What engineering leaders and their teams report about OpenCode, with every finding tied to its evidence.
Read the findingsPractitioner sentiment, all practitioners
+27 Positive from 60 sources that take a side
How this figure is madeFrom 59 authors in 36 discussions. Use a task pilot to measure accepted work and review time.
Aug 2025 to Oct 2026.
90 sources from practitioners, by month and sentiment.
The read is positive. Plugins and model choice draw the most praise, followed by the server and SDK that teams build agents on. Lean prompts and low-cost plans also draw praise. Permission defaults are the most frequent concern, followed by the data OpenCode receives by default, then release churn.
Positive, mixed and negative sources
The score counts them as 31 positive, 13 mixed and 15 negative votes, one per author. See How the numbers work.
See the evidenceBelow: 6 praise themes, 8 concerns, 3 close to agreement and 2 disagreements.
Counted for All practitioners, from 90 sources. Change group
Every capability practitioners describe positively, ranked by how many sources say so. Open one to read who said it.
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive
cyanydeez, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: The State of Context EngineeringHacker News comment
Runs OpenCode on local models with a context-compaction plugin they extended with eviction to keep context near 128,000 tokens.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
verdverm, developer using custom agents and subagents in OpenCode
Comment on: OpenCode agents and markdown engineeringHacker News comment
Uses custom agents and subagents in OpenCode as a repeatable one-line workflow, while noting that smaller models still make more hallucinations and bad assumptions.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Alex Spînu, Applied AI Tech Lead at Deloitte (stated in profile)
Post by @alspinu on XPost on X
Runs OpenCode with project-specific plugins that OpenCode wrote for him, such as running code on Lambda with one-time keys that are revoked when the agent finishes.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control
Mixed
martinkivi, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment
Uses OpenCode daily across three or four projects at once and values how easily custom agents are created, while missing the old session sidebar.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
porridgeraisin, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: AUR packages compromised with Infostealer and RootkitHacker News comment
Has OpenCode, with the opencode-pty plugin, drive the Arch package helper and review each package build before they upgrade.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes
Positive
Rajesh Bhatia, leader of the Productivity Platform function at Cloudflare
The AI engineering stack we built internally - on the platform we shipCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Thakur, Roe-Meschke and Bhatia describe Cloudflare's internal AI stack, where one opencode auth login command configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands and permissions. From Feb 5 to April 15, 2026, 3,683 users (93% of R&D) were active, with 27.08M OpenCode messages against 434.9K for Windsurf.
"That command triggers a chain that configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands, and permissions, without the user touching a config file."
"3,683 internal users actively using AI coding tools (60% company-wide, 93% across R&D), out of approximately 6,100 total employees…"
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare
Orchestrating AI Code Review at scaleCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Skidmore reports that Cloudflare built its CI merge-request reviewer around OpenCode because the team already used it, it is open source, its SDK makes plugins easy and, most importantly, it is server first, letting them create sessions programmatically. In the first 30 days it ran 131,246 review runs across 48,095 merge requests.
"It has a great open source SDK, allowing us to easily build plugins that work flawlessly…"
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
Tyson Trautmann, Senior Director, Engineering at Cloudflare
Agents that remember: introducing Agent MemoryCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Trautmann and Sutter say Cloudflare uses an internal OpenCode plugin that wires Agent Memory into the development loop. With a shared team profile, the agent knows what others have already learned, so it "can stop asking questions" already answered and stop repeating corrected mistakes.
"We use an internal OpenCode plugin that wires Agent Memory into the development loop."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Derek Meegan, software engineer at Browserbase
How we build internal agents at BrowserbaseCompany engineering blog post, Browserbase blog
Jeong and Meegan describe Browserbase's internal agent bb, one OpenCode agent loop shared across tasks and pre-started on a local port in each sandbox. Domain workflows live as skills in .opencode/skills, with typed service packages as a second layer.
"The core loop is OpenCode. It handles the LLM conversation, tool orchestration, context management, streaming, and context compaction. We don't touch any of that."
Practitioner account, name and role on an outside page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
solarkraft, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Spends most of their AI time in OpenCode at work and at home. Calls it the most complete agent they have found for its server, SDK, web UI and plugin model, and names its security approach as the main criticism.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep
Positive
u/rizal72, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI
Why I left OpenCode for Pi, then came back for v2Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Left OpenCode 1 for Pi to build custom widgets, then returned for v2's plugin API, and reports a lighter first prompt (about 11,000 tokens) than their Pi setup.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep
Positive
Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare
Cutting our inference bill by 68% by being obsessive about optimizationCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Cloudflare cut its OpenCode-based reviewer from US$2.43 to US$0.77 per review. OpenCode 1 placed its only cache breakpoint after repository-specific text, which a plugin hook fixed. OpenCode 2 matched 1 on 98% of approval decisions and finished 13% faster.
