CelonisCompanyCelonisCelonis is a process intelligence company. It owns Make, the visual automation platform formerly called Integromat.MakeOpen companyWorkflow Automation
Make
Make, formerly Integromat and owned by Celonis, connects 3,500+ apps through visual scenarios built from modules, routers, and iterators. Each module operation is billed in credits. Make AI Agents are in open beta, and the Make MCP server lets assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT run scenarios.
The 30-Second Take
Pick Make if operations teams need routing, loops and error recovery without code, cheaper per step than Zapier.
Teams build scenarios across 3,500+ apps, with routers, iterators and error handlers on one canvas. Celonis owns it, and it now adds AI agents and an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT.
- Best fit
- Operations and business teams automating multi-step processes across many SaaS apps.
- Main constraint
- Nearly every module run uses credits, trigger checks included, and the main admin controls, such as audit logs, SSO, and custom roles, are Enterprise only.
- First move
- Count module runs for your three busiest scenarios, then pick an annual credit tier and store incomplete executions.
Why
Watch the credits: nearly every module run uses one, trigger checks included, and every public source that discusses them raises them as a concern. Polling schedules and loops set the bill, while routers and error handlers use none.
48 practitioners, 72 sources reviewed, Updated Nov 1, 2026How this is measured
- Operating stack
- AI Knowledge Work
Comparisons
How does Make compare with the alternatives?
Make vs Zapier
- Workflow Automation
Pick Make for EU data zones and a lower price per step, and Zapier for the larger app catalog. Zapier bills only successful actions, while Make bills a credit for nearly every module run, trigger checks included, and none for routers or error handlers. Count one real workflow on both before comparing prices.
Make vs n8n
- Workflow Automation
Pick n8n for long workflows or full self-hosting, and Make for a hosted builder with EU data zones and an on-premise agent on Enterprise. Make charges a credit for nearly every module run, so long scenarios cost more per run. n8n charges one execution per workflow run, whatever its length.
Make vs Power Automate
- Workflow Automation
Use the cloud flows your Microsoft 365 licenses include before buying Make, and pick Make when business teams automate many non-Microsoft apps. Make bills credits per module run with unlimited users, in US or EU data zones. Power Automate adds per-user or per-flow licenses and desktop flows for Windows applications.
Operator Insights
What are business and product leaders learning from rolling Make out across their teams?
Blaine CarterCIOFranklinCovey
IT and business units at a US company of 1,001 to 5,000 employees.
Make success story (vendor case study), published Read the case study (opens Make success story (vendor case study) in a new tab)
Observation
At FranklinCovey, Make replaced aging middleware, and business units now automate their own processes.
- Takeaway
- Make can stand in for aging middleware while the core systems stay as they are. A scenario on tools the company already pays for is worth pricing against a new application.
- What happened
- FranklinCovey connected its systems through a 15-year-old service bus whose original developers had left, so even small changes were slow and costly. Make replaced it as both the integration layer and the automation layer, without changes to the core systems. The company built the functions it needed on tools it already had and chose not to buy a finance application that would have cost about US$60,000 a year. HR, finance, operations, and sales build their own scenarios, and one annual HR process fell from about 30 days to 2 hours.
- Vendor case study
- Savings and process time reported by the customer
- Published by Make
Deployment details
IT and business units at a US company of 1,001 to 5,000 employees.
- Vendor case study
- Savings and process time reported by the customer
- Published by Make
- Team
- FranklinCovey IT under the CIO, with business-unit staff building scenarios
- Duration
- Multiple years of use, per the CIO
- Workload
- System integration in place of a 15-year-old service bus, plus departmental workflows
- Product version
- Make scenarios with automation and agentic features
- Measurement
- One annual HR process cut from about 30 days to 2 hours; about US$60,000 a year in software spend avoided
Conor PowerDigital Process Improvement ManagerStellantis &You UK
Aftersales. 30+ UK dealerships. Two-way SMS with Knack, ClickSend, and OpenAI.
