Skip to main content
GranolaProduct page

Granola Signals

What leaders and teams rolling out Granola report, with every finding tied to its evidence.

Read the findings

What the evidence says

Whose sources count

Practitioner sentiment, all users

+68 Strong positive from 57 sources that take a side

How this figure is made

Strong positive overall signal, net 68 points

From 57 authors in 43 discussions. Run a pilot on a month of real meetings to measure how much each summary needs editing before it is shared.

Analyzed
99 total sources
Top praise
Bot-Free Capture (17 of 17 sources) See praise evidence
Top concern
Platform Gaps (7 of 7 sources) See concern evidence

Jan 2025 to Oct 2026.

79 sources from practitioners, by month and sentiment.

Public accounts are strongly positive. Bot-free capture draws the most praise, then meeting memory and note quality. Platform gaps and privacy and consent are each raised by 7 sources. Every source that discusses platform gaps raises them. Privacy and consent appear in 12 sources, including two IT decisions.

Positive, mixed and negative sources

The score counts each source once, as the split does. See How the numbers work.

See the evidence

Below: 4 praise themes, 4 concerns, 1 point of agreement and 1 disagreement.

Findings

Counted for All users, from 79 sources. Change group

What practitioners praise

Every capability practitioners describe positively, ranked by how many sources say so. Open one to read who said it.

  1. Bot-Free CaptureAll 17 sources on it praise itCapturing meetings from the device's audio with no bot joining, across Zoom, Meet, Teams, and in person.

    Counted for All users.

    1. Positive

      Taissa Maleh, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      With no bot joining calls, Granola replaced the reviewer's in-meeting note-taking and keeps their notes in one place connected to the rest of their workflow.

      Published Jul 13, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    2. Positive

      Dr Amantha Imber, host of How I Work, with Neo Aplin, who leads AI training at Inventium

      How I AI: Our #1 favourite AI tool for meetingsPodcast episode show notes, How I Work

      Inventium captures every internal meeting, one-on-ones included, in Granola by default and calls it non-negotiable. Imber's assistant adds a line to every external invite saying Granola is running.

      Published Apr 5, 2026self-described: Every internal meeting at Inventium, one-on-ones included, captured in Granola by default

    3. Positive

      Toby Mather, edtech and software executive

      Rollup, GranollupNewsletter

      Toby Mather prefers Granola because it listens on the PC without a meeting participant or full recordings, searches across meetings, and is good enough to pay for.

      Published Feb 28, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    4. Positive

      TEA (The Era Arc), tech newsletter author

      Product TEA Test: GranolaNewsletter

      Using Granola since July 2025, the author recommends it for low-effort notes without a bot, but notes the free plan tightened and drafted emails arrive as Markdown.

      Published Feb 22, 2026self-described: Own online meetings since July 2025

    5. Positive

      MrMeritocracy, r/sales commenter

      Comment on: Android version of Granola?Reddit comment

      The commenter rates Granola best because it does not join calls, unlike Otter and Fireflies bots that arrive late and promote themselves in chat.

      Published Feb 7, 2026self-described: Own calls

    6. Positive

      marinkowo, Product manager, r/ProductManagement

      Comment on: How do you automate your PM work when you constantly forget things and go blank in meetings?Reddit comment

      A product manager with ADHD runs Granola in every meeting, in person too, and says tasks no longer get forgotten.

      Published Sep 1, 2025self-described: Own meetings, in person and online

    7. Positive

      Becky Tia, Product Hunt reviewer, project manager

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      A project manager three weeks in relies on capture from computer audio and started using the mobile app for in-person client meetings.

      Published May 16, 2025self-described: Client meetings, online and in person

    8. Positive

      Laura Kinder, President of Daversa

      Can Granola's AI meeting notes eat bigger apps for breakfast?News article, Upstarts Media

      Kinder chose Granola because a notetaker bot felt intrusive on confidential client calls; she asks clients whether they mind Granola running in the background. Her use helped bring 136 of Daversa's roughly 150 employees onto Granola, and staff share takeaways on Slack.

      "If I’m in an important conversation with a client, it’s intrusive to have a notetaker bot in there…"
      Excerpt, Laura Kinder

      Published Apr 2, 2025Executive search firm Daversa, where 136 of about 150 employees use Granola on recruiting calls

    9. Positive

      HandbagHawker, r/projectmanagement commenter

      Comment on: Best AI Note-Taking App That Works with Headphones?Reddit comment

      With no stake in the company, the commenter says Granola works on a Mac with headphones because it records the computer's audio and microphone.

      Published Mar 21, 2025self-described: Own meetings on a Mac with AirPods

    10. Positive

      Cory MacVie, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      Having tried Zoom, Otter.ai, Fathom, Gong, and others, the reviewer prefers Granola because it works across meeting software, keeps no recording, and takes accurate notes.

      Published Mar 19, 2025self-described: Compared Zoom, Otter.ai, Outreach, Fathom, Chorus, and Gong

    11. Mixed

      Asad M., Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer values no bot and their own lines kept in the notes, but speaker attribution on four-person calls is a coin flip, so they recheck commitments in the transcript.

      Published Sep 2, 2026self-described: Founder calls

    12. Positive

      Jeremy Caplan, author of the Wonder Tools newsletter and Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism

      Meet Granola AINewsletter

      After nearly 1,000 meetings Jeremy Caplan calls Granola a daily notetaker, valued for typed emphasis in the notes, mid-meeting catch-ups, and search across meetings.

      Published Apr 4, 2026self-described: Nearly 1,000 meetings since September 2024

    13. Positive

      Dan Shipper, CEO and cofounder of Every

      Transcript: 'Opus 4.5 Changed How Andrew Wilkinson Works and Lives'Podcast episode transcript, The Every Podcast

      With Every at about 20 people, Shipper asked Granola's assistant to write a handbook for new employees from his last 25 meetings. He calls the draft pretty good and says he would check it before handing it to every employee.