"The problem ended up being in how OpenCode v1 constructed the system prompt: It built one block containing our agent prompt, followed by an environment section with the working directory and the date, and placed the only cache breakpoint at the end of that block."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits
Positive
Tobias Jonas, Co-CEO at innFactory AI
AI-Assisted Software Development with OpenCode: How We're Shaping the Future of Coding at innFactoryCompany blog post, innFactory AI
Jonas reports that all innFactory developers are progressively adopting OpenCode for its skill system and free model choice, with code quality comparable to Claude Code when both use the same model. Legacy enterprise systems still need human experts, and team API costs led innFactory to build its own usage-control software.
"All developers on the team are progressively adopting the tool, with particular emphasis on internal training and the development of best practices."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive, 12
Positive
sammajayi, developer
Post by @sammajayi on XPost on X
Likes switching providers inside one OpenCode session when credits run out, without re-explaining the codebase.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control
Positive
Andreas Jansson, Principal Systems Engineer at Cloudflare
Cut your AI spend with AI Gateway's Auto RouterCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Cloudflare routes requests from its internal OpenCode deployment to a capable enough model per task, saving up to 30% against frontier models alone. Without the router, users in OpenCode and other harnesses pick models by hand.
"We use Auto Router internally at Cloudflare within our OpenCode deployment and within Cloudflare OS, our custom agent harness."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control
Positive
Rajesh Bhatia, leader of the Productivity Platform function at Cloudflare
The AI engineering stack we built internally - on the platform we shipCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Thakur, Roe-Meschke and Bhatia describe Cloudflare's internal AI stack, where one opencode auth login command configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands and permissions. From Feb 5 to April 15, 2026, 3,683 users (93% of R&D) were active, with 27.08M OpenCode messages against 434.9K for Windsurf.
"That command triggers a chain that configures providers, models, MCP servers, agents, commands, and permissions, without the user touching a config file."
"3,683 internal users actively using AI coding tools (60% company-wide, 93% across R&D), out of approximately 6,100 total employees…"
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
scuff3d, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Picked OpenCode to avoid being locked into one vendor's models; runs it on GPT today and found Claude Code buggy and unpolished.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
Tobias Jonas, Co-CEO at innFactory AI
AI-Assisted Software Development with OpenCode: How We're Shaping the Future of Coding at innFactoryCompany blog post, innFactory AI
Jonas reports that all innFactory developers are progressively adopting OpenCode for its skill system and free model choice, with code quality comparable to Claude Code when both use the same model. Legacy enterprise systems still need human experts, and team API costs led innFactory to build its own usage-control software.
"All developers on the team are progressively adopting the tool, with particular emphasis on internal training and the development of best practices."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at Ramp
Post by @rahulgs on XX post
Ramp's CTO announces Inspect, Ramp's own background coding agent built on OpenCode and Modal, which works with all the frontier models and gives every Ramp builder a cloud environment with Ramp's tooling.
"…its powered by @opencode and @modal, and works with all the frontier models…"
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control
Positive
David Heinemeier Hansson, co-owner and CTO of 37signals
Promoting AI agentsPersonal blog post, DHH on HEY World
DHH has put Opus, Codex, Gemini, and open-weight models to work in OpenCode and values switching between them in one terminal interface. He states that Omarchy will ship OpenCode as a default in its next version.
"I've thoroughly enjoyed putting them all to work in OpenCode, which is a terminal interface for coding agents that allows you to seamlessly switch between all of the models…"
Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control
Positive
cyanydeez, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: The State of Context EngineeringHacker News comment
Runs OpenCode on local models with a context-compaction plugin they extended with eviction to keep context near 128,000 tokens.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
otekengineering, engineer trying OpenCode with API credits
Comment on: OpenCode and free modelsHacker News comment
Tried OpenCode to use API credits unavailable in another client, liked its accessibility for students and hobbyists, and found the free Nemotron model useful.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Positive
u/FickleSwordfish8689, Reddit poster in r/ChatGPTCoding
Finally moved off claude code to OSS models on opencodeReddit post, r/ChatGPTCoding
Moved fully from Claude Code to OpenCode on open models such as Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, while noting the recent workload has been light.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at Ramp
Why Ramp built its own in-house coding agent, InspectNewsletter deep dive, The Pragmatic Engineer
Ramp's engineering leaders chose OpenCode as the harness inside Inspect because its HTTP API made setup straightforward and it works with any model. Inspect sessions now produce 75% of Ramp's merged pull requests.
"…exposed an HTTP API which made it straightforward to set up, and was open-source, good enough, and importantly, offered model agnosticism."