Make success story (vendor case study), published Read the case study (opens Make success story (vendor case study) in a new tab)
Observation
A Make scenario at Stellantis &You UK reads customer replies with OpenAI and closed 18,000 of 47,000 messages in a year without a person.
- Takeaway
- Pilot the AI step without customer data and settle data residency and training terms before customer messages flow through it. Then let the model close only the replies that need no action.
- What happened
- Stellantis &You UK, Stellantis's UK retail arm, saw its score Promoter Score fall as aftersales calls went unanswered. Two staff without technical backgrounds built two-way SMS in Make, with an OpenAI step that classifies each reply by intent and sentiment. It closes replies that need no response and alerts the aftersales team to upset customers. Before live data, the team ran pilots without customer data and a Data Privacy Impact Assessment with its GDPR consultants. It would accept only a supplier offering UK or Ireland data storage. Over 12 months the scenario analyzed 47,000+ messages and closed 18,000+, and the company runs 700+ active Make scenarios.
- Vendor case study
- Message counts reported by the customer
- Published by Make
Deployment details
Aftersales. 30+ UK dealerships. Two-way SMS with Knack, ClickSend, and OpenAI.
- Vendor case study
- Message counts reported by the customer
- Published by Make
- Team
- Stellantis &You UK digital process team for Aftersales
- Duration
- 12 months of messages measured
- Workload
- Inbound customer SMS for service and maintenance bookings across 30+ locations
- Product version
- Make scenarios with Knack, ClickSend, and OpenAI modules; prompt on version 13
- Measurement
- 47,000+ messages analyzed and 18,000+ closed automatically in 12 months; 151 hours saved at 30 seconds a message
Buying and deployment
What business and product leaders should verify before rolling it out across teams.
Sourced from Make documentation
Signals
What is the current evidence saying about Make?
Public accounts from people running Make at work praise the logic it handles without code and raise credit metering more than any other concern. Every finding links to its sources.
Practitioner sentiment, all users
0 Mixed net
of 49 sources that take a side, each author counted once.
How this figure is madeLeaders and teams have 19 accounts; GILD prints their sentiment from 20.
Current sentiment
Positive, mixed and negative sources
The score counts them as 14 positive, 20 mixed and 14 negative votes, one per author.
Logic without code draws the most praise, and every source that discusses credits raises them as a concern. Fourteen sources build client scenarios, and 11 describe moving work off Make against 3 that stayed.
Run a pilot on one live workflow to measure failed runs and the time spent fixing them.
Evidence field. All 72 sources, one mark each.
Arrange by
Each mark is one source: positive, mixed, negative, no opinion stated, or documentation (not counted).
| Group | Sources | Positive | Mixed | Negative | No opinion stated and not counted in the score | Documentation, checked and not counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mixed | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Not counted | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Documentation | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Quarter | Sources |
|---|---|
| Q1 2025 | 6 |
| Q2 2025 | 5 |
| Q3 2025 | 12 |
| Q4 2025 | 11 |
| Q1 2026 | 10 |
| Q2 2026 | 4 |
| Q3 2026 | 7 |
| Q4 2026 | 0 |
| Documentation, checked | 17 |
By sentiment
17 documentation pages check facts and are not counted.
Hover a mark for a quick look, click it or press Enter to open its source.Tap a mark to open its source, then step to its neighbors with Previous and Next.
What practitioners praise
Top praise of 3. Each mark is a source on it; filled marks praise it.
Most common concerns
Top concern of 3. Each mark is a source on it; filled marks raise it.