      "It was pretty good. I probably wouldn’t just put it into every employee’s hand immediately, but you have the ground truth for it to start working from…"
      Excerpt, Dan Shipper

      Published Jan 21, 2026Every at about 20 people, drafting a new-employee handbook from his own Granola meetings

    14. Positive

      Traditional-Star6659, r/ProductManagement commenter

      Comment on: How do you automate your PM work when you constantly forget things and go blank in meetings?Reddit comment

      The commenter records every meeting, even Slack huddles, with Granola and pastes each transcript into a meeting index in Cursor to act on later.

      Published Sep 10, 2025self-described: Own meetings, including Slack huddles

    15. Positive

      Christian Pean MD, MS, surgeon-founder at RevelAi

      Techy Surgeon Tutorials: How I Automate Meeting Notes & Action Items with Granola's Ambient Recorder and ClaudeNewsletter

      A surgeon-founder files recurring meetings into Granola folders to query, posts recaps to Slack, sends action items to Claude, and recommends disclosing the tool.

      Published Aug 6, 2025self-described: Hospital rounds, startup stand-ups, and video calls

    16. Positive

      Jess Joyce, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      With no notetaker joining the meeting, the reviewer states tasks aloud and Granola drafts the follow-up emails and tasks for the team.

      Published Apr 24, 2025self-described: Back-to-back meetings with a team

    17. Positive

      kashisharma, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: What is your default notes app?Hacker News comment

      Granola is the non-invasive notetaker in this commenter's stack, and pasting the Granola note link into Apple Notes or Notion lets colleagues read the AI call notes.

      Published Jan 17, 2025self-described: Apple devices, with Notion for team collaboration

    Open them in the record
  2. Note Quality15 of 17 sources on it praise itWhether Granola notes and summaries capture the meeting accurately, including action items. This theme also covers length and usefulness.

    Counted for All users.

    Positive, 15

    1. Positive

      Ira, solo AI founder after 20 years in federal IT

      Granola picked up an all-Russian-language meetingX post

      Ira expected Granola to miss a Russian-language meeting with a colleague. It produced a full write-up, which the two participants now use to review their plan.

      Published Oct 23, 2026self-described: A Russian-language planning meeting with a Ukrainian colleague

    2. Positive

      Feliks Primigg, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      Two weeks in, the reviewer rates the call summaries highly and finds their quality consistent across calls held in different languages.

      Published Jun 7, 2026self-described: Calls in several languages

    3. Positive

      AI World, YouTube channel

      My Granola AI Review and Best Practices After 200+ MeetingsVideo

      After a year and 200+ meetings the creator calls Granola the best free AI notetaker the channel has tested, and covers group meetings, languages, and the free plan's 30-day limit.

      "…try a better note taking app instead of doing everything manually. And just to be clear, this isn’t something I tested for a day or two. I’ve been using Granola AI for about a year now, across easily 200+ meetings, including client…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 1:23

      Published Apr 27, 2026self-described: A year across 200+ of the creator's meetings

    4. Positive

      kristanbullett, r/startups commenter

      Comment on: Granola AI - US$1.5Bn Val (I will not promote)Reddit comment

      The commenter prefers Granola because it only takes notes and does that well: it detects meetings, follows prompts for reshaping notes, and lets notes go anywhere.

      Published Mar 29, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    5. Positive

      saberience, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Show HN: Rowboat - AI coworker that turns your work into a knowledge graph (OSS)Hacker News comment

      The commenter finds the Granola summary is all they need almost every time, says Granola already extracts decisions, and sends the transcript to Claude for anything more.

      Published Feb 11, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    6. Positive

      Riska Ambarastita, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      A week in, the reviewer finds the summaries capture key points from context better than plain transcription tools, so they no longer type through meetings.

      Published Oct 6, 2025self-described: Own calls

    7. Positive

      Fun-Database-8220, r/productivity commenter

      Comment on: I Stopped Writing Meeting Notes ManuallyReddit comment

      The commenter notices Granola's summaries improving from release to release over three months.

      Published Aug 25, 2025self-described: Own meetings

    8. Positive

      Eastern-Explorer-832, r/productivity commenter

      Comment on: Note-taking app that has supreme accuracy?Reddit comment

      The commenter got Granola in a Lenny's Newsletter bundle and finds it surprisingly accurate for meetings, much better than Fireflies, catching pretty much everything.

      Published Aug 6, 2025self-described: Own meetings; Granola from a Lenny's Newsletter bundle

    9. Positive

      Mrinal Singh, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer's team added Granola to its productivity stack and rates its generated action items as spot on every time.

      Published Mar 11, 2025self-described: Team productivity stack

    10. Positive

      Anastasiia Romanova, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer finds the notes concise and well structured, and says Granola keeps them focused on conversations without losing action points.

      Published Feb 24, 2025self-described: Non-stop meetings

    11. Positive

      Jake McGraw, former VP Engineering at Global Payments and Harness Wealth and cofounder and CTO of The Block

      Claude + Granola MCP is a killer combinationX post

      Jake McGraw finds a Granola summary imported into Claude through MCP more useful than Claude working from the raw call transcript, and wishes he had paired the two sooner.

      Published Oct 20, 2026self-described: His own calls, with Granola summaries pulled into Claude through the Granola MCP server

    12. Mixed

      urbandw311er, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Granola for Apple WatchHacker News comment

      The commenter finds Granola highly capable at summarizing, but an app that holds their microphone, calendar, and private notes and seems free makes them ask what the catch is.

      Published Jul 28, 2026self-described: Granola on a Mac

    13. Positive

      acrooks, Hacker News commenter who runs a company with a CTO

      Comment on: The 'white-collar bloodbath' is all part of the AI hype machineHacker News comment

      The commenter loves Granola for notes on every meeting, reminders of promises made, follow-up email drafts, and meeting prep.