"Engineers at Ramp can use any tool they want, but 75% of merged PRs are now raised by Inspect…"
Practitioner account, self-described; second-hand; not counted until substantiated
Positive
rurban, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Ranks OpenCode above Codex, Claude Code, Copilot and Qwen Code for its output, subagents and free models; Opus through a GitHub Copilot plan runs out of quota within a day.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed or negative, 1
Negative
lvl155, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Unauthenticated remote code execution in OpenCodeHacker News comment
Stopped using OpenCode as features outran upkeep of the core, found switching context across models impractical, and went back to Claude Code and Codex.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive
Alan Wells, founder of Rocketable (stated in profile)
Post by @alanwells on XX post
Rocketable's QA agent uses OpenCode with agent-browser as its runner for markdown test scenarios, run in full before each release and again on production.
"For the QA agent, we use opencode + agent-browser (thanks @vercel!) as a runner."
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; not counted, takes no position
Positive
nfriedly, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment
Uses a terminal agent at work, and OpenCode through OpenChamber's web and mobile clients for personal projects in short sessions away from the desk.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Rahul Sengottuvelu, chief technology officer at Ramp
Why Ramp built its own in-house coding agent, InspectNewsletter deep dive, The Pragmatic Engineer
Ramp's engineering leaders chose OpenCode as the harness inside Inspect because its HTTP API made setup straightforward and it works with any model. Inspect sessions now produce 75% of Ramp's merged pull requests.
"…exposed an HTTP API which made it straightforward to set up, and was open-source, good enough, and importantly, offered model agnosticism."
"Engineers at Ramp can use any tool they want, but 75% of merged PRs are now raised by Inspect…"
Practitioner account, self-described; second-hand; not counted until substantiated
Positive
Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare
Orchestrating AI Code Review at scaleCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Skidmore reports that Cloudflare built its CI merge-request reviewer around OpenCode because the team already used it, it is open source, its SDK makes plugins easy and, most importantly, it is server first, letting them create sessions programmatically. In the first 30 days it ran 131,246 review runs across 48,095 merge requests.
"It has a great open source SDK, allowing us to easily build plugins that work flawlessly…"
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
Robin Guldener, co-founder and CEO of Nango
What we learned building 200+ API integrations with OpenCodeCompany engineering blog post, Nango blog
Guldener describes how Nango's orchestrator spawns one OpenCode agent per API interaction; OpenCode runs headless in the pipeline, its SDK manages sessions, and the team attaches the UI to a session to inspect failures. The agent generates ~200 integrations across five APIs in 15 minutes for less than US$20 in tokens.
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Mixed
jFriedensreich, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Values the client and server split that lets one session move between the TUI, VS Code, a web app and the desktop app. But the web UI and API routes nobody has identified reach OpenCode's servers, and the defaults are unsafe outside a container.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
pprotas, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Runs OpenCode's web UI on a Raspberry Pi as a homelab assistant and reaches it from a phone over Tailscale.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control
Positive
Zach Bruggeman, Engineer at Ramp
Post by @zachbruggeman on XX post
Says Ramp's Inspect, a cloud background agent built on OpenCode and Modal, wrote 30% of Ramp's merged frontend and backend pull requests in one week and starts in seconds with no setup.
"We call it Inspect. It wrote 30% of merged frontend + backend PRs in the past week."
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes
Positive
Derek Meegan, software engineer at Browserbase
How we build internal agents at BrowserbaseCompany engineering blog post, Browserbase blog
Jeong and Meegan describe Browserbase's internal agent bb, one OpenCode agent loop shared across tasks and pre-started on a local port in each sandbox. Domain workflows live as skills in .opencode/skills, with typed service packages as a second layer.
"The core loop is OpenCode. It handles the LLM conversation, tool orchestration, context management, streaming, and context compaction. We don't touch any of that."
Practitioner account, name and role on an outside page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Positive
solarkraft, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Spends most of their AI time in OpenCode at work and at home. Calls it the most complete agent they have found for its server, SDK, web UI and plugin model, and names its security approach as the main criticism.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive, 7
Positive
Systima, AI consultancy whose team usually works in OpenCode
Claude Code Is Way More Token-Hungry Than OpenCode. We Measured Exactly How MuchCompany blog post, Systima blog
Measured both agents on the same model and tasks: about 33,000 tokens of scaffolding for Claude Code before a one-line prompt against about 7,000 for OpenCode. The prompt cache was steadier. Claude Code, however, spent less on one multi-step task.
Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes
Positive
neya, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kHacker News comment
On the same GLM 5.2 model through OpenRouter, Claude Code cost about US$10 per task and OpenCode about US$10 a day for four or five tasks.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
estebarb, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: DeepSeek reasonix, DeepSeek native coding agent with high caching and low costHacker News comment
In a day of regular coding on DeepSeek, OpenCode hit the prompt cache for 120 million input tokens and missed it for 2.59 million.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
pzo, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanentHacker News comment
Spent about US$2 for 100 million tokens in a day of OpenCode on DeepSeek V4 Pro, mostly cached tokens.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Carmelo Daniele, developer and OpenCode user
Claude Code, OpenCode, and π (pi): anatomy of a trivial requestPersonal blog post, cd4n1's blog
Captured the first request of Claude Code, OpenCode and Pi on the same Bedrock model. OpenCode stays his choice, with a system prompt about a third the size of Claude Code's and safety guidance Pi lacks.
Practitioner account, self-described; structured test; counts toward Operational control
Positive
Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at Cloudflare
Building the foundation for running extra-large language modelsCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Cloudflare added session affinity headers to OpenCode and had its heaviest internal users adopt them. Input token cache hits on Workers AI rose from 60% to 80% at peak, and interactive OpenCode sessions got faster.
"We added session affinity headers to popular agent harnesses like OpenCode, where we noticed a significant increase in total throughput."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; not counted, takes no position
Positive
Kevin Flansburg, Senior Manager, Engineering at Cloudflare
Powering the agents: Workers AI now runs large models, starting with Kimi K2.5Company engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Cloudflare engineers use the open model Kimi K2.5 as a daily driver for agentic coding inside OpenCode. OpenCode sends the session affinity header that raises prompt cache hits on Workers AI without extra setup.
"Within our OpenCode environment, Cloudflare engineers use Kimi as a daily driver for agentic coding tasks."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Operational control
Mixed or negative, 2
Positive
Ryan Skidmore, Systems Engineer at Cloudflare
Cutting our inference bill by 68% by being obsessive about optimizationCompany engineering blog post, The Cloudflare Blog
Cloudflare cut its OpenCode-based reviewer from US$2.43 to US$0.77 per review. OpenCode 1 placed its only cache breakpoint after repository-specific text, which a plugin hook fixed. OpenCode 2 matched 1 on 98% of approval decisions and finished 13% faster.
"The problem ended up being in how OpenCode v1 constructed the system prompt: It built one block containing our agent prompt, followed by an environment section with the working directory and the date, and placed the only cache breakpoint at the end of that block."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability, Operational control, Cost predictability and limits
Positive
Ivan Fioravanti, co-founder and board member of CoreView (stated in profile)
Post by @ivanfioravanti on XPost on X
Uses OpenCode alongside other agents and likes it, but shows that editing AGENTS.md mid-session forces about 62,000 tokens to be processed again, which hurts most on local models.
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive, 6
Positive
its_eknock, builder in Nairobi (stated in profile)
Post by @its_eknock on XPost on X
Dropped Claude, Cursor and Codex subscriptions for OpenCode on free open models, with a Claude API key kept for Opus when needed.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Mixed
john01dav, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedHacker News comment
Gets great results from Qwen 3.7 Plus on OpenCode Go for US$10 per month and knows no other option of nearly that value, but is interested in switching because OpenCode "isn't so trustworthy, it seems", calling this the second issue seen.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits
Positive
otekengineering, engineer trying OpenCode with API credits
Comment on: OpenCode and free modelsHacker News comment
Tried OpenCode to use API credits unavailable in another client, liked its accessibility for students and hobbyists, and found the free Nemotron model useful.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Positive
bel8, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7kHacker News comment
Has unlimited Anthropic and OpenAI plans at work, and covers personal projects with the US$10 OpenCode Go plan on open models.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control, Cost predictability and limits
Positive
Brad Trnavsky, operations leader (stated in profile)
Post by @bmtrnavsky on XPost on X
Has a US$20 Claude plan and uses Opus for planning and verification, and uses DeepSeek 4.1 Flash for most code work. Separately lists US$10 for OpenCode Go and US$10 for CommandCode GOAT, and has never run out despite hours-long sessions.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits
Positive
zkmon, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Settled on OpenCode with its free Big Pickle model after paying for Claude and Codex, and splits work into small tasks the free model can finish.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed or negative, 1
Negative
u/Arkhaitekton, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-described
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash nerf on OpenCode so now CommandCode is betterReddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Measured OpenCode Go's DeepSeek V4.1 Flash allowance at half the earlier usage and moved to CommandCode, which gave more usage for the same price.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive, 6
Positive
rurban, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Ranks OpenCode above Codex, Claude Code, Copilot and Qwen Code for its output, subagents and free models; Opus through a GitHub Copilot plan runs out of quota within a day.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
martinkivi, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment
Uses OpenCode daily across three or four projects at once and values how easily custom agents are created, while missing the old session sidebar.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
ctmnt, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode and its interface but wants it to stop clearing the terminal on exit.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Positive
boomskats, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode's interface and results after months of use; when Anthropic access turned flaky, tried Claude Code again and moved to an OpenAI plan to keep using OpenCode.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
zkmon, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Settled on OpenCode with its free Big Pickle model after paying for Claude and Codex, and splits work into small tasks the free model can finish.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Positive
David Heinemeier Hansson, co-owner and CTO of 37signals
Promoting AI agentsPersonal blog post, DHH on HEY World
DHH has put Opus, Codex, Gemini, and open-weight models to work in OpenCode and values switching between them in one terminal interface. He states that Omarchy will ship OpenCode as a default in its next version.
