Notion AI Signals

Who counts

Leaders and teams rolling it out

Small team, Department, IT & leadership, Organization-wide

Individual users

Individual user

All users

Everyone in the leaders and teams and individual users groups

Choose a group to select whose experience counts. Within that group, each author counts once in the practitioner sentiment, with their latest view. GILD files each source in a group from how the account describes its author. A role or employer marked self-described is what the source states about themselves. Documentation checks facts for every group and never counts toward sentiment.

How the numbers work

• Overall signal. Positive votes minus negative ones, per 100 votes from the sources that take a side. Each author counts once, with their latest view, whoever they are and wherever they posted. The older weighted reading, where accounts GILD matched to a named person count three times when GILD lists the author among IT and business leaders and twice otherwise, is shown beside it as a second view. Where an author wrote more than one source, the line beside the split gives the votes, one per author, so the score follows from it. When one author's sources from the same day disagree, that author counts as mixed, and a half point rounds away from zero. Sources with no opinion are listed and not counted. Strong positive is +50 or higher, positive +20 to +49, mixed −19 to +19, negative −20 to −49, strong negative −50 or lower.
• Weighted reading, second view. Counted the older way, where an account GILD matched to a named person counts two or three times, leaders and teams read +13 mixed (method sentiment/S1). GILD printed that number as "GILD score" until October 29, 2026; most of those matches rest on a name or a self-described role.
• Method change, Oct 30, 2026. GILD changed how practitioner sentiment counts, to one vote per author. Weighted, it read +13 Mixed; with one vote per author it reads +5 Mixed. No evidence changed.
• Unscored. A group gets a score only with 20 sources from 15 authors. Below that, one source moves the score about 5 points, so the read says "Unscored until 20 sources from 15 authors" and shows its counts.
• Independence. A source whose author works for the vendor, for one of its partners or programs, or for a competitor, and a page the vendor published or ran, is listed with that tie and counts toward nothing. One author counts on at most two records per product. The line under the score says how many authors and how many separate discussions the counted sources come from: comments in one thread are one discussion.
• Praise and concerns. How many of the sources that discuss a theme praise it or raise it.
• Consensus. A statement joins when 20% of the group's sources support it and fewer contradict it. Contradicting sources are counted separately. Below that line a statement shows as building. At 40% or more it reads Strong agreement; below, Recurring point.
• Disagreements. The count on each side. GILD names no winner and gives no share of all users.
• Minimum evidence. A finding needs 5 sources from 3 authors; a disagreement also needs 2 on each side. Smaller counts stay in the table below, marked under the minimum.

Labels on a source

A source's date and whether it still applies are separate: a recent post can describe an old version, and an old one can still hold.

Documented

Stated in official documentation.

Reported

A practitioner's account of their own use.

Measured

Backed by the source's own measurements, such as a comparative test or tracked team metrics.

GILD analysis

GILD's check of a claim against official documentation.

Current

Describes the product as it is now.

Still applicable

Older, and the behavior or lesson still holds.

Needs a recheck

May depend on a plan, version or setting that changed since it was written. It keeps counting until GILD rechecks it, since the rest of the account usually holds, and its card says so.

Out of date

No longer accurate. Kept in the record; counts toward nothing current.

Flagged for a recheck, of the sources that take a side: leaders and teams 0 of 21, individual users 1 of 57, all users 1 of 78.

Limits

• These figures cover 89 reviewed public sources; they do not represent all customers. Reddit's r/Notion supplies 60 and Hacker News 16. Six podcast episodes from Notion in Practice carry operators' own accounts, among them Flight Centre's automation lead and a startup head of operations. Three practitioner newsletters add individual accounts, and a PromptArmor security study and Simon Willison's blog report prompt-injection attacks on Notion AI. Much of the 2026 Reddit discussion followed Custom Agent credit pricing and the August usage limits, so the evidence tilts toward price complaints. Ramp's head of product ops describes the company-wide move onto Notion AI in his own article. Every describes its internal agents in an article tied to a Notion partnership, with editorial independence disclosed; Buoyant Partners describes consulting workflows and inconsistent output. Team and company accounts make up 28 of 89. G2 and TrustRadius refused automated reading, so GILD read named practitioners' own pages instead. Notion customer stories appear only as labeled Operator Insights.
• Notion AI changed shape during this window. AI moved from a paid add-on into Business and Enterprise in May 2025. Notion Agent arrived in September 2025. Custom Agents went on Notion credits on May 4, 2026. A rolling and monthly usage allowance for Notion Agent took effect on August 3, 2026. Monthly Standard and Select credits replaced that allowance for new workspaces on October 19, 2026, reaching existing workspaces on November 2. The one source from before May 13, 2025 describes the add-on and is marked Needs a recheck.