All 72 sources behind these findings
- Make pricingMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- CreditsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- OperationsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Extra creditsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Monthly and annual subscriptionsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Adjustments to plans and pricing (Nov 6, 2025)Make (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Credit usage for AI agentsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Introduction to Make AI Agent (New)Make (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Make MCP serverMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- AI providers and data zones in MakeMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Audit logsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Credits per team managementMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Scenario version controlMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Automatic retry of incomplete executionsMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- On-premise agentMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Maia by Make system cardMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Security and complianceMake (Official Make documentation), Product documentation, checked Oct 12, 2026
- Automation workflowsMake Community member (self-described: Automation provider with client scenarios), Community forum post, published Sep 28, 2026
- How to correctly aggregate and pass 3 parallel AI model outputs into a single Google Gemini judge module in Make?Make Community member (self-described: Self-hosted n8n on own server for a multi-model project), Community forum post, published Sep 28, 2026
- n8n always seemed too complicated to me. Until today.Wolfgang Wagner, TYPO3 trainer, integrator, and consultant (self-described: 16 active Make scenarios for his business: RSS imports into Notion and Zoom, Digistore24, and KlickTipp webhooks), Personal blog post, wwagner.net, published Sep 23, 2026
- How Stellantis scaled an AI voice agent with MakeDavid Male, Head of Transformation at Stellantis &You UK (Stellantis &You UK's customer service transformation team, scaling an AI voice agent), Make customer story, Stellantis &You UK, published Sep 22, 2026
- I deleted the Make.com automation I built for thisR Dilip Kumar, founder building VoiceLab (X profile) (self-described: Make scenario that created his recurring Notion tasks, replaced by a scheduled Claude Code instruction), X post, published Aug 4, 2026
- Reporting helpMake Community member, Community forum post, published Jul 29, 2026
- Comment on: Idea Farming for MakeAutomation builder, simplymation.eu (self-described: Automation builder with hundreds of production Make scenarios and home automation), Reddit comment, published Jul 2, 2026
- Everyone Starts With Zapier. Here's Why I Switched to Make.com Before Paying a CentSEO content specialist (self-described: Content brief automation for their own work), Personal blog post, dev.to, published Jun 27, 2026
- Comment on: Tired of Zapier breaking at 2am. What does everyone actually trust for production?Reddit user (self-described: Business automation pipeline on self-hosted n8n), Reddit comment, published May 29, 2026
- --blueprint requires inline JSON: Windows argv limit blocks writes of non-trivial scenariosAriel Moatti, developer with an IT specialist background (GitHub profile) (self-described: Windows evaluation of the Make CLI 1.3.1 across 5 Make organizations and 106 active scenarios), GitHub issue on integromat/make-cli, published Apr 23, 2026
- Migrate Zapier to Make: A Practitioner's Migration Guide (2026)Automation consultant (self-described: Client content pipelines moved from Zapier to Make over two years), Personal blog post, renezander.com, published Apr 8, 2026
- New AI-Agents: feedbackMake user scaling AI agents across scenarios (self-described: AI agents across several scenarios), Community forum post, published Mar 19, 2026
- Summry - I replaced my mess of Make.com automations with thisCompetitive intelligence professional (self-described: Company competitive intelligence tracking, about 15 scenarios), Hacker News story text, published Mar 10, 2026
- Asana usage running when there's no new activity?New Make user handling client and account management (self-described: Asana task copying for account management at their employer), Community forum post, published Mar 4, 2026
- Anyone else getting killed by Make (integromat) operation costs ?Automation freelancer (self-described: Five client accounts), Reddit post, published Feb 26, 2026