"I've thoroughly enjoyed putting them all to work in OpenCode, which is a terminal interface for coding agents that allows you to seamlessly switch between all of the models…"
Practitioner account, self-described; direct use; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Operational control
Mixed or negative, 1
Mixed
monkey26, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode after months of use but finds too much GUI packed into the terminal UI, and now reaches for Codex and Pi more often.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Every concern practitioners raise, most raised first.
Counted for All practitioners.
Negative
Luke Wren, engineer, on his personal site
Stop Using OpenCodePersonal blog post, wren.wtf
Tried OpenCode with Qwen3.6-27B on an M4 Max and shows a "git *" deny rule blocking git status while allowing the same commands through env, a full path or a pipe to bash. Calls textual command filtering entirely useless and says everyone using OpenCode should stop using it.
Practitioner account; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Negative
sorentwo, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Stopped using OpenCode after it moved from a Dockerfile fix to deploying to production without asking.
"The moment that OpenCode, after helping fix a Dockerfile issue, decided it was time to deploy to prod _without asking for consent_, I was out."
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
vstenvik, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described
opencode not respecting permissionsGitHub issue
Denied git in the bash permission config, and OpenCode kept running git commands.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Mixed
edmBernard, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described
Is there a way to sandbox the agent ?GitHub issue
Asks how to keep agent commands inside the project directory, noting that Gemini CLI and Codex CLI sandbox with Seatbelt on macOS.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted until substantiated
Positive
spopejoy, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment
Tried Pi twice and came back; OpenCode 2.0 cleared most of the 1.x bugs, though permission parsing still fails on long tool calls.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Mixed
u/avinthakur080, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI
How is opencode v2 going for you guys ? (my experience in description)Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Uses OpenCode for all work and personal coding and finds it largely works. Daily v2 issues and the lack of a built-in sandbox across several machines have them weighing Pi or a fork.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Mixed
jFriedensreich, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Values the client and server split that lets one session move between the TUI, VS Code, a web app and the desktop app. But the web UI and API routes nobody has identified reach OpenCode's servers, and the defaults are unsafe outside a container.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources
Checked Oct 25, 2026.OpenCode 2 starts every agent from a policy that allows every action except .env reads, and paths outside the project proceed without a prompt unless a rule is added. OpenCode 1 also allowed most actions by default. OpenCode 2 docs: Permissions
Open them in the recordCounted for All practitioners.
No opinion stated
u/trytoinfect74, Reddit commenter in r/LocalLLaMA
Comment on: Does opencode send chats/other data to their server? It establishes a connection even though I am using local modelReddit comment, r/LocalLLaMA
Their company's infosec team banned OpenCode after seeing it send telemetry and data with every sharing option turned off.
not counted until substantiated
Negative
regexorcist, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment
Dropped OpenCode for the lighter maki harness because it sent data to the cloud for session titles while they used only a local model.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
jFriedensreich, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Values the client and server split that lets one session move between the TUI, VS Code, a web app and the desktop app. But the web UI and API routes nobody has identified reach OpenCode's servers, and the defaults are unsafe outside a container.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
No opinion stated
movq, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Warns that OpenCode sent prompts to its own Zen proxy without the user choosing it, so a developer limited to an approved provider could leak proprietary code.
not counted, repeats a stronger account
Negative
lukewarm707, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Traced pinned version 1.2.20 with mitmproxy on a local model and found it silently called OpenCode Zen's gpt-5-nano for side tasks, a model with 30-day retention.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Operational control
Mixed
MatthewCroughan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode
OpenCode is not private by default?GitHub issue
Found through firewall rules that session titles were generated outside their network while they ran only local models.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources
Checked Oct 25, 2026.OpenCode documents that title generation uses a cheaper model from the user's provider when one exists, and otherwise the main model. Several reports describe older versions calling OpenCode Zen instead. A report about an earlier release does not establish current behavior. Config
Open them in the recordCounted for All practitioners.