      Published Jun 2, 2025self-described: Own meetings

    14. Positive

      Cory MacVie, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      Having tried Zoom, Otter.ai, Fathom, Gong, and others, the reviewer prefers Granola because it works across meeting software, keeps no recording, and takes accurate notes.

      Published Mar 19, 2025self-described: Compared Zoom, Otter.ai, Outreach, Fathom, Chorus, and Gong

    15. Positive

      someonehere, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Show HN: Mikey - No bot meeting notetaker for WindowsHacker News comment

      The commenter calls Granola the best meeting app they have used: they type prompts per person during check-ins and Granola fills them in from the transcript.

      Published Feb 13, 2025self-described: Team check-in meetings

    Mixed or negative, 2

    1. Negative

      Collin McLelland, CEO at Collide

      Ripped out whisprflow and Granola is nextX post

      McLelland implemented Granola at Collide and plans to replace it over weak summaries and an API with no way to export transcripts. He wants raw transcripts and sensitive conversations kept on the company's own servers.

      "Loved both of those products and implemented them at our company but now they suck and aren't needed."
      Excerpt, Collin McLelland

      Published May 10, 2026Granola rolled out at Collide, an AI company for the energy industry, now being replaced with an open-source notetaker hosted on its own machines

    2. Negative

      akkanzn, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: AI has fixed my productivityHacker News comment

      Replying to a post praising Granola, the commenter says their own and their friends' experience is that these notetakers miss important points and fall apart under scrutiny.

      Published Feb 18, 2026self-described: Own and friends' use of AI meeting notetakers

    Open them in the record
  3. Meeting MemoryAll 14 sources on it praise itGranola retrieves past meeting details through chat and search. Recipes use those meetings to draft follow-ups.

    Counted for All users.

    1. Positive

      EasyTangent, r/msp commenter

      Comment on: AI TranscribingReddit comment

      The commenter leaves Granola running in every meeting and asks it follow-up questions afterward, including about tone.

      Published Apr 29, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    2. Positive

      Andrea Del Angel, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer started with conference notes and says the value compounds over time, because chat across their meeting history finds everything said on a topic.

      Published Apr 8, 2026self-described: Conference sessions and meetings

    3. Positive

      Jeremy Caplan, author of the Wonder Tools newsletter and Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism

      Meet Granola AINewsletter

      After nearly 1,000 meetings Jeremy Caplan calls Granola a daily notetaker, valued for typed emphasis in the notes, mid-meeting catch-ups, and search across meetings.

      Published Apr 4, 2026self-described: Nearly 1,000 meetings since September 2024

    4. Positive

      Benjamin VanEvery, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer relies on in-meeting chat to recap what was just said and on search across meetings, and asked for an Android app so their phone could stay off speaker.

      Published Mar 20, 2026self-described: Several meetings a day

    5. Positive

      Dan Shipper, CEO and cofounder of Every

      Transcript: 'Opus 4.5 Changed How Andrew Wilkinson Works and Lives'Podcast episode transcript, The Every Podcast

      With Every at about 20 people, Shipper asked Granola's assistant to write a handbook for new employees from his last 25 meetings. He calls the draft pretty good and says he would check it before handing it to every employee.

      "It was pretty good. I probably wouldn’t just put it into every employee’s hand immediately, but you have the ground truth for it to start working from…"
      Excerpt, Dan Shipper

      Published Jan 21, 2026Every at about 20 people, drafting a new-employee handbook from his own Granola meetings

    6. Positive

      aylim1001, r/productivity poster

      Any to-do app with MCP capabilities for creating to-dos?Reddit post

      The poster asks Granola's chat across meetings for the day's to-dos and wants a to-do app that accepts them over MCP.

      Published Oct 9, 2025self-described: Own meetings and to-do list

    7. Positive

      Christian Pean MD, MS, surgeon-founder at RevelAi

      Techy Surgeon Tutorials: How I Automate Meeting Notes & Action Items with Granola's Ambient Recorder and ClaudeNewsletter

      A surgeon-founder files recurring meetings into Granola folders to query, posts recaps to Slack, sends action items to Claude, and recommends disclosing the tool.

      Published Aug 6, 2025self-described: Hospital rounds, startup stand-ups, and video calls

    8. Positive

      m3h, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Ask HN: What useful AI tools do you use every day?Hacker News comment

      Granola is one of the commenter's two daily AI tools, used for transcription and meeting notes, searching across notes, and recalling action items.

      Published Jun 25, 2025self-described: Daily work tools

    9. Positive

      acrooks, Hacker News commenter who runs a company with a CTO

      Comment on: The 'white-collar bloodbath' is all part of the AI hype machineHacker News comment

      The commenter loves Granola for notes on every meeting, reminders of promises made, follow-up email drafts, and meeting prep.

      Published Jun 2, 2025self-described: Own meetings

    10. Positive

      Jess Joyce, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      With no notetaker joining the meeting, the reviewer states tasks aloud and Granola drafts the follow-up emails and tasks for the team.

      Published Apr 24, 2025self-described: Back-to-back meetings with a team

    11. Positive

      Charles Cook, VP Operations at PostHog

      Making Claude Cowork actually usefulCompany blog post, PostHog

      Cook's weekly promise tracker and week-in-review report at PostHog read the transcripts of every Granola-recorded meeting he attended. He reports that the Granola MCP works really nicely when he needs it and would matter more if he had more meetings.

      "If I had more meetings this would probably be a lot more useful. Works really nicely when I need it though!"
      Excerpt, Charles Cook

      Published Apr 24, 2026Scheduled Claude Cowork tasks at PostHog that read his Granola transcripts through the Granola MCP server

    12. Positive

      Toby Mather, edtech and software executive

      Rollup, GranollupNewsletter

      Toby Mather prefers Granola because it listens on the PC without a meeting participant or full recordings, searches across meetings, and is good enough to pay for.