- Comment on: Anyone else getting killed by Make (integromat) operation costs ?Automation provider (self-described: Client automations), Reddit comment, published Feb 26, 2026
- Comment on: Anyone else getting killed by Make (integromat) operation costs ?Reddit user (self-described: Uses Power Automate, n8n, and Azure functions for automation), Reddit comment, published Feb 26, 2026
- Comment on: Anyone else getting killed by Make (integromat) operation costs ?Reddit user (self-described: Self-hosted n8n running 30k workflow executions monthly), Reddit comment, published Feb 26, 2026
- Comment on: Anyone else getting killed by Make (integromat) operation costs ?Reddit user (self-described: AWS automation setup with 150K+ Make operations), Reddit comment, published Feb 26, 2026
- Comment on: Alternative to Zapier? A few observationsReddit user (self-described: Uses Make for Dropbox automation), Reddit comment, published Feb 11, 2026
- Show, don't tell: How a Head of Engineering used automation to fuel company-wide transformationChargeGuru Engineering Team, five squads merging legacy systems with Make (ChargeGuru's engineering and product teams, five squads using Make to merge two legacy systems), Make customer story, ChargeGuru, published Jan 23, 2026
- Comment on: White House website mysteriously streams personal finance YouTube creatorWebsite operator (self-described: A Make automation that uploads YouTube videos to a website), Hacker News comment, published Dec 20, 2025
- 3 automations that made my team think I hired an assistant (it's literally just Make workflows)Reddit user (self-described: Marketing team), Reddit post, published Dec 3, 2025
- How we reduced 720K+ Operations Annually Using Make's Custom VariablesMake Community member (self-described: Runs 20 Make scenarios processing monthly client files), Community forum post, published Nov 19, 2025
- Comment on: Is Make much worse than Zapier or I'm missing something? Alternatives?Reddit user, Reddit comment, published Nov 17, 2025
- Comment on: Is Make much worse than Zapier or I'm missing something? Alternatives?Reddit user, Reddit comment, published Nov 17, 2025
- Service Outage: November 12thMake Community member (self-described: Automation provider with client accounts), Community forum post, published Nov 13, 2025
- Instagram module suddenly failing with "Media ID is not available (9007, OAuthException)"Make Community member (self-described: Client workflows), Community forum post, published Nov 12, 2025
- Trying to use Make with Asana instead of Zapier - Why is there no Trigger on tasks moving to sections yet?Make Community member, Community forum post, published Nov 11, 2025
- Triggering scenario in the middle upon users approvalMake Community member, Community forum post, published Oct 27, 2025
- Agents-MCP Server with Oauth2?Make Community member (self-described: Team with a self-hosted MCP server), Community forum post, published Oct 26, 2025
- Comment on: Introducing Credits: A New System Of BillingMake user, Community forum post, published Oct 3, 2025
- FranklinCovey's Make rollout replaced a 15-year-old service busFranklinCovey Business Units, HR, finance, operations, and sales teams building Make scenarios (FranklinCovey's HR, finance, operations, and sales teams, building shared Make scenarios), Make customer story, FranklinCovey, published Sep 30, 2025
- How I Saved a Content Agency 80+ Hours/Month with One-Click Content Approvals (Make + Trello)Automation freelancer (self-described: A content agency client with 20 clients), Reddit post, published Sep 29, 2025
- Comment on: Introducing Credits: A New System Of BillingMake customer (self-described: Business running scenarios with many Make AI modules), Community forum post, published Aug 29, 2025
- Extra Credits Rest?Make Community member, Community forum post, published Aug 28, 2025
- Comment on: Introducing Credits: A New System Of BillingMake user who manages two organizations (self-described: Two Make organizations), Community forum post, published Aug 28, 2025
- Is it possible to "transfer data"?Make Community member (self-described: Lead generation agency), Community forum post, published Aug 22, 2025
- Introducing Credits: A New System Of BillingSolo builder (self-described: Solo builder with a passion project), Community forum post, published Aug 21, 2025
- How We Automated Project Administration with Jira, Make and AirtableFounder of Scalevise, a development agency (self-described: Scalevise, internal project administration), Company blog post, dev.to, published Jul 31, 2025
- Instagram - Create A Reel For Creator AccountsMake Community member (self-described: Instagram creator account user), Community forum post, published Jul 22, 2025