Raised as a concern, 6
Mixed
u/SM8085, Reddit poster in r/LocalLLaMA, self-described
OpenCode 2.0.26 is out, if you need to constantly prompt "Continue" it's not just your bot AFAIKReddit post, r/LocalLLaMA
After upgrading to 2.0.26, agents stopped after announcing a step and needed a prompt to continue, even on capable models.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Mixed
u/avinthakur080, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI
How is opencode v2 going for you guys ? (my experience in description)Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Uses OpenCode for all work and personal coding and finds it largely works. Daily v2 issues and the lack of a built-in sandbox across several machines have them weighing Pi or a fork.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Mixed
u/CarryOnRTW, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI
Forced transition from opencode v1 to v2Reddit post, r/opencodeCLI
A routine Arch package update installed OpenCode 2 under a 1.x version number and broke their local llama.cpp setup until they found the new background service.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Operational control, Adoption and upkeep
Negative
Darkmoon_UK, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Leaving OpenCode after weeks of SSE timeouts and a broken desktop UI, and is looking at Junie CLI for a Kotlin stack.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Negative
port11, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Gave up after minor and patch releases repeatedly broke a tuned plugin and prompt setup, and went back to other agents.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Negative
lvl155, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Unauthenticated remote code execution in OpenCodeHacker News comment
Stopped using OpenCode as features outran upkeep of the core, found switching context across models impractical, and went back to Claude Code and Codex.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Discussed without concern, 1
Positive
spopejoy, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment
Tried Pi twice and came back; OpenCode 2.0 cleared most of the 1.x bugs, though permission parsing still fails on long tool calls.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Counted for All practitioners.
No opinion stated
jprokay13, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedHacker News comment
Got OpenCode's breach notice the same morning Anthropic reported their US$20 of monthly API credits used up on the exposed key.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
Mixed
john01dav, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode Hacked: User credentials leakedHacker News comment
Gets great results from Qwen 3.7 Plus on OpenCode Go for US$10 per month and knows no other option of nearly that value, but is interested in switching because OpenCode "isn't so trustworthy, it seems", calling this the second issue seen.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits
Mixed
u/New-Stop1494, Reddit poster in r/ClaudeAI, self-described
PSA: OpenCode breach - my stored Anthropic key was used to drain ~$158 overnight. Revoke yours.Reddit post, r/ClaudeAI
An Anthropic key stored only in OpenCode Console was drained of about US$158 overnight in the October breach; Anthropic declined a refund and OpenCode offered US$200 in credit.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Operational control
No opinion stated
CyberShadow, security researcher who reported the flaw
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in OpenCodeSecurity disclosure, cy.md
Disclosed CVE-2026-22812: before 1.1.10 OpenCode silently started an unauthenticated server that ran shell commands for any caller, and the opt-in server still had no authentication at disclosure.
Practitioner account; structured test; counts toward Operational control
Positive
solarkraft, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Spends most of their AI time in OpenCode at work and at home. Calls it the most complete agent they have found for its server, SDK, web UI and plugin model, and names its security approach as the main criticism.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Adoption and upkeep
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive
boomskats, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode's interface and results after months of use; when Anthropic access turned flaky, tried Claude Code again and moved to an OpenAI plan to keep using OpenCode.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
hereme888, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Patched OpenCode to keep using a Claude subscription after Anthropic blocked it, knowing this breaks Anthropic's terms.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Mixed
jmspring, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCodeHacker News comment
Still reached Claude Max from OpenCode during Anthropic's block, but sessions hung and needed restarts every few context windows.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Mixed
piotryordanov, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode
Broken Claude MaxGitHub issue
On OpenCode 1.1.8 on a Mac, Claude Max usage stopped with an error a few moments before the report, and reconnecting gave the same error.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Mixed
frankdejonge, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Moved back to Claude Code because Claude, the model their company uses, became less and less productive inside OpenCode.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Counted for All practitioners.
Negative
u/Lordddddddy, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-described
Free models are having ridiculous limitsReddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Pays for OpenCode Go and sends cheap work to the free models to save quota, but the free models now stop after about 100,000 to 120,000 tokens.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Cost predictability and limits
Negative
u/Arkhaitekton, Reddit poster in r/opencodeCLI, self-described
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash nerf on OpenCode so now CommandCode is betterReddit post, r/opencodeCLI
Measured OpenCode Go's DeepSeek V4.1 Flash allowance at half the earlier usage and moved to CommandCode, which gave more usage for the same price.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; structured test; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Cost predictability and limits
Mixed
dizhn, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: Annoying and alarming things about OpenCodeHacker News comment
Used free models for a long time and finds today's free choices very limited, running out way too quickly. In the same thread suggests OpenCode's Go plan, US$5 the first month and US$10 at renewal, which on DeepSeek Flash alone "would take you a long way".