      Published Feb 28, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    13. Positive

      TEA (The Era Arc), tech newsletter author

      Product TEA Test: GranolaNewsletter

      Using Granola since July 2025, the author recommends it for low-effort notes without a bot, but notes the free plan tightened and drafted emails arrive as Markdown.

      Published Feb 22, 2026self-described: Own online meetings since July 2025

    14. Positive

      saberience, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Show HN: Rowboat - AI coworker that turns your work into a knowledge graph (OSS)Hacker News comment

      The commenter finds the Granola summary is all they need almost every time, says Granola already extracts decisions, and sends the transcript to Claude for anything more.

      Published Feb 11, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    Open them in the record
  4. Your Own NotesAll 6 sources on it praise itThe user's typed notes and templates guide Granola's output.

    Counted for All users.

    1. Positive

      BigGreen1769, r/startups commenter

      Comment on: Granola AI - US$1.5Bn Val (I will not promote)Reddit comment

      What sets Granola apart for the commenter is that it builds on the notes the user typed and lets the user decide what mattered.

      Published Jul 21, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    2. Positive

      Jeremy Caplan, author of the Wonder Tools newsletter and Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism

      Meet Granola AINewsletter

      After nearly 1,000 meetings Jeremy Caplan calls Granola a daily notetaker, valued for typed emphasis in the notes, mid-meeting catch-ups, and search across meetings.

      Published Apr 4, 2026self-described: Nearly 1,000 meetings since September 2024

    3. Positive

      someonehere, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Show HN: Mikey - No bot meeting notetaker for WindowsHacker News comment

      The commenter calls Granola the best meeting app they have used: they type prompts per person during check-ins and Granola fills them in from the transcript.

      Published Feb 13, 2025self-described: Team check-in meetings

    4. Mixed

      Asad M., Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer values no bot and their own lines kept in the notes, but speaker attribution on four-person calls is a coin flip, so they recheck commitments in the transcript.

      Published Sep 2, 2026self-described: Founder calls

    5. Positive

      Dr Amantha Imber, host of How I Work, with Neo Aplin, who leads AI training at Inventium

      How I AI: Our #1 favourite AI tool for meetingsPodcast episode show notes, How I Work

      Inventium captures every internal meeting, one-on-ones included, in Granola by default and calls it non-negotiable. Imber's assistant adds a line to every external invite saying Granola is running.

      Published Apr 5, 2026self-described: Every internal meeting at Inventium, one-on-ones included, captured in Granola by default

    6. Positive

      TEA (The Era Arc), tech newsletter author

      Product TEA Test: GranolaNewsletter

      Using Granola since July 2025, the author recommends it for low-effort notes without a bot, but notes the free plan tightened and drafted emails arrive as Markdown.

      Published Feb 22, 2026self-described: Own online meetings since July 2025

    Open them in the record

What concerns them

Every concern practitioners raise, most raised first.

  1. Platform GapsAll 7 sources on it raise it as a concernMissing devices or sign-in options, no audio to replay or files to upload, and getting notes out to other tools.

    Counted for All users.

    1. Mixed

      Maria Telegina, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer liked having all meeting notes in one place, but could not get recording to work in the iPhone app and had to switch to a laptop.

      Published Aug 27, 2026self-described: Tried the iPhone app, then the laptop

    2. Mixed

      _puk, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Show HN: Rowboat - Open-source, local-first alternative to Claude DesktopHacker News comment

      The commenter fed Granola notes into a local folder that Claude reads, until the sync silently stopped working when Granola encrypted its local database.

      Published Jul 7, 2026self-described: Own meeting transcripts synced into a local knowledge folder for Claude

    3. No opinion stated

      Andrew Zeitlin, associate professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy

      debrief: granola-mcp can't read tokens after Granola's May 2026 storage changeGitHub issue on andrewzeitlin/claude_skills

      Granola's May 7, 2026 desktop update encrypted its local token and cache files, so Zeitlin's community MCP server read a frozen token and his transcript skill failed on its first call.

      Published May 11, 2026self-described: A Claude skill that fetches Granola transcripts through a community MCP server, on Windows under WSL

    4. Negative

      Collin McLelland, CEO at Collide

      Ripped out whisprflow and Granola is nextX post

      McLelland implemented Granola at Collide and plans to replace it over weak summaries and an API with no way to export transcripts. He wants raw transcripts and sensitive conversations kept on the company's own servers.

      "Loved both of those products and implemented them at our company but now they suck and aren't needed."
      Excerpt, Collin McLelland

      Published May 10, 2026Granola rolled out at Collide, an AI company for the energy industry, now being replaced with an open-source notetaker hosted on its own machines

    5. Mixed

      Fabulous-Ice-2424, IT manager, r/ITManagers

      Comment on: Evaluation criteria for enterprise AI notetakersReddit comment

      Evaluating notetakers for an organization, the commenter sees Granola's privacy approach as a plus but judges that it gives up team collaboration and search.

      Published Feb 26, 2026self-described: Enterprise notetaker evaluation

    6. Positive

      Benjamin VanEvery, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer relies on in-meeting chat to recap what was just said and on search across meetings, and asked for an Android app so their phone could stay off speaker.

      Published Mar 20, 2026self-described: Several meetings a day

    7. Positive

      Joseph Thacker (rez0), personal blog

      Reverse Engineering Granola to Get Notes In ObsidianPersonal blog post

      Joseph Thacker loves Granola but wanted notes in Obsidian; with no API offered at the time, Thacker reverse engineered the desktop app's endpoint to export them.

      Published May 8, 2025self-described: Own calls and meetings, notes kept in Obsidian

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Granola keeps no meeting audio and cannot transcribe uploaded recordings. The desktop apps run on macOS and Windows, the mobile apps on iOS and Android, and Business and Enterprise add an API. How transcription works

    Open them in the record
  2. Privacy & Consent7 of 12 sources on it raise it as a concernWho can see notes, model training, data handling, and telling participants that a meeting is transcribed when no bot is visible.

    Counted for All users.

