Skip to main content

Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform vs Microsoft Foundry: Google Cloud or Azure for Models and Agents

Gemini and Claude on Google Cloud, or OpenAI models and Claude on Azure. What Fin, Slack, Grab and Zalando run on each, catalogs, capacity, data terms, measured reliability, Opus 5.5 fast mode and priced workloads compared.

Reading time
7 min read
Sources
25 cited

GILD verdict

Start from the models you need, because teams at scale buy by model, as Fin does across Vertex AI and Azure.

Fin runs Claude on Vertex AI and OpenAI models on Azure. Then choose the cloud where your identity, data and spend commitments already live, because procurement and security review go fastest there: Agent Platform for Gemini and Claude in one Google Cloud project, Foundry for OpenAI's GPT models sold by Azure. Price per token does not pick a winner. Claude Opus 5.5 costs US$4,800 a month on both at GILD's 60,000-task workload, and only Foundry sells its fast mode. At 1 billion input and 200 million output tokens a month, gpt-oss-120b costs US$162 on Agent Platform and US$270 on Foundry, while Llama 4 Maverick costs US$580 and US$450. Test EU capacity on Agent Platform before you commit an EU workload.

Teams that run at scale use both clouds by model: Fin serves Claude through Vertex AI beside Anthropic and Bedrock and OpenAI models through Azure, failing over between vendors (Aug 2025), while Grab ran its data classification on one shared Azure OpenAI quota of 240,000 tokens per minute (Jul 2024). The catalogs split the decision: Agent Platform carries Gemini and Claude, and Foundry sells OpenAI's GPT models directly. At GILD's workload of 60,000 Claude Opus 5.5 tasks a month, both bill US$4,800, and only Foundry offers Opus 5.5 fast mode. Requesty's gateway saw 96% of Gemini requests on Vertex complete in April 2026, against 78% on Azure.

What teams report

Run both 3

  1. Fin (Intercom)

    Fin keeps vendor redundancy for every model: Claude traffic can be served by Vertex AI, Anthropic's API or Bedrock, and OpenAI models by Azure or OpenAI, with automatic failover between them (Aug 8, 2025).

    “For example, Anthropic models can be served by AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex, or Anthropic’s own infrastructure; OpenAI models are served by either Azure or OpenAI itself.”
    Fin AI research team, Authors of Fin's reliability write-up, Fin (Intercom)Fin AI Research, , write-up
  2. SlackOn Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

    Slack added Vertex AI beside Amazon Bedrock as a second serving cloud for Slack AI by early 2026, for redundancy and a wider model catalog, and reports about 67% lower latency on high-velocity, low-token workloads from matching models to features (May 28, 2026).

    “By early-2026 we officially expanded our footprint to include Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Vertex AI, not just as a failover for redundancy, but as a strategic engine to accelerate product innovation through access to a broader catalog of state-of-the-art models.”
    Shaurya Kethireddy, Lead Member of Technical Staff, SlackEngineering at Slack, , write-up
  3. ZalandoOn Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

    Zalando's ML platform team has run a LiteLLM proxy since January 2024 that serves engineers models from OpenAI, AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex (Aug 14, 2026).

    “…our ML platform team deployed in January 2024 a LiteLLM based API proxy with access to models from different providers (now: OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, and Google Vertex).”
    Bartosz Ocytko, Executive Principal Engineer, ZalandoZalando Engineering, , write-up

Adopted 1

  1. GrabOn Microsoft Foundry

    Grab's data classification on Azure OpenAI scanned more than 20,000 data entities in its first month, with every model deployment sharing one 240,000 tokens-per-minute quota under a single account (Jul 15, 2024).

    “Currently, all Azure OpenAI model deployments share the same quota under one account, which is set at 240K tokens per minute.”
    Hualin Liu and co-authors, Grab engineers, GrabGrab Tech Blog, , write-up

Choosing between Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and Microsoft Foundry

Choose Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform if

  • Your identity, data and spend commitments already sit in Google Cloud, as Slack's second model cloud and Zalando's gateway route do.
  • You need Gemini 4 Argon or the Gemini Flash models next to Claude under one IAM policy.
  • You want US or EU multi-region endpoints and Provisioned Throughput bought by the week, and you will test EU capacity first: one UK team saw up to 80% 429 errors outside the us endpoint in October 2026.

