenCodeID pd-01 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
DownloadID pd-02 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/downloadAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Intro (OpenCode 1)ID pd-03 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docsAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode 2 docs: IntroID pd-04 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/v2/docs/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Anomaly: OpenCode 2.0 (Oct 12, 2026)ID pd-05 | OpenCode Documentationanoma.ly/notes/opencode-2-0/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
ChangelogID pd-06 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/changelogAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
ProvidersID pd-07 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/providers/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
ConfigID pd-08 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/config/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Permissions (OpenCode 1)ID pd-09 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/permissions/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode 2 docs: PermissionsID pd-10 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/v2/docs/permissions/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
ServerID pd-11 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/server/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
WebID pd-12 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/web/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
GitHubID pd-13 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/github/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
ACP supportID pd-14 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/acp/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Enterprise (docs)ID pd-15 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/docs/enterprise/AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode EnterpriseID pd-16 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/enterpriseAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode GoID pd-17 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/goAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode ZenID pd-18 | OpenCode Documentationopencode.ai/zenAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Security advisory GHSA-vxw4-wv6m-9hhh (CVE-2026-22812)ID pd-19 | OpenCode Documentationgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/security/advisories/GHSA-vxw4-wv6m-9hhhAnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
Security advisory GHSA-632h-h47v-g4x4ID pd-20 | OpenCode Documentationgithub.com/anomalyco/opencode/security/advisories/GHSA-632h-h47v-g4x4AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only
OpenCode on X: security breach notice (Oct 17, 2026)ID pd-21 | OpenCode Documentationx.com/opencode/status/2111516673953935833AnomalyOfficialNot counted (documentation)No date statedDocumentation checked Oct 25, 2026CurrentVerification only