- Comment on: How I build software quicklyRails developer (self-described: Exploring a product idea), Hacker News comment, published Jul 14, 2025
- Comment on: What do you expect in return to teach me Make.com?Reddit user (self-described: Automation builder for clients), Reddit comment, published Jul 14, 2025
- AI Agents FeedbackAutomation builder for clients (self-described: Client scenarios), Community forum post, published Jul 2, 2025
- Make.com AI Agent + Data Store: Key for GetRecordReddit user, Reddit post, published Jun 16, 2025
- Hands-Free AI Video: How I Connected Google Sheets and Luma via Make.comIndependent builder (self-described: Personal AI video pipeline), Personal blog post, dev.to, published Jun 2, 2025
- How Make helped Stellantis &You UK auto-close 18,000 customer messagesDaniel Cheng, Digital Systems and Database Engineer at Stellantis &You UK (Stellantis &You UK's Aftersales team, analyzing customer messages with Make and OpenAI), Make customer story, Stellantis &You UK, published May 12, 2025
- Comment on: N8n - Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teamsHacker News commenter (self-described: Automations and AI agent tasks), Hacker News comment, published May 3, 2025
- Diary of a Voice AI Developer 3Freelance voice AI developer (self-described: Freelance low-code automation projects), Hacker News story text, published Apr 14, 2025
- Syntaxic recognition of operators, functions and logicals switchMake Community member (self-described: Company evaluating no-code automation), Community forum post, published Mar 28, 2025
- My perspective as new user from Make.comMake power user of nearly 8 years who builds automations for clients (self-described: Client automations built inside clients' own Make accounts), Community forum post, published Mar 26, 2025
- Where are the AI agents?Make Community member, Community forum post, published Mar 19, 2025
- Potentially moving over from Zapier and having difficulty with Squarespace integrationReddit user, Reddit post, published Feb 21, 2025
- How can I bill clients based on make usage?Make Community member (self-described: Automation provider billing clients), Community forum post, published Feb 16, 2025
- Comment on: How do you use Make in your business?Reddit user (self-described: Freelance automation builder), Reddit comment, published Jan 1, 2025
Jan 2025 to Sep 2026.
55 sources from practitioners, by month and sentiment.
Where It Fits
Where does Make belong in the stack?
Make is Core across Automate and touches Assist, Find, Create, and Analyze.
- Business area
- Company-wide
- Function
- Knowledge Work
- Operating stack
- AI Knowledge Work
- Primary role
- Workflow Automation & AI Agents
Assist
AI assistant: Touches
AI assistant, touches. Maia builds and edits scenarios from a chat, and assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT run Make scenarios through the Make MCP server. Open-ended drafting and research stay with a general assistant.
Find
Web research: Touches
Web research, touches. Make AI Web Search, in beta on all plans, brings live web results into a scenario as structured output. Cited research for people stays with a research tool.
Enterprise search: Touches
Enterprise search, touches. Knowledge files give a Make AI Agent its own reference documents, embedded for retrieval. Search across the company's apps, with each app's permissions, stays with an enterprise search product.
Create
Documents: Touches
Documents, touches. Scenarios draft text with AI modules and write it into tools such as Google Docs or Notion, where the team's documents live.
Meeting notes: Touches
Meeting notes, touches. Make records no meetings. Its scenarios pick up recordings and transcripts from tools such as Zoom and route summaries and action items to other systems.
Analyze
Data analysis: Touches
Data analysis, touches. Scenarios move and reshape data between systems and keep small datasets in data stores. Analysis and dashboards stay with an analytics tool.
Automate
Automation: Core
Automation, core. This is Make's primary role. Visual scenarios run across 3,500+ apps with routers, iterators, and error handlers, alongside Make AI Agents in open beta and the Make MCP server. Usage is billed in credits per module operation, on Make's hosted cloud in US or EU data zones.
Market mapThe layers Make covers, and who else owns each one.
Workflow automation & agents
General AI assistant
Web research & cited answers
Enterprise search & company knowledge
Writing & documents
2 more layers on the full map. Core, Supports and Touches describe coverage. They say nothing about quality.