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
bowmanjd, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode
Copilot auth now sets far too many requests as "user" consuming premium requests rapidlyGitHub issue
A request or two to Opus 4.5 through GitHub Copilot in OpenCode used half a monthly premium quota after an auth plugin update marked agent requests as user requests.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability, Cost predictability and limits
Positive
rurban, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Ranks OpenCode above Codex, Claude Code, Copilot and Qwen Code for its output, subagents and free models; Opus through a GitHub Copilot plan runs out of quota within a day.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Counted for All practitioners.
Positive
ctmnt, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode and its interface but wants it to stop clearing the terminal on exit.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Mixed
monkey26, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Likes OpenCode after months of use but finds too much GUI packed into the terminal UI, and now reaches for Codex and Pi more often.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Mixed
plastic3169, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Finds OpenCode breaks terminal habits: no low-color theme, copy and paste taken over, and the keypad Enter ignored, though the agent itself is good.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Negative
EnPissant, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Dislikes OpenCode for taking over the terminal's alternate screen, which Codex no longer does.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; opinion; not counted, takes no position
Mixed
maheshmuttintidev, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode, self-described
Copy To Clipboard is not workingGitHub issue
Selecting response text in the TUI says it was copied, but the clipboard still holds the previous text.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Counted for All practitioners.
Raised as a concern, 5
Negative
cute_boi, Hacker News commenter, self-described
Comment on: OpenCode 2.0Hacker News comment
Reports that each OpenCode subagent uses about 300 MB of RAM.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, takes no position
Negative
NicuCalcea, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
Abandoned OpenCode because a memory leak filled the machine's memory within minutes.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Negative
Imustaskforhelp, Hacker News commenter
Comment on: OpenCode, Open source AI coding agentHacker News comment
OpenCode ran out of memory on a 512 MB server and needed 1 GB or more, so they moved to Charm's Crush, which runs on small machines.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; not counted, repeats a stronger account
Mixed
roymecat, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode
One OpenCode process grew to 21 GB resident on a 20 GB Linux VM, causing out-of-memory kills and lockups that needed a hard power-off.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Mixed
albertilagan, GitHub issue author on anomalyco/opencode
opencode eating 70gb of memory?GitHub issue
An idle OpenCode session left open in tmux grew to about 70 GB of memory.
Practitioner account, pseudonymous; direct use; counts toward Reliability
Discussed without concern, 1
Mixed
Ishaan Jaffer, CTO at LiteLLM
How we built a background agent to cover 30% of our backlogCompany engineering blog post, LiteLLM blog
LiteLLM picked OpenCode as the harness for its ticket agent after the Claude Agents SDK ran out of memory at about one request per minute. OpenCode holds sessions in memory too, but its memory grew more slowly. The team keeps a layer that can swap it for Claude Code or Codex.
"OpenCode hits the same fundamental bottleneck (long-running sessions held in memory), but its memory usage grew more slowly, making it the better fit for now."
Practitioner account, name and role on their organization's own page; ran the rollout; counts toward Delivered outcomes, Reliability
Statements this group's sources agree on, then the ones close to agreement.
Close to agreement: each needs 18 supporting sources
OpenCode's defaults trust the agent and OpenCode's own services, so whoever deploys it sets permissions, data paths, and isolation.
17 supporting sourcesLow-cost open models through Go, free tiers, or cheap keys handle most routine coding in OpenCode.
9 supporting sourcesPractitioners who keep OpenCode run it in a container, virtual machine, or bubblewrap, because it ships no sandbox of its own.
5 supporting sourcesQuestions the sources split on, with the count on each side.
Evidence remains mixed
OpenCode holds up, 8 sources
Some prefer OpenCode for its model freedom and measured lower token overhead, and some left Claude Code for it.
Claude Code does better, 4 sources
Others went back to Claude Code, saying it gets more out of Claude models and finishes work more reliably.
Evidence remains mixed
Moved to a lighter agent, 4 sources
Some moved to Pi or another light agent for its minimal design, security, or how it works.
Stayed or came back, 3 sources
Others tried Pi and stayed with or returned to OpenCode, citing version 2's plugin API, safety guidance, and stability.
The three groups, then every practitioner by the context they work in, and how emphasis changes with scale.
Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on All practitioners. Leaders and teams have 13 accounts; GILD prints their sentiment from 20.
20 sources. These accounts focus on data paths, permission defaults, and running OpenCode headless inside a team's own pipeline.
70 sources. These accounts focus on model and plan choice, spend, the terminal experience, and what breaks between releases.