    Raised as a concern, 7

    1. No opinion stated

      Abhirup Ghosh, CEO of Sainapse

      Routing Granola notes between a personal and a company brainX post

      Ghosh sends notes from a Granola team folder to the company knowledge base and keeps the rest personal. Warns that one 1:1 filed in the wrong folder becomes searchable by the whole team.

      Published Oct 23, 2026Two knowledge bases, one personal and one for the company, fed from Granola folders

    2. Mixed

      hiro-v, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Goodnotes releases new AI notetakerHacker News comment

      The commenter records 1:1 meetings with Granola and worries those notes could leak.

      Published Sep 21, 2026self-described: 1:1 meetings captured with Granola

    3. Mixed

      urbandw311er, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Granola for Apple WatchHacker News comment

      The commenter finds Granola highly capable at summarizing, but an app that holds their microphone, calendar, and private notes and seems free makes them ask what the catch is.

      Published Jul 28, 2026self-described: Granola on a Mac

    4. Negative

      Toesinthesand2024, r/sales commenter

      Comment on: AI notetaking without permissionReddit comment

      The commenter's company banned Granola and similar apps because they record without asking participants for consent.

      Published Jul 25, 2026self-described: The commenter's employer

    5. Negative

      Query_Cat, IT administrator, r/sysadmin

      Comment on: Blocking AI notetakersReddit comment

      The commenter's concern with Granola is that any user can record any meeting without a visible bot, out of IT's view.

      Published Apr 1, 2026self-described: Assessing Granola for the commenter's organization

    6. Negative

      eawgewag, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Launch HN: Hyprnote (YC S25) - An open-source AI meeting notetakerHacker News comment

      The commenter accepts cloud processing of work notes, but found Granola had made their note folders, including 1:1s, visible to the whole organization, which shook their trust.

      Published Jul 30, 2025self-described: Granola used inside an organization workspace

    7. Negative

      Collin McLelland, CEO at Collide

      Ripped out whisprflow and Granola is nextX post

      McLelland implemented Granola at Collide and plans to replace it over weak summaries and an API with no way to export transcripts. He wants raw transcripts and sensitive conversations kept on the company's own servers.

      "Loved both of those products and implemented them at our company but now they suck and aren't needed."
      Excerpt, Collin McLelland

      Published May 10, 2026Granola rolled out at Collide, an AI company for the energy industry, now being replaced with an open-source notetaker hosted on its own machines

    Discussed without concern, 5

    1. Positive

      takmsdsm, IT administrator, r/sysadmin

      Comment on: Blocking AI notetakersReddit comment

      The commenter's company bought tools that meet its privacy rules, including enterprise Granola, to avoid chasing unapproved notetakers. Staff stopped using Otter.

      Published Nov 7, 2025self-described: Company that chose not to block AI notetakers and bought approved ones

    2. Mixed

      Asad M., Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer values no bot and their own lines kept in the notes, but speaker attribution on four-person calls is a coin flip, so they recheck commitments in the transcript.

      Published Sep 2, 2026self-described: Founder calls

    3. Positive

      Dr Amantha Imber, host of How I Work, with Neo Aplin, who leads AI training at Inventium

      How I AI: Our #1 favourite AI tool for meetingsPodcast episode show notes, How I Work

      Inventium captures every internal meeting, one-on-ones included, in Granola by default and calls it non-negotiable. Imber's assistant adds a line to every external invite saying Granola is running.

      Published Apr 5, 2026self-described: Every internal meeting at Inventium, one-on-ones included, captured in Granola by default

    4. Positive

      Jeremy Caplan, author of the Wonder Tools newsletter and Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism

      Meet Granola AINewsletter

      After nearly 1,000 meetings Jeremy Caplan calls Granola a daily notetaker, valued for typed emphasis in the notes, mid-meeting catch-ups, and search across meetings.

      Published Apr 4, 2026self-described: Nearly 1,000 meetings since September 2024

    5. Positive

      Christian Pean MD, MS, surgeon-founder at RevelAi

      Techy Surgeon Tutorials: How I Automate Meeting Notes & Action Items with Granola's Ambient Recorder and ClaudeNewsletter

      A surgeon-founder files recurring meetings into Granola folders to query, posts recaps to Slack, sends action items to Claude, and recommends disclosing the tool.

      Published Aug 6, 2025self-described: Hospital rounds, startup stand-ups, and video calls

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Granola's automated meeting-chat message and video watermark tell participants that transcription is running. Users turn them on themselves, and only Enterprise admins can enforce them for a workspace. Let People Know You're Using Granola

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Granola uses anonymized data to improve its models by default on Basic and Business until each user opts out. Enterprise workspaces are opted out by default and admins enforce the setting. Models & training

    Open them in the record
  3. Price & Plan Limits3 of 7 sources on it raise it as a concernSubscription cost, what the free plan withholds, and plan changes.

    Counted for All users.

    Raised as a concern, 3

    1. No opinion stated

      George Diab, engineering manager and senior architect at Codingscape

      Rebuilding Granola without the subscriptionX post

      Diab wanted Granola without paying for it, so he had Codex reverse engineer how it works and build his own version, with the first commit about 91 minutes in.

      Published Oct 14, 2026self-described: A personal meeting notebook built with Codex to replace a Granola subscription

    2. Mixed

      polemos, builder of hobnob, a local meeting notes alternative

      Comment on: I built a local, free Granola alternativeHacker News comment

      Tired of paying a Granola subscription, the commenter built a local tool that transcribes and summarizes meetings into JSON and Markdown files they control.

      Published Jun 13, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    3. Positive

      TEA (The Era Arc), tech newsletter author

      Product TEA Test: GranolaNewsletter

      Using Granola since July 2025, the author recommends it for low-effort notes without a bot, but notes the free plan tightened and drafted emails arrive as Markdown.