Choose Microsoft Foundry if

  • Your identity sits in Microsoft Entra ID and your spend counts toward an Azure commitment.
  • You need OpenAI's GPT models sold directly by Azure, as Fin and Grab do, with Data Zone deployments in the US, EU or Asia Pacific.
  • You want Claude Opus 5.5 fast mode inside a cloud contract: it runs on Azure-hosted Foundry deployments and not on Google-managed Claude.
  • You run Llama 4 Maverick at volume, where Azure's Global Standard rate is lower than Model Garden's.

Side by side

DimensionGemini Enterprise Agent PlatformMicrosoft Foundry
Choose it ifChoose Agent Platform if your workloads run on Google Cloud and you need Gemini and Claude in the same project1Choose Foundry if your identity sits in Microsoft Entra ID and you need OpenAI's GPT models sold by Azure9
Model catalogModel Garden: Gemini 4 Argon and the Gemini Flash models, Anthropic's Claude family, and open models such as Gemma, Llama, DeepSeek and gpt-oss-120b12More than 10,000 models from Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta and others; Azure OpenAI models are sold directly by Azure911
Pay-per-token optionsStandard, Priority, Flex and Batch PayGo; the global endpoint carries the list price, and non-global endpoints cost 10% more for Gemini 3 and later2Global Standard, Data Zone Standard and regional Standard; Global Standard launches first at the lowest price10
BatchBatch rows per model, such as gpt-oss-120b at US$0.045 input and US$0.18 output per million tokens against US$0.09 and US$0.36 on Standard2Global Batch and Data Zone Batch at a 50% discount, with a 24-hour window10
Reserved capacityProvisioned Throughput in GSUs: US$7.14 per GSU-hour on a 1-week term down to about US$2.74 on a 1-year term, global24Provisioned throughput units in Global, Data Zone and regional deployments, with spillover of excess traffic to a standard deployment1014
Shared capacityStandard PayGo tiers follow 30-day organization spend: 500,000 tokens per minute at Tier 1 up to 10,000,000 at Tier 4 for Gemini Pro and Argon. A UK team saw up to 80% 429 errors on London, EU and global endpoints at about 0.5 requests a second, and none on us (Oct 21, 2026)323Quota tiers that rise automatically with usage, from a Free Tier upward; Grab's Azure OpenAI deployments shared one 240,000 tokens-per-minute quota (Jul 2024)1321
Cost at a stated workload: gpt-oss-120bGILD's calculation from published rates, fetched Oct 28, 2026: monthly tokens times each platform's published per-million rate, with no caching, batch or commitment discounts.US$162 a month for 1 billion input and 200 million output tokens at US$0.09 and US$0.36 per million (GILD calculation from Google's list price, Oct 28, 2026)2US$270 a month for the same workload at Global Standard US$0.15 and US$0.60 per million (GILD calculation from Azure's retail price, East US 2, Oct 28, 2026)15
Cost at a stated workload: Llama 4 MaverickGILD's calculation from published rates, with the same inputs as the row above.US$580 a month for 1 billion input and 200 million output tokens at US$0.35 and US$1.15 per million (GILD calculation, Oct 28, 2026)2US$450 a month for the same workload at Global Standard US$0.25 and US$1.00 per million (GILD calculation, East US 2, Oct 28, 2026)16
Monthly bill at one workload: Claude Opus 5.5GILD's calculation from published rates, fetched Oct 28, 2026: 2,000 tasks a day for 30 days, each with 10,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens and no caching, at Opus 5.5's list prices on each route, with the 10% regional premium both clouds charge on US and EU routes. Taxes, committed-spend discounts and negotiated rates are excluded.US$4,800 a month on Google-managed Claude Opus 5.5 at US$4 input and US$20 output on the global endpoint; US$5,280 on the us or eu endpoints. No fast mode on this route224US$4,800 a month at the same list price on Global; US$5,280 on the US route; US$9,600 in fast mode on Azure-hosted deployments at US$8 and US$402425
Claude Opus 5.5 fast modeNot on Google-managed Claude in Agent Platform; Anthropic-managed Claude Models on Google Cloud offer it at US$8 input and US$40 output25Offered on Azure-hosted deployments as a separate claude-opus-5-5-fast model at US$8 input and US$40 output; not on Anthropic-hosted deployments25
What teams run on eachFin fails Claude traffic over across Vertex AI, Anthropic and Bedrock (Aug 2025); Slack added Vertex AI as Slack AI's second model cloud (May 2026); Zalando serves Vertex models through its LiteLLM gateway (Aug 2026)181920Fin serves OpenAI models through Azure or OpenAI (Aug 2025); Grab ran data classification on Azure OpenAI with one 240,000 tokens-per-minute quota shared across deployments (Jul 2024)1821
Data handlingNo training on customer data without permission; zero data retention requires opting out of abuse-monitoring prompt logging and caching6Prompts and completions are not available to OpenAI or other model vendors and are not used to train foundation models without permission12
Data residencyGlobal endpoint, us or eu multi-region endpoints, or named regional endpoints5Global, Data Zone (US, EU or Asia Pacific), or regional deployments within a customer-specified geography10
AgentsAgent Development Kit, Agent Runtime with Memory Bank for long-running agents, and Agent Identity, Registry and Gateway1Foundry Agent Service: declarative prompt agents and hosted agents that run your own code, extended with Foundry Toolbox tools9
Identity and governanceGoogle Cloud IAM and service accounts, VPC Service Controls, CMEK, and Cloud Audit Logs78Microsoft Entra ID, role-based access control, network isolation and Azure Policy under one Azure resource9
Measured success rate96% of Gemini requests through Vertex completed without an upstream error on Requesty's gateway in April 20261778% on Azure in the same data, the lowest of the major routes Requesty measured17