90 sources. This count includes every practitioner: individual builders and the team and leadership accounts together.
90 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.
Emphasizes Model and plan choice, spend, and setups that break between releases
Emphasizes Token overhead measured against Claude Code
Emphasizes Headless agents on the SDK, project plugins, and prompt caching
Emphasizes One login that configures models and permissions for every engineer
What changes with scale. Individual builders pick OpenCode for model choice and cheap open models, and leave it over defaults, data paths, or release churn. Team accounts use it as infrastructure: a headless server their own orchestrator or CI drives, measured for token and cache cost before it is trusted with volume.
Where this group's sources were published.
Counted for All practitioners, from 90 sources. Change group
111 sources for this group, 21 of them documentation
Older evidence is retained when it still applies. Accounts tied to OpenCode 1.x defaults, a fixed vulnerability, or a closed issue stay in the record, marked Needs a recheck.
See sources by originWho each source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and what it counts toward.
Newest first, on its own page. Every count above opens its sources there.
Read all 111 sourcesAbout this read
A running review of what engineering teams report about OpenCode, from individual builders to company-wide rollouts. Each finding links to its sources, and each conflict shows both sides.
Counts cover only the sources GILD reviewed.
Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. GILD files each source in a group from how the account describes its author. A role or employer marked self-described is what the source states about themselves. Documentation checks facts for every group and never counts toward sentiment.
A source's date and whether it still applies are separate: a recent post can describe an old version, and an old one can still hold.
Flagged for a recheck, of the sources that take a side: leaders and teams 0 of 13, individual builders 7 of 47, all practitioners 7 of 60.
Each row opens its sources for the group you are reading.
| Finding | Engineering leaders and teams | Individual builders | All practitioners | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current readCurrent sentiment | 12 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative | 20 positive, 12 mixed, 15 negative | 32 positive, 13 mixed, 15 negative | Sources |
| PraiseAny Provider, Any Model | 6 of 6 positive | 6 of 7 positive | 12 of 13 positive | Sources |
| PraiseServer, SDK, and Remote Clients | 6 of 6 positive | 4 of 4 positive (under the minimum) | 10 of 10 positive | Sources |
| PraisePlugins and Custom Agents | 7 of 7 positive | 6 of 6 positive | 13 of 13 positive | Sources |
| PraiseLean Prompts and Cache Reuse | 3 of 5 positive | 4 of 4 positive (under the minimum) | 7 of 9 positive | Sources |
| PraiseGo and Free Models | 0 of 0 positive (under the minimum) | 6 of 7 positive | 6 of 7 positive | Sources |
| PraiseTerminal Interface | 1 of 1 positive (under the minimum) | 5 of 6 positive | 6 of 7 positive | Sources |
| ConcernPermissive Defaults and No Sandbox | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 7 of 7 raise it | 7 of 7 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernData Sent to OpenCode by Default | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 6 of 6 raise it | 6 of 6 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernRelease Churn and Regressions | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 6 of 7 raise it | 6 of 7 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernServer Exposure and the Console Breach | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 5 of 5 raise it | 5 of 5 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernMemory Use | 0 of 1 raise it (under the minimum) | 5 of 5 raise it | 5 of 6 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernClaude Subscription Access | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 5 of 5 raise it | 5 of 5 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernPlan Limits and Quota Burn | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 5 of 5 raise it | 5 of 5 raise it | Sources |
| ConcernBreaks Terminal Habits | 0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum) | 5 of 5 raise it | 5 of 5 raise it | Sources |
| ConsensusGuardrails are the deployer's job | 0 supporting (under the minimum) | 17 supporting | 17 supporting (below threshold) | Sources |
| ConsensusOpen models carry routine work | 1 supporting (under the minimum) | 8 supporting (below threshold) | 9 supporting (below threshold) | Sources |
| ConsensusRun it inside your own sandbox | 0 supporting (under the minimum) | 5 supporting (below threshold) | 5 supporting (below threshold) | Sources |
| DisagreementDoes OpenCode hold up against Claude Code as the daily agent? | OpenCode holds up 2, Claude Code does better 0 (under the minimum) | OpenCode holds up 6, Claude Code does better 4 | OpenCode holds up 8, Claude Code does better 4 | Sources |
| DisagreementStay on OpenCode, or move to a minimal agent such as Pi? | Moved to a lighter agent 0, Stayed or came back 0 (under the minimum) | Moved to a lighter agent 4, Stayed or came back 3 | Moved to a lighter agent 4, Stayed or came back 3 | Sources |
| Current readEvidence mix | 41 sources | 91 sources | 111 sources | Sources |
GILD's checks of claims against official documentation, kept apart from the source counts.