      Published Feb 22, 2026self-described: Own online meetings since July 2025

    Discussed without concern, 4

    1. Mixed

      urbandw311er, Hacker News commenter

      Comment on: Granola for Apple WatchHacker News comment

      The commenter finds Granola highly capable at summarizing, but an app that holds their microphone, calendar, and private notes and seems free makes them ask what the catch is.

      Published Jul 28, 2026self-described: Granola on a Mac

    2. Positive

      AI World, YouTube channel

      My Granola AI Review and Best Practices After 200+ MeetingsVideo

      After a year and 200+ meetings the creator calls Granola the best free AI notetaker the channel has tested, and covers group meetings, languages, and the free plan's 30-day limit.

      "…try a better note taking app instead of doing everything manually. And just to be clear, this isn’t something I tested for a day or two. I’ve been using Granola AI for about a year now, across easily 200+ meetings, including client…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 1:23

      Published Apr 27, 2026self-described: A year across 200+ of the creator's meetings

    3. Positive

      Jeremy Caplan, author of the Wonder Tools newsletter and Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism

      Meet Granola AINewsletter

      After nearly 1,000 meetings Jeremy Caplan calls Granola a daily notetaker, valued for typed emphasis in the notes, mid-meeting catch-ups, and search across meetings.

      Published Apr 4, 2026self-described: Nearly 1,000 meetings since September 2024

    4. Positive

      Toby Mather, edtech and software executive

      Rollup, GranollupNewsletter

      Toby Mather prefers Granola because it listens on the PC without a meeting participant or full recordings, searches across meetings, and is good enough to pay for.

      Published Feb 28, 2026self-described: Own meetings

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Basic has no daily transcription limit but shows only the last 30 days of notes in the app. Older notes are kept, and a CSV export returns them. Subscriptions and billing

    Open them in the record
  4. Transcript Accuracy2 of 7 sources on it raise it as a concernTranscription errors, who said what, languages, and details the summary gets wrong.

    Counted for All users.

    Raised as a concern, 2

    1. Mixed

      Asad M., Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      The reviewer values no bot and their own lines kept in the notes, but speaker attribution on four-person calls is a coin flip, so they recheck commitments in the transcript.

      Published Sep 2, 2026self-described: Founder calls

    2. Mixed

      Alex Kotran, founder and CEO of aiEDU

      Delights and insights from my new favorite AI tool: Granola.aiNewsletter post, Notes on AI Readiness (Substack)

      Kotran reports that Granola freed members of his aiEDU team from note-taking duty so they could take part in meetings. Its transcript butchered figures from a finance video prepared for a board meeting, which he caught only because he checked.

      "Already, I’ve seen it unlock members of my team, making them more free to engage, knowing that AI is capturing key details."
      Excerpt, Alex Kotran
      "…butchering important figures for a board meeting would have had serious implications if I hadn’t checked…"
      Same speaker

      Published Jan 3, 2025Granola on his own meetings and team sessions at aiEDU, including board preparation

    Discussed without concern, 5

    1. Positive

      Ira, solo AI founder after 20 years in federal IT

      Granola picked up an all-Russian-language meetingX post

      Ira expected Granola to miss a Russian-language meeting with a colleague. It produced a full write-up, which the two participants now use to review their plan.

      Published Oct 23, 2026self-described: A Russian-language planning meeting with a Ukrainian colleague

    2. Positive

      Feliks Primigg, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      Two weeks in, the reviewer rates the call summaries highly and finds their quality consistent across calls held in different languages.

      Published Jun 7, 2026self-described: Calls in several languages

    3. Positive

      AI World, YouTube channel

      My Granola AI Review and Best Practices After 200+ MeetingsVideo

      After a year and 200+ meetings the creator calls Granola the best free AI notetaker the channel has tested, and covers group meetings, languages, and the free plan's 30-day limit.

      "…try a better note taking app instead of doing everything manually. And just to be clear, this isn’t something I tested for a day or two. I’ve been using Granola AI for about a year now, across easily 200+ meetings, including client…"
      Transcript excerpt, at 1:23

      Published Apr 27, 2026self-described: A year across 200+ of the creator's meetings

    4. Positive

      Riska Ambarastita, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      A week in, the reviewer finds the summaries capture key points from context better than plain transcription tools, so they no longer type through meetings.

      Published Oct 6, 2025self-described: Own calls

    5. Positive

      Cory MacVie, Product Hunt reviewer

      Granola review on Product HuntProduct Hunt review

      Having tried Zoom, Otter.ai, Fathom, Gong, and others, the reviewer prefers Granola because it works across meeting software, keeps no recording, and takes accurate notes.

      Published Mar 19, 2025self-described: Compared Zoom, Otter.ai, Outreach, Fathom, Chorus, and Gong

    GILD's fact checks, which don't count as sources

    Checked Oct 12, 2026.Speaker names come from the meeting app on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams on macOS and Windows. Elsewhere the transcript reads Me and Them, and people sharing one room device are not told apart. Speaker tags

    Open them in the record

Where the evidence agrees

Statements this group's sources agree on, then the ones close to agreement.

  1. Recurring point

    The notes pay off once they reach the tools where work continues: Slack, Notion, a CRM, a task list, or an AI assistant.

    16 supporting sources

Close to agreement: each needs 16 supporting sources

  1. Below threshold

    With capture handled, nobody has to write everything down, so people listen and take part.

    8 supporting sources
  2. Below threshold

    AI notes get checked against the transcript before anyone relies on them or forwards them.

    6 supporting sources

Where it disagrees

Questions the sources split on, with the count on each side.

  • Evidence remains mixed

    Should people keep typing their own notes during the meeting, or let Granola write them?

    • Type along, 4 sources

      Some type a few lines of their own during the meeting and let Granola build on them, so the notes carry their emphasis.

    • Hands off, 5 sources

      Others take no notes at all and rely on Granola's summary, so their attention stays on the conversation.

The evidence

Whose experience this is

The three groups, then every practitioner by the context they work in, and how emphasis changes with scale.