What practitioners report, side by side

Each product's figures come from its own practitioners, for the group you pick.

Whose sources to count
Compare Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform with
  • Microsoft Foundry

Overall signal

Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform reads −27 and Microsoft Foundry −26, each from its own practitioners. Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform: 15 positive, 24 negative of 45. Microsoft Foundry: 9 positive, 20 negative of 36.

The score counts the authors from all practitioners that take a side, one vote each with their latest view, and is how far positive votes lead negative ones, per 100 votes, so Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform's −27 rests on votes split 12 positive, 6 mixed and 23 negative and Microsoft Foundry's −26 on 9, 7 and 18.

A lead of a fifth of the votes reads positive and a lead of half strong positive, with the same lines below zero. The dots show each source, positive, mixed, negative. Run a pilot on your own prompts to measure output quality and cost per task.

Footprint on the AI Application Platform stack

Both cover the same 9 layers at the same depth. Coverage is each product's placement on this stack, as its product page shows it. Core is a job the product owns; Supports and Touches are jobs it helps with. Coverage says nothing about how well a product does them.

Coverage by stage, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and Microsoft Foundry
StageGemini Enterprise Agent PlatformMicrosoft Foundry
Model2 layersCore 1, Supports 1Core 1, Supports 1
Build2 layersSupports 2Supports 2
Data1 layerSupports 1Supports 1
Evaluate1 layerSupports 1Supports 1
Operate3 layersCore 1, Supports 2Core 1, Supports 2
Show all 9 layers
Layers where Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and Microsoft Foundry match
LayerGemini Enterprise Agent PlatformMicrosoft Foundry
Model
Model APIsCoreCore
Model gatewaySupportsSupports
Build
OrchestrationSupportsSupports
Tool useSupportsSupports
Data
RetrievalSupportsSupports
Evaluate
EvaluationSupportsSupports
Operate
ObservabilitySupportsSupports
Cloud deploymentCoreCore
GuardrailsSupportsSupports

What practitioners praise

Among all practitioners, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform alone has four praise themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Model Choice & Claude Access and Token Pricing lead, at 10 of 10 and 5 of 8. Microsoft Foundry alone has four praise themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Model Catalog & Choice and Contracts, Data Terms & Identity lead, at 11 of 16 and 8 of 10.

What practitioners praise, All practitioners
Praised forGemini Enterprise Agent PlatformMicrosoft Foundry
Model Choice & Claude Access10 of 10Not a theme in its sources
Token Pricing5 of 8Not a theme in its sources
Reliability vs Direct APIs5 of 10Not a theme in its sources
Compliance & Data Residency4 of 7Not a theme in its sources
Model Catalog & ChoiceNot a theme in its sources11 of 16
Contracts, Data Terms & IdentityNot a theme in its sources8 of 10
CostNot a theme in its sources3 of 5
Developer ExperienceNot a theme in its sources3 of 10

Each count is the sources that praise a theme, or raise it as a concern, out of those that discuss it. A row pairs the two products when both carry a theme under the same or an equivalent name.

