How does Make compare with the alternatives?
Pick Make for EU data zones and a lower price per step, and Zapier for the larger app catalog. Zapier bills only successful actions, while Make bills a credit for nearly every module run, trigger checks included, and none for routers or error handlers. Count one real workflow on both before comparing prices.
Pick n8n for long workflows or full self-hosting, and Make for a hosted builder with EU data zones and an on-premise agent on Enterprise. Make charges a credit for nearly every module run, so long scenarios cost more per run. n8n charges one execution per workflow run, whatever its length.
Use the cloud flows your Microsoft 365 licenses include before buying Make, and pick Make when business teams automate many non-Microsoft apps. Make bills credits per module run with unlimited users, in US or EU data zones. Power Automate adds per-user or per-flow licenses and desktop flows for Windows applications.
Use Make for fixed scenarios across 3,500+ apps that bill most module runs in credits, and ChatGPT for tasks it plans from a prompt in a per-seat workspace. Both run work on a schedule or on events in other apps, and ChatGPT can call Make scenarios as tools through the Make MCP server.