Three groups drawn from the same sources. Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. Signals open on All users. Leaders and teams have 14 accounts; GILD prints their sentiment from 20.

  • Leaders and teams rolling it out

    16 sources. This group counts teams and departments using the tool together, and the leaders deciding its rollout.

  • Individual users

    63 sources. Individuals report on Granola capture and note quality in their own meetings.

  • All users

    79 sources. Every Granola account counts here. Individuals wrote 63 of the 79 sources.

79 sources from practitioners, by the context they work in. Filled rows count for this group.

  1. Individual userOne person using it for their own work63 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Meeting memory, bot-free capture, and staying present

  2. Small team2 to 10 people sharing it3 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Action items and notes shared with a small team

  3. DepartmentA department, or a named company's team4 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Folder visibility inside an organization workspace

  4. IT & leadershipIT and business leaders deciding the rollout8 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Whether to allow a notetaker that records without a bot, and team search

  5. Organization-wideCompany-wide rollout1 sources, counted here

    Emphasizes Daversa's firm-wide use on confidential recruiting calls, with clients asked first

What changes with scale. Individuals focus on recall across meetings and capture without a bot. Team accounts focus on shared action items and who can see notes. Workspace sharing and retention settings control those outcomes.

Where the sources come from

Where this group's sources were published.

Counted for All users, from 79 sources. Change group

99 sources for this group, 20 of them documentation

  • Communities & Product Reviews61, 62% of 99 sources
  • Product Documentation20, 20% of 99 sources
  • Blogs, Newsletters & Reviews12, 12% of 99 sources
  • Podcasts, Talks & Videos6, 6% of 99 sources

Older evidence is retained when it still applies. Sources that depend on a plan, limit, or gap that has since changed stay in the history, marked Needs a recheck.

See sources by origin

The record

Who each source is, how it knows, whether it still applies and what it counts toward.

About this read

What changed, and how we count

What changed

  • Nov 1, 2026: since Oct 30 the page prints one vote per author, and a figure given on the weighted reading is the second view. Individual users read +81 and all users +68; leaders and teams are unscored.
  • Builds the evidence base from public sources only: every source links to the page it comes from and names its author and publication date.
  • Shows a finding for a group only when at least 5 sources from 3 different authors discuss it, and a disagreement only with at least 2 sources on each side.
  • Merges consent and data privacy into Privacy & Consent, since consent alone is raised by 1 source. Drops Audio Retention as a disagreement, since only 1 source asks for recordings to be kept.
  • Removes 5 sources: 2 dated before January 2025 and 3 from publishers outside GILD's source standard. Adds 17 from Reddit and Hacker News, 4 of them from IT and company decisions. Present in the Meeting drops out of the points all accounts agree on as a result.
  • Checks every documentation page against Granola's current site and help center.
  • Oct 25, 2026: adds 7 sources from X, a podcast, and GitHub, 3 of them from founders and a company team. Privacy & Consent now has 5 sources from 3 authors among leaders and teams, and all accounts now agree on Tell Participants.
  • Oct 26, 2026: adds named leaders at aiEDU, PostHog, Collide, Daversa, and Every, each with the role stated on a first-party page.
  • Oct 26, 2026: adds named leaders at aiEDU, PostHog, Collide, Daversa, and Every, each with the role a first-party page states.
  • Oct 28, 2026: adds 13 sources from GILD's research ledger, each with the passage it quotes where the page holds one: Dan Shipper's Lenny's Podcast account of Granola beside Notion's recording, and 12 X, Reddit and GitHub posts that count toward no score. All practitioners move from +64 to +65; individual users stay at +82, and leaders and teams stay under the 20 sources a score needs.
  • Oct 30, 2026: a second-model check removed a Reddit comment that names no use, and lists Dan Shipper's Lenny's Podcast account without counting it, since the podcast offers its newsletter's annual subscribers a year of Granola free. It corrected Strix's report to a vulnerability found in security testing with no exploitation found, Collide's exit to a planned replacement, Every's Notion use, which is the CEO's own meeting recording, and Sarah Constantin's role. Shipper's record follows his episode's stored transcript, where Granola is his stock answer for a favorite product, and the Computerworld card no longer says how the lawsuit stands. On the weighted reading, all practitioners move from +65 to +64 on 79 sources; individual users stay at +82.

Method

A running review of what people using Granola at work report, from individual users to company-wide rollouts. Each finding links to its sources, and each conflict shows both sides.

Counts cover only the sources GILD reviewed.

Who counts

Leaders and teams rolling it out
Small team, Department, IT & leadership, Organization-wide
Individual users
Individual user
All users
Everyone in the leaders and teams and individual users groups

Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. GILD files each source in a group from how the account describes its author. A role or employer marked self-described is what the source states about themselves. Documentation checks facts for every group and never counts toward sentiment.

How the numbers work

  • Overall signal. Positive votes minus negative ones, per 100 votes from the sources that take a side. Each author counts once, with their latest view, whoever they are and wherever they posted. The older weighted reading, where accounts GILD matched to a named person count three times when GILD lists the author among IT and business leaders and twice otherwise, is shown beside it as a second view. Where an author wrote more than one source, the line beside the split gives the votes, one per author, so the score follows from it. When one author's sources from the same day disagree, that author counts as mixed, and a half point rounds away from zero. Sources with no opinion are listed and not counted. Strong positive is +50 or higher, positive +20 to +49, mixed −19 to +19, negative −20 to −49, strong negative −50 or lower.
  • Weighted reading, second view. Counted the older way, where an account GILD matched to a named person counts two or three times, all users read +64 strong positive (method sentiment/S1). GILD printed that number as "GILD score" until October 29, 2026; most of those matches rest on a name or a self-described role.
  • Method change, Oct 30, 2026. GILD changed how practitioner sentiment counts, to one vote per author. Weighted, it read +64 Strong positive; with one vote per author it reads +68 Strong positive. No evidence changed.
  • Unscored. A group gets a score only with 20 sources from 15 authors. Below that, one source moves the score about 5 points, so the read says "Unscored until 20 sources from 15 authors" and shows its counts.
  • Independence. A source whose author works for the vendor, for one of its partners or programs, or for a competitor, and a page the vendor published or ran, is listed with that tie and counts toward nothing. One author counts on at most two records per product. The line under the score says how many authors and how many separate discussions the counted sources come from: comments in one thread are one discussion.
  • Praise and concerns. How many of the sources that discuss a theme praise it or raise it.
  • Consensus. A statement joins when 20% of the group's sources support it and fewer contradict it. Contradicting sources are counted separately. Below that line a statement shows as building. At 40% or more it reads Strong agreement; below, Recurring point.
  • Disagreements. The count on each side. GILD names no winner and gives no share of all users.
  • Minimum evidence. A finding needs 5 sources from 3 authors; a disagreement also needs 2 on each side. Smaller counts stay in the table below, marked under the minimum.