A count ending in "so far" has under 5 sources from 3 authors among all practitioners. "Not a theme in its sources" means GILD found no theme of that name in that product's sources.

What practitioners raise as concerns

Among all practitioners, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform alone has six concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Quotas & 429 Errors and Naming & Product Sprawl lead, at 10 of 11 and 6 of 7. Microsoft Foundry alone has six concern themes that reach 5 sources from 3 authors. Agent Service & Tool Failures and Missing Models & Features lead, at 9 of 9 and 8 of 8.

What practitioners raise as concerns, All practitioners
Raised as a concernGemini Enterprise Agent PlatformMicrosoft Foundry
Quotas & 429 Errors10 of 11Not a theme in its sources
Naming & Product Sprawl6 of 7Not a theme in its sources
Setup & Region Configuration5 of 5Not a theme in its sources
Function Calling Failures5 of 5Not a theme in its sources
Latency5 of 6Not a theme in its sources
Surprise Bills & Billing Support4 of 5Not a theme in its sources
Agent Service & Tool FailuresNot a theme in its sources9 of 9
Missing Models & FeaturesNot a theme in its sources8 of 8
Reliability & LatencyNot a theme in its sources7 of 7
Portal, Naming & SetupNot a theme in its sources6 of 7
Quotas, Capacity & CostNot a theme in its sources5 of 5
Data Terms & Model GovernanceNot a theme in its sources3 of 6

25 sources

  1. Google Cloud blog: Introducing Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform (Apr 22, 2026)Official documentationcloud.google.com
  2. Google Cloud: Agent Platform generative AI pricingOfficial documentationcloud.google.com
  3. Agent Platform documentation: Standard PayGoOfficial documentationdocs.cloud.google.com
  4. Agent Platform documentation: Provisioned ThroughputOfficial documentationdocs.cloud.google.com
  5. Agent Platform documentation: Deployment and endpoint locationsOfficial documentationdocs.cloud.google.com
  6. Agent Platform documentation: Agent Platform and zero data retentionOfficial documentationdocs.cloud.google.com
  7. Agent Platform documentation: Security controlsOfficial documentationdocs.cloud.google.com
  8. Google Cloud: Agent Platform audit loggingOfficial documentationcloud.google.com
  9. Microsoft Learn: What is Microsoft Foundry?Official documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  10. Microsoft Learn: Deployment types for Microsoft Foundry ModelsOfficial documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  11. Microsoft Learn: Foundry Models sold directly by AzureOfficial documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  12. Microsoft Learn: Data, privacy, and security for Foundry ModelsOfficial documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  13. Microsoft Learn: Foundry Models quotas and limitsOfficial documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  14. Microsoft Learn: Manage traffic with spillover for provisioned deploymentsOfficial documentationlearn.microsoft.com
  15. Azure retail prices: gpt-oss-120b meters, East US 2Official documentationprices.azure.com
  16. Azure retail prices: Llama 4 Maverick meters, East US 2Official documentationprices.azure.com
  17. Requesty: Operational metrics per provider, April 2026 (May 9, 2026)Public sourcerequesty.ai
  18. Fin AI Research: Running a reliable service over unreliable parts (Aug 8, 2025)Public sourcefin.ai
  19. Engineering at Slack: Slack AI, the path to multi-cloud (May 28, 2026)Public sourceslack.engineering
  20. Zalando Engineering: Agentic engineering at Zalando, a snapshot (Aug 14, 2026)Public sourceengineering.zalando.com
  21. Grab Engineering: LLM-powered data classification for data entities at scale (Jul 15, 2024)Public sourceengineering.grab.com
  22. Rajesh Beri: Bedrock vs Vertex AI vs Microsoft Foundry, commit drawdown in 2026 (Oct 25, 2026)Public sourceberi.net
  23. r/googlecloud: Vertex Gemini has zero capacity outside of the US (Oct 21, 2026)Public sourcereddit.com
  24. OpenRouter: Claude Opus 5.5 endpoints, including Vertex and Azure (Oct 28, 2026)Public sourceopenrouter.ai
  25. Claude API docs: Fast mode, where Opus 5.5 fast mode runs (as of Oct 28, 2026)Public sourceplatform.claude.com