Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on Leaders and teams rolling it out.
Leaders and teams rolling it out
50 sources. These accounts focus on who builds and owns flows, governance of connections and data, licensing, and time saved, from teams, departments, IT leaders, and company-wide accounts.
Individual users
42 sources. These accounts focus on how flows are built and maintained, licensing surprises, and AI help, from people building their own automations.
All users
92 sources. This gives the broadest read, but combines one-person automations with department and company-wide programs that reach different conclusions.
92 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.
- Individual userOne person using it for their own work42 sources
Emphasizes Maintaining flows, Premium paywalls, and building with outside AI assistants
- Small team2 to 10 people sharing it5 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Premium paywalls for small organizations already on Microsoft 365
- DepartmentA department, or a named company's team35 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Time saved on department routines, approvals in Teams, and flows orphaned when people leave
- IT & leadershipIT and business leaders deciding the rollout6 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Per-user Premium cost at scale and Copilot Studio rollouts
- Organization-wideCompany-wide rollout4 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Moving desktop automation off Power Automate
What changes with scale. Individual builders focus on maintaining flows and building with AI. Team and department accounts report time saved inside Microsoft 365 and raise most licensing complaints, from a 1,000-user organization pricing Premium seats to a small office reaching an unexpected paywall.