Labels on a source

A source's date and whether it still applies are separate: a recent post can describe an old version, and an old one can still hold.

Documented
Stated in official documentation.
Reported
A practitioner's account of their own use.
Measured
Backed by the source's own measurements, such as a comparative test or tracked team metrics.
GILD analysis
GILD's check of a claim against official documentation.
Current
Describes the product as it is now.
Still applicable
Older, and the behavior or lesson still holds.
Needs a recheck
May depend on a plan, version or setting that changed since it was written. It keeps counting until GILD rechecks it, since the rest of the account usually holds, and its card says so.
Out of date
No longer accurate. Kept in the record; counts toward nothing current.

Flagged for a recheck, of the sources that take a side: leaders and teams 1 of 14, individual users 3 of 43, all users 4 of 57.

Limits

  • GILD reviewed 79 public sources dated January 2025 or later. They do not represent all Granola customers. Individual users wrote 63 accounts. Teams, companies, and IT departments wrote 16, and privacy and consent is the one finding with 5 sources from 3 authors among them. The set includes 15 Hacker News comments, 18 Reddit posts and comments, and 12 Product Hunt reviews that lean positive. It also has 11 blog posts and newsletters, 1 news article, 3 videos, and 13 X posts from named founders, engineers and users. The rest are 3 podcast episodes and 3 GitHub issues. The 12 X, Reddit and GitHub posts added on October 28 come from a research set gathered toward critical accounts and count toward no score. Arctic Shift rate limits required reading Reddit threads on reddit.com. Product Hunt supplies the review-site record, since TrustRadius lists no Granola reviews. GILD excluded Granola customer stories because the vendor published them.
  • Granola changed plan limits, sign-in options, the API, and Android support during 2025 and 2026. Each account describes the product at publication. Accounts tied to old plans, limits, or missing features that have changed carry a Needs a recheck label.

Every count, and the sources behind it

15 findings for 3 groups

Each row opens its sources for the group you are reading.

FindingLeaders and teams rolling it outIndividual usersAll usersSources
Current readCurrent sentiment8 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative36 positive, 6 mixed, 1 negative44 positive, 8 mixed, 5 negativeSources
PraiseBot-Free Capture4 of 4 positive (under the minimum)13 of 13 positive17 of 17 positiveSources
PraiseNote Quality1 of 2 positive (under the minimum)14 of 15 positive15 of 17 positiveSources
PraiseYour Own Notes1 of 1 positive (under the minimum)5 of 5 positive6 of 6 positiveSources
PraiseMeeting Memory3 of 3 positive (under the minimum)11 of 11 positive14 of 14 positiveSources
ConcernTranscript Accuracy1 of 1 raise it (under the minimum)1 of 6 raise it2 of 7 raise itSources
ConcernPrice & Plan Limits0 of 0 raise it (under the minimum)3 of 7 raise it3 of 7 raise itSources
ConcernPlatform Gaps2 of 2 raise it (under the minimum)5 of 5 raise it7 of 7 raise itSources
ConsensusNotes leave Granola4 supporting (under the minimum)12 supporting (below threshold)16 supportingSources
ConsensusPresent in the meeting1 supporting (under the minimum)7 supporting (below threshold)8 supporting (below threshold)Sources
ConsensusTell participants2 supporting (under the minimum)2 supporting (under the minimum)4 supporting (under the minimum)Sources
ConsensusCheck before sharing2 supporting (under the minimum)4 supporting (under the minimum)6 supporting (below threshold)Sources
DisagreementShould people keep typing their own notes during the meeting, or let Granola write them?Type along 0, Hands off 0 (under the minimum)Type along 4, Hands off 5Type along 4, Hands off 5Sources
Current readEvidence mix36 sources83 sources99 sourcesSources

Fact checks

GILD's checks of claims against official documentation, kept apart from the source counts.

  • Privacy & Consent. Granola's automated meeting-chat message and video watermark tell participants that transcription is running. Users turn them on themselves, and only Enterprise admins can enforce them for a workspace. Let People Know You're Using Granola, checked Oct 12, 2026
  • Privacy & Consent. Granola uses anonymized data to improve its models by default on Basic and Business until each user opts out. Enterprise workspaces are opted out by default and admins enforce the setting. Models & training, checked Oct 12, 2026
  • Transcript Accuracy. Speaker names come from the meeting app on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams on macOS and Windows. Elsewhere the transcript reads Me and Them, and people sharing one room device are not told apart. Speaker tags, checked Oct 12, 2026
  • Price & Plan Limits. Basic has no daily transcription limit but shows only the last 30 days of notes in the app. Older notes are kept, and a CSV export returns them. Subscriptions and billing, checked Oct 12, 2026
  • Platform Gaps. Granola keeps no meeting audio and cannot transcribe uploaded recordings. The desktop apps run on macOS and Windows, the mobile apps on iOS and Android, and Business and Enterprise add an API. How transcription works, checked Oct 12, 2026