Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on All users. Leaders and teams have 14 accounts; GILD prints their sentiment from 20.
Leaders and teams rolling it out
16 sources. This group counts teams and departments using the tool together, and the leaders deciding its rollout.
Individual users
63 sources. Individuals report on Granola capture and note quality in their own meetings.
All users
79 sources. Every Granola account counts here. Individuals wrote 63 of the 79 sources.
79 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.
- Individual userOne person using it for their own work63 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Meeting memory, bot-free capture, and staying present
- Small team2 to 10 people sharing it3 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Action items and notes shared with a small team
- DepartmentA department, or a named company's team4 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Folder visibility inside an organization workspace
- IT & leadershipIT and business leaders deciding the rollout8 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Whether to allow a notetaker that records without a bot, and team search
- Organization-wideCompany-wide rollout1 sources, counted here
Emphasizes Daversa's firm-wide use on confidential recruiting calls, with clients asked first
What changes with scale. Individuals focus on recall across meetings and capture without a bot. Team accounts focus on shared action items and who can see notes. Workspace sharing and retention settings control those outcomes.